Summary
Evaluating your sender score is a critical step in understanding and improving your email inbox placement. While a single sender score might not provide the complete picture, it serves as a valuable baseline metric. A comprehensive evaluation involves looking beyond a singular score to encompass various deliverability factors, including engagement, authentication, and overall sending practices. This holistic approach helps you identify areas for improvement and maintain a positive reputation with internet service providers (ISPs).
Key findings
- Baseline metric: Sender score can act as an initial indicator of your email reputation, helping to track general trends.
- Holistic view: While useful, sender score alone does not guarantee inbox placement, as many other factors contribute to deliverability.
- Limitations: Proprietary nature and individual user filtering can limit the accuracy of sender score as a sole measure of inbox delivery.
- Domain reputation: Focusing on your overall domain reputation and authenticated sending (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is often more impactful for consistent inboxing.
- Engagement metrics: Real-world engagement, such as opens, clicks, and complaint rates, offers a more accurate reflection of deliverability.
Key considerations
- Multi-metric approach: Combine sender score with other metrics like bounce rates, unsubscribe rates, and spam complaint rates for a clearer picture.
- Consistent monitoring: Regularly monitor your sender score and associated metrics to detect trends and address issues proactively. For instance, a dropping sender score can indicate underlying problems.
- Authentication protocols: Ensure your emails are properly authenticated with SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records to build trust with ISPs. Resources like SenderScore.org can help check basic reputation.
- List hygiene: Maintain a clean and engaged email list to minimize bounces and complaints, which directly impact your sending reputation. This is crucial for overall email deliverability.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often approach sender score with a blend of acceptance and skepticism. While many acknowledge its role as a basic indicator, they also recognize its limitations in providing a complete picture of inbox placement. The consensus leans towards a multi-faceted approach, prioritizing actionable metrics like engagement rates and list health over a single, proprietary score.
Key opinions
- Mixed utility: Some marketers find sender score helpful for identifying issues and seeing positive results when improved, especially for initial diagnostics.
- Limited scope: Many marketers emphasize that a high sender score does not automatically translate to perfect inbox delivery across all providers.
- Actionable metrics focus: The preference is for metrics like open rates, click-through rates, bounce rates, and unsubscribe rates, which directly reflect subscriber engagement and deliverability.
- Baseline for trends: While not perfect, using sender score as a trending metric over time can provide useful feedback on reputation changes.
Key considerations
- Beyond the score: Do not rely solely on sender score; instead, integrate it into a broader deliverability monitoring strategy that includes user engagement. This is key to improving overall email reputation and deliverability.
- Adjust sending routine: Implement basic deliverability best practices, as these adjustments can lead to positive results that may be reflected in your sender score and actual inbox placement.
- Inbox testing: While useful, understand that inbox testing tools may not fully capture individual user delivery patterns or Bayesian filtering effects. More information on this can be found at Mailgun's guide to sender reputation.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks indicates that they use sender score tools to establish a baseline for evaluating fluctuations in inbox placement. This helps them monitor general trends in their email performance over time. Having a quantifiable score provides a starting point for assessing the effectiveness of their deliverability efforts.This marketer finds that the sender score, when used in conjunction with other metrics, correlates well with their deliverability. It helps pinpoint specific issues that need addressing. Therefore, despite its limitations, it proves to be a valuable diagnostic tool.
Marketer view
Marketer from Mailmodo notes that sender score quantifies a sender's reputation by assessing sending practices, recipient engagement, and spam reports. This evaluation is critical for understanding why emails might not be reaching the inbox. A strong sender score is often seen as a prerequisite for good deliverability.They emphasize that continually monitoring and improving this score can lead to better inbox placement. It acts as a comprehensive indicator, guiding marketers on areas such as list hygiene and content relevance to avoid spam folders.
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts generally view sender score as one piece of a much larger puzzle, often cautioning against over-reliance on it. While they acknowledge its use as a trending metric, they consistently advocate for a deeper dive into domain reputation, engagement metrics, and the nuances of individual ISP filtering. The consensus among experts is that true inbox placement requires a holistic and ongoing strategy, adapting to the complex and evolving landscape of email filtering.
Key opinions
- Not sufficient: Experts often state that a high sender score does not directly equate to high inbox placement, citing instances where high scores exist alongside low inboxing rates.
- Complex filtering: ISPs use complex, often individual-level, filtering mechanisms and Bayesian learning, which are not fully captured by general sender scores or typical inbox testing services.
