Summary
The belief that spam filters penalize HTTP links, even if they redirect to HTTPS, is a topic of concern for many email marketers. While some express skepticism, the consensus among experts and industry observations suggests that using HTTP links can indeed have a negative impact on email deliverability, though perhaps not always through direct 'penalties' in the traditional sense. Modern email clients and web browsers prioritize security, and unencrypted HTTP connections are increasingly flagged as insecure, potentially leading to warnings, broken links, or an increased likelihood of being routed to the spam folder. This shift reflects a broader internet trend towards ubiquitous HTTPS adoption for enhanced user security and trust.
Key findings
- Deliverability Impact: There is a non-zero impact on email deliverability when using HTTP links compared to HTTPS. Mailbox providers and internet service providers (ISPs) increasingly favor secure connections.
- Browser Warnings: Browsers like Google Chrome have historically flagged non-HTTPS links as insecure, which can affect user experience when recipients click on email links, leading to 'can't connect securely' errors even if the final destination is HTTPS.
- Sender Reputation: While not always a direct blacklist trigger, using HTTP links can implicitly signal a lack of attention to security best practices, potentially impacting your sender reputation.
- Industry Best Practice: Using HTTPS for all links (including tracking links) is now a widely accepted best practice in email marketing, aligning with the broader internet security trend.
- Spam Filter Scrutiny: HTTP links, particularly if they involve redirects, can draw more scrutiny from spam filters that analyze link behavior and security to identify potentially malicious content.
Key considerations
- HTTPS is Standard: Given that SSL certificates are often free and easy to implement (e.g., via Let's Encrypt), there are few justifiable reasons to continue using HTTP for links. Modern web standards strongly advocate for HTTPS across the board.
- User Trust: Links that trigger security warnings or redirect through insecure channels can erode recipient trust, leading to lower engagement and increased spam complaints.
- Compliance: While not directly an issue under the CAN-SPAM Act for example, adhering to security best practices helps build a stronger, more compliant email program overall.
- Tracking Links: Ensure that your Email Service Provider (ESP) uses HTTPS for their tracking links. If they do not, inquire about their plans to transition to HTTPS to avoid potential deliverability issues.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often find themselves navigating a complex landscape of deliverability factors, and the use of HTTP versus HTTPS links is one such area that can cause confusion. Many are unsure if the perceived penalty for HTTP links is real, anecdotal, or a relic of older web practices. While some marketers have not personally observed direct penalties, there's a growing awareness that best practices lean heavily towards secure links to avoid potential issues with spam filters and improve user experience.
Key opinions
- Uncertainty Prevails: Many marketers admit they haven't specifically heard of or encountered direct penalties from spam filters for using HTTP links, even with redirects.
- Perceived Ridiculousness: The idea of HTTP links being penalized, particularly when they lead to HTTPS pages, can seem illogical or 'ridiculous' to some marketers.
- Focus on Best Practices: Despite a lack of direct experience with penalties, most marketers acknowledge that using HTTPS for all links is a modern best practice and should be adopted.
- ESP Practices: Some marketers have encountered ESPs that still use HTTP for link tracking, citing compatibility reasons, which creates a dilemma.
- General Link Concerns: Concerns about links triggering spam filters often revolve around the number or suspicious nature of links, rather than the protocol itself.
Key considerations
- User Experience: Even without direct spam filtering, HTTP links can lead to browser security warnings, degrading the recipient's experience and potentially discouraging clicks.
- Reputation Management: Marketers should proactively move to HTTPS for all links to align with evolving web standards and maintain a positive sender reputation. This includes checking how link shorteners are handled.
- Trust Signals: In a competitive inbox, every signal of trustworthiness counts. HTTPS is a fundamental trust signal that recipients and mailbox providers expect.
- Deliverability Impact of Links: The Rebrandly blog highlights that too many suspicious links in an email can trigger spam filters and negatively impact deliverability. Ensuring links are secure and reputable is a part of this broader concern. You can read more here.
Marketer view
An email marketer from Email Geeks notes they have not encountered specific penalties for HTTP links directly causing emails to go to spam. This indicates that while it might not be a primary flag for filters, its subtle effects could be overlooked. The complexity of email deliverability means that many factors contribute to inbox placement, and a single element like link protocol might not be the most obvious culprit when issues arise. Marketers often focus on content, sender reputation, and list hygiene, sometimes missing the technical nuances of link security.
Marketer view
An email marketer from Email Geeks indicates this was a new concept to them, but they now understand the implications. This highlights a common learning curve for marketers as web security standards evolve. Staying informed about evolving technical factors that influence deliverability is crucial. What was once considered acceptable, like HTTP links, can quickly become a disadvantage as mailbox providers and web browsers tighten security protocols.
What the experts say
Industry experts largely agree that while there might not be explicit, direct penalties from every spam filter for using HTTP links, the overall trend and best practice strongly favor HTTPS. The digital ecosystem is increasingly secure-by-default, and outdated protocols can cause unintended consequences, from browser warnings to a subtle yet significant impact on deliverability and sender reputation. Experts advise moving away from HTTP links due to security concerns, user experience degradation, and the general expectation of encrypted connections.
Key opinions
- Historical Browser Issues: Experts recall instances where major browsers (e.g., Google Chrome) began flagging non-HTTPS links as early as 2019-2020, affecting how recipients perceive and interact with email content.
- Best Practice Evolution: Avoiding HTTP links has become such a long-standing best practice that the specific reasons for their negative impact are sometimes forgotten, but the recommendation to use HTTPS remains strong.
