Summary
When standard email tracking is unreliable, especially with government emails, alternative strategies are necessary. Focusing on ensuring successful delivery and avoiding bounces/blocks through good list hygiene and authentication is key. Since engagement metrics might be irrelevant due to unique government rules and web traffic interception, prioritize getting emails to the inbox. Utilize direct replies, UTM parameters, and analyze transactional emails, SMTP error codes, domain/IP reputation (Google Postmaster Tools/Microsoft SNDS), and ARF reports. Implement feedback loops, webhooks, seed list testing, unique identifiers, server log analysis, and consider ABM strategies. Track preheader text interactions. Reconfirmation campaigns can help refine strategy. These methods enable proactive monitoring and issue identification, shifting focus from traditional metrics to successful delivery and inbox placement.
Key findings
- Focus on Delivery Success: Successful email delivery is paramount when traditional tracking methods are unreliable.
- List Hygiene & Authentication: Maintaining good list hygiene and employing strong authentication practices are crucial for preventing bounces and blocks.
- Engagement Metric Irrelevance: Traditional engagement metrics may not accurately reflect email performance due to specific government regulations and technical factors.
- Technical Analysis: Analyzing SMTP error codes, domain and IP reputation, and ARF reports provides valuable insights into delivery issues.
- Proactive Monitoring: Implementing feedback loops, webhooks, and seed list testing enables proactive monitoring and identification of deliverability problems.
- Alternative Engagement Indicators: Direct replies, UTM parameters, preheader text interactions, and ABM strategy performance offer alternative indicators of email engagement.
Key considerations
- Government-Specific Rules: Recognize and adapt to the unique email regulations and technical infrastructure of government entities.
- Technical Expertise: Requires technical expertise to interpret technical data such as SMTP error codes and reputation reports.
- Privacy Compliance: Ensure compliance with data privacy regulations when collecting and analyzing email event data and recipient information.
- Shifted Focus: Shift the focus from engagement to inbox placement.
- Holistic Approach: Employ a holistic approach by combining different alternative tracking mechanisms.
What email marketers say
12 marketer opinions
When traditional email tracking methods like open and click tracking are unreliable, particularly with government emails, alternative mechanisms become crucial. These include encouraging direct replies, using UTM parameters for analytics, analyzing transactional emails for bounce rates and delivery errors, and implementing feedback loops for spam complaints. Monitoring domain and IP reputation through tools like Google Postmaster Tools and Microsoft SNDS offers insights. Embedding unique identifiers and analyzing server logs provide delivery confirmation, while seed list testing measures inbox placement. Analyzing preheader text provides insights into rendering, and Account-Based Marketing (ABM) strategies can gauge engagement. A/B testing and reconfirmation campaigns help refine strategies based on response. Focusing on successful delivery is key, along with list hygiene and authentication.
Key opinions
- Direct Replies: Encouraging recipients to directly reply provides a reliable engagement metric, bypassing the need for open and click tracking.
- UTM Parameters: UTM parameters track traffic and conversions in analytics platforms, providing insights even with limited open and click tracking.
- Transactional Analysis: Analyzing transactional emails helps identify deliverability issues through bounce rates and delivery errors.
- Feedback Loops: Feedback loops offer data on recipient complaints and spam reports, providing insights into how emails are being received.
- Reputation Monitoring: Monitoring domain and IP reputation helps identify deliverability problems and spam issues.
- Delivery Confirmation: Embedding unique identifiers and analyzing server logs provide confirmation of email delivery, even without open/click data.
- Inbox Placement: Seed list testing measures inbox placement rates, helping determine if emails are landing in the inbox or spam folder.
- ABM Strategy: Adopting Account-Based Marketing strategies gives insights into whether the messages are being delivered and read.
- A/B Testing and Reconfirmation: A/B testing subject lines and reconfirmation campaigns allow improvement of future emails and delivery rates.
- Ensure Successful Delivery: The most important factor in environments where data is unreliable is ensuring the emails actually reach their intended destination.
Key considerations
- List Hygiene: Maintaining a clean and up-to-date email list is essential for deliverability, especially when other tracking methods are limited.
- Authentication: Implementing proper email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is crucial for improving deliverability and sender reputation.
- Content Relevance: Ensuring email content is relevant and valuable to recipients can encourage engagement, such as direct replies, even without tracking opens and clicks.
- Compliance: Adhering to email marketing regulations (e.g., GDPR, CAN-SPAM) is vital for maintaining a positive sender reputation and avoiding deliverability issues.
- Regular Monitoring: Consistently monitoring feedback loops, domain reputation, and server logs is important for identifying and addressing deliverability problems promptly.
