The recent changes introduced by Gmail and Yahoo have significantly heightened the importance of DMARC alignment for all email senders, particularly those using a branded domain. These updates, primarily targeting bulk senders, mandate robust authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to combat spam and enhance email security. For businesses operating with a branded domain, understanding these requirements is not just about compliance, but about ensuring continued inbox delivery and maintaining sender reputation.The core of these changes revolves around ensuring that the domain in the 'From' header aligns with the domains used for SPF and DKIM authentication. A branded subdomain, such as email.yourbrand.com, is generally considered part of your branded domain. Therefore, as long as DMARC, SPF, and DKIM are correctly configured for this specific subdomain, you should be compliant.
Key findings
Branded Domain Definition: A subdomain like email.yourbrand.com is considered a branded domain, distinct from a shared sending domain provided by a third party (an ESP). This distinction is crucial for compliance.
DMARC Alignment: Emails must pass DMARC alignment, meaning the 'From' domain must align with either the DKIM 'd=' tag domain or the SPF 'Return-Path' domain. Without proper alignment, messages are likely to be rejected or sent to spam.
Authentication Requirements: All senders, particularly bulk senders, must have valid SPF and DKIM records in place. These foundational authentication methods are prerequisites for DMARC implementation and compliance.
DMARC Policy: A DMARC record with at least a 'p=none' policy is now mandatory for bulk senders. While 'p=none' is a monitoring policy, it serves as a starting point for compliance with the new rules.
Domain Reputation: Even with perfect authentication, a poor domain reputation due to high spam rates will severely impact deliverability. Keeping complaint rates below 0.3% is essential.
Key considerations
Verify Authentication: Ensure your branded domain (including any subdomains used for sending) has correctly configured SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records. Use a deliverability testing tool to confirm proper setup.
DMARC Policy Implementation: If you are a bulk sender and do not have a DMARC policy, you must publish one. Starting with p=none allows for monitoring, while planning to move to stricter policies like p=quarantine or p=reject is advisable for long-term security.
Monitor Deliverability: Continuously monitor your deliverability rates and DMARC reports to identify and resolve any authentication failures or blocklist issues promptly. Pay close attention to your DMARC reports for insights.
Manage Spam Complaints: Actively work to keep your spam complaint rate low by maintaining a clean mailing list, segmenting audiences, and providing a clear, one-click unsubscribe option. High complaint rates will directly impact your sender reputation and inbox placement.
Understand Alignment Nuances: Deep dive into how DMARC alignment works for both SPF and DKIM. Sometimes one passes while the other fails, leading to DMARC failure.
Email marketers have been actively discussing the implications of the new Gmail and Yahoo sender requirements, particularly regarding the use of branded domains versus shared sending domains. The consensus highlights that using your own branded domain, even a subdomain, is generally preferred and often simplifies compliance. Many marketers expressed initial confusion, but quickly grasped that direct control over authentication records on a branded domain is key to navigating these changes successfully. The emphasis shifted from whether a subdomain is 'branded' enough to whether it's properly authenticated and aligned.
Key opinions
Branded Subdomains are Safe: Marketers confirmed that a subdomain like email.yourcompany.com counts as a branded domain, not a shared one, provided you manage its DNS and authentication.
Confusion Around 'Branded': There was initial panic about the term 'branded domain,' with some marketers wondering if they needed to switch from subdomains. Clarification helped alleviate these concerns.
Authentication is Paramount: The primary concern is not the specific domain structure (root vs. subdomain) but ensuring that SPF, DKIM, and DMARC authentication is correctly set up and aligned for the sending domain.
Shared vs. Dedicated Distinction: Marketers emphasized the importance of distinguishing between using your own dedicated domain (even a subdomain) and relying on a shared domain provided by an Email Service Provider (ESP). The new rules are particularly stringent on shared domains if they are not authenticated on behalf of the sender.
Ongoing Education: Many brands are new to these technical requirements, highlighting a need for simplified explanations and educational resources to help them adapt.
Key considerations
Assess Your Sending Domain: If you're using a subdomain for sending, verify that it's truly your branded asset and not a shared domain from an ESP. Shared domains have stricter rules.
Prioritize DMARC: Ensure your DMARC record is published and correctly configured for your branded sending domain. Even a p=none policy is a must for bulk senders.
Check DKIM and SPF Alignment: Double-check that your 'From' domain, DKIM 'd=' tag, and SPF 'Return-Path' domain are all aligned to ensure DMARC passes. This is a common pitfall. For more details on this, see our article on what DMARC, DKIM, and SPF updates are needed.
Educate Your Team: Given the newness of these requirements to many, plan to educate your marketing and technical teams on the updated standards and their implications for campaigns. Resources like detailed guides can be helpful.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks asks about the need to switch to a branded domain given the new Gmail/Yahoo changes, wondering if their current subdomain is sufficient. They also confirmed they are sending.Their current setup uses email.signos.com for sending emails.
02 Jan 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Absolute Design Associates suggests that emails must pass DMARC alignment, which means they need to align with either the DKIM or SPF standards. This change is aimed at improving overall email security and reliability.They emphasize that proper authentication is the cornerstone of successful email delivery under the new guidelines.
05 Feb 2024 - Absolute Design Associates
What the experts say
Deliverability experts have provided nuanced perspectives on the Gmail and Yahoo changes, emphasizing that the key differentiator is not necessarily whether a domain is a root or a subdomain, but rather who controls the domain and its authentication records. They highlight that a subdomain of your primary brand's domain, when properly configured with SPF, DKIM, and DMARC under your control, functions effectively as a branded sending domain. The concern primarily lies with third-party shared domains where the sender lacks direct control over the authentication of the sending domain itself, which can lead to DMARC alignment failures. Experts consistently stress the importance of DMARC alignment and maintaining a healthy sender reputation.
