Summary
Third-party emails linking to your website can face rejection by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) due to a complex interplay of factors, primarily stemming from the sender's reputation and technical adherence to email standards. ISPs scrutinize these emails for signs of spam, phishing, or unauthorized sending, often flagging them based on the third party's sender history, authentication failures, or even the content's characteristics. Crucially, the sending practices of these external partners can also inadvertently damage your own domain's reputation, leading to rejections of emails containing your links, regardless of your direct sending quality.
Key findings
- Poor Sender Reputation: Emails are rejected if the third-party sender's IP address or domain is on a blocklist or has a history of sending spam or malicious content, indicating a poor sender reputation.
- Authentication Failures: Rejections occur when third-party emails fail DMARC, SPF, or DKIM authentication, particularly if your DMARC policy is set to 'reject' or the sender is not explicitly authorized by your domain's SPF record.
- Content and Design Issues: Spam filters can be triggered by suspicious content, such as excessive images, suspicious keywords, broken links, or poorly formatted HTML within the third-party email, signaling low quality or spam.
- Impact on Linked Domain Reputation: Poor sending practices by third parties, including high complaint rates or low engagement from their mailings, can negatively affect your own domain's reputation, leading to rejections of emails containing your links.
- Technical Configuration Gaps: A lack of proper reverse DNS records or insufficient IP/domain warmup by the third-party sender can cause ISPs to view the emails as suspicious or less legitimate, leading to rejections.
- Perceived Spoofing or Phishing: ISPs may reject emails if URL patterns, like 'partner-com' instead of '.com', or mismatched domains between the visible text of a link and its HTML code, resemble past phishing attempts.
- Low Engagement Metrics: Consistently low open and click-through rates from the third-party sender can signal to ISPs that their emails are unwanted by recipients, contributing to increased rejections.
Key considerations
- Vet Third-Party Partners: Carefully select and monitor third-party senders, ensuring they adhere to strict email sending policies and best practices to protect your domain's reputation.
- Mandate Proper Authentication: Ensure all third-party senders are correctly authorized in your SPF and DKIM records and align with your DMARC policy to pass authentication checks.
- Monitor DMARC Policy: Understand how your DMARC policy, especially if set to 'reject' or 'quarantine', directly impacts the deliverability of third-party emails that fail authentication.
- Emphasize Content Quality: Provide guidelines to third parties regarding content creation, advising them to avoid spam triggers, suspicious formatting, broken links, and excessive images.
- Promote List Hygiene and Engagement: Encourage third-party senders to maintain clean lists, avoid unengaged addresses, and prioritize recipient engagement to reduce bounce rates and spam complaints.
- Ensure Technical Compliance: Verify that third-party senders maintain proper technical setups, including correct reverse DNS records and appropriate IP or domain warmup procedures for new sending infrastructure.
- Understand ISP Guidelines: Be aware of and encourage third-party adherence to major ISP bulk sender guidelines, such as those from Google and Microsoft, to optimize deliverability.
What email marketers say
8 marketer opinions
When third-party emails incorporating links to your website fail to reach their intended recipients, it's often a sign of underlying issues with the sender's practices or technical configuration. ISPs are highly sensitive to signals of suspicious activity, poor sender reputation, or non-compliance with established email protocols. These rejections can stem from various sources, including authentication failures, problematic content, inadequate sender infrastructure, or a history of low recipient engagement, all of which raise red flags for deliverability.
Key opinions
- Sender Reputation Issues: Third-party emails are rejected if the sender's IP address or domain has been blocklisted due to a history of sending unsolicited or malicious email, indicating a poor reputation.
- DMARC Authentication Failures: Rejections commonly occur when third-party emails fail DMARC authentication because they do not align with your domain's SPF or DKIM records, especially if your DMARC policy is set to 'reject'.
- Content and Design Triggers: Even with proper authentication, emails can be rejected if their content or design activates spam filters, signaled by excessive images, suspicious keywords, broken links, or poorly formatted HTML.
- Poor List Hygiene: If a third-party sender utilizes poor list hygiene, sending to invalid or unengaged email addresses, high bounce rates and spam complaints will lead ISPs to reject their emails.
- Technical Setup Deficiencies: Emails may be rejected if the third-party sender's server lacks proper reverse DNS (rDNS) records or if a new IP address or domain has not been adequately warmed up before sending large volumes.
- Suspicious URL Patterns: ISPs might perceive specific URL patterns, such as 'partner-com' instead of '.com' or other variations resembling past phishing attempts, as spoofing, leading to rejections.
- Lack of Recipient Engagement: Consistently low open and click-through rates for the third-party sender signal to ISPs that their emails are unwanted by recipients, which can contribute to increased rejections.
Key considerations
- Strict Vetting of Senders: Thoroughly evaluate third-party senders, ensuring they uphold high email sending standards and best practices to protect your brand's reputation.
- Enforce Authentication Protocols: Require all third-party senders to properly configure SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, ensuring their emails align with your domain's authentication policies to prevent rejections.
- Optimize Content for Deliverability: Provide clear guidelines to third parties regarding email content and design, advising them to avoid spam triggers, suspicious formatting, broken links, or excessive images.
- Prioritize List Health: Encourage third-party senders to maintain clean subscriber lists and to actively engage their audience to minimize bounce rates and spam complaints, improving deliverability.
- Validate Technical Setup: Confirm that third-party senders have correctly configured technical elements, including reverse DNS records and proper IP or domain warmup procedures for new sending infrastructure.
