Low email engagement in B2B content marketing is a common challenge, often masked by automated bot opens that inflate metrics. The core issue frequently lies in distinguishing between a true deliverability problem and a lack of recipient interest or brand awareness. Many businesses report seeing high open rates, but virtually no clicks or conversions, indicating that emails might be landing in inboxes only to be opened by security scanners rather than human recipients.The primary goal for troubleshooting is to ascertain if emails are genuinely reaching the intended inbox or if they are being filtered into spam or quarantine. Once deliverability is confirmed, the focus shifts to optimizing content relevance and audience segmentation. This involves a systematic approach to technical checks, audience analysis, and testing strategies tailored to the unique complexities of B2B email ecosystems, which often lack the detailed feedback loops available in B2C.
Key findings
Bot opens: High open rates in B2B campaigns often signify corporate bot activity rather than genuine human engagement, skewing performance metrics.
Audience relevance: Even with an engaged list, low click-through rates suggest content may not be resonating or that recipients lack sufficient brand awareness.
Technical health: Proper email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is crucial, as misconfigurations can lead to emails being filtered by corporate systems.
B2B complexities: Unlike B2C, B2B email environments often lack robust tools for directly tracking inbox placement, requiring more indirect diagnostic methods.
List hygiene: Sending to stale or unengaged addresses can negatively impact sender reputation and overall deliverability.
Key considerations
Technical audit: Begin by verifying your email's technical configuration. Tools like About My Email can assess authentication, size, and structure.
Audience segmentation: Ensure your content is highly relevant to your recipients' current roles and needs, and segment lists based on recent engagement to avoid sending to unengaged contacts.
Delivery monitoring: Utilize trusted internal contacts at various corporate domains to get direct feedback on where your emails are landing.
Avoid drastic changes: Switching domains or ESPs without proper diagnosis can complicate matters and appear as filter evasion. Focus on fixing underlying issues first.
Engagement strategies: Introduce low-effort, engaging elements (e.g., simple polls) to encourage initial clicks and confirm human interaction, helping to differentiate from bot activity.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often find themselves in a bind when B2B content marketing emails yield disappointing results, despite seemingly healthy open rates. The consensus among marketers is that the issue often stems from list quality and content relevance, particularly when dealing with lists derived from content syndication or older, less engaged contacts. There's a strong emphasis on the qualitative aspect of engagement over raw numbers, especially given the prevalence of bot opens in corporate environments. Marketers highlight the importance of refreshing strategies to boost engagement and getting genuine human interaction.
Key opinions
Engagement authenticity: Marketers frequently encounter high open rates that are deceptive, as they are primarily generated by corporate email bots rather than actual human recipients, leading to a false sense of success.
List quality: Addresses from sources like content syndication or old lost deals may not represent truly engaged prospects who are warmed up to the brand, impacting real conversions.
Brand awareness: A lack of brand awareness among recipients can be a significant barrier to engagement, even if the content is relevant.
Stale contacts: Including older, inactive emails on lists often results in low engagement, as recipients may have moved roles or lost interest. Focusing on recent engagement is key for re-engagement strategies.
Key considerations
Recipient relevance: Before technical fixes, consider if the content of your mail is truly relevant to the recipients' jobs and current needs.
Email testing: Use test emails to trusted contacts behind corporate filters to gather real-world data on inbox placement (e.g., inbox, spam, quarantined).
Data analysis: Run reports using pivot tables to identify specific domains or segments that exhibit low open or click-through rates, helping to pinpoint problematic areas.
Autoresponder checks: If autoresponders deliver content links, check their click statistics to confirm actual engagement from initial interactions.
List segmentation: Focus on lists with recent engagement (e.g., within the current year) to improve overall performance and signal positive intent to mailbox providers. This will also help with improving deliverability for B2B nurture campaigns.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks observes that their B2B content marketing emails show high open rates, but these are clearly bot clicks, with no human engagement or conversions. They use Pardot and have only recently increased their email regularity.
02 Aug 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Iron Horse Blog points out that poor messaging, a dead email list, lack of segmentation, irrelevant or repeat content can all contribute to low engagement. These factors are often more significant than technical deliverability issues.
