Suped

What are the deliverability considerations when moving to Amazon SES with a dedicated IP?

Michael Ko profile picture
Michael Ko
Co-founder & CEO, Suped
Published 22 Jun 2025
Updated 15 Aug 2025
9 min read
Moving an email sending operation to a new platform is a significant undertaking, and choosing Amazon SES with a dedicated IP comes with its own set of deliverability considerations. While a dedicated IP offers more control over your sender reputation, it also places greater responsibility on your shoulders. It's not a set-it-and-forget-it solution. Instead, it requires careful planning and ongoing management to ensure your emails consistently reach the inbox.
Many factors influence whether your emails land in the inbox or the spam folder. With a dedicated IP address, your sending behavior directly impacts its reputation. This means any missteps, such as sending to unengaged users or experiencing high bounce rates, can quickly lead to deliverability issues. It's crucial to understand these nuances before making the switch.
My goal is to walk through the critical aspects you need to consider for a smooth transition and sustained high deliverability when using Amazon SES with a dedicated IP. This involves understanding IP warming, robust authentication, reputation management, and even how specific mailbox providers might treat your mail.

The importance of IP warming

One of the most critical steps when starting with a new dedicated IP is IP warming. A dedicated IP address starts with no sending history, meaning internet service providers, ISPs, have no data to assess its trustworthiness. Immediately sending high volumes of email from a cold IP can trigger spam filters, leading to blocklists (or blacklists) and poor deliverability. A slow, controlled ramp-up builds trust with ISPs, demonstrating consistent, legitimate sending behavior.
Amazon SES provides guidance on how to manage this process, even offering managed dedicated IP pools which handle some of the complexity. However, it is essential to have a strategy in place. This strategy should consider your overall email volume, the types of emails you send (transactional vs. marketing), and your target audience's engagement levels. Overly aggressive warming can harm your reputation before it even has a chance to develop.
Your warming plan should involve gradually increasing the volume of emails sent over days or weeks, targeting your most engaged subscribers first. Monitor your deliverability metrics, such as open rates, click-through rates, bounces, and complaints, closely during this period. Any spikes in complaints or bounces signal that you might be increasing volume too quickly or sending to unengaged recipients. A detailed guide to IP and domain warming can provide more insights.

IP warming best practices

  1. Start small: Begin with low volumes and gradually increase over time.
  2. Target engaged users: Send to your most active subscribers first.
  3. Consistency is key: Maintain a steady sending volume during the warming period. Significant peaks or dips can negatively affect your reputation, as discussed in deliverability risks of volume peaks and dips.
  4. Monitor metrics: Track bounce, complaint, and engagement rates daily.

Technical configuration and authentication

Beyond warming, a flawless technical setup is non-negotiable for deliverability with Amazon SES. This includes ensuring your email authentication protocols are correctly configured and aligned. ISPs rely heavily on these records to verify that emails genuinely originate from your domain and haven't been tampered with.
Specifically, you must have correct Sender Policy Framework (SPF), DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM), and Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (DMARC) records configured in your DNS. These protocols ensure that your emails are authenticated and aligned, preventing spoofing and improving trust with mailbox providers. DMARC, in particular, allows you to specify how receiving mail servers should handle unauthenticated emails and provides valuable feedback through DMARC reports. Understanding how these authentication methods work together is crucial.
Another technical aspect is reverse DNS (rDNS). This verifies that the IP address sending the email matches the domain in the MAIL FROM (or return-path) address. A correctly configured rDNS record is a strong signal of legitimacy to receiving mail servers. Amazon SES manages rDNS for its dedicated IPs, but it's still something to be aware of.
Example DNS records for Amazon SES authenticationTXT
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com ~all v=DKIM1; k=rsa; p=YOURPUBLICKEY _dmarc.yourdomain.com. IN TXT "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_reports@yourdomain.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_forensic@yourdomain.com; fo=1;"

Managing sender reputation

When using a dedicated IP, your sender reputation is entirely your responsibility. Amazon SES, like most email service providers (ESPs), has strict thresholds for bounce and complaint rates. Exceeding these limits can lead to throttling, temporary suspensions, or even permanent termination of your sending privileges.
This means you need robust list hygiene practices. Regularly remove unengaged subscribers and suppress bounced addresses. Implementing a double opt-in process for new subscribers can significantly reduce complaint rates. Furthermore, monitoring your blocklist (or blacklist) status is crucial, as getting listed can severely impact your deliverability. Using a blocklist checker and monitoring service is a good proactive measure.
Understanding and responding to feedback loops (FBLs) from major ISPs is also vital. These reports notify you when a recipient marks your email as spam, allowing you to quickly remove that address from your list and prevent future complaints. Amazon SES integrates with these FBLs, making it easier to manage. Proactive reputation maintenance is key to long-term success on a dedicated IP.

