Summary
The acquisition of eDataSource by SparkPost in late 2019 raised questions among email marketers and deliverability professionals about the future of service, support, and product offerings. This event merged two significant entities in the email ecosystem: SparkPost, a major email sending platform, and eDataSource, known for its inbox placement and competitive intelligence tools. The primary concern for customers was how this integration would affect the quality and scope of their existing services, given that previous acquisitions in the deliverability space had sometimes led to service disruptions or changes in product focus.
Key findings
- Integration focus: SparkPost aimed to integrate eDataSource's analytics and deliverability insights directly into its platform, offering a more comprehensive solution for email performance management. This move was intended to provide a unified experience for users, from sending to detailed performance tracking, as detailed in their official announcement regarding the acquisition.
- Service continuity: Both companies emphasized maintaining continuity of service and support for existing customers, a critical aspect during mergers and acquisitions. Efforts were made to reassure clients that their operations would not be negatively impacted.
- Enhanced capabilities: The acquisition was largely seen as a strategic step to bolster SparkPost's offerings with advanced inbox intelligence and competitive data, providing a deeper understanding of email marketing health and deliverability.
- Customer communication: Early communications focused on the benefits of combined capabilities for improving email engagement and conversion rates, as highlighted in reports such as the one from MarTech.org regarding the acquisition.
- Product evolution: The long-term vision involved evolving both platforms under the SparkPost umbrella to offer more robust email authentication and deliverability insights.
Key considerations
- Migration impact: For eDataSource customers, understanding any potential migration impacts to the combined platform was crucial, particularly concerning data access and reporting changes.
- Support expectations: While commitments were made to service continuity, customers often monitor support responsiveness and expertise closely post-acquisition.
- Feature set evolution: The long-term benefit hinged on how well eDataSource's features would be integrated and enhanced within SparkPost's ecosystem, rather than merely maintained.
- Contractual reviews: Customers were advised to review their contracts for clauses related to acquisitions, allowing for flexibility if service expectations were not met.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often approach company acquisitions, especially in the deliverability space, with a mix of optimism and caution. The integration of two major players like SparkPost and eDataSource naturally led to discussions about potential changes in service quality, product roadmaps, and overall customer experience. Many marketers rely heavily on the stability and reliability of their email service providers and deliverability tools, so any significant change prompts a close evaluation of continuity and future value.
Key opinions
- Uncertainty is normal: Many marketers acknowledge that acquisitions introduce an element of uncertainty, as the success hinges on integration strategy and shared vision. Time is often needed to observe the true impact.
- Past acquisitions as indicators: Experiences with previous acquisitions in the email industry, such as Validity acquiring Return Path and 250ok, often shape initial expectations.
- Customer service focus: There's a strong emphasis on maintaining or improving customer service and support quality post-acquisition, as this directly impacts daily operations and troubleshooting.
- Product synergy potential: Some marketers express optimism about the potential for enhanced product capabilities through the combination of sending infrastructure with advanced analytics.
Key considerations
- Direct communication: Marketers frequently advise reaching out directly to account managers or sales representatives for clarity on transition plans.
- Peer consultations: Speaking with existing customers of both companies (SparkPost and eDataSource) is recommended to gather firsthand accounts of service satisfaction and support quality. For example, some may inquire about the best inbox monitoring tools for Sparkpost.
- Contractual flexibility: Reviewing existing contracts for clauses that allow for early termination or re-negotiation in the event of significant service changes is a prudent step.
- Impact on deliverability: Marketers are keenly aware that any disruption could affect their email deliverability issues, particularly concerning blacklist presence or inbox placement.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks shared their company's plan to sign with eDataSource, only to receive an acquisition email from SparkPost, raising immediate concerns about service quality changes based on prior acquisition experiences.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks suggested that all acquisitions vary based on terms and the vision alignment of the parties involved. They noted that predicting the outcome is difficult without a crystal ball.
What the experts say
Experts in the email deliverability space often provide a more nuanced perspective on acquisitions, drawing on industry knowledge and previous experiences. Their insights typically focus on the strategic alignment of the companies, the technical challenges of integration, and the long-term implications for the market and customer base. The SparkPost acquisition of eDataSource was viewed through the lens of combining a robust sending infrastructure with critical inbox and competitive intelligence.
