Summary
While a LinkedIn news feature can significantly amplify content visibility and drive traffic, it does not inherently lead to an increase in email spam complaints. Instead, any surge in complaints is almost exclusively linked to how email addresses are collected and managed from this amplified audience. The consensus among experts is that poor list acquisition practices, particularly a failure to secure explicit and verifiable consent, are the primary culprits behind higher complaint rates, not the LinkedIn feature itself. Marketers are advised to implement robust opt-in processes, like double opt-in, to ensure that new subscribers genuinely wish to receive emails, thereby mitigating the risk of unwanted emails being marked as spam.
Key findings
- No Direct Link: A LinkedIn news feature itself does not directly cause an increase in email spam complaints; the feature primarily amplifies content visibility and reach.
- Consent is Paramount: The primary driver of increased complaints stems from improper list acquisition practices, particularly the absence of explicit, clear, and verifiable consent for email subscriptions.
- Opt-in Necessity: Acquiring subscribers from social media, including those influenced by a LinkedIn news feature, necessitates a robust and active opt-in process, with double opt-in being strongly recommended.
- Expectation Mismatch: If users are added to an email list without their active request, or if the email content does not align with their expectations set by the initial interaction, they are highly likely to mark emails as spam.
- Reputation Impact: High complaint rates damage sender reputation and can lead to severe deliverability issues, account suspensions by Email Service Providers (ESPs), and non-compliance with email marketing regulations.
Key considerations
- Prioritize Explicit Opt-in: Always ensure clear, unambiguous consent is obtained for every email sign-up, especially for leads generated through high-visibility platforms like LinkedIn.
- Implement Double Opt-in: Employ double opt-in processes for all social media-driven leads to verify intent and significantly reduce the risk of spam complaints.
- Manage Subscriber Expectations: Clearly communicate what subscribers will receive, how often, and why, to prevent them from feeling misled and to encourage positive engagement.
- Qualify Leads Carefully: Focus on attracting genuinely interested subscribers rather than simply collecting large volumes of email addresses, as higher quality leads lead to lower complaint rates.
- Understand User Behavior: Recognize that users often choose 'report spam' over unsubscribe if they feel an email is unsolicited or unwelcome, even if an unsubscribe link is present.
- Ensure Compliance: Ensure all list acquisition and email sending practices comply with relevant regulations such as CAN-SPAM and GDPR to avoid legal issues and deliverability problems.
What email marketers say
11 marketer opinions
A LinkedIn news feature primarily serves to enhance content visibility and audience reach; it does not, by itself, directly cause an uptick in email spam complaints. The actual risk of increased complaints stems entirely from how marketers manage the transition of engaged viewers into email subscribers. If individuals are added to a mailing list without their clear, explicit consent, or if their expectations regarding the email content are not met, they are far more likely to mark such communications as spam. This underscores the critical importance of a robust, consent-based opt-in process, particularly when converting leads generated from social media platforms.
Key opinions
- No direct link to complaints: A LinkedIn news feature's role is to boost content exposure and audience reach, not to directly cause an increase in email spam complaints.
- Consent is the core issue: Surges in spam complaints are predominantly tied to the absence of clear, active consent during the email subscription process, particularly when sourcing leads from social media.
- Spam over unsubscribe preference: If recipients perceive an email as unsolicited or unwelcome, they often choose to report it as spam rather than simply unsubscribing, even if an unsubscribe option is available.
- Expectation mismatch drives complaints: Adding users to an email list without their explicit request, or sending content that doesn't align with their initial engagement, frequently leads to increased spam reports.
- Impact on sender reputation: High spam complaint rates negatively affect sender reputation and email deliverability, signaling to Internet Service Providers that your emails are unwanted.
- Double opt-in is a safeguard: Implementing a double opt-in process is highly effective for verifying subscriber intent and significantly reducing the likelihood of spam complaints from social media leads.
Key considerations
- Prioritize explicit consent: Always ensure that individuals generated from LinkedIn features provide clear, active consent before being added to any email marketing list.
- Utilize double opt-in: For all leads originating from social media, including LinkedIn, implement double opt-in to confirm their genuine interest and prevent unsolicited additions.
- Manage subscriber expectations: Clearly communicate what subscribers will receive and how often, ensuring the email content aligns with the interest shown on LinkedIn to avoid disappointment and spam reports.
- Focus on lead qualification: Aim to attract genuinely interested subscribers rather than merely collecting email addresses, as higher quality leads are less likely to complain.
- Understand user reporting behavior: Recognize that users often report spam if an email feels unrequested or irrelevant, so design your opt-in process to prevent this perception.
- Monitor engagement and deliverability: Pay close attention to open rates, click-through rates, and complaint rates from new subscribers to quickly identify and address any issues affecting your sender reputation.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks shares his doubt about the LinkedIn news feature causing a sudden uptick in spam complaints, drawing a parallel to similar discussions that arose with the rollout of CAN-SPAM.
21 May 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that if a recipient didn't subscribe to an email, they should mark it as spam instead of unsubscribing. He doubts that one more article giving advice that has been around for decades on a niche website will significantly increase spam complaints.
16 Dec 2021 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
2 expert opinions
A LinkedIn news feature, while effective for amplifying reach, does not directly cause an increase in email spam complaints. Instead, any rise in complaints is an indirect consequence, typically occurring when the feature drives a large volume of new subscribers who are not adequately onboarded, lack strong intent to receive emails, or whose expectations are not clearly established. Experts emphasize that successful email deliverability hinges on sending only to individuals who have explicitly requested and anticipate receiving communications.
