Summary
Bit.ly links, like other generic URL shorteners, can indeed harm your email deliverability. While they offer convenience and analytics tracking, their shared nature makes them a frequent target for spammers. This can lead to increased scrutiny from spam filters and potential blocklisting, even if your overall deliverability rate is high. Masking these links through a custom redirect, ideally using a branded domain, can significantly mitigate these risks by associating the link with your sender reputation rather than a shared, potentially compromised, one.
Key findings
- Reputation risk: Generic URL shorteners (like bit.ly) are widely used by spammers, causing them to be viewed suspiciously by email filters. This can negatively impact your sender domain reputation.
- Masking helps: Using a custom redirect or a branded short link (a masked link) significantly improves deliverability. This is because the link is then associated with your own trusted domain, not the shared shortener domain.
- Shared domain issue: The problem isn't the act of shortening itself, but rather the shared underlying domain of generic services. When one user abuses the service, it can affect all users of that shared domain.
- Deliverability impact: Even with an otherwise high deliverability rate, using generic short links can lead to emails landing in spam folders for some recipients.
Key considerations
- Branded links: Always opt for custom, branded short links rather than generic ones when possible. This maintains control over your link reputation.
- Analytics vs. deliverability: If a platform ties analytics to generic short links, explore options for custom domains within that platform to balance tracking with optimal email deliverability.
- Spam filter scrutiny: Indiscriminate use of link shorteners can raise red flags for spam filters. Gmail, for instance, is known to scrutinise them.
- Blacklist risk: Link shorteners can get your domain blacklisted, bringing email deliverability to a standstill.
- Easy change: Migrating to custom domains for link shortening is typically a straightforward process that yields significant deliverability benefits.
- Reputation cost: Using generic URL shorteners can be akin to turning up to a job interview wearing a ski mask, as one expert put it, implying a lack of transparency and trustworthiness. Read more on this from Quinset on Bitly deliverability.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often face a dilemma: the convenience of URL shorteners for tracking versus the potential deliverability hit. Many acknowledge the risk associated with generic services like bit.ly, particularly due to their widespread use by spammers. The consensus leans towards adopting custom, branded domains for short links to maintain sender reputation and ensure emails reach the inbox effectively, even if their internal tools (like Kapost or Pardot) integrate with these services.
Key opinions
- Awareness of risk: Many marketers are aware that bit.ly links can hurt deliverability due to their association with spam.
- Masking value: Using a custom redirect or masking the bit.ly link is seen as a way to make a difference in deliverability.
- Branded solution: The ideal solution involves using a branded shortened link that still allows for analytics tracking.
- Prioritising deliverability: Despite a high overall deliverability rate (e.g., 99%), marketers recognize that generic short links can still cause specific deliverability issues for some recipients.
Key considerations
- Hidden destinations: Link shorteners obscure the final destination, a tactic often used by spammers, which can trigger spam filters and lead to a domain being blocklisted.
- Security vulnerabilities: Short URLs are easier for attackers to scan, potentially leading to unintended data exposure or malicious redirects, a point highlighted by EasySendy Pro.
- Content team challenges: Marketers may face internal pressure from content teams who rely on generic shorteners for integrated analytics, necessitating a solution that offers both.
- URL strategies: The way links are used can trigger spam filters; it is important to consider if vanity URLs are right for your campaigns.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks inquires about the impact of bit.ly links on email deliverability, especially when their current deliverability rate is already high. They also question if masking the link will be effective, given that it ultimately redirects to the bit.ly URL.
Marketer view
Email marketer from AtData states that generic link shorteners can lead to a domain being blocklisted, severely impacting email deliverability and potentially ruining email marketing campaigns.
What the experts say
Deliverability experts generally agree that using generic URL shorteners like bit.ly can negatively affect sender reputation. They emphasize that the core issue lies not in the shortening itself, but in the shared domains of these services, which are frequently abused by spammers. Experts advise that implementing custom, branded short links (or masking) can significantly improve deliverability, as it links the click-through domain directly to the sender's own trusted reputation rather than a potentially compromised shared one. They also point out that while shorteners can be 'pointless' for legitimate senders, the reputational benefit of avoiding shared domains is substantial.
Key opinions
- Reputation harm: Bit.ly is widely used in spam and can harm sender reputation when used in legitimate mail.
- Shared domain risk: The problem stems from link shorteners that share a domain across multiple untrusted users, not from the act of shortening itself.
- Masking effectiveness: Masking or using custom domains for short links makes a significant difference in deliverability.
- Easy resolution: It is an easy change to make, and the benefits for deliverability outweigh the effort.
Key considerations
- Recipient impact: The degree of impact from generic shorteners depends on the specific mailboxes and ESPs being sent to.
- Custom domain necessity: If using a service that integrates with bit.ly, leveraging the custom domain option offered by bit.ly is crucial.
- Link transparency: Spam filters often view hidden or redirected links with suspicion, making it important to understand how redirects affect reputation.
- Pointless but harmful: While link shorteners are often functionally unnecessary for legitimate senders, their use via shared domains can still lead to being blocklisted.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks confirms that using bit.ly links in email can negatively impact a sender's reputation because the service is frequently associated with spam content.
Expert view
Deliverability expert from SpamResource observes that shared shortener domains are often abused by spammers, which can lead to reputational damage for legitimate senders who use them.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and research often highlight the risks associated with URL shortening services, especially generic ones. While services like bit.ly are legitimate, the potential for abuse by bad actors is a recurring theme. The core concern revolves around the opacity of the final destination and the shared nature of these domains, which spam filters are designed to scrutinize. Best practices often advise using custom, branded domains to ensure transparency and maintain positive sender reputation, thereby improving email deliverability.
Key findings
- Security risks: There are potential security vulnerabilities and scams associated with using URL shortening services, as confirmed by Quora discussions.
- Abuse potential: Even legitimate services like bit.ly can be abused by malicious actors, leading to deliverability issues for others.
- Spam filter triggers: Link shorteners tend to hide the link's true destination, a common tactic used by spammers, which raises red flags with email service providers.
- ISP scrutiny: Major ISPs, like Gmail, can interpret seemingly harmless bit.ly links as suspicious, potentially preventing emails from reaching the inbox.
Key considerations
- Transparency: Spam filters favor transparency. Hiding the final URL destination can increase spam scores.
- Domain reputation: The reputation of the domain used in the link (whether the shortener's or your own custom domain) is a critical factor in deliverability.
- Link quality: While links aren't inherently bad, their quality and how they are structured can impact whether they affect email deliverability.
- Abuse prevention: To prevent deliverability issues, ensure your links don't lead to malicious or compromised sites, a common reason generic shorteners are flagged. ExpressVPN explains Bitly safety concerns.
Technical article
Researcher from Quora confirms that using Bitly links or other URL shortening services carries a risk of potential security vulnerabilities and scams, making them a concern for email recipients.
Technical article
Security documentation from ExpressVPN states that Bitly is a legitimate service and not inherently harmful. However, it acknowledges that malicious actors can abuse any URL-shortening service, and Bitly is no exception to this vulnerability.
Related resources
5 resources
Related pages
Are bitly links bad for email deliverability?
Are URL shorteners like bit.ly bad for email deliverability?
Is it bad to use bitly links in email marketing?
How do URL shorteners and domain reputation impact email deliverability?
Do link shorteners impact email deliverability with ESP click tracking?
What are the pros and cons of using vanity URLs in email, and do they impact deliverability?
How do link redirects affect email reputation and deliverability?
How do public URL shorteners affect email deliverability?
How to run an email deliverability test: a proven checklist
Why your emails are going to spam in 2024 and how to fix it