Key opinions
- Synergistic potential: Experts generally agreed that the combination of SparkPost's sending capabilities with eDataSource's analytics created a potent synergy for improved email performance and insights.
- Commitment to support: Company representatives confirmed that maintaining existing levels of service and support was a top priority, crucial for customer retention and satisfaction.
- Market consolidation: The acquisition reflects a broader trend of consolidation in the email technology market, where providers seek to offer more integrated, end-to-end solutions.
- Data integration challenges: While beneficial, integrating diverse data sets and platforms can present significant technical challenges, requiring careful planning and execution.
Key considerations
- Product roadmap clarity: Customers and experts alike look for clear communication on how product roadmaps will converge and what new features or enhancements will be prioritized.
- Talent retention: Retaining key personnel from both organizations, particularly in deliverability and customer-facing roles, is critical for smooth transitions and continued expertise.
- Competitive landscape: The acquisition alters the competitive landscape for email deliverability monitoring providers, potentially influencing pricing and innovation across the industry.
- Customer data handling: Ensuring transparent and compliant handling of customer data across integrated platforms is a significant consideration, aligning with expert guidance on improving email deliverability.
Expert view
Company representative from Email Geeks confirmed that the entire services and support team would be an integral part of the new combined team, assuring continued or improved support post-acquisition.
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource stated that acquisitions in the email space are becoming more common, signifying a mature market where consolidation leads to more comprehensive service offerings.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and press releases surrounding the SparkPost acquisition of eDataSource focused on the strategic rationale and the anticipated benefits for customers. These documents typically aim to reassure stakeholders, outline the combined capabilities, and articulate the vision for the unified entity. They serve as primary sources for understanding the acquiring company's immediate plans and long-term goals for the newly integrated assets.
Key findings
- Strategic rationale: The acquisition was framed as a strategic move to combine SparkPost's sending scale with eDataSource's competitive intelligence, aiming to create a comprehensive email performance platform.
- Customer benefits: Press releases highlighted enhanced predictive inbox performance insights and increased email engagement as direct benefits for customers, enabling them to understand how SparkPost obtains inbox placement data.
- Combined capabilities: The combined entity aimed to offer capabilities to create, send, and measure email performance, providing a holistic view from campaign execution to outcome analysis.
- Industry recognition: The acquisition was often noted by industry publications as a significant development in the email marketing technology landscape.
Key considerations
- Product naming and branding: How existing eDataSource products (like InBox Tracker and Competitive Tracker) would be rebranded or integrated into SparkPost's product suite was a key area of interest.
- Platform unification: The ultimate success depended on the seamless technical unification of the two platforms to deliver on the promised synergies, impacting things like email authentication setup.
- Service level agreements: Customers would want to confirm that their service level agreements (SLAs) remained consistent or improved under the new ownership.
- Customer support channels: Documentation often clarifies how support channels and contacts would be managed after the merger, to ensure uninterrupted assistance for deliverability issues.
Technical article
eDataSource's official announcement stated that the agreement to be acquired by SparkPost would result in a combined platform for email sending and performance analytics, providing a unified solution.
Technical article
Finovate reported that the acquisition aimed to deliver enhanced predictive inbox performance insights, contributing to increased email engagement and conversion rates for users.
Related resources
12 resources
Related pages
How do Return Path, 250ok, and eDataSource compare for email deliverability monitoring?
How can I effectively use SparkPost's delivery index and other KPIs to measure and improve email marketing health and deliverability?
What deliverability monitoring tools are good alternatives to Return Path, Everest and Sparkpost?
How does Sparkpost obtain inbox placement data?
What are the best practices for email deliverability when using SparkPost and Amazon SES, including reverse DNS, blacklist monitoring, and handling dedicated IPs?
Email Deliverability Issues: Getting Your Messages to the Inbox in 2025
Why Your Emails Fail: Expert Guide to Improve Email Deliverability [2025]
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
What are the best practices for migrating to a new ESP while retaining sender reputation?
What does it mean when your email is blacklisted?
