DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance) is an email authentication protocol designed to protect your domain from impersonation, phishing, and other unauthorized uses. It builds upon existing authentication methods like SPF (Sender Policy Framework) and DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) by providing instructions to receiving mail servers on how to handle emails that fail authentication checks, and offering a mechanism for reporting on these failures.
Key findings
Core purpose: DMARC ensures that only authorized entities can send email using your domain in the From: header, primarily to combat phishing and spoofing attempts.
Reliance on SPF and DKIM: DMARC does not replace SPF or DKIM. Instead, it leverages their results, requiring at least one of them to pass and to be aligned with the domain in the From: header. Alignment means the domains in the From: header and the SPF (Return-Path) or DKIM (d=tag) domains are the same or closely related (e.g., subdomain). Learn more about DMARC, SPF, and DKIM.
Policy enforcement: A DMARC record allows you to specify a policy (p=none, p=quarantine, or p=reject) that tells recipient servers what to do with emails that fail authentication. This policy instructs servers to monitor, quarantine, or outright reject unauthenticated messages.
Reporting capabilities: DMARC includes a reporting feature, enabling domain owners to receive aggregate (RUA) and forensic (RUF) reports about email authentication results. These reports are crucial for understanding who is sending email on behalf of your domain, and for identifying legitimate sending sources that might be failing authentication.
Enhanced security: Implementing DMARC significantly boosts your email security posture, making it harder for cybercriminals to spoof your domain. According to Fortinet, DMARC ensures domain authenticity and helps enforce policies against unauthorized senders.
Key considerations
Gradual implementation: It is highly recommended to start with a p=none policy to monitor email traffic and identify legitimate sources that might be failing authentication before moving to stricter policies like p=quarantine or p=reject. This prevents legitimate emails from being inadvertently blocked. For a step-by-step guide, see how to verify your DMARC, DKIM, and SPF setup.
Subdomain impact: DMARC policies can be applied at the root domain or subdomain level. It is possible to set different policies for subdomains, offering flexibility in managing email streams.
Deliverability impact: While beneficial for security, a poorly configured or overly strict DMARC policy can lead to deliverability issues, where legitimate emails might be blocked. Careful monitoring of DMARC reports is essential.
Report analysis: DMARC reports (XML format) can be complex and challenging to parse manually. Utilizing DMARC monitoring tools or services is often necessary to effectively analyze these reports and gain actionable insights.
Email marketers often grapple with the practical aspects of DMARC implementation, especially concerning alignment, reporting, and potential deliverability impacts. Their concerns frequently revolve around understanding the technical nuances and ensuring that legitimate campaigns are not negatively affected by stricter authentication policies.
Key opinions
Alignment importance: Marketers frequently question how SPF and DKIM alignment (strict vs. relaxed) impacts DMARC validation, especially when sending from subdomains or third-party email service providers (ESPs). Understanding domain alignment best practices is key.
DMARC feedback confusion: There's often uncertainty about where DMARC aggregate reports are sent and how they are processed, particularly if a third-party service is listed as the recipient.
Value proposition: Some marketers question the tangible benefits of DMARC if their organization doesn't have a direct relationship with the DMARC report receiver, wondering if reports are being ignored. However, Higher Logic highlights DMARC's role in providing instructions to receiving servers about unauthenticated mail.
Technical complexity: The process of setting up and managing DMARC records and understanding their impact is often perceived as complex for those without deep technical knowledge.
Deliverability concerns: A primary concern is that improper DMARC configuration could lead to legitimate emails going to spam or being blocked, directly impacting campaign performance and requiring methods to diagnose and fix deliverability issues.
Key considerations
Subdomain application: Marketers need to verify if their DMARC setup accounts for emails sent from subdomains, as proper configuration is essential for these to pass DMARC checks, especially with relaxed alignment.
Monitoring strategy: It is crucial to have a clear strategy for receiving and interpreting DMARC feedback reports. If reports are directed to a third-party without an active service agreement, the insights may be lost.
Internal vs. external handling: Deciding whether to handle DMARC reports internally or through a specialized vendor requires evaluating internal resources and expertise.
Learning curve: Acknowledging and dedicating time to learn about DMARC, SPF, and DKIM best practices is vital for long-term email deliverability success and avoiding common pitfalls.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks indicates that their current DMARC setup seems to have alignment issues, possibly due to subdomain configurations. They are actively seeking to verify this understanding by reviewing the email headers and comparing them against known DMARC alignment rules.
01 Feb 2019 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks confirms that their email setup passes DMARC with 'relaxed alignment'. This suggests they have a foundational understanding of DMARC's flexibility regarding domain matching, which is crucial for handling emails from various sending sources including subdomains.
