Evaluating an ESP for deliverability before setup involves a multi-faceted approach, encompassing technical, investigational, and practical steps. Initial deliverability issues are often intrinsic to the sender's mail flow, content quality, and overall email program setup; new ESPs won't automatically fix bad practices. Inquire about the ESP's customer base, technical features (particularly custom domains for images, click tracking, DKIM signing to isolate reputation), enforcement policies, and onboarding process, assessing whether your email program is a good fit. Sender authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is paramount, and testing that the ESP is set up to authenticate mail correctly is critical. Actively monitor the ESP's sender reputation through IP ranges, domain reputation, and blacklist checks. Implement practical testing strategies, including free trials to test deliverability across different email providers, focusing on real user addresses rather than solely seed lists, and analyzing content against spam filters. Engaging with ESP deliverability support, warming up IP addresses, and checking for ISP feedback loops are also important steps. Finally, monitoring reputation via tools like Google Postmaster Tools and Microsoft SNDS, and understanding whether the ESP offers dedicated IP addresses are vital for ongoing management.
12 marketer opinions
Evaluating an Email Service Provider (ESP) for deliverability before fully committing involves assessing various factors. These include the level of support provided, the opportunity to meet with deliverability experts, and understanding that ESPs generally have similar deliverability rates. Before migrating, warming up the IP address and focusing on proper email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) are critical. Checking the ESP's sender reputation through blacklist checks and monitoring IP address ranges is also essential. Utilizing free trials to test deliverability across different email providers, researching customer reviews, testing with real email addresses instead of solely relying on seed lists, and evaluating content against spam filters are all valuable steps. Understanding if the ESP offers feedback loops and dedicated IP addresses are also important considerations.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks suggests requesting a meeting with the ESP's deliverability support leader to ask detailed questions about reputation management, shared vs. dedicated IPs, service level options, ISP communication, and recommendations for your specific program.
18 Oct 2021 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Mailjet shares that before fully migrating to a new ESP, it's important to warm up your IP address by gradually increasing sending volume to build a positive reputation with ISPs. Start with your most engaged subscribers.
29 Oct 2023 - Mailjet
5 expert opinions
Evaluating an ESP for deliverability involves several crucial steps. Primarily, focus on factors within your control, as delivery issues often stem from mail flow, content, and email program quality. Investigating the ESP's practices, asking about their clients, technical features, enforcement policies, and onboarding process, is essential. Prioritize whether your email program will thrive on their platform. Custom domain usage for images, click tracking, and DKIM signing can help isolate your reputation. Thorough deliverability testing beyond seed lists, evaluating authentication, content, and overall setup, is necessary, even if it requires a paid service. Ensuring the ESP uses proper sender authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is a fundamental aspect of pre-emptive deliverability assessment.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains that doing a thorough deliverability test with a new ESP is crucial. This includes more than just seedlists, and that you should evaluate authentication, content and overall setup. This may be a paid service but is worthwhile.
31 Jul 2023 - Word to the Wise
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that ensuring the ESP uses proper sender authentication protocols such as SPF, DKIM and DMARC is the first and crucial step in evaluating them for deliverability. These ensure that the sent emails are properly authenticated and are less likely to be flagged as spam.
3 Jun 2022 - Spam Resource
5 technical articles
Evaluating an ESP for deliverability involves understanding and implementing key email authentication protocols and monitoring tools. SPF records authorize mail servers to send email on behalf of a domain, preventing spoofing. DMARC builds upon SPF and DKIM to provide a policy framework for handling authentication failures. DKIM uses cryptographic signatures to verify the domain and message integrity. Google Postmaster Tools and Microsoft SNDS allow monitoring sending reputation with Gmail and Microsoft services respectively, enabling identification and correction of deliverability issues.
Technical article
Documentation from Google Postmaster Tools explains that it allows domain owners to monitor their sending reputation with Gmail. By analyzing the data provided, you can identify deliverability issues and take corrective actions to improve your sender reputation.
24 Dec 2022 - Google Postmaster Tools
Technical article
Documentation from DKIM shares that DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) is an email authentication system designed to verify the DNS domain of an email sender and the integrity of the message. It uses cryptographic signatures to provide assurance that the email was not altered in transit.
14 Oct 2023 - DKIM
Are auto warming/deliverability improvement services for email marketing sketchy?
How can I assess deliverability health for prospective email marketing clients?
How do ESPs manage internal vs client deliverability responsibilities?
How do ESPs manage IP pools and how does it affect deliverability?
What are the benefits and costs of email certifications like CSA, Signal Spam, and M3AAWG for ESPs?
What steps should I take when changing my domain name for email marketing?