Summary
The terminology surrounding email "From" addresses can be confusing due to the distinctions made by different RFCs (Request for Comments) and common usage. Understanding these various terms is crucial for proper email deliverability, authentication, and sender reputation management. This overview clarifies the different email identifiers and their functions.
Key findings
- Two main 'From' addresses: Emails technically have two From addresses: the RFC 5321.From (envelope sender or MAIL FROM) used for the SMTP protocol, and the RFC 5322.From (header From) which is visible to the recipient.
- Multiple terminologies: Both RFC 5321.From and RFC 5322.From are known by many different names, leading to potential confusion in discussions about email architecture and deliverability.
- Authentication impact: SPF authenticates the RFC 5321.From address, while DKIM signs parts of the email including the RFC 5322.From. DMARC then uses alignment between these two 'From' addresses to pass or fail authentication. Knowing the difference is key to setting up DMARC, DKIM, and SPF.
- Importance of alignment: Aligning the domains of both From addresses is a common practice to simplify email authentication and improve deliverability.
Key considerations
- Clarifying communication: When discussing email issues, be precise about which "From" address is being referred to (e.g., envelope sender versus header From) to avoid misunderstandings.
- Impact on bounce handling: Bounce messages are typically sent to the RFC 5321.From address. Proper management of this address is crucial for understanding email bounces.
- User experience: The RFC 5322.From (and the associated From Name) is what recipients see, directly impacting trust and engagement. This also relates to how sender logos are displayed.
- Debugging deliverability: When troubleshooting deliverability issues or blocklist placements, identifying which specific From address is affected is critical for diagnosis.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often focus on the "From Name" and the visible "From" address because these elements directly impact recipient engagement and open rates. They are less concerned with the underlying technical distinctions unless they face deliverability challenges.
Key opinions
- Recipient visibility: The most important From address for marketers is the one users see in their inbox (the Header From), as it influences whether an email is opened.
- Brand recognition: A consistent and recognizable From Name (e.g., 'Company Name' or 'Customer Support') is crucial for brand identity and trust.
- Alignment benefits: Aligning all From domains (envelope and header) can simplify email setup and reduce deliverability headaches.
- User confusion: The multiple terms for From addresses can be quite confusing for marketers not deeply involved in the technical aspects of email delivery.
Key considerations
- From name optimization: Marketers often test different From Names (e.g., 'Company Name', 'Customer Support', 'Newsletter') to see which performs best for open rates.
- Reply-to address strategy: While not strictly a "From" address, the Reply-To address is a key consideration for managing subscriber replies and customer service. Marketers should consider if real reply-to addresses improve deliverability.
- Impact on deliverability: Despite focusing on the visible From, marketers must ensure proper underlying authentication for the Envelope From to avoid email deliverability issues that impact campaign performance. Understanding who your email marketing should be from is critical.
- Avoiding spam folder: Inconsistent From addresses or misconfigured DNS records can lead to emails landing in the spam folder, affecting campaign ROI.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks notes that discussions about "From" addresses can become complicated due to the many names associated with both RFC 5321 FROM and RFC 5322 FROM. They aim to create a clear reference to help navigate these terms effectively.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks explains that they added DNS records to their overview to clarify which domains need definition, as there is often confusion around this topic. They typically align all "From" domains to minimize dealing with different "From" types.
What the experts say
Experts emphasize the technical distinctions between the different "From" addresses, particularly those defined by RFCs, due to their critical role in email authentication, routing, and deliverability. They often use precise terminology to avoid ambiguity.
Key opinions
- RFC terminology: Experts frequently use terms like 821.From, 5321.From, 822.From, and 5322.From as shorthand for the envelope From and the header From, respectively.
- DKIM's role: DKIM is primarily about signing email data and resides in its own header, distinct from the From fields themselves. However, its verification is crucial for authenticating the visible From address through DMARC alignment. You can find out more on DKIM errors.
- MX record function: MX records are external to the email protocol/header distinction. They are DNS records that tell sending servers which server to connect to for delivering mail to a domain, a key part of email infrastructure.
