Suped

How do I identify and handle spam bot clicks in email reporting and how can they affect deliverability?

Michael Ko profile picture
Michael Ko
Co-founder & CEO, Suped
Published 15 Aug 2025
Updated 17 Aug 2025
8 min read
Email reporting can sometimes feel like a puzzle, especially when you encounter unusual click patterns that don't seem to originate from human interaction. I've often seen instances where a single email address, even from major providers like Gmail, registers dozens of clicks on a specific link, like a company logo in the footer. This behavior raises a critical question: Is this a legitimate, albeit hyper-engaged, recipient, or is it a spam bot inflating our metrics and potentially impacting our deliverability?
The challenge lies in distinguishing between genuine engagement and automated activity, particularly when the email address appears to belong to a real person. We hesitate to remove these contacts, fearing we might lose a valuable customer, yet the concern about how these artificial clicks affect our sender reputation and inbox placement is very real. Understanding how to identify these suspicious bot clicks in email reporting is essential for accurate analytics and maintaining strong email deliverability.
Ignoring these anomalies can lead to skewed performance data, making it difficult to assess the true effectiveness of your campaigns. More importantly, it can inadvertently trigger engagement-based automations, sending more emails to non-human entities, which can ultimately harm your sender reputation. Let's explore how these bot clicks manifest, their impact, and strategies for managing them effectively.

The nature of bot clicks and their impact

Bot clicks are automated interactions with your email links, often performed by security scanners, privacy tools, or even malicious spam bots. These programs are designed to check links for viruses, phishing attempts, or to confirm the validity of an email address. They operate differently from human users, and their activity can significantly distort your email metrics.
The primary concern with these artificial clicks is their impact on your reporting. When a significant portion of your recorded clicks comes from bots, your engagement rates appear higher than they truly are. This inflated data can lead to poor decision-making regarding campaign optimization, audience segmentation, and overall email strategy. It becomes difficult to discern what content genuinely resonates with your human audience when your metrics are skewed.
From a deliverability perspective, direct harm from bot clicks alone is usually minimal unless the bots encounter problematic content on the linked pages. However, the indirect impact can be substantial. If your email service provider (ESP) or marketing automation platform triggers follow-up emails based on click activity, bots can unwittingly enroll themselves into engagement flows, leading to an increase in sends to non-human recipients. This false positive engagement can then negatively affect your sender reputation over time, as it signals that you're sending to an audience that isn't truly engaged. It’s a subtle but significant risk for your overall email program.

Identifying bot click behavior

Identifying bot clicks requires a closer look at your email data beyond simple click counts. I've found several patterns and data points that help in distinguishing automated activity from genuine human interaction. The key is to look for inconsistencies that deviate from typical user behavior.
  1. Click spikes and timing: One of the most telling signs is a large number of clicks occurring almost instantaneously after the email is sent or very close to the open time. Bots often scan emails immediately upon receipt, sometimes even before a human recipient has a chance to open it.
  2. Excessive clicks on a single link: As I've observed, bots frequently click the same link multiple times, often a default element like a logo or an unsubscribe link, rather than navigating through different content. This pattern is highly unusual for human interaction.
  3. User-agent strings and IP addresses: Analyzing user-agent data can reveal whether the click originated from a standard browser or a known bot program. Similarly, IP addresses associated with data centers or cloud providers are strong indicators of automated activity, as opposed to residential or mobile IPs. You might need to request this raw data from your ESP.
  4. Lack of further engagement: A bot click often isn't followed by any further engagement on your website, such as page views, form submissions, or purchases. A human click, on the other hand, typically leads to more activity.
It's important to remember that bot clicks and human engagement are not mutually exclusive. A real person might have their emails scanned by a security filter before they even see it, leading to a bot click followed by a legitimate human click later on. This is where the analysis becomes tricky, and why solely relying on click data can be misleading. For more details on identifying email bot activity, refer to resources on identifying bot clicks.

