Identifying suspicious MX records is crucial for maintaining email deliverability and security. While no single rule automatically flags an MX record as suspicious, a combination of experience and the right tools can reveal anomalies. These anomalies often indicate misconfigurations, potential hijacking, or even the presence of spam traps. Proper MX record configuration ensures that emails reach their intended recipients, preventing bounces and protecting your sender reputation.
Key findings
Absence or timeout: A domain with no MX records or one that consistently times out during a DNS query suggests that it cannot receive email. This could indicate an unmaintained domain or a deliberate attempt to avoid email. Identifying suspicious email domains is key.
Unusual priority values: MX records have priority numbers (lower is preferred). Unusual or excessively high priority values might indicate a misconfiguration or an attempt to route mail through unexpected servers.
Generic hostnames or IP addresses: While some legitimate services use generic hostnames, a complete lack of identifiable branding or an MX record pointing directly to an IP address can sometimes be suspicious, especially if it's not a known mail provider.
Mismatch with domain history: If a domain suddenly changes its MX records to an obscure or unknown mail server, it could be a sign of compromise or a new, potentially less reputable, email service provider.
Key considerations
Use reliable lookup tools: Tools that perform thorough DNS checks are more reliable than basic command-line utilities. Consider using services like NsLookup.io for comprehensive MX data.
Cross-reference with blacklists: Check if the IP addresses associated with the MX records are present on any major blocklists or blacklists. This is a strong indicator of potential abuse.
Verify related DNS records: Suspicious MX records often go hand-in-hand with issues in SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records, which are vital for email authentication.
Understand timeouts: A DNS timeout doesn't always mean the records don't exist; it simply means no response was received. Further investigation with different tools or at a later time is often necessary.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often encounter suspicious MX records when cleaning lists or investigating delivery failures. Their primary concern is typically how such records impact their campaigns and sender reputation. While some marketers rely on automated tools, many acknowledge that a degree of experience is necessary to interpret results accurately and identify nuanced signs of trouble.
Key opinions
Experience is vital: Beyond basic checks, understanding what looks suspicious in MX records often comes from knowing typical configurations for various email providers.
Absence of records: The most straightforward sign of a problematic MX record is its complete absence, meaning the domain cannot receive mail.
DNS timeouts: A DNS timeout during an MX lookup can indicate that mail wouldn't be delivered, but it doesn't necessarily mean the record doesn't exist. Further investigation is needed.
Tool limitations: Some common tools, like nslookup, can provide misleading diagnostics, making it important to use more robust alternatives for accuracy.
Key considerations
Automated vs. Manual: While automated tools are great for bulk checking and cleaning MX records, manual checks with advanced tools like dig provide deeper insights.
Email flow implications: Marketers must understand that suspicious MX records directly impact email delivery rates, potentially leading to hard bounces or being flagged as spam.
Marketer from Email Geeks suggests that besides an MX record not existing, most suspicious signs come from experience. It's about recognizing what a legitimate email provider's MX records typically look like versus something unusual.
19 Sep 2019 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks warns that tools like nslookup can be misleading. They advise using more advanced or alternative DNS query tools to get accurate diagnostic information, as nslookup has known issues.
19 Sep 2019 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability and security emphasize that identifying suspicious MX records goes beyond a simple lookup. It involves a deep understanding of DNS, email routing, and common attacker tactics. They stress the importance of correlating MX record data with other DNS records like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, as well as checking against known blocklists. Automated tools are helpful, but human expertise is often required for nuanced analysis.
Key opinions
Holistic view: Experts agree that suspicious MX records are rarely isolated issues. They often correlate with other DNS anomalies, particularly if email authentication records are missing or misconfigured.
Reputation is key: The reputation of the mail server identified by the MX record is paramount. Checking its IP and domain against public blocklists and threat intelligence feeds is a standard practice.
Dynamic DNS analysis: Suspicious activity can involve frequent, unexplained changes to MX records, suggesting domain hijacking or attempts to bypass security measures.
Spam trap indicators: Some MX records (or their absence) can be strong indicators of spam traps, especially for domains that have been dormant or explicitly set up to catch spammers.
Key considerations
Beyond simple lookups: While basic MX lookup tools are a starting point, experts advise using comprehensive DNS analysis platforms that can also perform sender reputation checks.
Blocklist integration: Automated tools that cross-reference MX record IPs with a wide range of email blocklists (or blacklists) are essential for real-time monitoring.
Domain registration analysis: Examining the domain's registration details (WHOIS) can sometimes reveal inconsistencies or suspicious ownership that aligns with problematic MX records.
Threat intelligence feeds: Subscribing to and integrating with threat intelligence feeds provides early warnings about newly identified malicious domains or IPs, including those used in MX records.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks states that the mere absence of an MX record for a domain is a primary indicator that the domain is not configured to receive email. This is often the first check performed when troubleshooting email delivery.
20 Sep 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks highlights that interpreting MX record health requires a strong understanding of DNS fundamentals. They caution against relying solely on automated checkers without understanding the underlying mechanisms of email routing.
05 Aug 2024 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
Official documentation and internet standards (RFCs) define the structure and purpose of MX records. While they do not explicitly list what makes an MX record 'suspicious,' they provide the baseline for what constitutes a valid configuration. Deviations from these standards, or the absence of expected behaviors, are often the first clues to a problem. Documentation also guides the use of various DNS query tools and how to interpret their outputs.
Key findings
RFC 5321 (SMTP) requirements: This RFC defines that an MX record must point to a valid hostname (A or AAAA record) that resolves to an IP address. Failure to resolve indicates a non-functional mail exchanger.
Priority values: RFCs specify that lower priority values are preferred. Unusual or identical priority numbers across multiple records, especially without proper mail server setup, can lead to unpredictable mail delivery.
No MX record: If no MX records are found for a domain, mail servers should fall back to an A record. However, this is discouraged for active mail reception and can indicate a domain not set up to receive email properly.
DNSSEC validation: DNSSEC-signed zones provide cryptographic authentication for DNS data. An MX record in a non-DNSSEC validated zone, or one that fails validation, could be more susceptible to tampering.
Key considerations
Adherence to RFCs: Understanding what RFCs mandate for email helps identify non-standard or potentially problematic MX setups.
Impact on deliverability: Misconfigured or absent MX records are fundamental barriers to email delivery. Ensuring proper configuration is a basic step to boosting deliverability rates.
DNS query tools: Documentation often recommends specific DNS query tools (e.g., dig) over others (e.g., nslookup) due to their advanced features and more accurate reporting for DNS records.
Error codes and responses: Understanding standard DNS error codes and responses, such as SERVFAIL or NXDOMAIN, is critical for diagnosing MX record issues from a technical perspective.
Technical article
Documentation from RFC 5321 (SMTP) states that MX records are used to locate the mail exchange servers for a domain. It specifies that these records must point to one or more hostnames, and each hostname must have a corresponding A or AAAA record to be resolvable.
01 Oct 2008 - RFC 5321
Technical article
Documentation from DNS Checker explains that an MX lookup tool queries DNS servers to retrieve the MX records associated with a domain. It validates if the email server is responding correctly, which is fundamental for email flow.