- Importance of diagramming: Visual aids, like diagrams illustrating the anatomy of the "From" header, are highly useful for clarifying these complex relationships.
Key considerations
- Precise language: When discussing email delivery issues or configuration, using the specific RFC terms (e.g., RFC 5321.From vs. RFC 5322.From) helps avoid confusion and ensures accurate troubleshooting.
- Authentication deep dive: Understanding how From addresses interact with SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is fundamental for achieving strong email authentication.
- Role of DNS records: Correctly defining DNS records (like SPF and DKIM) on the sending domain is essential. This directly impacts how ISPs process incoming mail, affecting whether your emails land in the inbox or are sent to the spam or junk folder (or blocked entirely).
- Beyond the visible: While marketers focus on the visible From, experts highlight the critical, often hidden, roles of the envelope From and other headers in determining an email's fate. More on this at Spam Resource.
Expert view
Email expert from Email Geeks suggests that DKIM is part of the email data but is not directly related to any of the "From" fields or email addresses. It exists in its own dedicated header within the email structure.
Expert view
Email expert from Email Geeks explains that MX records largely exist outside the strict protocol or header distinction, as their primary function is to identify which server should be contacted to initiate the SMTP protocol for mail delivery. It defines the mail exchange servers for a domain.
What the documentation says
Official RFCs and technical documentation provide the foundational definitions for email addresses and their components. These sources detail the precise specifications that govern how email systems should handle different "From" fields, ensuring interoperability and security.
Key findings
- RFC 5321 (SMTP): This RFC defines the MAIL FROM command, which sets the "Envelope Sender" or "Return-Path" address. This address is used for bounces and SPF authentication.
- RFC 5322 (Internet Message Format): This RFC defines the "Header From" field, which is the From: address visible to the end-user in their email client. This is the primary field for DKIM and DMARC alignment checks. Learn more about RFC 5322.
- Email address components: Documentation typically breaks down an email address into a local-part (username) and a domain-part, separated by an '@' symbol.
- Authentication standards: Standards like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC (defined in other RFCs) rely heavily on these distinct "From" addresses to establish sender authenticity.
Key considerations
- Compliance with standards: Adhering to RFC specifications for "From" addresses and associated headers is fundamental for ensuring email deliverability across different mail servers and systems.
- Implications for bounces: Understanding that the RFC 5321.From (or Return-Path) is used for bounce responses is critical for proper email list hygiene and avoiding issues like email backscatter.
- Sender address vs. Reply-To: While the From field indicates the sender, documentation clearly outlines the distinct purpose of the Reply-To field for directing responses. See this article on email address characters for more.
- Header vs. envelope confusion: Documentation aims to clarify the difference between information found in the email header (like Header From) and information exchanged during the SMTP envelope process (like Envelope From), which is crucial for DMARC. Also check out DMARC tags.
Technical article
Documentation from one.com defines the parts of an email address: the username, followed by the @ symbol (at sign), and then the domain. The at sign serves to direct the email to a specific domain.
Technical article
Documentation from L-Soft's glossary includes a definition for 'Merge-purge,' which refers to the process of removing duplicate email addresses from a combined list that originated from two or more existing lists. This is vital for list hygiene.
Related resources
15 resources
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/4514164700_cba75ff94d_o-Horia-Varlan-or-at-sign-made-of-puzzle-pieces-on-white-background--56a28a7d3df78cf7727751ce.jpg)
.avif)
Related pages
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
What RFC 5322 Says vs. What Actually Works
How to set up DMARC, DKIM, and SPF for emails from a web server and manage bounce responses?
Should I authenticate email with my own domain or an ESP's domain?
Why your emails are getting a 'DMARC verification failed' error
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
Understanding and troubleshooting DMARC reports from Google and Yahoo
How to fix common DMARC issues in Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace
Do real reply-to email addresses improve deliverability and sender reputation?
What are the best email address validation workflows and tools?
