Receiving bounce messages for emails you didn't send from your domain can be alarming, but it's a common issue primarily stemming from email spoofing or backscatter spam. This means that malicious actors are forging your domain's email address in the 'From' field of their spam messages, and when these illicit emails are rejected by recipient servers, the bounce notifications are directed back to your legitimate domain.
Key findings
Email spoofing: Spammers often forge (or spoof) your domain's email address in the 'From' header to make their spam appear legitimate.
Backscatter: The bounce messages you receive are a form of backscatter. This happens when recipient mail servers try to deliver the forged email, fail, and then send a non-delivery report (NDR) back to the forged sender address (your domain).
No direct sending: It's important to understand that these emails were not sent from your mail servers or infrastructure, but rather from the spammer's own systems.
Domain reputation: While these bounces don't directly originate from your servers, a high volume of backscatter can signal an issue with your domain's authentication, potentially impacting your sender reputation if not properly addressed.
Key considerations
Implement strong authentication: Ensure your domain has robust email authentication protocols in place, specifically SPF, DKIM, and DMARC.
DMARC policy: An enforced DMARC policy (such as p=reject or p=quarantine) instructs receiving mail servers to reject or quarantine emails that fail authentication and claim to be from your domain, thereby stopping both the spam and the subsequent backscatter.
Monitor DMARC reports: Regularly analyze your DMARC reports to identify sources of unauthorized mail attempting to spoof your domain.
Review your logs: Double-check your own email sending logs to confirm that no unauthorized emails are originating from your infrastructure. This helps differentiate between external spoofing and an internal compromise.
What email marketers say
Email marketers frequently encounter the frustrating scenario of receiving bounce messages for emails they never sent. Their discussions often revolve around understanding the root cause, typically email spoofing, and assessing the potential impact on their sender reputation. Marketers tend to seek reassurance that their own systems are not compromised and look for practical steps to prevent such incidents.
Key opinions
Initial confusion: Marketers often express immediate concern, initially thinking their own email systems might have been compromised or are malfunctioning.
Spoofing is common: There's a general understanding among marketers that such bounces are usually due to spammers forging email addresses, making it appear as though the email came from their domain.
Reputation concern: A key worry is whether these unsolicited bounces could negatively affect their domain or IP reputation, even if they didn't send the emails.
Unknown recipients: Many report that the email addresses generating bounces are completely unknown to their contact lists, further confirming external spoofing.
Key considerations
Internal verification: Marketers should first conduct a thorough check of their own sending logs to rule out any unauthorized activity from their systems.
Proactive authentication: Implementing and enforcing DMARC is crucial for telling receiving servers how to handle spoofed emails and for reducing the impact of backscatter.
Monitor legitimate bounces: Continue to monitor legitimate bounce rates from your actual campaigns to ensure the spoofing issue isn't masking other deliverability problems. See why email bounce notifications differ.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks reports a sudden surge in bounce messages for @wanadoo.fr emails, suspecting a bug or external issue since the addresses are unknown. They observed a 200%+ increase, receiving 19,252 bounces for only 9,137 emails sent.
19 Jun 2019 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks indicates no similar issues on their end, though their sending volume to France is lower, suggesting the problem might be localized or specific to the original sender's profile.
19 Jun 2019 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts consistently pinpoint email spoofing as the primary reason for receiving bounce messages for emails you didn't send. They emphasize that while unsettling, this issue is often a sign that recipient servers are effectively rejecting illegitimate mail, and that robust email authentication, particularly DMARC, is the most effective defense against it.
Key opinions
Forged addresses: Experts confirm that these bounces are a classic indication of someone forging your domain's email addresses in the 'From' line of their spam campaigns.
Return-path abuse: The spammers use your domain as the return-path address, so bounce notifications are automatically sent back to you when their messages fail to deliver.
DMARC is key: Implementing a DMARC policy is widely recommended as the most effective method to prevent your domain from being used in spoofing attacks and to control unsolicited bounces.
