Suped

Does SPF alignment with aspf=strict provide email deliverability benefits over aspf=relaxed?

Summary

Email marketing experts and technical documentation largely agree that employing aspf=strict SPF alignment does not offer a direct, inherent deliverability advantage over aspf=relaxed. Instead, the main benefit of strict alignment is its ability to provide stronger anti-spoofing protection, requiring an exact domain match between the From: header and the SPF-authenticated domain. This enhanced security indirectly supports email deliverability by preventing malicious actors from impersonating your domain, thereby safeguarding your sender reputation and reducing the likelihood of legitimate messages being misclassified. For most senders, the key factor for improved deliverability is achieving DMARC alignment, regardless of whether a relaxed or strict SPF policy is in place, as this demonstrates a commitment to preventing abuse and fosters trust with receiving mail servers.

Key findings

  • No Direct Deliverability Boost: The overwhelming consensus is that aspf=strict does not inherently provide a direct, superior deliverability benefit for legitimate emails compared to aspf=relaxed.
  • Indirect Deliverability Benefit: The primary advantage of aspf=strict is its enhanced security against domain spoofing. By preventing unauthorized use of your domain, it helps preserve your sender reputation, which then indirectly aids deliverability.
  • DMARC Alignment is Crucial: For deliverability, the most critical factor is simply achieving DMARC alignment, whether through relaxed or strict SPF, as this signals to receiving servers that the sender is authentic and trustworthy, building sender reputation.
  • Strict vs. Relaxed Defined: Aspf=strict demands an exact match between the domain in the RFC5322.From header and the SPF-authenticated domain. Aspf=relaxed is more lenient, allowing subdomain matches for alignment.

Key considerations

  • Security vs. Flexibility: While aspf=strict provides the strongest anti-spoofing defense, it also limits flexibility for internal configurations and third-party sending services. For many senders, aspf=relaxed is sufficient and simpler to manage, especially when using external platforms.
  • Niche Use Cases for Strict: Strict alignment might be considered in specific, rare scenarios, such as when there is a lack of trust between different divisions within a company, or for organizations seeking absolute control over every server sending mail from their domain.
  • Avoid Unnecessary Changes: If your current email deliverability is already good, experts advise against making changes to your sending configurations. Even seemingly minor adjustments could unintentionally lead to negative impacts on your deliverability.
  • Diligence with Strict Alignment: Choosing aspf=strict requires more diligent management of all sending domains to ensure every legitimate sending source maintains the exact domain match required for proper SPF alignment.

What email marketers say

12 marketer opinions

When evaluating the impact of SPF alignment on email deliverability, the consensus among experts is that selecting aspf=strict over aspf=relaxed does not inherently lead to a direct improvement in how legitimate emails reach inboxes. Instead, the primary advantage of strict alignment lies in its robust anti-spoofing capabilities, which mandate an exact match between the domain in the 'From' header and the SPF-authenticated domain. This heightened security measure indirectly aids deliverability by fortifying sender reputation, as it significantly reduces the risk of malicious entities impersonating your domain. Ultimately, the crucial factor for enhancing email deliverability is the successful implementation of DMARC alignment itself, regardless of whether a relaxed or strict SPF policy is employed. This signals to recipient mail servers a proactive stance against email abuse, thereby fostering trust.

Key opinions

  • Deliverability Parity for Legitimate Mail: Aspf=strict generally offers no direct deliverability improvement for legitimate emails compared to aspf=relaxed, as long as DMARC alignment is achieved.
  • Enhanced Anti-Spoofing Security: The main benefit of aspf=strict is its superior protection against domain spoofing, demanding an exact match between the From domain and the SPF-validated domain.
  • Reputation Preservation via Security: This heightened security indirectly supports deliverability by preventing unauthorized domain use, which safeguards sender reputation.
  • DMARC Alignment is Core: Regardless of strictness, establishing DMARC alignment remains the most critical factor for signaling sender legitimacy and building trust with receiving servers.

Key considerations

  • Balancing Security and Flexibility: While strict alignment offers maximal anti-spoofing defense, it can limit flexibility, especially when using third-party email services that might send from subdomains.
  • Contextual Application of Strict: Aspf=strict is rarely necessary for most senders but can be considered in specific, high-security edge cases, such as managing trust between internal company divisions.
  • Risk of Unnecessary Changes: Experts advise against altering well-functioning email sending configurations, as even minor adjustments can inadvertently negatively impact current deliverability rates.
  • Management Complexity: Implementing aspf=strict requires meticulous management to ensure all legitimate sending sources consistently achieve the exact domain match, which can be more complex than relaxed alignment.

Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks explains that there is likely no deliverability benefit to using aspf=strict over aspf=relaxed. He notes that "DMARC aligned" is the widely accepted standard, which typically involves aspf=relaxed, and advises against being concerned about it unless conflicting data emerges.

26 Feb 2023 - Email Geeks

Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks advises that if current email deliverability is satisfactory, it's best not to alter sending configurations or seek minor improvements, as even seemingly inconsequential changes could negatively impact deliverability.

1 Jun 2023 - Email Geeks

What the experts say

2 expert opinions

Building on previous discussions about SPF alignment, it's evident that aspf=strict offers significant advantages over aspf=relaxed, particularly concerning security and fostering trust. Strict alignment, which necessitates an exact domain match between the 'From' header and the SPF-validated domain, provides a superior level of authentication. This rigorous control is crucial for more effectively preventing domain spoofing and unauthorized use of a domain. By making it much harder for malicious actors to impersonate a legitimate sender, strict SPF alignment reinforces the sender's identity, thereby enhancing sender reputation and building greater confidence with recipient mail servers. Ultimately, this stronger security posture directly contributes to better email deliverability, as it increases the chances of legitimate messages being successfully placed in the recipient's inbox.

