Summary
Spam reports significantly harm email domain reputation and deliverability. ISPs use spam complaints as a critical signal for evaluating email program quality, directly impacting sender reputation and leading to filtering into spam folders, blacklisting, or complete blocking. AI systems may analyze images and links, associating their reputation with seemingly clean domains. Maintaining a low spam rate, monitoring complaint rates, and utilizing feedback loops are crucial for understanding and addressing issues. Low engagement combined with high complaints severely damages sender reputation, as ISPs prioritize engagement metrics. Proper authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) contributes indirectly, while proactive measures and high-quality content are essential for mitigating negative impacts and maintaining service quality.
Key findings
- Direct Negative Impact: Spam complaints directly and negatively impact sender reputation and deliverability.
- ISPs Use Complaints as Signal: ISPs heavily weigh spam complaints as a critical indicator of email program quality.
- AI Content Analysis: AI systems analyze content (images, links), impacting reputation even for seemingly clean domains.
- Importance of Feedback Loops: Feedback loops (FBLs) are crucial for receiving direct ISP feedback about spam complaints.
- Low Engagement Amplifies Damage: Low email engagement coupled with high spam complaints severely damages sender reputation.
- Authentication Matters: Proper authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) helps improve sender reputation and deliverability.
- Spam Rate Thresholds: Google recommends spam rates stay below 0.1%, avoiding rates exceeding 0.3%.
Key considerations
- Monitor Complaint Rates: Actively monitor spam complaint rates to identify deliverability problems early.
- Implement Feedback Loops: Set up and use feedback loops to understand specific reasons for spam complaints.
- Improve Engagement: Focus on improving email engagement metrics to signal email quality and relevance to ISPs.
- Review Content Regularly: Regularly review email content (images, links) to ensure high quality and avoid spam triggers.
- Implement Authentication: Configure SPF, DKIM, and DMARC for email authentication to improve deliverability.
- Practice List Hygiene: Regularly clean email lists by removing unengaged subscribers to reduce spam complaints.
- Proactive Action: Take proactive measures to address spam complaints and maintain a positive sender reputation.
What email marketers say
8 marketer opinions
Spam reports significantly harm email domain reputation and deliverability. High complaint rates signal to ISPs that email practices are undesirable, potentially leading to filtering into spam folders, blacklisting, or complete blocking. AI systems may assign reputation scores to images and links, impacting seemingly clean domains. Monitoring and addressing spam complaints is crucial, often involving feedback loops to understand and resolve issues. Low engagement combined with high complaints severely damages sender reputation, as ISPs use engagement as a quality indicator.
Key opinions
- Direct Impact: Spam complaints directly and negatively impact sender reputation with ISPs.
- AI Analysis: AI systems can analyze images and links within emails, associating their reputation with the sender's domain.
- Engagement Matters: Low email engagement coupled with high spam complaint rates severely damages sender reputation.
- Feedback Loops: Utilizing feedback loops (FBLs) is a key method for monitoring and addressing spam complaints by receiving data directly from ISPs.
- Blacklisting Risk: A high volume of spam complaints can lead to blacklisting, significantly hindering deliverability.
Key considerations
- Monitor Complaints: Actively monitor spam complaint rates to identify deliverability problems early.
- Implement FBLs: Set up and use feedback loops to understand the specific reasons for spam complaints.
- Engagement Strategy: Focus on improving email engagement metrics to signal email quality and relevance to ISPs.
- Content Review: Regularly review email content, including images and links, to ensure they are not associated with spam or low-quality content.
- Proactive Action: Take proactive measures to address spam complaints and maintain a positive sender reputation.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Litmus explains that low engagement combined with high spam complaint rates will severely damage sender reputation and deliverability. ISPs use engagement metrics as an indicator of email quality and relevance.
10 Nov 2022 - Litmus
Marketer view
Email marketer from Reddit explains that if a large number of recipients mark your emails as spam, it can lead to blacklisting, which significantly impacts deliverability. Getting off a blacklist can be a difficult process.