01 Jan 2024 - Iron Horse
What the experts say
Experts emphasize that troubleshooting low B2B email engagement requires a clear distinction between a technical deliverability problem and an audience engagement issue. While verifying email authentication is a critical first step, changing domains or ESPs is generally seen as an extreme measure that can complicate, rather than solve, the problem. B2B environments pose unique challenges due to stricter corporate filters and a lack of direct inbox placement visibility. A data-driven approach is essential for B2B email marketing strategies, focusing on direct feedback and analysis by recipient domain.
Key opinions
Technical vs. audience: The primary diagnostic step is to determine if emails are actually reaching the inbox or if the issue is a lack of recipient interest, as the solution differs significantly.
Extreme measures: Changing sending domains or Email Service Providers (ESPs) is generally not recommended as a first step, as it can be counterproductive and appear as filter evasion without proper diagnosis.
Corporate filters: Corporate email filters (e.g., O365, Proofpoint) are stringent, and inconsistencies in sending or poor list hygiene can lead to blocking, making resolving widespread blocking and spam issues challenging.
B2B testing limitations: Tools for B2B inbox placement are less reliable than those for B2C, necessitating creative troubleshooting methods.
Key considerations
Technical alignment: Ensure SPF is aligned and all technical authentication records are correctly configured, as this can significantly improve inbox placement.
Direct feedback: Send emails to trusted friends and family contacts who are behind various corporate filters (especially those in your target market) to gather direct data on delivery status.
Domain-specific analysis: Break down reporting by recipient domain to pinpoint if issues are concentrated at specific mailbox providers (e.g., O365 versus Google Workspace), allowing for targeted troubleshooting. This helps you understand how to refine your B2B email strategy.
Gamified clicks: Implement simple, low-stakes gamification elements within emails to prompt any click. This confirms inbox delivery, human engagement, and willingness to click on links.
Double opt-in: For new content downloads or hand-raises, implement a double opt-in process. This verifies recipient intent and provides implicit consent, improving list quality.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks suggests starting with technical correctness by sending an email to a diagnostic tool to ensure proper authentication before anything else.
02 Aug 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from SpamResource highlights that consistent monitoring of email deliverability is essential, as even minor changes in sending patterns or recipient engagement can impact inbox placement over time.
20 May 2024 - SpamResource
What the documentation says
Official email documentation and industry best practices consistently highlight the foundational importance of proper email authentication and rigorous list hygiene for achieving optimal deliverability and engagement, especially in the B2B sector. These guidelines underscore that technical setup (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is not merely a formality but a critical component in building sender trust with corporate mailbox providers. Furthermore, maintaining an actively engaged and permission-based list is paramount, as documented standards often penalize senders for mailing to unengaged or stale contacts.
Key findings
Authentication standards: Adherence to email authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is fundamental for proving sender legitimacy and preventing spoofing, which directly impacts deliverability.
Permission-based sending: Obtaining explicit consent (e.g., double opt-in) from recipients for B2B communications is a documented best practice that reduces complaints and improves engagement.
List hygiene: Regularly cleaning and segmenting email lists to remove inactive or invalid addresses is crucial for maintaining a healthy sender reputation and avoiding spam traps.
Content relevance: Providing valuable, relevant content tailored to recipient interests is a key driver of engagement and a documented principle for effective email marketing.
Engagement monitoring: Monitoring various engagement metrics beyond opens (e.g., clicks, conversions, replies) is essential for understanding true audience interaction and optimizing campaigns. A data-driven approach is always recommended.
Key considerations
DMARC implementation: Implementing a DMARC policy with reporting (p=none) allows senders to gain visibility into authentication failures and potential spoofing attempts, which is critical for improving email deliverability.
Regular list validation: Periodically validate email addresses to remove hard bounces and invalid contacts, preventing reputation damage caused by high bounce rates.
Sender reputation management: Proactively monitor your domain and IP reputation using tools like Google Postmaster Tools, as outlined in guidance on domain reputation.
Engagement-based segmentation: Segment your audience based on their engagement levels, sending different content or frequencies to highly active vs. less engaged groups to optimize performance.
Technical article
The RFC 7489 (DMARC) standard mandates that email senders publish a DMARC record to enable domain-level authentication, which significantly reduces phishing and spoofing by providing a framework for recipient mail servers to validate email origins.
10 Mar 2015 - RFC 7489 (DMARC)
Technical article
The M3AAWG Sender Best Practices advise that senders should obtain explicit, confirmed consent for all commercial email messages to ensure high engagement and compliance with anti-spam regulations, thereby protecting sender reputation.