- Proactive DMARC Monitoring: Regularly analyze DMARC reports to promptly identify and resolve any third-party sending issues that lead to authentication failures and subsequent email rejections.
- Adherence to ISP Best Practices: Stay informed about and promote adherence to major ISP bulk sender guidelines among third-party senders to optimize deliverability and reduce the likelihood of rejections.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks explains that Comcast might perceive third-party emails linking to a site as a spoofing attempt and suggests that URL patterns like 'partner-com' instead of '.com' could be flagged due to their resemblance to past phishing attempts.
8 Apr 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from SendGrid explains that if a third-party email linking to your website fails DMARC authentication because it doesn't align with your domain's SPF or DKIM records, ISPs will reject it, especially if your DMARC policy is set to 'reject'. This is a common issue when third parties are not authorized correctly.
13 Sep 2024 - SendGrid Blog
What the experts say
3 expert opinions
Emails sent by third parties that include links to your website can be rejected by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) primarily because ISPs assess the reputation of not only the sender, but also the domains featured within the email. When third-party senders, such as affiliates, exhibit poor email practices-like sending to unengaged lists, generating high complaint rates, or even having technical discrepancies such as mismatched link domains-this negatively impacts the reputation of your linked website domain. This association can cause ISPs to filter or reject emails containing your links, even if your own direct email sending practices are excellent, as your domain becomes associated with the problematic sender's activity, which can also harm your overall email deliverability.
Key opinions
- Linked Domain Reputation is Key: ISPs evaluate the reputation of domains linked within email content, in addition to the sender's IP and domain reputation.
- Third-Party Practices Affect Your Domain: Poor sending practices by third-party senders, such as affiliates, directly harm the reputation of your linked domain.
- Associated Deliverability Risk: Your own email deliverability can be negatively impacted by your domain's association with third-party mailings that generate high complaint rates or low engagement.
- Link Mismatches Trigger Fraud Warnings: Discrepancies between the visible text of a link and its underlying HTML code can be perceived as fraudulent, leading to email rejection.
Key considerations
- Rigorous Partner Management: It is critical to carefully manage and continuously monitor all third-party email partners who include links to your website.
- Enforce Best Practices: Ensure that all third-party partners adhere to strict email sending policies and best practices.
- Proactive Reputation Protection: Vigilant oversight of third-party senders is essential to protect your own domain's email deliverability and avoid being penalized for their actions.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that mismatched domains between the visible text of a link and its HTML code can sometimes trigger fraud warnings, leading to email rejection.
16 Jun 2025 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that when third-party senders, such as affiliates, send emails containing links to your website, their poor sending practices can negatively impact your domain's reputation with ISPs. Even though you are not directly sending the email, ISPs associate the linked domain with the sender's reputation. This can lead to your website's links being rejected in these third-party emails, and can also harm your own email deliverability due to association with high complaint rates or low engagement from those third-party mailings. It is crucial to monitor and ensure third-party partners adhere to strict email sending policies.
21 Oct 2022 - Spam Resource
What the documentation says
5 technical articles
Third-party emails containing links to your website face rejection by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) primarily due to issues originating from the sender's reputation, their adherence to technical email standards, and compliance with ISP guidelines. ISPs actively monitor for signs of spam, unauthorized sending, or malicious content, and will reject emails from senders with a poor history or those that fail fundamental authentication checks like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. This means that if a third party's sending practices are subpar-or if your own domain's DMARC policy is strict and their emails fail authentication-your linked content will not reach recipients, regardless of your site's own reputation.
Key findings
- Poor Sender Standing: Third-party emails are rejected when the sender's IP address or domain has a history of spamming or is listed on blocklists, signifying a low sender reputation.
- Authentication Non-Compliance: Rejections occur if third-party senders fail to properly authenticate emails with SPF or DKIM, particularly when your domain's DMARC policy is set to 'reject' or 'quarantine' for such failures, or if the sender isn't authorized by your SPF record.
- Deviation from ISP Guidelines: Third-party emails may be rejected by ISPs if their sending practices, including spam rates and DNS configurations, do not meet the specific bulk sender guidelines established by major providers like Google and Microsoft.
Key considerations
- Diligent Partner Selection: Emphasize the importance of selecting third-party senders with strong email sending reputations and a history of compliance.
- Mandate Authentication Protocols: Require third parties to fully implement and align with your domain's SPF, DKIM, and DMARC policies to ensure proper email authentication.
- Insist on ISP Guideline Compliance: Ensure third-party senders consistently meet the bulk sender guidelines of major ISPs, such as maintaining low spam rates and correct DNS configurations.
Technical article
Documentation from Mimecast explains that third-party emails linking to your website can be rejected by ISPs if the sending IP address or domain of the third party is on a blocklist or has a poor sender reputation due to a history of sending spam or malicious content.
8 Feb 2022 - Mimecast Knowledge Base
Technical article
Documentation from Google Postmaster Tools explains that third-party emails linking to your website can be rejected if the sending practices of the third party do not adhere to Google's bulk sender guidelines, which include maintaining low spam rates, authenticating emails with SPF and DKIM, and using proper DNS records.
16 Aug 2021 - Google Postmaster Tools Help
How can I determine if third-party links in email affect deliverability?
How to resolve 'Blacklisted by Internal Reputation Service' email bounces from small ISPs?
Why are click tracking links from my ESP being blocked as dangerous?
Why are my emails being marked as spam even with good domain reputation?
Why are my marketing emails being blocked by the recipient?
Why does O365 mark emails from my domain sent via a third-party ESP as spam?