Random domain selection: Spammers often randomly select domains to forge, meaning your domain was simply chosen by chance, not necessarily targeted specifically. See also why email From and To addresses sometimes match.
Key considerations
Enforce DMARC: Moving your DMARC policy to 'p=quarantine' or 'p=reject' will instruct receiving servers to either quarantine or reject emails that fail authentication and attempt to spoof your domain.
Monitor reports: Actively monitor your DMARC reports to identify the scope and nature of spoofing attempts targeting your domain. This provides valuable insights into unauthorized use.
SPF and DKIM alignment: Ensure your SPF and DKIM records are correctly configured and align with your DMARC policy to properly authenticate legitimate emails and reject spoofed ones. Learn how to set up DMARC, DKIM, and SPF.
Understand backscatter impact: While backscatter itself is unwanted, its presence often indicates that mail servers are successfully identifying and blocking illegitimate emails, which is a positive sign for email security overall. This is further detailed on SpamResource.com.
Expert view
Deliverability Expert from SpamResource advises that receiving non-delivery reports for emails you did not send is a classic symptom of backscatter, resulting from your domain being spoofed. They emphasize that this indicates legitimate receiving servers are doing their job.
14 Feb 2024 - SpamResource
Expert view
Deliverability Expert from SpamResource suggests that the primary defense against email spoofing, which causes unwanted bounce messages, is the proper implementation of DMARC. They recommend starting with a monitoring policy and gradually enforcing it.
14 Feb 2024 - SpamResource
What the documentation says
Official internet standards (RFCs) and technical documentation provide the foundational understanding of how email protocols work, including the vulnerabilities that enable spoofing and backscatter. These documents detail the mechanisms like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC that are designed to mitigate such issues by authenticating sending domains and providing clear instructions for handling unauthenticated messages.
Key findings
Forgeable 'From' address: RFC 5322 specifies that the 'From' header, which users see, is purely for display and can be easily forged without breaking protocol rules. This allows spammers to pretend to be anyone.
'MAIL FROM' for bounces: RFC 5321 defines the 'MAIL FROM' address (also known as 'Return-Path' or envelope sender) as the address to which bounce messages are sent. Spammers often place a forged sender address here.
SPF's role (RFC 7208): SPF enables domain owners to publish a list of authorized IP addresses that can send email on their behalf, primarily protecting the 'MAIL FROM' address from unauthorized use.
DKIM's role (RFC 6376): DKIM provides a cryptographic signature that verifies the sender's identity and confirms that the message content has not been tampered with since it was signed.
DMARC's comprehensive approach (RFC 7489): DMARC unifies SPF and DKIM, allowing domain owners to specify policies for handling emails that fail authentication and providing valuable aggregate and forensic reports on authentication results.
Backscatter is a side effect: Documentation refers to unsolicited bounce messages as 'backscatter,' a common side effect of spammers attempting to send emails with forged 'MAIL FROM' addresses to invalid recipients.
Key considerations
DMARC alignment: For DMARC to effectively prevent spoofing, the domain in the 'From' header must align with the domain authenticated by SPF or DKIM. Without alignment, DMARC policies are not applied.
Policy enforcement: A DMARC policy of p=reject is the strongest defense, instructing receiving servers to discard emails that fail authentication and claim to be from your domain, thereby eliminating backscatter for those messages.
DNS configuration: Correctly publishing SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records in your Domain Name System (DNS) is fundamental for these authentication mechanisms to work. An invalid DKIM record can cause issues.
RUA reports: The rua tag in a DMARC record specifies an email address to which aggregate reports (XML format) on email authentication failures are sent, providing critical data for identifying spoofing. Understanding these reports is essential.
Technical article
RFC 5322 Documentation states that the 'From' header field, visible to email recipients, does not require authentication and can be easily spoofed by malicious actors. This structural allowance is a primary enabler of email impersonation.
01 Jan 2008 - RFC 5322
Technical article
RFC 5321 Documentation explains that the 'Return-Path' address, also known as the 'MAIL FROM' address, is where bounce messages are sent, and this address is often used by spammers as the forged sender to direct bounces away from themselves.