Key opinions
Control Over Authentication: Experts agree that if you control the DNS records for your sending domain, including subdomains, you meet the 'branded' criteria for compliance. This allows for direct management of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC.
DMARC Alignment is Crucial: The core of the new requirements hinges on DMARC alignment. If the 'From' domain does not align with either the DKIM or SPF authenticated domain, deliverability will be significantly impacted.
Reputation Matters: Beyond authentication, maintaining a good sender reputation through low spam rates and positive engagement is critical for inbox placement, regardless of domain type.
Shared Domains Risk: While not directly about branded domains, experts note that senders using shared ESP domains without proper 'branding' (e.g., custom DKIM and return-path) will face significant challenges due to DMARC enforcement.
Proactive Verification: It is essential to verify that the authentication domain (e.g., DKIM and/or return-path) matches what is understood as the sending domain. This explicit confirmation helps ensure compliance.
Key considerations
Confirm Domain Control: Ensure that your organization has full control over the DNS records for any domain or subdomain used for email sending. This control is fundamental for implementing required authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC.
Review DMARC Policy: For branded domains, establish and monitor a DMARC policy. While a p=none policy is a starting point, aim to evolve towards p=quarantine or p=reject to maximize protection. More on this can be found in our guide to safely transitioning your DMARC policy.
Address Authentication Failures: If DMARC reports show failures, investigate whether it's due to SPF or DKIM misalignment, or an issue with the 'From' domain not matching authentication. Failure to address these can lead to emails landing in spam or being rejected.
Monitor Domain Reputation: Actively monitor your domain's reputation using tools like Google Postmaster Tools. A positive reputation, coupled with strong authentication, is key to successful email delivery. This is especially true for how DMARC rejections impact reputation.
Consult Experts: When in doubt, consult with email deliverability experts who can provide tailored advice for your specific sending infrastructure. Many resources, like SpamResource.com, offer valuable insights.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks seeks clarification on the specific use of a sending domain (e.g., for return path or DKIM) to accurately assess compliance. They noted the importance of understanding the precise role of the domain in the email headers.This highlights that 'sending domain' can refer to different technical aspects of an email.
02 Jan 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from WordToTheWise explains that DMARC provides a crucial framework for domain owners, enabling them to instruct receiving mail servers on how to handle unauthenticated mail originating from their domain. This control is vital for combating spoofing.It empowers domain owners to protect their brand reputation by dictating actions for emails that fail authentication.
10 Apr 2024 - WordToTheWise
What the documentation says
Official documentation from major mailbox providers and email industry bodies consistently underscores the importance of DMARC alignment for all email senders, with particular emphasis on those sending to Gmail and Yahoo accounts. The requirements specify that emails must pass authentication via SPF or DKIM, and crucially, the 'From' domain must align with the domain authenticated by at least one of these protocols. For bulk senders, a DMARC record with a policy of p=none or stronger is now mandatory. This move is a clear step towards creating a more secure and trustworthy email ecosystem, making it harder for spammers and phishers to masquerade as legitimate senders.
Key findings
Mandatory Authentication: Documentation confirms that all senders to Gmail and Yahoo must authenticate their emails with SPF and DKIM. This is a baseline requirement for email delivery.
DMARC Policy for Bulk Senders: Bulk senders (those sending 5,000+ messages per day) are explicitly required to have a DMARC record published for their sending domain, with a policy of at least p=none.
Domain Alignment: Crucially, the 'From' header domain must align with either the domain found in the SPF 'Return-Path' or the DKIM 'd=' tag. This alignment ensures that the displayed sender is indeed authorized.
Spam Rate Threshold: Senders are required to maintain a low spam complaint rate, typically below 0.3%, as reported via Google Postmaster Tools. Exceeding this threshold can lead to deliverability issues.
Easy Unsubscribe: A one-click unsubscribe mechanism is also a key requirement, designed to make it easier for recipients to opt out of unwanted emails and reduce spam complaints. Our article on new email authentication and unsubscribe requirements provides more detail.
Key considerations
Implement DMARC: Ensure a DMARC record exists for your sending domain. Even if you are not a bulk sender yet, it's a best practice for domain protection and future compliance. Our guide on DMARC requirements can help.
Verify SPF and DKIM: Confirm that your SPF and DKIM records are correctly published in DNS and that your email sending system is properly signing emails. Misconfigurations are common and can lead to authentication failures.
Monitor DMARC Reports: Regularly analyze DMARC reports (RUA and RUF) to gain visibility into your email authentication performance and identify any unauthorized sending or legitimate failures. These reports are invaluable for diagnostics.
Optimize Sending Practices: Beyond technical setup, ensure your email content is relevant, your lists are clean, and you are not sending to disengaged recipients. High engagement and low complaint rates reinforce your sender reputation.
Address Forwarding Impact: Be aware of how email forwarding can affect DMARC and other authentication results. Some forwarding scenarios can break SPF and DKIM, leading to DMARC failures.
Technical article
Documentation from Twilio indicates that the new sender requirements implemented by Gmail and Yahoo are fundamentally aimed at improving email security and fostering greater trust within the email ecosystem. They emphasize that stricter authentication helps protect users from malicious emails.This foundational shift seeks to reduce spam, phishing, and spoofing activities across these major mailbox providers.
17 Jan 2024 - Twilio
Technical article
Documentation from BuzzStream specifies that senders of 5,000 or more emails per day must ensure their emails are properly authenticated with SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. This clear threshold dictates which senders fall under the stricter bulk sender rules.Adherence to all three protocols is mandatory for high-volume senders to maintain deliverability.