- Recipient Engagement: The emails should be tailored to the correct recipients to ensure that the emails are engaged with and not simply ignored or sent to spam.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Reddit explains that incentivizing recipients to reply directly to emails can provide a reliable engagement metric. Asking a question or requesting feedback encourages replies, which bypasses the need for open and click tracking.
8 Mar 2022 - Reddit
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that replies and clicks are reliable engagement metrics and suggests encouraging replies or providing a tracked link for a free item, while tracking the link server-side.
11 Feb 2023 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
3 expert opinions
When standard email tracking is unreliable, especially with government emails, different strategies are needed. Experts recommend focusing on ensuring successful delivery and avoiding bounces and blocks. This includes good list hygiene and authentication practices. Since engagement metrics may not be relevant for government emails due to different rules and web traffic interception, the primary goal should be to get the email to the inbox. Using methods such as feedback loops and seed email addresses can help monitor whether emails reach the target destination.
Key opinions
- Focus on Delivery: Successful delivery is the primary goal when standard email tracking is unreliable.
- List Hygiene & Authentication: Good list hygiene and authentication practices are crucial for avoiding bounces and blocks.
- Engagement Irrelevance: Engagement metrics may not be relevant for government emails due to web traffic interception and different rules.
- Feedback Loops & Seed Lists: Feedback loops and seed email addresses can help monitor if emails reach the target destination.
Key considerations
- Government-Specific Rules: Understand and adapt to the unique email rules and practices that apply to government entities.
- Bypass Engagement Focus: Shift focus from traditional engagement metrics to ensuring successful email delivery.
- Proactive Monitoring: Implement proactive monitoring using feedback loops and seed lists to identify deliverability issues.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains that when dealing with environments where tracking is unreliable, focusing on ensuring successful delivery (e.g., avoiding bounces and blocks) is crucial. This involves careful list hygiene and authentication practices rather than relying on open/click data.
26 Oct 2022 - Word to the Wise
Expert view
Expert from Spamresource explains that in environments where open and click tracking is unreliable (such as government emails), it is important to ensure messages are delivered and are not being classified as spam. If your message does not hit the inbox, it does not matter how interesting the content of that email may be. This can be done with the analysis of feedback loops and using seed email addresses to monitor if your email is reaching the target destination.
4 Aug 2022 - Spamresource
What the documentation says
5 technical articles
When traditional email tracking is unreliable, analyzing technical data becomes essential for understanding deliverability issues. SMTP error codes provide specific reasons for delivery failures. Google Postmaster Tools and Microsoft SNDS offer insights into domain and IP reputation, respectively. Webhooks enable real-time tracking of email events, and Abuse Reporting Format (ARF) reports provide standardized feedback on email abuse, all offering alternatives to open and click tracking.
Key findings
- SMTP Error Codes: Analyzing SMTP error codes helps identify blocked domains, spam filters, and other delivery problems.
- Domain Reputation (Google): Google Postmaster Tools provides data on domain reputation, indicating if emails are marked as spam or encounter delivery problems.
- IP Reputation (Microsoft): Microsoft SNDS allows monitoring the reputation of sending IP addresses for deliverability issues specific to Microsoft domains.
- Webhooks for Event Tracking: Webhooks provide real-time data on email events (delivery, bounces, complaints) for indirect engagement monitoring.
- Abuse Reporting Format (ARF): ARF reports offer standardized feedback about email abuse, indicating deliverability or spam issues.
Key considerations
- Technical Expertise: Requires technical expertise to interpret SMTP error codes, webhooks, and analyze reputation data effectively.
- Proactive Monitoring: Proactive monitoring of reputation, error codes, and ARF reports is crucial for identifying and addressing deliverability issues promptly.
- Integration: Webhooks require integration with your email infrastructure to receive real-time event data.
- Data Privacy: Ensure compliance with data privacy regulations when collecting and analyzing email event data and reputation information.
Technical article
Documentation from IETF explains that the Abuse Reporting Format (ARF) as defined in RFC 6522 facilitates standardized feedback about email abuse. Receiving ARF reports can indicate deliverability or spam issues, allowing you to identify and address problems without relying on open/click data.
4 Sep 2022 - IETF
Technical article
Documentation from SparkPost shares that utilizing webhooks for tracking email events (delivery, bounces, spam complaints) can give insight into deliverability when open and click tracking is unreliable. Webhooks provide real-time data pushed to your server, enabling you to monitor engagement indirectly.
3 Oct 2022 - SparkPost
Besides Spamhaus, what blocklists are important for email marketers to monitor?
How accurate are email spam testing tools and what are the alternatives?
How accurate are seed lists for email deliverability testing?
How can I accurately test and measure email deliverability and sender reputation?
How do Mail Privacy Protection (MPP) and Intelligent Tracking Prevention (ITP) affect click tracking in email marketing?