- Domain reputation matters more: Many experts prioritize domain reputation as a more significant factor influencing deliverability than a singular sender score.
- Spam causation: Spam arrives in inboxes due to the imperfect nature of filtering systems, not because spammers consistently achieve high sender scores.
Key considerations
- Focus on engagement: Prioritize metrics reflecting user response, such as revenue generated, pixel loads, and direct feedback, as these are more indicative of real-world inbox placement. For more on this, read our guide on improving inbox placement with segmentation.
- Trend analysis: Use sender score as a tool to observe trends over time rather than a definitive snapshot. A dropping score may warrant further investigation to troubleshoot potential issues.
- Understanding ISP behavior: Acknowledge that each ISP has unique filtering algorithms. A high sender score might not prevent blocklisting by specific providers like Mail.ru or Microsoft if other internal factors are triggered. John Levine on Spam Resource often discusses such complexities.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks notes that Sender Score is a proprietary measurement and suggests checking the Validity website for related information. This highlights that while sender score is widely referenced, its precise calculation and factors are often opaque, controlled by its developer.They imply that relying solely on this single metric might be insufficient due to its proprietary nature. Instead, a broader understanding of email reputation and deliverability principles is necessary.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise cautions that a sender score may not fully reflect inbox delivery for an entire recipient base. This is due to individual-level delivery decisions made by webmail and other providers. These systems often deliver mail to the inbox for some users while sending it to the spam folder for others, based on personalized engagement patterns.They also point out that inbox testing services typically lack normal user patterns, leading to potential inaccuracies. Additionally, individual user filters and Bayesian learning engines, like those in Apple Mail, further complicate a universal inbox delivery assessment.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and research often highlight sender score as one of many reputation metrics. They typically emphasize a blend of technical compliance (like authentication), sending behavior (volume, consistency), and recipient engagement as the core pillars of email deliverability. While specific scores are useful for internal trending, the broader message is about adhering to best practices and understanding the underlying factors that contribute to a healthy sender reputation, which ultimately drives inbox placement.
Key findings
- Comprehensive evaluation: Sender score is part of a larger assessment that includes factors like IP reputation, domain reputation, authentication, and user engagement.
- Authentication importance: Protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are fundamental for verifying sender identity and preventing spoofing, directly impacting reputation and deliverability.
- Engagement signals: Positive recipient interactions (opens, clicks, replies) and low negative feedback (spam complaints, unsubscribes, bounces) are critical signals for ISPs.
- List quality: Maintaining a clean email list by removing invalid or unengaged addresses is paramount to preventing bounce rates and complaints.
Key considerations
- Monitor diverse metrics: Regularly track a range of deliverability metrics from your email service provider (ESP) and ISP postmaster tools for comprehensive insights.
- Adhere to best practices: Implement and consistently follow email sending best practices, which are the foundation of a good sender reputation. This includes things like managing blocklist (blacklist) status.
- Optimize content: Design emails that encourage positive engagement and avoid elements commonly flagged by spam filters. Consult guides like Mailgun's on inbox placement.
- Feedback loops: Utilize feedback loops (FBLs) from major ISPs to quickly identify and address high complaint rates, which severely impact reputation. Resolving deliverability issues often starts here.
Technical article
Documentation from Sender Score states that it assesses an email program's performance and highlights areas for improvement. This indicates its role as a diagnostic tool, providing senders with a general idea of their standing in the email ecosystem.It implies that the score is a starting point for deliverability optimization, guiding senders to investigate deeper into factors that could be affecting their email delivery. It also suggests checking for blocklist presence and list validity.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailgun explains that a good sender reputation signals positive sending habits to email providers. This reputation is crucial for achieving high inbox placement rates.It emphasizes that sender reputation is a composite score, influenced by factors such as bounce rates, spam complaints, and recipient engagement. Therefore, maintaining a healthy reputation requires consistent effort across multiple facets of email marketing.
Related resources
13 resources
Related pages
What factors influence email deliverability and how does SenderScore work?
How to interpret and use email sender reputation scores effectively, especially for low volume senders?
How to improve email inbox placement with sending priority and audience segmentation?
How to troubleshoot and address a dropping email sender score?
What are the best tools for inbox placement testing?
Why has my sender score dropped and what can I do about it?
How can I improve my email reputation and deliverability?
How relevant is sender score to email deliverability?
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
An in-depth guide to email blocklists