Key opinions
- Indirect Complaint Risk: A LinkedIn news feature itself does not directly lead to email spam complaints; the risk arises indirectly from the management of newly acquired subscribers.
- Subscriber Intent: An influx of new subscribers, if they lack strong intent to receive emails or are not properly onboarded, can lead to increased spam complaints.
- Expectation Setting: Clear communication of expectations and robust consent are crucial to prevent new subscribers, especially those from high-visibility features, from marking emails as spam.
- Explicit Request Rule: To avoid complaints, emails should only be sent to individuals who have explicitly requested them and anticipate their arrival.
Key considerations
- Onboarding Process: Develop a thorough onboarding process for all new subscribers originating from high-profile features like LinkedIn to ensure their engagement and understanding.
- Verify Intent: Implement measures to confirm the strong intent of new subscribers to receive emails, as opposed to simply collecting volume.
- Clarify Expectations: Proactively set clear expectations for new subscribers regarding email content, frequency, and purpose, aligning with their initial interaction on LinkedIn.
- Consent Verification: Reinforce explicit consent mechanisms for all sign-ups driven by a news feature to ensure subscribers genuinely want to be on the list.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains that a LinkedIn news feature itself doesn't directly cause spam complaints, but if it leads to a surge of new subscribers who are not properly onboarded or do not have strong intent to receive emails, it can indirectly increase email spam complaints. The article, 'The New Subscriber Challenge,' highlights that new subscribers acquired through various methods can pose a deliverability risk, including higher complaint rates, if their expectations are not clearly set or their consent is not robust.
18 Oct 2024 - Word to the Wise
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that a LinkedIn news feature itself won't directly cause email spam complaints, but the resulting influx of new subscribers could lead to increased complaints if proper consent and clear subscriber expectations are not maintained. John Levine's article, 'Best Practices to Avoid Spam Complaints,' emphasizes that the most critical rule for preventing complaints is to send email only to individuals who have explicitly requested it and anticipate receiving it. Therefore, if a news feature drives sign-ups from users with low intent or unclear expectations, a rise in complaints is probable.
22 Nov 2022 - Spam Resource
What the documentation says
5 technical articles
A LinkedIn news feature primarily boosts content reach and audience engagement, but it is not a direct cause of increased email spam complaints. Instead, the risk of higher complaint rates arises from the methods used to convert this engaged audience into email subscribers. When email addresses are collected without explicit, verifiable consent, or if implied consent is assumed from social media engagement, the likelihood of recipients marking emails as spam significantly increases. This principle is reinforced by major Email Service Providers and regulatory bodies, who stress that proper consent and adherence to acts like CAN-SPAM and GDPR are paramount for maintaining good sender reputation and deliverability.
Key findings
- No direct cause: A LinkedIn news feature's role is to amplify content visibility; it does not directly generate spam complaints.
- Consent central: The absence of explicit, verifiable consent during email acquisition is the leading cause of increased spam complaints, regardless of lead source.
- Regulatory mandates: Non-compliance with regulations like GDPR and CAN-SPAM, particularly regarding consent and clear opt-out options, exacerbates the risk of spam reports and legal issues.
- ESP policies: Email Service Providers strictly enforce direct opt-in policies, flagging lists derived from manual additions or implied consent for high complaint rates, which can lead to account suspension.
- Deliverability impact: Acquiring emails without proper consent can result in landing on spam traps or incurring high complaint rates, severely damaging sender reputation and email deliverability.
- Double opt-in value: Implementing double opt-in is a highly recommended practice to confirm subscriber intent and effectively mitigate the risk of spam complaints.
Key considerations
- Obtain explicit consent: Always secure clear, unambiguous, and verifiable consent for every email sign-up, particularly for leads generated through high-visibility platforms like LinkedIn.
- Utilize double opt-in: Implement a double opt-in process for all new subscribers to confirm their genuine interest and significantly reduce potential spam complaints.
- Ensure regulatory compliance: Adhere strictly to email marketing laws such as CAN-SPAM and GDPR, focusing on transparent consent, clear sender identification, and accessible unsubscribe mechanisms.
- Avoid implied consent: Refrain from manually adding contacts or assuming consent based solely on engagement with a LinkedIn feature or other social media content.
- Prioritize list quality: Focus on attracting truly interested subscribers who actively opt-in, as a high-quality list inherently yields lower complaint rates and better engagement.
- Educate subscribers: Clearly communicate what subscribers can expect in terms of content and frequency to align their expectations and prevent them from marking emails as spam.
Technical article
Documentation from SendGrid Docs explains that while a LinkedIn news feature can drive traffic, the risk of increased spam complaints comes from poor list acquisition practices, not the feature itself. SendGrid emphasizes that any email address added to a list without verifiable, explicit consent, regardless of the source, is prone to generating spam complaints. They recommend double opt-in to mitigate this risk.
22 Jun 2022 - SendGrid Docs
Technical article
Documentation from Validity (formerly Return Path) Blog indicates that collecting emails from any source, including those who engage with a LinkedIn news feature, without proper consent can lead to acquiring spam trap addresses or generating high complaint rates. Their research shows that consent is a primary factor in maintaining good deliverability and avoiding spam folders.
22 Apr 2023 - Validity (Return Path) Blog
Can using social media links or classes trigger spam filters?
Does linking to paywalled content in email affect sender reputation and engagement?
How does linking to external sites in an industry news roundup impact email deliverability?
How will Google's approach to allowing political campaign emails impact spam filtering and user experience?
What could cause a sudden, drastic increase in spam complaint rates?
Why am I suddenly getting an influx of spam complaints?
