Why am I seeing temporary server errors on 0365 for specific subnets?
Michael Ko
Co-founder & CEO, Suped
Published 16 Jun 2025
Updated 16 Aug 2025
10 min read
Encountering Temporary server error. Please try again later ATTR3 messages when sending emails to Microsoft 365 (O365) recipients can be incredibly frustrating, especially when it's specific to certain sending subnets. What's even more perplexing is when Microsoft support indicates there’s no active block on your IPs. This scenario suggests a deeper, more nuanced issue than a simple temporary hiccup, particularly if these errors persist for weeks or even months. It means messages are stuck in transit, failing to deliver despite retries, pointing to a persistent underlying problem.
When you encounter these messages, your mail transfer agent (MTA) might try to retry sending the email for an extended period, perhaps 24 hours or more, before finally giving up. If emails from other subnets deliver successfully to the same O365 recipients, it strongly suggests the problem is tied to the specific subnet that's experiencing the failures.
Understanding the
The 451 4.4.4 Temporary server error. Please try again later ATTR3 message is a deferred delivery status notification (DSN), meaning the receiving server is temporarily unable to accept the message. In typical cases, this is indeed temporary, caused by high traffic, server load, or minor network glitches. However, when these errors become a long-term pattern, they are no longer truly temporary and point to a persistent underlying issue with your sending infrastructure or the way Outlook.com's (Office 365) servers are perceiving connections from your specific subnet. Microsoft's own documentation on temporary server issues often refers to client-side activation problems, not mail flow, further highlighting the specific nature of your problem.
The key detail here is the specificity to a sending subnet. This isolates the problem to the originating network segment, strongly implicating factors like IP reputation, network configuration, or subtle server-side blockages that aren't explicitly declared as such. When a receiving server denies a connection or defers delivery for a specific IP address or range, it's often a signal of perceived malicious activity or a poor sending reputation. It's akin to Microsoft temporarily rate limiting emails or throttling connections based on their internal assessment, even if it's not a full blacklist (blocklist) entry.
This issue is distinct from general server outages where all or most emails to O365 might fail, or common client-side errors like incorrect date/time or firewall conflicts that affect individual users, as discussed in troubleshooting Outlook's temporary server issues. Your problem specifically points to how O365 views the mail-sending behavior originating from that particular subnet.
Deep diving into SMTP conversation and error codes
To truly understand why these temporary server errors occur, examining the full SMTP conversation is crucial. The typical SMTP sequence involves commands like EHLO, MAIL FROM, RCPT TO, and DATA. When the 451 4.4.4 error occurs specifically after the DATA command, it signals that Microsoft's servers accepted the sender and recipient but then encountered a problem with the actual message content or the way it's being transmitted from your specific IP.
Failed SMTP session from problematic subnet (IP 89.188.15.43)SMTP
Monitoring connection from x.x.x.x to 104.47.2.36
220 DB5EUR01FT043.mail.protection.outlook.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service ready at Thu, 26 Apr 2022 13:51:53 +0000
EHLO redacted name
250-DB5EUR01FT043.mail.protection.outlook.com Hello [89.188.15.43]
250-SIZE 157286400
250-PIPELINING
250-DSN
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-STARTTLS
250-8BITMIME
250-BINARYMIME
250-CHUNKING
250 SMTPUTF8
STARTTLS
220 2.0.0 SMTP server ready
EHLO redacted
250-DB5EUR01FT043.mail.protection.outlook.com Hello [89.188.15.43]
250-SIZE 157286400
250-PIPELINING
250-DSN
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-8BITMIME
250-BINARYMIME
250-CHUNKING
250 SMTPUTF8
MAIL FROM:<bounce@redacted.coml> BODY=8BITMIME RET=HDRS
RCPT TO:<redacted@redacted.com> NOTIFY=NEVER ORCPT=rfc822;redacted@redacted.com
DATA
451 4.4.4 Temporary server error. Please try again later ATTR3 [DB5EUR01FT043.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com]
503 5.5.2 Need mail command [DB5EUR01FT043.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com]
503 5.5.2 Need mail command [DB5EUR01FT043.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com]
QUIT
Connection closed
