Summary
When it comes to B2B email deliverability, the question of whether internet service providers (ISPs) and anti-spam filters prioritize IP reputation, domain reputation, or both, is common. The reality is that B2B mailbox providers (MBPs) consider a holistic view of sender reputation, integrating both IP and domain signals, alongside other sophisticated metrics. While IP reputation traditionally held significant weight, domain reputation has become increasingly critical, reflecting the sender's brand identity and long-term sending practices.
Key findings
- Dual importance: B2B MBPs assess both IP and domain reputation to determine email legitimacy and inbox placement. There isn't a single factor that completely outweighs the other in all scenarios.
- Evolving emphasis: While IP reputation remains important, particularly for new sending infrastructure, domain reputation has gained prominence. This is due to factors like the widespread use of shared IPs and the direct association with a brand's credibility.
- Holistic filtering: Advanced anti-spam filters, especially those used by major providers like Microsoft and Google, employ sophisticated algorithms that combine various signals, including recipient complaints and trap networks, to identify poor sending practices.
- Authentication: Proper implementation of authentication protocols such as SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is fundamental. These records help verify the sender's identity and link the sending IP to the domain, enhancing overall trust.
Key considerations
- Consistent sending practices: Maintaining a steady sending volume, high-quality content, and good engagement are crucial for building and protecting both your IP and domain reputations.
- Proactive monitoring: Regularly monitor your IP and domain health using various tools to detect and address any issues promptly. Understanding the difference between IP and domain reputation is essential.
- Content and headers: Ensure your email content is relevant and engaging, and that your email headers are authentic and consistent. These aspects directly contribute to your domain's positive perception by recipients and providers. This is a good practice for all senders, as not all mailbox providers use the same metrics.
- Shared vs. dedicated IPs: Be aware of how using shared versus dedicated IPs affects your reputation. On a shared IP, your deliverability is influenced by other senders on that IP, making domain reputation even more critical.
What email marketers say
Email marketers widely agree that both IP and domain reputation are foundational to deliverability. They often highlight a growing emphasis on domain reputation, especially in B2B contexts where brand identity and long-term sender behavior are paramount. While a strong IP reputation is a good starting point, it's increasingly seen as insufficient without a robust domain reputation to back it up. Marketers prioritize maintaining consistent, positive sending habits.
Key opinions
- Integrated approach: Most marketers acknowledge that B2B MBPs consider both IP and domain reputation in combination, making a holistic strategy essential for success.
- Domain's growing influence: Many perceive domain reputation as increasingly significant, particularly as it directly reflects the sending brand and its email program's overall health.
- Authentication as a base: Proper SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are frequently cited as non-negotiable foundations for establishing trust and ensuring that domain reputation signals are correctly interpreted.
- Sending habits analysis: Mailbox providers scrutinize sending patterns at both the IP and domain levels, meaning consistent, positive behavior is rewarded.
Key considerations
- Balanced focus: Marketers are advised not to overemphasize one reputation type over the other. A balanced approach to building and maintaining IP and domain reputation for B2B email filtering is key.
- Engagement and content quality: These are direct drivers of domain reputation. Prioritizing relevant, valuable content and fostering recipient engagement will yield positive results. Consider how sending practices impact domain reputation.
- Blacklist avoidance: Steer clear of email marketing tactics that could land your IP or domain on a blocklist (or blacklist). Proactive list hygiene is critical here.
- Provider-specific nuances: While general principles apply, specific inbox providers might weigh IP and domain reputation differently. As noted by Twilio, some will put more emphasis on domain.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks indicates that B2B mail providers broadly consider both IP and domain reputation, alongside organization-level blocks arising from recipient complaints. They also employ trap networks, frequently utilizing recycled client addresses, which are effective in identifying poor data practices. Leading providers like Microsoft and Google use sophisticated filtering.
Marketer view
Marketer from Quora notes that while both IP and domain reputation are important, proper SPF and DKIM records are crucial. They observe that a blacklisted IP can affect deliverability, but domain reputation can mitigate this if a good sender is using a problematic IP.
