Even in the serious world of email marketing and deliverability, humor can be found in the more outlandish and poorly executed spam or phishing attempts. While these attempts pose a real threat, some are so comically inept they serve as a reminder of the various tactics, both crude and sophisticated, employed by malicious actors. Understanding these attempts, even the funny ones, helps email marketers stay vigilant and better protect their brand and recipients from genuine threats. We often encounter phishing attempts that are not only obvious but sometimes even absurd in their approach.
Key findings
Absurd requests: Some phishing emails stand out due to their highly unusual or contradictory demands, such as requesting all promotional materials be sent individually by email, which goes against standard marketing practices.
Impersonation flaws: Attempts to impersonate known entities (like a CEO) often contain subtle or obvious inconsistencies, ranging from unexpected communication channels (e.g., a random calendar invite) to misspelled names or poor grammar, making them easily identifiable.
System exploitation: Some spammers attempt to exploit vulnerabilities in legitimate systems, like inbound lead confirmation processes, to generate unwanted interactions or create false impressions of misconduct.
Learning opportunity: Even unsuccessful or amusing spam offers insights into sender tactics, helping marketers refine their own security measures and improve how they identify spam traps.
Sender reputation impact: While funny, such incidents underscore the importance of protecting your domain reputation against misuse.
Key considerations
Vigilance: Always remain alert to unusual email behavior, even if it seems harmless or amusing at first glance. These could be subtle phishing attempts.
System security: Regularly review and tighten inbound lead and confirmation systems to prevent them from being exploited for spam or malicious purposes. This helps maintain a healthy domain reputation.
Training: Educate your team on identifying phishing attempts, even those that appear silly. This includes looking for bad grammar, suspicious links, and unusual requests, as highlighted by All About Cookies.
Incident response: Have a clear process for reporting and responding to suspected spam or phishing. This includes understanding how to determine if emails are going to spam.
Collaboration: If a platform or service is being exploited, communicate with them to help improve their security. This proactive approach benefits the entire email ecosystem.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often share anecdotes about bizarre spam and phishing attempts they've encountered. These stories, while humorous, highlight the persistent challenge of distinguishing legitimate emails from deceptive ones. They also reveal the varied, sometimes unsophisticated, methods used by spammers. Marketers consistently point out the critical details that give these attempts away, from unusual requests to poor execution.
Key opinions
Obvious tells: Many marketers find humor in phishing emails that contain glaring errors or highly improbable scenarios, making them easy to spot. These can often be identified through methods discussed in how to identify spammers.
Creative absurdity: Some spammers employ oddly specific or theatrical narratives, like requests for detailed product information one email at a time, which contribute to the amusement despite the malicious intent.
System abuse: Marketers note instances where spammers try to weaponize legitimate services, like calendar booking tools, to generate spam or create false complaints, underscoring the constant battle against how spammers get content.
Engagement as defense: Some marketers engage directly with the exploited service to flag the issue, showing a proactive approach to combating misuse.
Recognizing patterns: Identifying recurring themes, such as the infamous 'Nigerian prince' scam, helps marketers and general users quickly dismiss such emails. Selzy Blog covers many funny spam email examples.
Key considerations
Educate teams: Ensure all staff, especially those handling communications, are aware of common spam and phishing tactics, including those that are clearly inept but still attempts.
Validate unexpected requests: Implement internal protocols for verifying unusual requests, even from seemingly known contacts or services, before taking action.
Monitor inbound systems: Regularly check and secure any publicly accessible forms, booking systems, or lead generation tools to prevent abuse.
Report misuse: While sometimes amusing, reporting spam and phishing helps blocklist providers and ISPs refine their filters, protecting the broader email community.
Leverage tools: Use internal security tools and practices to identify and mitigate suspicious activities, such as unusual bot clicks in email marketing campaigns.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks shared a humorous phishing attempt involving a Calendly confirmation. The scammer impersonated them and requested all promotional materials be sent one by one via email, which was a clear giveaway.
18 Oct 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks discussed their proactive steps after encountering the phishing attempt, noting that they contacted the CEO of the exploited platform (Woodpecker) to investigate how the incident occurred. This demonstrates good incident response.
18 Oct 2024 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability and security often emphasize that even seemingly 'funny' or inept spam and phishing attempts are part of a larger, more serious threat landscape. They view these as indicators of evolving (or sometimes stagnant) tactics by malicious actors. While the humor is acknowledged, the underlying message from experts is always about vigilance, education, and robust security protocols to prevent real damage.