01 Feb 2019 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Email experts stress the foundational role of DMARC in email security, highlighting its ability to enforce policies based on SPF and DKIM authentication. They emphasize the necessity of precise alignment and the strategic use of DMARC reports for comprehensive domain protection and deliverability management.
Key opinions
Foundational security: Experts consistently position DMARC as a critical component for preventing email spoofing and phishing by ensuring domain authenticity.
Alignment requirement: A key tenet for DMARC success is that emails must pass either SPF or DKIM, and the domains used for these checks must align (match) the From: header domain.
Policy enforcement: DMARC allows domain owners to instruct recipient servers to reject or quarantine emails that fail authentication and alignment checks, directly impacting how unauthorized mail is handled.
Comprehensive authentication: For DMARC to be effective, TechTarget states that all mail, whether first-party or third-party, must be authenticated via aligned SPF or DKIM to pass DMARC.
Reporting necessity: DMARC reports are essential for understanding the authentication status of all emails sent from a domain, providing visibility into both legitimate and fraudulent sending activity.
Key considerations
Staged rollout: Experts advise a phased approach, starting with a monitoring-only policy (p=none) to analyze reports before transitioning to enforcement policies (p=quarantine or p=reject). This prevents unintended blocking of legitimate mail and allows for safe transition to a DMARC p=reject policy.
Reporting complexity: The raw DMARC reports can be difficult to interpret, often requiring specialized DMARC monitoring services to process and present the data in an actionable format. For more on this, consider expert guides to improving email deliverability.
Potential deliverability impact: Even with perfect DMARC configuration, a minor deliverability hit is possible due to the strictness of DMARC enforcement by some receiving mail servers.
Subdomain policies: DMARC standards allow for policies to be set at both the root domain and subdomain levels, providing granular control over different email streams.
Expert view
Email expert from Email Geeks highlights that DMARC's primary function is to guarantee that only the legitimate domain owner can send emails using their domain in the From: header, which is essential for brand protection.
01 Feb 2019 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Email expert from Email Geeks explains that recipient mail servers check for a DMARC record associated with the From: domain upon receiving an email. This is the first step in the DMARC validation process.
01 Feb 2019 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
Official documentation and authoritative sources consistently outline DMARC's architecture, its dependency on SPF and DKIM, and the precise definitions of its policies and reporting mechanisms. They provide the technical backbone for understanding how DMARC operates and its role in the broader email authentication ecosystem.
Key findings
Prerequisite for DMARC: DMARC requires both SPF and DKIM to be properly configured and published as DNS records for a domain to function effectively, as it relies on their authentication results.
DMARC record type: A DMARC record is published as a TXT record in the DNS, typically under the _dmarc subdomain (e.g., _dmarc.yourdomain.com). Learn more about the list of DMARC tags and their meanings.
Policy options: DMARC records define how receiving mail servers should treat emails that fail authentication. The common policies are p=none (monitor), p=quarantine (send to spam/junk), and p=reject (block entirely).
Alignment modes: DMARC checks for alignment between the From: domain and the SPF Return-Path domain (SPF alignment) or the DKIM signing domain (DKIM alignment). This alignment can be strict or relaxed, depending on the policy configuration.
Reporting mechanism: The DMARC record specifies where aggregated (RUA) and forensic (RUF) reports should be sent, allowing domain owners to receive detailed feedback on email authentication outcomes.
Key considerations
Mandatory authentication: Per WP Mail SMTP, implementing DMARC means ensuring all legitimate email sources are authenticated with SPF and DKIM. Failure to do so will result in legitimate emails being impacted by the DMARC policy.
Subdomain policies: The sp tag in a DMARC record allows for specifying a policy for subdomains different from the organizational domain. If not specified, the main domain's policy applies to subdomains.
Monitoring reports: The documentation stresses the importance of regularly reviewing DMARC aggregate reports to identify legitimate sending sources that might not be properly authenticated and unauthorized spoofing attempts. For examples of record and policy configurations, see DMARC record and policy examples.
DNS TXT record: Creating a DMARC record involves adding a specific TXT record to your domain's DNS settings. This record contains various tags defining the DMARC policy, reporting addresses, and other configurations.
Technical article
Documentation from Fortinet outlines that DMARC requires existing DKIM or SPF configurations to be in place for an email domain, along with the publication of a DMARC record in the DNS. This emphasizes DMARC as an augmentation, not a replacement, for other authentication methods.
22 Oct 2023 - Fortinet
Technical article
Documentation from WP Mail SMTP clarifies that a DMARC record is a TXT record that provides instructions to email servers on how to manage emails that fail authentication. This record essentially tells recipient servers what actions to take against unverified mail.