Notice the sequence: After MAIL FROM and RCPT TO receive 250 OK, the DATA command is met with the 451 4.4.4 Temporary server error. This suggests that while the basic connection and recipient validation were successful, something about the message itself, or the sending IP's perceived reputation at the moment of data transfer, triggered a deferral. The subsequent 503 5.5.2 Need mail command errors are likely a consequence of the initial 451, as the SMTP session effectively broke down. In contrast, a successful delivery looks much cleaner:
Successful SMTP session from a different subnet (IP 83.137.145.208)SMTP
Monitoring connection from x.x.x.x to 104.47.2.36
220 DB5EUR01FT051.mail.protection.outlook.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service ready at Thu, 26 Apr 2022 13:51:55 +0000
EHLO redacted
250-DB5EUR01FT051.mail.protection.outlook.com Hello [83.137.145.208]
250-SIZE 157286400
250-PIPELINING
250-DSN
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-STARTTLS
250-8BITMIME
250-BINARYMIME
250-CHUNKING
250 SMTPUTF8
STARTTLS
220 2.0.0 SMTP server ready
EHLO redacted
250-DB5EUR01FT051.mail.protection.outlook.com Hello [83.137.145.208]
250-SIZE 157286400
250-PIPELINING
250-DSN
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-8BITMIME
250-BINARYMIME
250-CHUNKING
250 SMTPUTF8
MAIL FROM:<redacted@redacted.com> BODY=8BITMIME RET=HDRS
RCPT TO:<redacted@redacted.com> NOTIFY=NEVER ORCPT=rfc822;redacted@redacted.com
DATA
250 2.1.0 Sender OK
250 2.1.5 Recipient OK
354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
250 2.6.0 <4917dcdc19789cf4a18efe4d0c5654b7@mailer.speak.nl> [InternalId=35046933155142, Hostname=AS8P191MB1734.EURP191.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM] 40635 bytes in 0.085, 461.886 KB/sec Queued mail for delivery
QUIT
Connection closed
This stark contrast, where the only difference is the sending IP address, points directly to an IP-specific (or subnet-specific) issue. It’s not a global O365 problem, nor is it necessarily a misconfiguration of your general mail commands, because other IPs work. The ATTR3 code is an internal Microsoft Exchange Online error, suggesting something within their internal filtering or throttling mechanisms is triggered by the problematic subnet. This could be due to a perceived threat or high volume from that specific IP range.
Potential underlying causes for subnet-specific issues
If Microsoft support denies an explicit blocklist (blacklist) entry, it doesn't mean your sending IP isn't being suppressed or filtered through other means. Major email providers like Microsoft use sophisticated, multi-layered systems for reputation scoring and threat detection. These systems leverage internal metrics and external data feeds, such as Cisco Talos Intelligence, to evaluate incoming traffic. Even if an IP isn't on a public blocklist (blacklist), a poor reputation score or suspicious behavior pattern could trigger these persistent temporary errors. This is closely related to temporary rate limiting due to IP reputation that some senders experience.
It's also possible that there's a subtle technical anomaly with the servers or network equipment associated with the problematic subnet. This could include issues with TLS negotiation, EHLO values, or rDNS configuration specific to that range. Even slight deviations from expected SMTP behavior or a mismatch in how your servers present themselves can trigger a deferral response from stringent receiving mail exchangers. For example, hidden SPF DNS timeouts can cause seemingly random failures.
Additionally, the problem might stem from a security block placed at the gateway level rather than a traditional email block. These types of blocks often don't appear in the standard query tools used by support staff because they originate from a different security data feed. These blocks are usually meant to be temporary and auto-expire, but they can get stuck, leading to prolonged issues that defy simple explanations. This is why it's crucial to understand the mechanisms of email blacklists (blocklists), as these hidden blocks might not be publicly visible.
Characteristics
Duration: Short-lived, typically hours or a few days at most.
Scope: Affects a broad range of senders or recipients.
Resolution: Often self-resolving as server loads balance or minor glitches clear.
Diagnostic: May be due to high traffic volume on the receiving end.
Characteristics
Duration: Persistent, lasting weeks or months without resolution.
Scope: Limited to specific sending IP addresses or subnets.
Resolution: Requires active investigation and troubleshooting from sender.
Diagnostic: Points to reputation issues or subtle configuration errors.
