Improving signup confirmation email delivery for a new domain presents unique challenges. The core issue often lies with establishing sender reputation and ensuring that initial messages bypass spam filters, which are particularly cautious of unestablished senders. While unconventional methods like relying on inbound emails for confirmation might seem intuitive, standard web-based sign-up flows coupled with robust authentication and a proper domain warm-up strategy are generally more effective and scalable. Prioritizing foundational deliverability practices will yield better long-term results than trying to find workarounds.
Key findings
Domain reputation: Newly registered domains lack sending history, leading to stricter filtering by mail servers. This can result in confirmation emails being treated as suspicious or being placed on a blocklist.
Greylisting effectiveness: SMTP servers using greylisting primarily operate on incoming MX data and delivery attempts, not outbound delivery information or Mail User Agent (MUA) data. Relying on a user sending an email first to bypass greylisting for a reply is unlikely to be broadly effective across major providers.
Web forms for sign-up: Web sign-up forms provide significantly more data points (HTTP headers, JavaScript support, image loading, behavioral analysis) to assess user legitimacy and mitigate bot traffic, which is crucial for preventing abuse like subscription bombing.
DMARC for trust: An incoming email with a DMARC-aligned pass indicates a relationship between the domain in the From: header and the sender, which can be a positive signal for your system. However, its absence does not necessarily mean the sender is illegitimate.
Key considerations
Sender reputation: Focus on building a strong sender reputation from day one. This includes proper email authentication with SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, and a careful warm-up process for your new domain.
Domain warm-up: Allowing your domain to age and gradually increasing sending volume is crucial. This helps establish trust with mailbox providers and avoid being flagged as spam. Learn more about warming up a new domain.
Subscription bombing prevention: Implement anti-bot measures on your sign-up forms, such as CAPTCHAs and behavioral analysis. Be aware that email address canonicalization (e.g., handling Gmail dots or plus aliases) helps with deduplication but not with attacks like subscription bombing, which occur across multiple senders.
User experience for delivery issues: Provide clear instructions for users to check their spam folders for confirmation emails and a straightforward escalation path if delivery issues persist. This empowers users to help improve future delivery by marking your email as not spam and moving it to their inbox.
What email marketers say
Email marketers frequently encounter challenges with confirmation email delivery, especially from new domains. While innovative approaches like email-based sign-ups are explored, the consensus points towards standard web forms combined with a strong focus on established deliverability best practices. The emphasis is on building trust with internet service providers (ISPs) and maintaining a positive sender reputation through consistent, legitimate sending patterns and user engagement.
Key opinions
Web sign-ups are standard: The vast majority of online services use web forms for sign-ups due to the rich data collected, which aids in validating users and preventing abuse.
Information advantage of web forms: Web forms offer more information about the sender (IP address, browser data, JavaScript status) than an inbound email, which helps in distinguishing human users from bots.
New domain challenges: A new domain without sending history will inherently face deliverability hurdles. Attempting unconventional fixes might not be the most efficient use of resources.
User interaction as a fix: Requiring users to interact with a confirmation email (e.g., clicking a link) and teaching them to check spam folders and move emails to the inbox can positively influence future email delivery.
Key considerations
Anti-abuse measures: Services that send emails are targets for abusers, as seen with subscription bombing attacks. Implementing robust anti-bot measures for sign-ups is essential, regardless of perceived service value to abusers.
Leverage existing solutions: Many email service providers (ESPs) have already developed solutions to mitigate common deliverability and anti-abuse problems. Utilizing these off-the-shelf approaches can save development effort and prevent common mistakes.
Canonicalization of email addresses: While not a full solution for subscription bombing, canonicalizing local parts of email addresses (e.g., removing dots in Gmail addresses or ignoring ''+aliases) is a practical measure for deduplication and rate-limiting to the same recipient.
Escalation paths for technical users: For services with technical audiences, providing an escalation path for delivery issues can lead to valuable bug reports and help diagnose problems effectively.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks observes that they are experiencing mail servers rejecting their initial confirmation messages and having a newly registered domain that ended up on a blocklist. This is a common challenge for new senders. They idealize that a user sending an inbound message would be sufficient to signal trust for replies.
13 Mar 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks states that their service is a testbed for learning about deliverability, specifically for notifications about newly released Go modules. They acknowledge that their current webform signup analysis is basic, using only IP-based rate limiting, which suggests a need for more sophisticated bot detection.