28 Oct 2022 - Reddit
What the experts say
4 expert opinions
Spam reports significantly impact email deliverability by damaging the reputation of both the mail stream and its content. ISPs use spam complaints as a critical indicator of email program quality; high rates signal unwanted content and lead to inbox deliverability issues. While ISPs report reputation for the configured domain, they also use internal measurements for delivery decisions. Setting up and monitoring feedback loops (FBLs) is essential for understanding and addressing spam complaints.
Key opinions
- Reputation Damage: Spam reports damage the reputation of both the mail stream and the email content itself.
- Critical Signal: ISPs view spam complaints as a crucial signal regarding the quality and desirability of an email program.
- Domain Reputation: ISPs report on domain reputation, which directly impacts deliverability.
- Internal Metrics: ISPs use internal, non-public reputation metrics for delivery decisions.
- Feedback Loops (FBLs): Feedback loops are essential for receiving direct feedback from ISPs about spam complaints.
Key considerations
- Content Quality: Ensure email content is high-quality and relevant to avoid spam complaints.
- Implement FBLs: Set up and actively monitor feedback loops to identify and address deliverability issues.
- Monitor Reputation: Monitor domain reputation and be aware of potential internal metrics used by ISPs.
- Authentication: Implement proper email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) to improve sender reputation.
- Data hygiene: Practice good email list hygiene by regularly removing unengaged users.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise responds that setting up and actively monitoring feedback loops (FBLs) is crucial for understanding the impact of spam complaints. FBLs provide direct information from ISPs about recipients marking your email as spam, allowing you to identify and address deliverability problems.
17 Aug 2022 - Word to the Wise
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that spam complaints are a critical signal to ISPs about the quality of your email program. A high complaint rate indicates that recipients do not want your email, leading to decreased deliverability to the inbox.
26 Dec 2021 - Spam Resource
What the documentation says
5 technical articles
Spam complaints are a critical factor influencing email domain reputation and deliverability, as highlighted in various documentation sources. Google Postmaster Tools advises keeping spam rates below 0.10% and avoiding exceeding 0.30%. Microsoft echoes this, emphasizing the negative impact of high complaint rates and the need for monitoring. While SPF aids authentication, it indirectly boosts deliverability. SparkPost notes that spam complaints directly determine sender reputation and email placement (blocking or spam filtering). AWS SES indicates that complaints from their feedback loop lead to account review or suspension, safeguarding service quality.
Key findings
- Spam Rate Thresholds: Google recommends keeping spam rates below 0.10%, avoiding exceeding 0.30%.
- Negative Impact: Microsoft confirms high spam complaint rates negatively affect sender reputation and deliverability.
- Indirect Benefit of SPF: SPF indirectly aids deliverability through improved authentication practices.
- Direct Influence: SparkPost emphasizes that spam complaints directly influence sender reputation and email placement.
- Account Impact: AWS SES outlines that spam complaints can lead to account review or suspension.
Key considerations
- Monitor Rates: Continuously monitor spam complaint rates to identify potential issues.
- Take Action: Take corrective action when complaint rates exceed acceptable levels.
- Authentication: Ensure proper email authentication practices, including SPF, DKIM and DMARC, are in place.
- Content Quality: Maintain high email content quality and relevance to minimize complaints.
- Use FBLs: Implement and monitor feedback loops (FBLs) to address user spam complaints.
Technical article
Documentation from RFC Editor specifies that while SPF doesn't directly address spam complaints, it aids in authentication, which indirectly affects deliverability. Proper authentication practices contribute to a positive sender reputation.
5 Jul 2024 - RFC Editor
Technical article
Documentation from Google Postmaster Tools specifies that senders should keep the spam rate below 0.10% and avoid ever reaching a rate of 0.30% or higher. If users are marking a sender's messages as spam, deliverability issues are likely.
11 Sep 2024 - Google
Are abuse reports and feedback loops (FBLs) still useful in email marketing, and how do they work with different email clients?
Are spam complaint rates siloed by provider affecting deliverability?
Do ISPs differentiate between single and bulk spam reports when evaluating email sender reputation?
How can I accurately monitor complaint rates for email marketing using Google Postmaster Tools, Yahoo FBL, and my ESP?
How can spam complaints and bad content choices impact email deliverability?
How do DMARC, spam complaints, and IP reputation affect email deliverability and rejections?
