Summary
Recent discussions and social media posts have suggested significant changes in how Gmail tracks email opens, particularly concerning "dotted opens" or pixel-based tracking. Many email marketers and senders have expressed concern over these supposed updates, fearing a further loss of visibility into their email campaign performance. However, a deeper examination of official documentation and expert opinions reveals that many of these claims are based on misinformation or a misinterpretation of existing Gmail functionalities. Google's official sender guidelines explicitly state that Google does not track open rates themselves and cannot verify the accuracy of third-party open rates.
Key findings
- Misinformation: Claims about Gmail fundamentally changing how it tracks email opens or "dotted opens" are largely unsubstantiated and appear to stem from misleading social media posts.
- Google's Stance: Google (Gmail) explicitly states that it does not track email open rates directly and cannot verify third-party reported open rates. Low open rates are also not necessarily indicators of deliverability or spam classification issues from Google's perspective.
- Image Caching and Proxy: Gmail's existing practice of caching images via a proxy server has long influenced the reliability of pixel-based open tracking. This is not a new change. This means that an image pixel might fire when Gmail's proxy fetches the image, not necessarily when the user opens the email.
- Gmail Workspace vs. Personal Gmail: Some supposed "changes" or warnings about tracking pixels might originate from Google Workspace accounts, which have different security and privacy settings, rather than personal Gmail accounts.
- Focus on Engagement: While open rates are becoming less reliable, Gmail still monitors engagement signals like clicks, replies, and marking emails as not spam for sender reputation.
Key considerations
- Verify Information: Always cross-reference claims about email platform changes with official documentation or reputable industry experts to distinguish truth from speculation.
- Adapt Metrics: Given the challenges with open tracking, marketers should pivot to more reliable metrics like click-through rates, conversions, and bounce rates to assess campaign performance.
- Understand Pixel Limitations: Be aware that pixel-based open tracking is inherently flawed due to image caching, pre-fetching, and privacy features like Apple Mail Privacy Protection (MPP). For a deeper understanding, review how Gmail image caching affects open rates.
- Maintain Good Sender Reputation: Focus on sending relevant, high-quality content to engaged subscribers to maintain a strong sender reputation, which is far more critical for inbox placement than precise open rate figures.
What email marketers say
Email marketers are often on the front lines, feeling the immediate impact of any perceived changes in email tracking. The recent LinkedIn posts about Gmail's open tracking caused a stir among those who rely heavily on these metrics for campaign optimization and reporting. Marketers often look for quick answers and solutions, and sometimes, misinformation can spread rapidly within these communities, causing unnecessary panic and diverting focus from fundamental deliverability best practices.
Key opinions
- Concern over accuracy: Many marketers express frustration over the diminishing reliability of open rates, often due to factors like image caching and privacy features, making it hard to prove ROI.
- Reliance on open data: Despite known limitations, open rates remain a primary metric for many, especially for internal reporting or quick campaign health checks, leading to anxiety when their accuracy is questioned.
- Seeking alternatives: Some marketers are actively seeking alternative ways to measure engagement and campaign success that are less reliant on pixel tracking.
- Vulnerability to hype: The email marketing community can be susceptible to viral posts on social media that claim significant, unverified changes by major email providers.
Key considerations
- Shift focus to clicks and conversions: Marketers should prioritize in-email clicks and downstream actions as primary performance indicators, as these are more reliable signals of true engagement.
- Educate stakeholders: It is crucial to inform clients and internal teams that reported open rates are often inflated or inaccurate due to various privacy and technical mechanisms.
- Invest in deliverability basics: Rather than chasing perceived changes in tracking, focusing on fundamental aspects like technical setup, list hygiene, and content quality will yield better results for inbox placement.
- Avoid panic: Do not react impulsively to unverified information; verify any claims through official channels or trusted experts before making significant changes to email strategies.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks suggests that the widespread belief in social media posts, especially on platforms like LinkedIn, is a significant problem. People often panic and make poor decisions based on unverified information. This tendency to believe sensationalized claims without critical evaluation can lead to unnecessary fear and disruption in email marketing strategies. It's crucial for marketers to exercise skepticism and verify information from multiple reliable sources.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Sparkle.io observes that recent privacy tools like Apple Mail Privacy Protection and Gmail's image caching have made it increasingly difficult to track email opens reliably. This ongoing trend means that marketers must adjust their expectations for open rates as a key performance indicator. The challenge now is to find alternative metrics that provide a more accurate picture of engagement and deliverability, rather than relying on potentially inflated or misleading open data.
What the experts say
Deliverability experts often have a more nuanced understanding of how email services operate, based on direct experience, testing, and engagement with industry specifications. Their perspective tends to be grounded in technical realities and official statements, rather than anecdotal evidence or social media speculation. When confronted with claims of major changes, experts typically advise caution and rigorous verification before drawing conclusions.
Key opinions
- Debunking misinformation: Experts widely agree that recent claims about Gmail fundamentally altering open tracking for "dotted opens" are false and often originate from misleading sources designed to promote services.
- Existing behavior, not new changes: Gmail's behavior regarding image caching and proxying, which affects open rates, has been in place for years. There are no new, significant changes on this front.
