Summary
When transitioning to a new dedicated IP address for email sending, many senders wonder how their existing domain reputation will influence the warming process. While a new IP starts with a neutral reputation, the established history and performance of your sending domain can indeed have a significant impact on how quickly and successfully your new IP gains trust with internet service providers (ISPs). This phenomenon is often referred to as reputation bleed. It highlights the interconnectedness of IP and domain reputation in the complex world of email deliverability.
Key findings
- Domain's Influence: A poor domain reputation can significantly impede the warming of a new dedicated IP, making it challenging to achieve good inbox placement despite proper warming practices.
- Persistent Problems: Bad sending practices associated with a domain are likely to carry over, even with a new IP address, leading to continued deliverability issues in the long term.
- Subdomain Limitations: While using an SMTP subdomain can offer some isolation for a new IP, it does not fully shield senders from the reputation of their root sending domain.
- Warming's Purpose: IP warming is about building trust based on sending behavior; it cannot magically erase a history of poor practices or a bad domain reputation.
Key considerations
- Root Cause Analysis: Before warming a new IP, identify and address the underlying issues that led to poor domain reputation, such as low engagement, high complaint rates, or spam trap hits.
- Clean Sending Practices: Focus on sending high-quality, desired mail to engaged recipients to genuinely build a positive reputation for both the new IP and the associated domain.
- Proactive Monitoring: Continuously monitor your domain and IP reputation during the warming phase and beyond to detect and address issues promptly.
- Strategic Approach: Consider the overall strategy, as simply changing IPs without addressing underlying quality issues can quickly turn an unknown IP into a known bad one.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often face the challenge of establishing a new dedicated IP's reputation while battling a history of poor domain performance. The consensus among marketers is that reputation bleed is a real phenomenon. They report encountering significant hurdles during new IP warming when the associated domain has a negative track record, underscoring that a new IP isn't a silver bullet for existing deliverability problems.
Key opinions
- Domain Overrides IP: Some marketers believe that domain reputation can outweigh the initial neutral state of a new IP, making warm-up efforts difficult from the outset.
- List Quality is Key: Even with active subscriber lists, poor domain reputation can lead to persistent deliverability challenges during the IP warming process.
- Subdomain Protection is Limited: While a dedicated IP paired with an SMTP subdomain offers some separation, it doesn't entirely prevent the negative reputation of the primary domain from affecting the new setup.
- Focus on Content: The quality and relevance of the email content remain paramount; merely changing IPs without improving content will likely lead to similar deliverability issues.
Key considerations
- Auditing Past Practices: Marketers should thoroughly review past sending behaviors that led to poor domain reputation before attempting to warm a new IP.
- Gradual Volume Increase: Sticking to a disciplined IP warming schedule, even with a challenging domain reputation, is crucial for establishing trust.
- Sender Authenticity: Ensure all email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) are correctly configured for both the root domain and any subdomains to reinforce sender legitimacy.
- Long-Term Strategy: Understand that warming a new IP is part of a broader strategy to improve overall deliverability, which includes consistent good email practices.
Marketer view
An email marketer from Email Geeks indicates that they have personally witnessed poor domain reputation transfer over, irrespective of how active the list is for warming up, making the entire warming process very challenging.
Marketer view
A marketer from a deliverability forum suggests that moving to a new dedicated IP won't magically solve deliverability issues if the underlying domain reputation is poor. The ISPs still connect the dots back to the sending domain.
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts agree that simply acquiring a new dedicated IP address does not automatically cleanse a sender's reputation if the associated domain has a history of poor sending practices. They emphasize that the core issue lies with the sending behavior itself, not merely the IP. Reputation bleed is indeed a factor, and a new IP will only reflect the underlying quality of the mail stream.
Key opinions
- Behavioral Link: Experts assert that poor deliverability stems from sending practices, and changing IPs or domains is merely a superficial fix that won't yield long-term success.