Troubleshooting and mitigation strategies
When facing these persistent, subnet-specific temporary server errors, a multi-faceted approach is necessary. Start by performing a thorough blocklist (blacklist) check on your problematic IP ranges, even if Microsoft has stated there's no block. While they might not be on public lists, proprietary ones or internal systems could still be flagging them. You can use a dedicated tool for this to ensure no stone is left unturned.
Next, dive deep into the technical configuration of your mail servers on the affected subnet. This includes: verifying rDNS records, ensuring proper SPF, DKIM, and DMARC alignment are in place. Even minor discrepancies in these authentication protocols can impact deliverability. You should also analyze TLS negotiation, looking for any unusual cipher suite preferences or certificate issues specific to the failing subnet. Packet sniffing can reveal subtle handshake errors or protocol violations that aren't apparent from server logs alone.
If you suspect an underlying reputation issue, consider a gradual IP warming process for the problematic subnet, slowly increasing volume to build trust with Outlook.com. Document all your findings, including full SMTP logs from both successful and failing subnets, and present this detailed data to Microsoft support. This level of detail helps them bypass initial no block responses and escalate to teams who can investigate deeper, potentially revealing hidden security blocks or systemic issues that may have become stuck. Remember that Office365 temp fails can be resolved with persistent investigation.
Best practices for Microsoft 365 email deliverability
Monitor Sender Reputation: Regularly check your IP and domain health. Tools like Google Postmaster Tools (for Gmail, but indicative of general health) and blocklist monitoring can help you stay proactive. Maintain a positive sending history.
Implement Email Authentication: Ensure your SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are correctly configured and aligned. Strong authentication is a key trust signal for O365.
Optimize Content: Avoid spam trigger words, excessive links, or overly promotional content that might flag filters.
In addition to these technical checks, ensure your content practices are sound. Even if the problem is IP-specific, poor email content or recipient engagement can exacerbate reputation issues. Regular auditing of your mail streams and prompt response to any deliverability warnings, even temporary ones, is key to maintaining consistent deliverability with major providers like Office 365.
Views from the trenches
Best practices
Always include full SMTP logs when contacting Microsoft support; they are crucial for diagnosing deep technical issues.
Regularly monitor your IP and domain reputation across various blacklists (blocklists) and internal metrics.
Ensure correct configuration of authentication protocols such as SPF, DKIM, and DMARC for all sending IPs and domains.
Investigate network-level anomalies like TLS negotiation issues or incorrect EHLO values for problematic subnets.
Common pitfalls
Assuming 'temporary' errors will self-resolve, leading to prolonged deliverability issues and lost emails.
Only checking public blocklists (blacklists) and neglecting the possibility of internal or security-related blocks by Microsoft.
Failing to capture and analyze full SMTP session logs for both successful and failing connections.
Not escalating to higher-tier Microsoft support with detailed data when initial responses deny any issues.
Expert tips
If only specific subnets fail, try to isolate configuration differences between successful and failing subnets.
Consider a slow ramp-up or 'warming' process for IPs if reputation is a suspected factor.
Recognize that security-related blocks might not appear on standard mail blocklist query tools.
Persistent 'temporary' errors often indicate a deeper, subtle technical or reputation problem.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks says that while the error is stated as temporary, if it persists for months, it is not actually temporary.
2022-04-26 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks says that if the issue is with IPv6, senders must ensure all their email practices are perfectly aligned and configured correctly.
2022-04-26 - Email Geeks
Resolving persistent O365 temporary errors
The 451 4.4.4 Temporary server error. Please try again later ATTR3 on Office 365, especially when limited to specific subnets and persisting over time, is rarely a fleeting issue. It’s a strong indicator that something about your sending IP, its reputation, or your mail server's configuration is triggering advanced filtering mechanisms on Microsoft's end. This isn't always a straightforward blocklist (blacklist) entry but can manifest as persistent deferrals or subtle rejections.
To resolve these issues, you need to go beyond surface-level diagnostics. Detailed SMTP log analysis, thorough checks of your IP's historical reputation, validation of all email authentication records (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), and scrutiny of your mail server's network-level behavior are essential. By systematically ruling out these potential causes and providing comprehensive data to Microsoft, you can push for a deeper investigation that uncovers the true root of these temporary server errors.