- Distinguishing Gmail from Google Workspace: Screenshots suggesting new warnings about tracking pixels are likely from Google Workspace environments, which have different features and security labels (e.g., "external"), not personal Gmail.
- Importance of reputation: Email providers, including Google, primarily rely on signals related to sender reputation and engagement to determine inbox placement, not precise open rate numbers from third-party trackers.
- Challenges of opacity: The inherent complexity and lack of transparency in email deliverability make it fertile ground for unverified claims to take root and spread, underscoring the need for expert guidance.
Key considerations
- Prioritize direct engagement metrics: Marketers should focus on clicks, conversions, and replies, which provide more accurate insights into subscriber behavior than pixel-based opens. Understanding how Gmail actually tracks engagement is key.
- Beware of sensationalism: Treat social media posts claiming drastic changes with skepticism; verify information with official sources or established industry figures like those on Spam Resource.
- Understand Gmail's image proxy: Acknowledge that Gmail's image proxy can trigger artificial opens, making the raw open rate unreliable. This is especially true for very fast opens.
- Invest in fundamental deliverability: Ensure strong sender authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), maintain a clean list, and send relevant content to improve overall inbox placement, which is more impactful than tracking nuances.
Expert view
Email deliverability expert from Email Geeks emphatically states that the LinkedIn post circulating about Gmail's open tracking changes is completely untrue. They advise others to either disregard it entirely or actively refute its false claims. This strong stance highlights the importance of fact-checking and preventing the spread of misleading information within the email community, which can cause unnecessary concern and misdirection.
Expert view
Email deliverability expert from Spam Resource notes that while open rates are often cited, their true value as a deliverability metric has been decreasing for years. They suggest that mailbox providers are sophisticated enough to understand engagement beyond a simple pixel load, focusing on more robust signals. This perspective encourages senders to look past single, easily manipulated metrics and consider a holistic view of recipient interaction for better inbox placement.
What the documentation says
Official documentation from Google and other authoritative sources provides the most reliable information regarding email open tracking. These documents typically outline general policies, technical specifications, and guidelines for senders, rather than addressing specific tracking nuances like "dotted opens" directly. However, their broader statements on privacy, image handling, and engagement metrics offer crucial context to understand how opens are perceived by mailbox providers.
Key findings
- No direct open tracking: Google's sender guidelines explicitly state that Google does not track email open rates and cannot verify the accuracy of third-party reports. This indicates a general disregard for pixel-based opens as a reliable metric from Google's side.
- Image proxying: Gmail (and other major email clients) uses image proxying to load images. This means tracking pixels are fetched by Google's servers, not directly by the recipient's device, which can lead to artificial opens or prevent real ones from being recorded accurately.
- Privacy protection impact: Initiatives like Apple Mail Privacy Protection (MPP) further complicate pixel tracking by pre-loading images, which registers an open regardless of whether the user actually viewed the email. This is an industry-wide trend, not specific to Gmail's recent changes.
- Engagement signals: Mailbox providers prioritize more direct engagement signals like clicks, replies, forwards, and whether an email is marked as spam or not, to assess sender reputation and deliverability.
Key considerations
- Refer to official sources: For accurate information on email deliverability and tracking, always consult official Google documentation and industry standards.
- Focus on deliverability fundamentals: Ensure your email program adheres to basic best practices, including proper authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), sending wanted mail, and maintaining a healthy list.
- Adapt to privacy changes: Understand that evolving privacy features in email clients will continue to impact pixel-based tracking, making it less reliable. Explore alternative tracking mechanisms.
- Monitor broader engagement: Shift your analytical focus from raw open rates to more robust metrics such as click-through rates, conversion rates, and unsubscribe rates to gauge email campaign effectiveness and audience health.
Technical article
Documentation from Google Workspace Admin Help clarifies that Google does not track open rates and cannot verify the accuracy of open rates reported by third parties. It further states that low open rates are not necessarily an accurate indicator of deliverability or spam classification issues. This foundational statement underscores that precise pixel-based open rates are not a direct factor in Google's internal spam filtering or deliverability assessments.
Technical article
Documentation from Sparkle.io's blog explains that email tracking pixels work by embedding a tiny, often invisible, image into an email. When this image is loaded by the recipient's email client, it signals that the email has been 'opened' to the sender's tracking system. However, the article highlights that this mechanism is increasingly unreliable due to privacy features and image caching, which can trigger the pixel without a genuine user open.
Related resources
11 resources
![How to set up read receipt in Gmail [2024 update]](https://www.rightinbox.com/wp-content/uploads/Set-Up-Read-Receipt-Gmail.jpeg)
Related pages
How accurate are email open rates and how does Gmail image caching affect them?
Does Gmail accurately track email opens?
How does Gmail track email engagement for reputation, including in-email clicks versus landing page visits?
Is email tracking dead and should marketers stop using open rates?
How does Gmail's image proxy affect email open tracking and what could cause very fast opens?
Why your emails are going to spam in 2024 and how to fix it
Email Deliverability Issues: Getting Your Messages to the Inbox in 2025
Ultimate Guide to Google Postmaster Tools V2
How does Apple Mail Privacy Protection (MPP) affect the tracking of email opens and clicks, and how are machine opens categorized?