13 Mar 2024 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability consistently advise against deviating from established best practices, particularly for new domains. Their insights highlight the complexities of mailbox provider systems, the limitations of attempting to bypass standard filters, and the critical importance of foundational elements like proper authentication and gradual sending volume increases (warm-up). They stress that sophisticated anti-abuse measures are necessary for any service sending email, irrespective of perceived threat levels.
Key opinions
Greylisting nuances: Greylisting typically occurs on the incoming Mail Exchanger (MX) and relies on delivery attempts to the MX. It does not factor in data from outbound deliveries or user agents, making it an unreliable mechanism for implicit allowlisting based on user replies.
Web forms for security: Web forms provide crucial information to determine if a client is human and benign, including HTTP request headers, JavaScript support, image loading, and behavioral analysis. This data can be used to implement CAPTCHAs or flag untrusted IPs.
Avoid 'MacGyvering' fixes: For new domains, attempts to create unconventional solutions to delivery problems are often less effective and sustainable than adhering to established best practices.
DMARC for domain trust: An incoming email with a DMARC-aligned pass provides assurance that the domain in the From: header is legitimately associated with the sender. However, this does not mean unaligned emails are necessarily illegitimate.
Key considerations
Strategic domain aging: Allowing a new domain to age and using a reputable ESP are more effective and sustainable approaches to establishing domain reputation. This also involves monitoring your sending IP address reputation.
Universal solutions for sign-ups: Solutions for secure and reliable web sign-ups are widely available and often included with ESPs, addressing problems like subscription bombing.
Canonicalization benefits: While not preventing all abuse, canonicalizing email addresses (e.g., handling ''+'' and Gmail dots) is practical for deduplication and rate limiting at the sender's end, even if it doesn't solve list bombing by different senders.
Continuous learning: For those building their own mail systems, experimenting with DMARC checks and observing outcomes is a valuable learning process. Having an escalation path for users who encounter issues is vital.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks indicates that greylisting as a mechanism is unlikely to occur at large, highly integrated email providers. They clarify that greylisting operates purely on the incoming MX, relying on delivery attempts to that MX, and does not incorporate data from outbound deliveries or the Mail User Agent (MUA).
13 Mar 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks states that sending an email to subscribe is largely obsolete, with web signup forms being the prevalent method. They highlight that web signups provide significantly more information compared to inbound emails, making them superior for security and data collection.
13 Mar 2024 - Email Gefter
What the documentation says
Official documentation and research consistently highlight the foundational role of email authentication and sender reputation in deliverability, especially for new sending domains. They underscore the importance of building trust gradually with mailbox providers and adhering to established protocols. Spam prevention mechanisms, including spam filters and blacklists, are designed to protect recipients from unwanted mail, making initial hurdles for new domains a common and expected challenge that must be addressed through compliant and reputation-building practices.
Key findings
Authentication is critical: Properly configuring SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is fundamental for establishing sender legitimacy and improving deliverability. These protocols help mailbox providers verify that your emails are authentic and not forged.
Domain and IP warming: A new domain or IP needs to be warmed up by gradually increasing sending volume. This process builds a positive sending history and reputation with ISPs, signalling that you are a legitimate sender.
Content quality: The content of your emails plays a significant role. Helpful, relevant, and non-spammy content improves user engagement, which in turn boosts sender reputation and deliverability.
Spam filter mechanisms: Spam filters are designed to protect recipients. Understanding how they work, including their use of blacklists (or blocklists) and sender reputation scores, is vital for ensuring messages reach the inbox.
Key considerations
Proactive reputation monitoring: Regularly monitor your sender reputation using tools like Google Postmaster Tools. This allows for early detection of issues and proactive mitigation.
List hygiene: Regularly clean your email lists to remove invalid, inactive, or spam trap addresses. This improves engagement rates and prevents bounces or blacklist occurrences.
Double opt-in: Implementing a double opt-in process for sign-ups ensures that subscribers truly wish to receive your emails, leading to higher engagement and lower complaint rates. This is especially important for transactional emails like signup confirmations.
Consistent sender practices: Maintaining consistency in your sender name and overall email practices helps build trust and recognition with recipients and mailbox providers over time.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailgun states that to improve email deliverability rates, a strong starting point is to establish proper authentication methods like SPF and DKIM. They also note that for new senders, custom domain authentication is often recommended to ensure proper alignment.
14 Jan 2025 - Mailgun
Technical article
Documentation from Campaign Monitor outlines that email marketing effectiveness is contingent on proper delivery. They list several best practices that enhance email marketing deliverability, focusing on fundamental technical and content strategies.