Key opinions
Intent matters: Experts stress that regardless of how silly a scam appears, its intent is malicious. Even if it causes a chuckle, it's still an attempt to defraud or compromise systems.
Sophistication range: The existence of crude, funny spam often coexists with highly sophisticated phishing techniques, highlighting the broad spectrum of threats. This makes understanding email authentication crucial.
Attack vector diversity: Funny examples often demonstrate how attackers leverage various communication channels, not just email, to attempt their scams.
Human factor: Many comical failures in spam are due to human error on the attacker's part (e.g., poor translation), but they still target human vulnerabilities like curiosity or fear.
Constant evolution: Even as some attempts remain primitive, experts from Word to the Wise and Spam Resource constantly monitor new and evolving threats, emphasizing that security is an ongoing process.
Key considerations
Comprehensive security: Don't underestimate the threat from seemingly amateurish phishing. Implement layered security, including blocklist monitoring and robust email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC).
Awareness campaigns: Regularly train employees to recognize various types of phishing, from the most obvious to the highly convincing ones. This builds a strong human firewall.
Threat intelligence: Stay informed about the latest phishing trends and attack vectors by following industry experts and security reports.
Automated defenses: Utilize email filtering solutions that can detect and quarantine suspicious messages based on known patterns and AI-driven analysis. This is critical for preventing phishing attacks.
Collaborative defense: Work with ISPs, email service providers, and security vendors to share threat intelligence and improve collective defenses against spam and phishing.
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource highlights that while some spam seems amateurish, it often still works on a small percentage of recipients. The sheer volume of these funny yet persistent attempts makes them a continuous problem, even for sophisticated filters.
20 Feb 2024 - Spam Resource
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise suggests that the 'funny' aspect of spam often comes from cultural misunderstandings or poor machine translation. These errors, while amusing, are part of a spammer's attempt to appear legitimate in different regions, even if poorly executed.
10 Jan 2024 - Word to the Wise
What the documentation says
Official documentation and security research often categorizes spam and phishing attempts by their technical characteristics and attack vectors, rather than their comedic value. However, the examples cited in these documents sometimes reveal the unsophisticated, yet persistent, nature of certain threats. Documentation typically focuses on the mechanisms of these attacks and the defensive measures against them, regardless of how absurd the content might be. They provide a framework for understanding and mitigating the risks associated with all forms of unsolicited email.
Key findings
Grammar and spelling errors: Many phishing attempts, including funny ones, are characterized by poor linguistic quality, which is a key indicator for detection systems and human users.
Lack of authentication: Documentation consistently highlights that fraudulent emails often lack proper SPF, DKIM, or DMARC authentication, making them easier to filter. Understanding DMARC verification failures is critical.
Social engineering: Even funny spam relies on social engineering principles to manipulate recipients into taking desired actions, regardless of the message's overt absurdity.
Exploiting trust: Phishing attempts, comical or not, often try to impersonate trusted entities or services, demonstrating a fundamental tactic to bypass skepticism.
Evasion techniques: Documentation may describe how even simple spam tries to evade filters through various techniques, such as using image-only content or unusual character sets.
Key considerations
Automated filtering: Rely on advanced email security gateways that can detect and block phishing and spam based on technical indicators, regardless of content humor.
Regular updates: Ensure that spam filters and security software are regularly updated to counter new and old attack patterns. This helps fix issues like DKIM temporary error rates.
User education: Supplement technical defenses with continuous user training on identifying phishing, even if it uses comical or unusual lures. Cisco offers information on what phishing is.
Incident reporting: Establish clear channels for reporting suspicious emails to security teams or IT, fostering a proactive security culture.
Proactive monitoring: Continuously monitor for potential brand impersonation attempts that could lead to phishing, even if they initially appear nonsensical.
Technical article
Documentation from IT Governance emphasizes that phishing attacks, regardless of how humorous their content, are designed to exploit human trust or fear. They cite examples of campaigns that may seem odd but are part of larger, dangerous schemes.
21 Jul 2021 - IT Governance Blog
Technical article
Documentation from Cisco details that identifying phishing involves looking for specific tactics like suspicious links, generic greetings, and poor grammar, all of which can be present even in comically bad attempts. The technical signature often remains clear.