Emails from Microsoft accounts are sometimes rejected by Gmail, often due to perceived "domain reputation issues" related to IPv6. This is a known issue, with both Google and Microsoft acknowledging the problem. The core of the problem stems from a history of spam originating from Microsoft's IPv6 ranges, leading Gmail to apply stricter filtering. Even though a sender's own domain reputation may be impeccable, the shared IP space (especially IPv6) of large providers like Microsoft can negatively affect deliverability. This highlights the ongoing complexities of email deliverability, particularly when major email services interact.
Key findings
Shared reputation impact: Gmail's rejections are often not about the individual sender's domain, but about the reputation of Microsoft's sending infrastructure, specifically its IPv6 addresses. This is a common issue that can impact third-party senders.
IPv6 sensitivity: Gmail holds emails sent over IPv6 to higher standards, and a history of spam from Outlook's IPv6 ranges has led to blanket rejections. Understanding the current state of IPv6 for email sending is crucial.
Acknowledgement from providers: Both Google and Microsoft have acknowledged this specific issue, indicating it's a known interoperability challenge.
Impact on deliverability: If emails from Microsoft 365 or Outlook are being rejected by Gmail, it is likely due to these underlying infrastructure reputation issues, not necessarily the sender's content or authentication directly.
Key considerations
Authentication practices: Ensure your domain's authentication, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, is perfectly configured, even if the primary issue lies with the sending infrastructure. Proper authentication is a fundamental aspect of email deliverability. More information on authentication can be found on ISIPP's blog.
Monitor delivery reports: Regularly review bounce messages and Gmail Postmaster Tools for specific error codes or patterns indicating Microsoft IPv6 issues.
IP preference: While IPv6 is the future, in some cases, forcing email sending over IPv4 (if possible with your Microsoft setup) might temporarily bypass these specific IPv6 reputation issues with Gmail.
Provider dialogue: If experiencing rejections, contact Microsoft 365 support to inquire about the status of their IPv6 reputation with major ISPs like Gmail.
What email marketers say
Email marketers and administrators often face the brunt of deliverability challenges that stem from infrastructure issues beyond their direct control. The situation with Microsoft and Gmail highlights a common frustration where their legitimate emails are impacted by the reputation of large email service providers' shared IP spaces, especially regarding IPv6. Many marketers are looking for practical workarounds and clearer communication from the major players to ensure their campaigns reach the inbox without unnecessary blockages.
Key opinions
Shared IP challenges: Many marketers acknowledge that sending via large providers means dealing with shared IP reputations, which can lead to unexpected blockages, particularly when one major provider sends to another, like Microsoft to Gmail.
IPv6 concerns: There is a prevailing sentiment that sending email over IPv6, especially to Gmail, can be fraught with deliverability risks if not handled meticulously, often leading to emails going to spam or being rejected. This is echoed in discussions about IPv6 emails going to spam.
Frustration with big players: Some express frustration that major email providers (Microsoft, Google) may not take enough responsibility for spam originating from their networks, forcing smaller senders to deal with the consequences.
Authentication exploitation: Marketers also note that some bad actors might exploit default DKIM domains in platforms like G Suite and O365 to send spam, which further degrades the reputation of these shared IP ranges.
Key considerations
Domain reputation management: While Microsoft's IP reputation is a factor, maintaining a strong independent domain reputation through consistent good sending practices remains paramount.
Contacting support: If encountering rejection, it's recommended to engage with Microsoft support and highlight the need for IPv4 sending options if IPv6 is causing issues.
Understanding error messages: Pay close attention to bounce messages; a "domain reputation issue" might refer to the sending infrastructure's domain, not your own. SendLayer advises on addressing Gmail blocking.
Long-term outlook: While some suggest avoiding IPv6 for Gmail if possible, it's acknowledged that IPv6 is the future, and major providers need to ensure its reliable use for email.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks notes that they primarily send emails to Google over IPv6, and Google reciprocates. This suggests that while there are known issues, it is indeed possible for some senders to maintain good deliverability over IPv6 with Gmail, indicating that the problem may be specific to certain IP ranges or configurations rather than IPv6 itself.
05 Jun 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
A marketer from Spiceworks Community suggests that problems with Google blocking emails from Microsoft 365 can arise if the recipient domain is overly aggressive in its spam filtering. This indicates that deliverability issues might not always be solely on the sender's side, but also due to the receiving domain's specific configuration and policies.
20 May 2024 - Spiceworks Community
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts frequently point to the inherent challenges of IPv6 adoption in the email ecosystem, particularly when it comes to reputation management by major inbox providers. They emphasize that while IPv6 is technically superior, its implementation by large volume senders, coupled with receiving providers' stricter filtering, creates significant hurdles. Experts also highlight how the actions of a few bad actors can degrade the reputation of entire IP ranges, impacting legitimate senders who share that infrastructure.
