Internal email addresses frequently surface on purchased marketing lists, primarily due to the unethical and often non-consensual data collection practices employed by list vendors. These practices commonly involve web scraping publicly available information, aggregating outdated databases, and indiscriminately merging unverified datasets. Additionally, internal addresses can appear if an employee or tester previously used their work email to subscribe to a public form, leading to their inclusion in general databases, or in cases where internal address books have been compromised. The inherent lack of consent and transparency in how these lists are compiled makes them unreliable, prone to poor data quality, and often non-compliant with data protection regulations such as GDPR.
10 marketer opinions
Internal email addresses are frequently found on purchased lists because these lists are often compiled through extensive, non-consensual methods by data brokers. These methods include widespread web scraping of publicly available information, the aggregation of various outdated or unverified databases, and the acquisition of previously compromised datasets. Consequently, if an internal email address was ever publicly visible-for example, on a company website or in a public directory-or if employees used their work emails to sign up for external services, these addresses can be inadvertently swept into these broadly collected, uncleaned datasets. This process highlights the inherently poor data quality and the pervasive lack of consent associated with purchased email lists.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks responds that simply having an email address makes it susceptible to being added to lists, and while common addresses like sales@ might be guessed, it's unusual for internal-only addresses to appear unless an address book was compromised.
24 Oct 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from WordStream Blog explains that internal email addresses can appear on marketing lists, including those that might be bought or sold, if employees or testers sign up for forms or newsletters using their work emails. These addresses then get mixed into the general database, and without strict segmentation or hygiene, they might be included in exported or shared lists.
4 May 2022 - WordStream Blog
3 expert opinions
Internal email addresses frequently surface on purchased marketing lists due to various illicit data collection methods. A primary cause is the theft or compromise of client address books, leading to the unauthorized inclusion of corporate contacts. Furthermore, these purchased lists are often populated with sophisticated spam traps, many of which are designed to mimic internal addresses, such as 'info@' or 'support@'. These 'pristine' traps, alongside 'recycled' email addresses that were once internal but later repurposed as traps, are deployed by anti-spam organizations specifically to identify senders using non-consensual data. While Email Service Providers employ systems to detect such lists, their automated safeguards do not always flag them instantly, highlighting the ongoing challenge of preventing the use of illicit data.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that internal email addresses appearing on purchased lists is a common occurrence, often due to a client's address book being stolen. She also suggests informing the event organizer if the list is unauthorized or publicly shaming the vendor.
17 Jun 2025 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks shares that even with systems like MailChimp's Omnivore, purchased lists are not always immediately flagged, highlighting the challenge ESPs face in automatically detecting and preventing the use of such lists.
16 Sep 2021 - Email Geeks
6 technical articles
Purchased email lists frequently contain internal company email addresses because their compilation methods are inherently indiscriminate and largely disregard data consent. These lists are often built by aggregating unverified public data, using web scraping tools that pull any visible email addresses, or by incorporating information from prior data breaches. Consequently, if internal addresses were ever publicly exposed or included in compromised datasets, they can be inadvertently swept into these large, unvetted lists, regardless of their intended purpose or the data subject's permission. This absence of proper validation, consent, and segmentation by list vendors is the root cause of internal emails appearing on such risky lists.
Technical article
Documentation from SendGrid Documentation explains that purchased email lists often lack transparency in their collection methods, which can lead to the inclusion of internal email addresses. These addresses might be gathered through web scraping of publicly available company information, or via previous data breaches and poorly managed datasets. When such unverified data is sold, internal addresses can inadvertently become part of the list without consent.
28 Jan 2025 - SendGrid Documentation
Technical article
Documentation from Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) highlights that email addresses on purchased lists, including potentially internal ones, are often acquired without the necessary consent or legitimate basis required by data protection regulations like GDPR. The lack of transparent and lawful data collection practices by list vendors means any email address, even those belonging to internal company staff, could be indiscriminately included if they were publicly accessible or obtained through illicit means, without the data subject's knowledge or permission.
22 Sep 2024 - Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
How can I identify and prevent suspicious or bot-generated email addresses in my lists?
What are potential reasons for spam or fake email addresses in a marketing email list?
What causes high unknown rates when validating purchased email lists and are they effective?
Where can I find resources about using purchased email lists?
Why am I receiving spam emails at unique internal testing email addresses?
Why do purchased email lists cause deliverability issues and are not a best practice?