What the experts say
Deliverability experts concur that B2B mail providers examine both IP and domain reputation. However, they increasingly point to domain reputation as a more stable and strategic indicator of sender trustworthiness, especially given the complexities of shared IP environments and the persistent identity of a brand. Experts often advise focusing on the long-term health of the domain through consistent, legitimate sending practices.
Key opinions
- Domain's primary role: Experts frequently observe that domain reputation is becoming the leading filter for major inbox providers, as changing domains is a more significant hurdle for spammers than acquiring new IPs.
- Complex interplay: The relationship between IP and domain reputation is nuanced. An established good domain reputation can sometimes buffer a new or temporarily problematic IP, illustrating their interconnectedness.
- Long-term strategy: Building and maintaining a strong domain reputation through consistent engagement and content quality is highlighted as critical for sustainable deliverability.
- Holistic view: Overall sender reputation is a composite of many factors, with IP and domain reputations being foundational components that reinforce each other.
Key considerations
- Adapt to evolving filters: Stay informed about the continuous evolution of anti-spam filters, which increasingly lean on domain metrics for deliverability decisions.
- Consistent positive signals: Prioritize sending to engaged recipients and maintain high email hygiene standards to send consistent positive signals for your domain. This directly affects email deliverability.
- Proactive reputation management: Actively monitor your IP and domain reputations and be prepared to address any issues. According to Word to the Wise, a holistic focus ensures long-term deliverability.
- Brand integrity: Recognize that your domain represents your brand. A strong domain reputation protects brand integrity and ensures your messages reach your audience effectively.
Expert view
Expert from SpamResource.com notes that modern spam filters evaluate both IP and domain reputation, with domain reputation sometimes holding greater importance. This dual consideration means senders must manage both aspects carefully.
Expert view
Expert from SpamResource.com explains that a poor domain reputation can negate a good IP reputation. If a domain is linked to spam, emails are likely to be blocked, regardless of the IP's standing, underscoring the domain's critical role.
What the documentation says
Official documentation from major email service providers and platforms consistently highlights the importance of both IP and domain reputation. While the specific weight given to each might vary, the general consensus is that a combination of factors related to sender identity, authentication, and user engagement informs deliverability decisions. Documentation often emphasizes adherence to best practices, secure authentication, and active monitoring as key to maintaining a healthy sender reputation.
Key findings
- Integrated evaluation: Documentation from providers frequently indicates that both IP and domain reputation are integral components of their filtering systems.
- Brand association: Domain reputation is often described as directly linked to the brand's identity and long-term trustworthiness, influencing recipient perception and filtering outcomes.
- Authentication standards: Adherence to SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is consistently mandated or strongly recommended to establish sender legitimacy and protect the domain's reputation from spoofing.
- Engagement metrics: Positive engagement (opens, clicks) and low complaint rates are documented as vital signals that contribute to a positive domain and IP reputation.
Key considerations
- Adhere to best practices: Follow documented best practices for email sending, list management, and content to maintain optimal deliverability for both IP and domain.
- Utilize postmaster tools: Leverage tools like Google Postmaster Tools to gain insights into your sender reputation metrics and diagnose issues.
- Implement authentication: Ensure that SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are correctly configured and aligned, as this forms the bedrock of trust signals for your domain and IP. See a simple guide to email authentication.
- Varying metrics: Be aware that while all providers care about reputation, their specific algorithms and the weight they assign to IP versus domain might differ. Mailgun documentation explains that not all mailbox providers use the same metrics.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailgun states that because mailbox providers do not all use identical metrics, it is advisable to assess both IP and domain reputation before sending emails. This ensures a comprehensive approach to deliverability.
Technical article
Documentation from Twilio indicates that some inbox providers may place greater importance on domain reputation compared to IP reputation, though many will consider both factors. This flexibility in evaluation requires senders to manage both effectively.
Related resources
15 resources
Related pages
What is the difference between IP and domain reputation in email deliverability?
How important is IP reputation versus domain reputation, especially for B2B senders with low engagement and emails going to spam?
How important is IP and domain reputation for B2B email filtering?
Is Domain Reputation More Important Than IP Reputation for Email Deliverability?
How to improve email IP and domain reputation and what to audit for deliverability?
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
Ultimate Guide to Google Postmaster Tools V2
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
Boost Email Deliverability Rates: Technical Solutions from Top Performing Senders
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
