Email deliverability is a complex ecosystem, with both IP and domain reputation playing critical roles. While a shared IP with a good reputation provides a foundational level of trust, it is entirely possible for your emails to still land in the spam folder due to a poor domain reputation. The core distinction lies in how different Mailbox Providers (MBPs) assess these reputations and at what stage of the email delivery process they are applied. IP reputation often acts as the initial gatekeeper, determining if your email is even accepted by the receiving server. However, once accepted, it is primarily your domain reputation that dictates whether the email reaches the inbox or is filtered into spam or bulk folders.
Key findings
Distinct reputations: IP and domain reputations are separate entities, each influencing different stages of email delivery. A strong IP reputation helps get your email accepted by the receiving server, while domain reputation largely determines inbox placement.
Inbox vs. spam: Even with a good IP reputation, a poor domain reputation can lead to emails being filtered into the spam or junk folder. This is because domain reputation is often weighted more heavily for final inbox placement decisions by major Mailbox Providers (MBPs).
Hidden filters: Domain reputation issues are typically not visible on external blocklist monitors. Instead, they are influenced by internal, hidden filters used by ISPs like Outlook.com (formerly Hotmail) and Gmail, requiring careful testing to diagnose.
Shared IP nuance: On shared IPs, while the IP's overall standing is important, your individual sending practices significantly impact your domain's reputation. This is why some senders on the same shared IP can achieve good inboxing while others struggle.
Authentication impact: Proper email authentication, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, is crucial as these records are tied to your domain and contribute to its trustworthiness. Missing or misconfigured authentication can negatively impact domain reputation.
Key considerations
Diagnosing issues: If you are experiencing deliverability problems and not seeing IP-based bounces or blocklist listings, the issue is likely rooted in your domain reputation and content quality, rather than the shared IP.
Content and engagement: High spam complaints or low engagement rates are direct signals that will harm your domain reputation, regardless of a good IP. Focus on sending desired content to engaged recipients.
Shared domains: If using an Email Service Provider (ESP), be aware that some (like Salesforce Marketing Cloud without a full sender authentication package) might use shared bounce domains, which can also influence your overall sending reputation. Understanding how domains in your email affect reputation is essential.
IP portability: IP addresses are generally not portable between ESPs. If you face persistent IP issues with a provider that won't address them, switching providers may be the only effective solution, although this involves its own set of deliverability challenges.
Future of reputation: While IPv6 offers potential for more unique IP space, the industry continues to heavily rely on domain-based reputation signals for filtering decisions, as highlighted in this Mailjet article on IP reputation factors.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often encounter situations where their IP reputation appears stable, but emails are still landing in spam folders, pointing directly to domain reputation as the culprit. Discussions among marketers emphasize the practical challenges of discerning between these two reputation types, especially when using shared IP infrastructures. Many agree that while IP reputation opens the door, domain reputation determines where the email ultimately lands within the recipient's inbox (or spam). This distinction is critical for troubleshooting deliverability issues and implementing effective remediation strategies.
Key opinions
Yes, it's possible: Many marketers confirm that even with a good shared IP, a poor domain reputation can lead to spam folder placement. This confirms that the two reputation types function independently.
Hidden filtering: Domain reputation issues are often attributed to hidden filters within major Mailbox Providers (MBPs), rather than publicly queryable blacklists. This makes diagnosis challenging, often requiring targeted testing with different sending domains.
IP as 'foot in the door': A common understanding is that IP reputation facilitates initial acceptance of the email by the receiving server. After this, domain reputation largely dictates whether the email reaches the inbox or the spam folder.
Spam complaints are key: If emails are being accepted but landing in spam, marketers often deduce that the problem lies with recipient engagement and content relevance, leading to spam complaints that damage domain reputation, rather than an IP block.
All elements contribute: Marketers recognize that IP, domain, and even tracking link domains, alongside content, all contribute to a collective deliverability score that determines inbox placement.
Key considerations
Diagnosis challenges: Tools may not clearly differentiate between IP and domain-based blocklistings or spam filtering. Marketers often rely on deliverability testing and analyzing SMTP logs for hard bounces to pinpoint the issue.
ESP relationship: When using ESPs with shared IPs, marketers may face resistance from the ESP in acknowledging IP issues if their internal monitoring shows otherwise. This often requires proving the issue through independent testing or looking at other metrics, like email open rates.
Shared bounce domains: For ESPs, without a full sender authentication package, a shared bounce domain (return path domain) can also significantly impact reputation. This is another layer of domain-related reputation to monitor.
Migration as a last resort: If an ESP's shared IP pool consistently performs poorly and they are unwilling to address it, migrating to a new ESP or a dedicated IP is a common consideration, though IPs are not easily transferable.
Beyond IP: Focusing solely on IP reputation can be misleading. Marketers should prioritize improving domain reputation through content, list hygiene, and engagement, as this ultimately dictates where emails land.
What email marketers say
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks confirms that it is definitely possible for email to go to spam due to domain reputation, even if the shared IP has a good standing. This highlights the independent nature of the two reputation types.
05 May 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks indicates that domain reputation is not something that typically shows up in a blocklist monitor. The issue usually stems from hidden filters within major Internet Service Providers (ISPs), which are not externally queryable by standard monitoring tools. This makes direct identification challenging.