Key opinions
IPv6 reputation challenges: Experts widely agree that IPv6 sending, especially to Gmail, is highly sensitive to reputation issues and can be difficult to manage, often leading to deliverability problems. This is distinct from challenges with IP warming generally.
Google's stricter standards: Gmail has stricter filtering standards for IPv6, meaning even a small amount of spam from a given IPv6 range can significantly impact its overall reputation and lead to blockages for all senders on that range.
Infrastructure reputation: Deliverability issues from large providers like Microsoft or Google are often due to the collective infrastructure reputation, where high volumes of spam from their customers can taint the entire IP range, affecting legitimate senders.
Exploitation of default configurations: Some experts point out that the misuse of default DKIM domains (e.g., in G Suite or Office 365) by spammers to protect their own domain reputation exacerbates the problem for the large providers' shared IPs.
Key considerations
Avoiding IPv6 when possible: For some, the simplest solution to current IPv6 deliverability issues with Gmail from Microsoft is to revert to or force IPv4 sending, if available. This can be a practical workaround for immediate deliverability concerns. This also applies when Microsoft 365 emails are being rate limited.
Pressure on large providers: Continued pressure and dialogue between large email providers (like Microsoft and Google) are necessary to drive changes that improve IPv6 email deliverability across the board.
Proactive monitoring: Even when sending through large providers, closely monitor your email performance and any bounce messages. Errors like "domain reputation issue" can be misleading and require deeper investigation to determine if it's your domain or the sending infrastructure's reputation. Tools like SpamResource provide valuable insights.
Understanding blame: It is important for senders to understand that major providers may sometimes deflect responsibility for outbound spam, making it crucial for senders to be vigilant and informed about the underlying issues.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks indicates that Google has a higher standard for mail delivered over IPv6. This implies that senders using IPv6, especially those relying on large shared infrastructures like Microsoft, must ensure exceptionally clean sending practices, as any missteps are more likely to result in blocks or spam placement compared to IPv4.
05 Jun 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view
An expert from SpamResource recommends to largely avoid sending email to Gmail over IPv6 if possible. This strong stance comes from observing persistent deliverability issues and Google's stringent filtering of IPv6 traffic, suggesting that IPv4 currently offers a more reliable path to the Gmail inbox for many senders.
11 Nov 2020 - SpamResource
What the documentation says
Email service provider documentation and industry reports indicate that IPv6 is increasingly being used for email traffic, but its implementation comes with specific deliverability considerations. Reputation on IPv6 is often managed more strictly by major inbox providers compared to IPv4. Authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are crucial, but their effectiveness can be influenced by the underlying IP reputation of the sending infrastructure. It's also noted that high volumes of spam originating from certain IPv6 ranges can lead to broad blocklists and filtering rules.
Key findings
IPv6 reputation management: Gmail, in particular, has a history of marking emails from Outlook's IPv6 as spam due to previous reputation issues, leading to rejections. This implies that IPv6 reputation is very closely monitored.
Authentication is foundational: Even with infrastructure issues, proper authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is non-negotiable for email deliverability, preventing emails from being seen as unauthenticated. Campaign Cleaner's guide emphasizes DMARC.
Provider communication: Direct communication between major email providers (e.g., Google and Microsoft) occurs to address systemic deliverability challenges, indicating that these are recognized industry-wide issues.
Forward Confirmed Reverse DNS (FCrDNS): Some documentation indicates that FCrDNS is a critical component for deliverability, especially for IPv6. This means that both forward (A/AAAA) and reverse (PTR) DNS records must correctly resolve. Forward Email's FAQ touches on SMTP server configurations.
Key considerations
Monitor bounce codes: Detailed analysis of bounce messages, especially those mentioning "domain reputation issue" or similar IPv6-related rejections, is crucial for diagnostics. For example, some documentation suggests that emails might bounce if a domain's DMARC policy is not properly aligned.
IPv4 fallback: While IPv6 is the long-term goal, current documentation and reports suggest that for certain scenarios, maintaining the ability to send via IPv4 may be a practical solution to avoid specific IPv6 reputation challenges with Gmail.
Sender behavior: Even when using large providers, maintaining excellent sender practices (low complaints, valid lists, relevant content) is paramount, as this directly influences your domain's individual reputation, which can mitigate some infrastructure issues.
Technical article
Documentation from ISIPP SuretyMail clarifies that Gmail often believes email from Outlook servers over IPv6 is spam. This is attributed to past interactions where Outlook's IPv6 reputation was negatively affected, leading Gmail to reject such emails as a protective measure for its users. This highlights the importance of historical IP reputation for deliverability.
01 Jun 2024 - ISIPP SuretyMail
Technical article
Documentation from Campaign Cleaner's email deliverability guide states that passing DMARC policy is crucial because without proper alignment, DMARC can fail, leading to emails being rejected or marked as spam. This underscores the technical requirement for senders to ensure their DMARC records are correctly configured to maintain trust with receiving mail servers.