Reputation on shared IPs

  1. aws.amazon.com logoPooled reputation: Your sender reputation is influenced by other senders using the same IP.
  2. Less control: Limited ability to mitigate damage from others' poor sending practices.
  3. Lower costs: Often cheaper or included in basic plans.
  4. Good for low volume: Suitable for senders with inconsistent or low volume, where warming a dedicated IP isn't practical, as discussed in downsides of migrating to a dedicated IP.

Reputation on dedicated IPs

  1. Exclusive control: Your sending behavior solely determines your IP's reputation.
  2. Greater impact: Requires careful management to maintain a positive standing.
  3. Higher costs: Dedicated IPs often come with an additional monthly fee.
  4. Ideal for high volume: Recommended for senders with consistent, high email volumes who want more control over their deliverability, as seen in benefits for high volume email.

The Microsoft challenge

While Amazon SES is a powerful sending platform, it's widely observed that certain mailbox providers, particularly Microsoft (Outlook/Hotmail), can be challenging when sending from Amazon's IP ranges, even with dedicated IPs. This isn't necessarily a fault of Amazon SES itself, but rather how Microsoft's filtering systems perceive traffic originating from large cloud providers. They might apply stricter filtering to these IP ranges due to the sheer volume and variety of senders using them, some of whom may have poor practices.
Even with your own dedicated IP within Amazon SES, you're still within Amazon's larger network. This means that if there's a wider issue affecting Amazon's network, or if Microsoft has blanket policies for certain Amazon IP blocks, your individual dedicated IP might still face deliverability challenges to their domains. This is a common frustration for senders who otherwise have excellent sending practices and high engagement.
For some, this has meant maintaining a separate ESP or sending method specifically for Microsoft destinations if deliverability to Microsoft remains problematic. It's a pragmatic approach if the issue persists despite all other best practices. Continuously monitor your deliverability to different mailbox providers using specific tools and adjust your strategy accordingly.

Existing reputation considerations

A crucial step in ensuring smooth deliverability is to ensure your domain reputation is in good standing before the migration. If your existing sending operations have a history of spam complaints, bounces, or blocklist (or blacklist) issues, simply moving to a new platform and IP won't magically solve them. In fact, a dedicated IP will only amplify these problems because your reputation is no longer shared or diluted across a large pool of senders.
Before migrating, clean your email lists rigorously. Remove unengaged subscribers, hard bounces, and any addresses that have previously marked your emails as spam. This proactive list hygiene is paramount. A clean list ensures that your new dedicated IP builds a positive reputation from day one, rather than inheriting or quickly acquiring negative marks. Think of it as preparing a clean slate for your new sending infrastructure.
While a dedicated IP provides more control, it does not act as a magic bullet for pre-existing deliverability problems. If you're experiencing issues, especially severe ones like consistent IP blocks, a new dedicated IP might only offer a temporary reprieve. Addressing the root cause of your deliverability problems, whether it's list quality, content, or sending practices, is essential for long-term success with Amazon SES or any email platform. For more information, read the article on dedicated IP for transactional emails.

Views from the trenches

Best practices
Always warm up your dedicated IP gradually, even with Amazon SES's managed pools, to build a positive sending history with ISPs.
Ensure SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are perfectly configured and aligned before you begin sending from your new dedicated IP.
Common pitfalls
Assuming a dedicated IP automatically guarantees inbox placement, especially if your current sending practices are subpar.
Ignoring your bounce and complaint rates, as Amazon SES has strict thresholds that can lead to account suspensions.
Expert tips
Monitor your reputation with specific mailbox providers, particularly Microsoft, as their filtering can be stricter for IPs from large cloud providers.
Maintain consistent sending volumes on your dedicated IP to avoid reputation degradation due to peaks and dips.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks says moving mail flows always creates a blip, but it shouldn't matter if there were no prior reputation issues, emphasizing the need to align technical and legislative aspects like authentication and unsub links.
2020-11-10 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks says that going with Amazon SES directly requires a software backend and a properly trained team, which might not be suitable if you're merging streams and haven't managed a sending platform from the ground up.
2020-11-10 - Email Geeks

Key takeaways for a successful migration

Moving to Amazon SES with a dedicated IP can be a strategic move to gain more control over your email deliverability, especially for high-volume senders. However, it's not without its challenges. The key to success lies in meticulous planning and continuous effort.
Focus on a proper IP warming schedule, ensure your authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) are perfectly configured, and diligently manage your sender reputation by maintaining a clean list and monitoring key metrics. Be aware of the unique challenges with certain mailbox providers like outlook.com logoMicrosoft, and adapt your strategy as needed.
By taking a proactive and informed approach, you can leverage the power of Amazon SES with a dedicated IP to achieve consistent and reliable email deliverability, ensuring your messages reach their intended recipients.

Frequently asked questions

DMARC monitoring

Start monitoring your DMARC reports today

Suped DMARC platform dashboard

What you'll get with Suped

Real-time DMARC report monitoring and analysis
Automated alerts for authentication failures
Clear recommendations to improve email deliverability
Protection against phishing and domain spoofing