- Observable Delivery Shift: Some experts have observed a measurable, non-zero shift in delivery rates for HTTP versus HTTPS links, prompting them to advise clients to fully transition to HTTPS.
- Implicit Disadvantage: Even if not directly penalized, HTTP links 'stand out like a sore thumb' in a security-conscious environment, leading to a de facto discouragement of their use.
- User Experience Issues: HTTP redirector links, even to HTTPS targets, can cause client-side 'cannot connect securely' errors, severely impacting recipient trust and engagement.
Key considerations
- Proactive Adoption: Given Google's stated policy of penalizing non-HTTPS pages in search results, and the general industry push for security, it is prudent to assume Gmail and other mailbox providers will eventually (if not already) factor this into their spam filtering algorithms.
- Mixed Content Risks: As Travis Murray highlights on Spamresource.com, even if the primary content is secure, mixed content (HTTP elements on an HTTPS page/email) can trigger warnings. This is particularly relevant for email clients that render web content. You can read more about mixed content here.
- ESPs and CAs: If your ESP uses HTTP tracking links, challenge them on this. Standard Certificate Authorities (CAs) provide free or affordable SSL certificates, making HTTPS implementation straightforward for tracking domains, thus improving overall link deliverability.
Expert view
An expert from Email Geeks recalls Google Chrome's past issues with non-HTTPS links around 2020 (version 86), suggesting a historical precedent for such concerns. This indicates that major web entities have been pushing for HTTPS for a while, influencing how web content, including email links, is perceived and handled. The evolution of browser security directly impacts email deliverability because many email clients render HTML emails like web pages. If a browser warns about insecure content, an email client might react similarly or even block the content, leading to a degraded user experience and potentially higher spam complaints.
Expert view
An expert from Email Geeks advises avoiding HTTP links, emphasizing that using HTTPS has been a best practice for so long that the precise negative impacts of HTTP links have become less clearly defined, though risks remain. This highlights a generational shift in web security. For seasoned deliverability professionals, HTTPS is now the default expectation. Any deviation immediately raises a red flag, not necessarily because of a specific penalty rule, but because it indicates a potential oversight in modern security standards, which can subtly affect trust and inbox placement over time.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and research often highlight the broad shift towards security on the internet, which implicitly impacts how email links are treated. While specific documentation might not explicitly state 'HTTP links will be penalized by spam filters,' the underlying principles of secure communication and user protection strongly suggest that unencrypted links are increasingly viewed as undesirable. Mailbox providers and regulatory bodies prioritize user safety, and this translates into algorithms that scrutinize insecure elements in emails.
Key findings
- Security Imperative: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) emphasizes the importance of security in online communications, indicating a broad regulatory push that influences how email is handled. The CAN-SPAM Act focuses on deceptive practices, which can include insecure links.
- User Trust and Safety: Mailchimp's guidelines on avoiding spam filters often stress building trust and ensuring recipient safety, which inherently includes using secure links to protect user data and prevent phishing.
- Content Analysis by Filters: EmailTooltester notes that spam filters use algorithms to analyze email content to determine legitimacy. This analysis can extend to the security of embedded links, flagging potentially insecure or suspicious URLs.
- Link Behavior Scrutiny: Badsender mentions that some anti-spam filters compare parts of emails with other campaigns to identify patterns, including link structures and protocols that might be associated with spam. This means unusual or insecure link practices can trigger flags.
Key considerations
- Implicit Penalty: While a direct 'HTTP penalty' might not be explicitly documented, the cumulative effect of being flagged for insecure content, triggering browser warnings, or failing to meet evolving security standards can effectively lead to emails landing in spam or being blocked, similar to an explicit penalty. This can act as a de facto blacklist.
- Holistic Deliverability: Documentation consistently points to a holistic approach to deliverability, where many factors contribute to inbox placement. Insecure links would detract from an otherwise well-optimized email.
- Future-Proofing: As internet security continues to tighten, relying on HTTP links is a short-sighted strategy that will likely lead to increasing deliverability challenges over time.
Technical article
The Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) CAN-SPAM Act compliance guide underscores that each separate email in violation can incur significant penalties. This highlights the serious nature of email marketing regulations. While HTTP links aren't a direct violation, operating a secure and transparent email program aligns with the spirit of these laws, which aim to protect consumers from deceptive or harmful practices. Using HTTPS is a step towards building trust and avoiding behaviors that might be associated with less reputable senders.
Technical article
Mailchimp's resources on avoiding spam filters often advise senders to focus on factors like audience engagement and content quality to ensure emails land in the inbox. They imply that secure links contribute to overall email health. Their guidance emphasizes building a positive sender reputation through consistent good practices. An insecure HTTP link, while perhaps not explicitly mentioned as a spam trigger, can undermine trust and signal to mailbox providers that the sender is not adhering to modern security standards, which ultimately impacts deliverability.
Related resources
13 resources
![Email Deliverability: Avoiding The Spam Folder [2025]](https://moosend.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Email-Deliverability.png)
Related pages
Does using HTTP links instead of HTTPS links affect email deliverability?
Do HTTP tracking links affect email deliverability?
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
How do hyperlinks in the body of an email affect deliverability?
Are link shorteners bad for email marketing?
How do multiple or long links affect email deliverability?
What does it mean when your email is blacklisted?
Email Deliverability Issues: Getting Your Messages to the Inbox in 2025
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
Do unsubscribe links and rates affect email deliverability and spam filtering?