05 May 2022 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Industry experts concur that the role of IP and domain reputation in email deliverability has evolved, with domain reputation gaining increasing prominence. While IP reputation remains essential for initial connection and basic trust, the finer filtering decisions, particularly regarding inbox versus spam placement, are heavily influenced by the sender's domain. Experts emphasize that good sending practices, proper authentication, and consistent engagement are key drivers of a positive domain reputation, and thus, successful deliverability.
Key opinions
Domain is paramount for inboxing: Experts widely agree that once an email is accepted, it's the domain reputation that primarily governs whether the email reaches the inbox or is filtered into the spam folder.
IP for connection, domain for acceptance: IP reputation establishes trust at the connection level, allowing the email to be transmitted. Domain reputation then determines acceptance by the recipient's mail server and subsequent filtering.
Behavioral data heavily weighted: Metrics like spam complaints, user engagement (opens, clicks), and unsubscribes are tied to the domain and significantly influence its reputation score at major ISPs.
Authentication is domain-centric: Protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are configured at the domain level, providing critical authentication signals that directly impact the domain's perceived trustworthiness. Issues here will lead to DMARC verification failures.
Shared IP complexities: While a shared IP's general reputation affects all users, individual domain behavior can still override a good IP. A single domain with poor practices on a shared IP can negatively impact its own deliverability without necessarily ruining the entire IP's standing for others.
Key considerations
Proactive monitoring: Regularly monitor your domain's health through tools like Google Postmaster Tools. While IP blocklists are easily checked via a blocklist checker, domain reputation requires deeper analysis of complaint rates and engagement metrics.
Focus on recipient experience: The primary way to improve domain reputation is to ensure subscribers consistently want and engage with your emails. This includes maintaining clean lists, segmenting effectively, and sending relevant content. Avoid practices that lead to high bounces or spam reports.
Subdomain strategy: Using subdomains for different mail streams (e.g., transactional vs. marketing) can help isolate reputation issues, preventing a problem with one type of mail from damaging your main domain's standing.
Sender authentication: Ensure your SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are correctly configured and aligned. These protocols are fundamental to verifying your domain's legitimacy and building trust with MBPs. For more on this, refer to this Twilio guide on email reputation.
What the experts say
Expert view
Expert from SpamResource emphasizes that IP reputation primarily dictates whether a connection is accepted, while domain reputation dictates what happens to mail once it is accepted. This confirms a hierarchical assessment process by Mailbox Providers.
20 Feb 2024 - SpamResource
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise suggests that domain reputation is increasingly becoming the more dominant factor for inbox placement. They point out that even if an IP is clean, poor sending behavior tied to a domain will lead to filtering.
15 Mar 2024 - Word to the Wise
What the documentation says
Official documentation and research consistently outline that both IP and domain reputations are fundamental components of sender reputation, but they serve distinct functions in the email delivery process. IP reputation is often evaluated first to determine the basic trustworthiness of the sending server, while domain reputation delves deeper into the credibility and sending practices associated with the brand or organization. This multi-layered assessment ensures that only legitimate and desired emails reach the inbox, while suspicious or unwanted mail is filtered out based on a comprehensive set of signals.
Key findings
Trust and credibility: Documentation defines IP reputation as the trustworthiness of the sending server (the IP address), while domain reputation reflects the credibility of the brand's domain name itself.
Gatekeeping vs. filtering: IP reputation is crucial for the initial acceptance or rejection of an email by the receiving server. Domain reputation then plays a vital role in internal filtering decisions, determining if an accepted email lands in the inbox, spam, or promotions folder.
Behavioral signals: Domain reputation is heavily influenced by how recipients interact with emails from that domain. This includes open rates, click-through rates, unsubscribes, and crucially, spam complaints. A high complaint rate is a strong negative signal.
Authentication standards: SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are authentication protocols tied to your domain. Proper configuration helps Mailbox Providers verify that emails claiming to be from your domain are legitimate, boosting its reputation. For example, Gmail heavily considers domain reputation in its filtering.
Content quality: The content within emails (spammy keywords, suspicious links, poorly formatted HTML) directly impacts domain reputation, leading to negative filtering decisions irrespective of IP reputation.
Key considerations
Holistic view: While distinct, Mailbox Providers combine both IP and domain reputation signals, along with content and authentication, to form a comprehensive sender score. A deficiency in one area can undermine strengths in another.
Long-term asset: Domain reputation is built over time through consistent positive sending practices. It's a long-term asset that, once damaged, can be challenging and time-consuming to rebuild.
Monitoring vital: Utilize available tools, like Google Postmaster Tools, which provide specific data on your domain's sending reputation, spam rate, and authentication errors, enabling proactive management. For more on this see this guide on Google Postmaster Tools domain reputation.
Bounce domain relevance: Documentation also points to the reputation of the bounce or return-path domain, especially in shared sending environments, as a factor that can impact overall deliverability.
User interaction: The ultimate decision often lies with the recipient. If they mark an email as 'not spam' or move it to the inbox, it sends a strong positive signal for the domain. Conversely, marking it as spam or ignoring it harms the domain's standing. Understanding how spam reports affect deliverability is critical.
What the documentation says
Technical article
Documentation from Twilio states that IP reputation and domain reputation are distinct concepts, each contributing to a sender's overall email reputation. Understanding their differences is key to optimizing deliverability.
01 Apr 2024 - Twilio
Technical article
Documentation from Mailgun explains that email reputation can be compared to a credit score, where a better sender score increases the likelihood of email delivery. Both IP and domain reputation factor into this crucial score.