Indicator

Bot Behavior

Human Behavior

Click Timing
Immediate (seconds after send or before open)
Varied (minutes, hours, days after open)
Click Frequency
Multiple, excessive clicks on one specific link
Moderate, distributed clicks across several links
User Agent
Non-standard, data center, security scanner
Common browsers, mobile devices, OS combinations
Follow-up Activity
None or limited beyond the initial click
Further engagement on linked website (pages, forms)

Mitigating the effects and maintaining deliverability

Once you've identified suspected bot clicks, the next step is to handle them in a way that preserves data accuracy and protects your deliverability. You can't always eliminate them entirely, but you can manage their impact.
Many email marketing platforms now offer built-in bot filtering features. These tools are designed to detect and filter out non-human interactions (NHI) from your reports, giving you a cleaner view of actual subscriber engagement. If your ESP provides this, enable it. If not, consider requesting raw data so you can perform your own analysis, looking at factors like user-agent strings and IP addresses. For more on protecting your email metrics, consider consulting external resources.

Best practices for data accuracy

  1. Segment your audience: Isolate segments of your audience that exhibit suspicious click behavior. This allows you to monitor them more closely and prevent them from skewing overall engagement rates. Learn more about detecting and segmenting bot clicks.
  2. Refine engagement definitions: Don't rely solely on clicks for engagement. Incorporate other metrics like website visits, purchases, or form fills to build a more comprehensive picture of true subscriber interest. This helps you to avoid false data.
  3. Implement honeypots (for new sign-ups): While not directly for email clicks, honeypots on your signup forms can deter bots from joining your list in the first place, reducing the pool of addresses that might generate bot clicks down the line. Consider how honeypots effectively filter bot clicks.
For individual cases where a legitimate customer seems to have bot-like click behavior, I advise against immediately removing them from your list. Instead, try to understand the nature of the clicks. Could it be a shared mailbox where multiple people are checking the email, or perhaps a security system scanning on behalf of a large organization? In these situations, direct outreach can sometimes clarify the situation, but often, it's just a phenomenon you learn to account for in your reporting.

Protecting your email data

Navigating the landscape of email bot clicks is a continuous process of observation and adaptation. While they present challenges to accurate reporting, understanding their nature and implementing strategic countermeasures can help preserve the integrity of your email marketing data. The goal is not always to eliminate every single bot click, but to accurately measure and respond to the genuine engagement from your audience. This helps in maintaining a healthy email ecosystem.
Focusing on user-agent strings, IP addresses, click patterns, and the context of subsequent website activity offers the clearest path to identifying these automated interactions. By doing so, you can filter out the noise and gain a more realistic view of your email performance. This clear insight allows for more informed decisions that truly drive results.
Ultimately, the presence of bot clicks means a heightened need for robust analytics and proactive data management. It underscores the importance of not just sending emails, but meticulously understanding how they are interacted with. By doing this, you safeguard your sender reputation and ensure your messages reach the inboxes of actual, engaged subscribers.

Views from the trenches

Best practices
Actively filter bot clicks from reports to gain accurate engagement insights.
Analyze click patterns and user-agent data to distinguish bots from human behavior.
Use a multi-metric approach, not just clicks, to assess subscriber engagement.
Prioritize sending emails to subscribers who have explicitly opted in for communication.
Common pitfalls
Solely relying on click rates as the primary engagement metric.
Ignoring inflated click data and making decisions based on inaccurate reports.
Removing legitimate subscribers due to suspected bot activity without further investigation.
Failing to adapt marketing automations to account for bot-generated engagement.
Expert tips
Implement a 'view in browser' link as the first link in your email to potentially capture bot clicks.
Request raw click data from your email service provider for deeper analysis of user-agents and IPs.
Recognize that some bot clicks are from legitimate security filters, which may also include real human clicks.
Understand that sometimes you just have to account for bot clicks, especially if they are legitimate customers.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks says that bot clicks and human engagement are not mutually exclusive, so avoid removing addresses unless all activity points to a bot. It's best to fingerprint bot clicks, timing, user agents, and IPs to filter specific events.
2023-08-24 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks says that security filters often follow links, sometimes randomly, and sometimes in response to something in the message.
2023-08-24 - Email Geeks

Frequently asked questions

DMARC monitoring

Start monitoring your DMARC reports today

Suped DMARC platform dashboard

What you'll get with Suped

Real-time DMARC report monitoring and analysis
Automated alerts for authentication failures
Clear recommendations to improve email deliverability
Protection against phishing and domain spoofing