- No Evasion: Attempting to evade spam filters by using a new IP or subdomain is generally ineffective, as mailbox providers can correlate sending identities.
- Warming Reveals Truth: If a mail stream is inherently bad, the IP warming process will simply transition the new IP's reputation from unknown to known bad.
- Infrastructure Smear: Allowing senders with poor reputations on a platform, even with dedicated IPs, can still negatively impact the deliverability of other, well-behaving customers due to shared infrastructure elements or interconnected reputation signals.
Key considerations
- Sender Vetting: It is crucial to avoid onboarding customers with a recent history of Spamhaus listings or other severe reputation issues.
- Content Quality: Prioritize sending mail that recipients genuinely want and expect to receive, as this is the fundamental driver of positive reputation.
- Holistic Improvement: Focus on improving the overall sending ecosystem rather than seeking quick fixes. This includes list management, engagement, and authentication.
- Monitoring and Adaptation: Actively monitor performance indicators during IP warming and be prepared to adapt strategies if a problematic domain reputation begins to affect the new IP's standing (e.g., as discussed in SNDS).
Expert view
An expert from Email Geeks states that deliverability is more nuanced than simply changing IPs, suggesting that the underlying issue often relates to a sender's intent to evade spam filters rather than delivering desired mail.
Expert view
An expert from Email Geeks indicates that customers with poor delivery issues are typically sending low-quality mail, and neither changing IP addresses nor domains will resolve this issue, except potentially for a very short period.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and industry guides frequently discuss the interplay between IP and domain reputation. They generally acknowledge that while IP warming focuses on establishing a new IP's individual reputation, the established domain reputation serves as a crucial underlying factor. A positive domain reputation can ease the warming process, while a negative one can significantly hinder it, often making ISPs view the new IP with immediate skepticism.
Key findings
- Domain's Foundation: Documentation often highlights that domain reputation forms the foundation of a sender's overall trustworthiness, impacting how even a new dedicated IP is perceived.
- Gradual Trust Building: IP warming is consistently defined as a process of gradually increasing email volume to build trust with ISPs, a process that is either aided or hindered by the associated domain's history.
- Combined Assessment: ISPs assess sender reputation based on multiple factors, including both IP and domain, meaning they are often considered in tandem for filtering decisions.
- Influence, Not Isolation: While dedicated IPs offer more control, they do not provide complete isolation from the influence of the sending domain's reputation.
Key considerations
- Holistic Reputation Management: Documentation often recommends a holistic approach to sender reputation, where improving domain health is as critical as warming new IPs.
- Consistency is Key: Maintain consistent sending volume and quality across all IPs and domains to build a stable and positive overall reputation.
- Authentication Standards: Adhere strictly to authentication standards like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to provide ISPs with verifiable sender identity, which aids in reputation building for both IP and domain.
- Monitoring Tools: Utilize postmaster tools and deliverability analytics to track reputation metrics for both IP addresses and domains during and after the warming phase.
Technical article
Klaviyo's documentation states that the IP warming process automatically completes once 100% of the expected email volume is sent through the dedicated IP, helping to establish its reputation within the context of the sending domain.
Technical article
Twilio's guide on email reputation explains that domain reputation centers on the sending domain, and this takes precedence in ISP filtering decisions, even when a new IP is introduced.
Related resources
15 resources
Related pages
What is the difference between IP and domain reputation in email deliverability?
What are the best practices for dedicated IP warm-up?
How does email reputation transfer during IP warming with a new ESP, and how to resolve deliverability issues?
Does a new dedicated IP for transactional emails fix existing deliverability problems?
How to warm up a dedicated IP and domain when moving from shared, especially with many automations?
Why Your Emails Fail: Expert Guide to Improve Email Deliverability [2025]
How long does it take to recover domain reputation from Bad/Low to High
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
What happens when your domain is on an email blacklist?
What happens when your ip gets blocklisted?