Key opinions

  • Superior Authentication: Aspf=strict provides a higher degree of authentication by mandating an exact domain match, thereby offering stronger assurance of the sender's identity.
  • Rigorously Prevents Spoofing: The strict alignment makes it considerably more difficult for spammers to spoof the sending domain, contributing to more rigorous prevention of unauthorized email.
  • Enhances Sender Reputation: By reinforcing sender identity and preventing domain impersonation, strict SPF alignment helps build and maintain a strong sender reputation and trust with receiving mail servers.
  • Increases Inbox Placement: The enhanced security and trust derived from strict alignment indirectly contribute to improved deliverability, increasing the likelihood that legitimate emails will successfully reach the inbox.

Key considerations

  • Control vs. Flexibility: While aspf=strict offers unparalleled control by requiring an exact domain match, aspf=relaxed provides valuable flexibility, especially for organizations that rely on third-party senders utilizing subdomains.
  • Organizational Security Needs: Strict SPF alignment is particularly beneficial for organizations prioritizing the highest level of security and wishing to ensure that only their explicitly authorized servers send mail on their behalf.

Expert view

Expert from Spam Resource shares that strict SPF alignment, which requires an exact domain match between the From: domain and the SPF-validated domain, offers benefits for organizations that want to ensure only their own servers send mail. This tighter control, compared to relaxed alignment which permits subdomain matches, contributes to better deliverability by more rigorously preventing spoofing and unauthorized use of the domain, thereby enhancing sender reputation and trust.

15 Jan 2023 - Spam Resource

Expert view

Expert from Word to the Wise explains that while relaxed SPF alignment offers flexibility, particularly for third-party senders using subdomains, strict SPF alignment provides a higher degree of authentication by requiring an exact domain match. This exactitude can offer deliverability benefits by providing stronger assurance of the sender's identity, making it harder for spammers to spoof the domain effectively, thereby increasing the likelihood of legitimate emails reaching the inbox.

31 May 2022 - Word to the Wise

What the documentation says

6 technical articles

Rather than providing a direct, inherent boost to email deliverability, SPF alignment with aspf=strict primarily enhances security. This strict policy demands an exact match between the domain in the From header and the SPF-authenticated domain, providing a more robust defense against domain spoofing and malicious impersonation. While this stronger security posture does not directly ensure better inbox placement for legitimate emails compared to aspf=relaxed, it indirectly supports deliverability. By effectively preventing unauthorized use of your domain, aspf=strict helps to preserve sender reputation and build trust with recipient mail servers, thereby mitigating risks that could otherwise negatively impact the delivery of your legitimate communications. Ultimately, the most crucial factor for email deliverability remains the successful implementation of DMARC alignment, regardless of whether a relaxed or strict SPF policy is in place.

Key findings

  • No Direct Deliverability Gain: Consensus among experts and documentation indicates that aspf=strict does not inherently offer a direct, superior deliverability advantage for legitimate emails over aspf=relaxed.
  • Security, Not Deliverability, is Primary Benefit: The main advantage of strict SPF alignment is its enhanced anti-spoofing capabilities, providing a higher level of security by requiring an exact domain match.
  • Indirect Deliverability Support: This stronger security indirectly aids deliverability by protecting sender reputation from spoofing attempts and fostering trust, rather than directly improving inbox placement.
  • DMARC Alignment is Key: For deliverability, the most critical aspect is achieving DMARC alignment itself, which signals legitimacy and trustworthiness to receiving mail systems, irrespective of the strictness level chosen for SPF.

Key considerations

  • Increased Management Effort: Implementing aspf=strict requires diligent management of all sending domains to ensure every legitimate source precisely matches the required domain, which can be more complex than relaxed alignment.
  • Balancing Security and Operational Flexibility: While strict alignment offers robust security, relaxed alignment provides more flexibility, particularly for organizations utilizing various third-party email services that might send from subdomains.
  • Focus on Preventing Abuse: The core value of strict alignment is its ability to prevent abuse and maintain a clean sender reputation, which are foundational for long-term deliverability success.
  • Suitability for Specific Security Needs: Aspf=strict is best suited for organizations with very specific, high-security requirements or those needing absolute control over their sending domains to prevent any form of impersonation.

Technical article

Documentation from Valimail explains that while DMARC aspf=strict requires an exact match between the domain in the RFC5322.From header and the SPF-authenticated domain, and aspf=relaxed allows subdomain matches, choosing strict over relaxed does not inherently provide direct email deliverability benefits. Instead, strict alignment's primary benefit is stronger anti-spoofing protection, which indirectly contributes to deliverability by preventing abuse and improving sender reputation over time.

2 Apr 2024 - Valimail

Technical article

Documentation from DMARC.org states that strict alignment (aspf=strict) offers stronger protection against phishing and spoofing by requiring an exact match between the RFC5322.From domain and the domain validated by SPF. While it provides a higher level of security, it also requires more diligent management of sending domains. The FAQ implies that the primary benefit is security, which indirectly supports deliverability by reducing spoofing attempts and maintaining a good sender reputation, rather than a direct deliverability boost over relaxed alignment.

19 Mar 2024 - DMARC.org

Start improving your email deliverability today

Sign up