Summary
Using separate email subdomains for transactional and promotional emails is a common recommendation in email deliverability, primarily to isolate sender reputation. Transactional emails, like order confirmations or password resets, typically have high engagement rates and are critical for user experience. Promotional emails, on the other hand, can have varying engagement and higher complaint rates, which might negatively impact sender reputation. By segmenting these streams onto different subdomains, businesses aim to protect the deliverability of their essential transactional communications.
Key findings
- Reputation isolation: Separating transactional and promotional email streams onto different subdomains helps to isolate their respective sender reputations. This means if your marketing emails experience deliverability issues (e.g., due to low engagement or high complaints), your critical transactional emails are less likely to be impacted. Mailgun notes that using subdomains for marketing and transactional emails allows you to separate those domain reputations, as discussed in their transactional vs marketing emails guide.
- Engagement impact: Engagement is a significant factor in sender reputation. Mailbox providers, especially Google, closely monitor how recipients interact with your emails. High engagement (opens, clicks, replies) boosts reputation, while low engagement (unopens, deletions without opening, spam complaints) can harm it.
- Mailbox provider behavior: Some mailbox providers attribute reputation at the subdomain or DKIM domain level, while others might roll up reputation to the root domain, particularly in cases of severe blocklisting. This is why understanding when to use subdomains for email sending is crucial.
- Over-segmentation risks: While segmentation offers benefits, creating too many subdomains can lead to management complexities and dilute reputation across multiple sending entities, potentially yielding no significant deliverability gains.
Key considerations
- Primary concern: The main reason to use separate subdomains is to safeguard the deliverability of your transactional emails. These are often time-sensitive and critical to customer experience, making their high inbox placement paramount.
- High volume, low engagement streams: If you have a high-volume promotional stream with inherently lower engagement (e.g., initial price quotes where many users are just browsing), separating it from other, higher-engagement marketing campaigns or newsletters could be beneficial to prevent reputational spillover. This approach aligns with the principle of separating transactional and marketing emails.
- Data quality over segmentation: While subdomains help, addressing underlying issues like invalid email addresses, spam complaints, and overall low engagement remains critical for improving deliverability across all streams. Segmentation does not solve a fundamental problem of poor sending hygiene.
- Monitoring is key: Regardless of your subdomain strategy, continuous monitoring of your sender reputation, email deliverability, and engagement metrics for each stream is essential to identify and address issues promptly.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often weigh the benefits of subdomain separation against the complexities of managing multiple reputations. While the default recommendation is usually to separate transactional from promotional emails, opinions diverge on further segmentation of marketing streams based on engagement levels or content type. Many marketers focus on the practical implications of managing additional sending domains.
Key opinions
- Default segmentation: Most marketers agree on separating transactional and promotional emails. This is considered a fundamental best practice to protect critical communications.
- Purpose of separation: The primary goal of subdomain separation is to ensure that even if marketing efforts face deliverability challenges, essential transactional messages still reach the inbox, thereby protecting the main domain reputation.
- Further segmentation debate: There is less consensus on whether to further segment promotional streams (e.g., newsletters vs. sales offers) based on varying engagement rates. Some marketers consider it, while others view it as unnecessary complexity.
- Low engagement stream concerns: Marketers with high-volume, lower-engagement streams (like automated quotes) worry about these impacting other, higher-performing marketing emails. They often look for ways to isolate this risk.
Key considerations
- Complexity vs. benefit: Adding more subdomains increases management overhead, including DNS records, authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), and reputation monitoring. The perceived benefit must outweigh this increased complexity.
- Holistic deliverability: Even with separate subdomains, core deliverability issues like poor list hygiene, high complaint rates, or sending to unengaged users will persist and can still affect the overall domain reputation or lead to blocklisting of the root domain.
- Sender reputation buildup: Each new subdomain requires a warm-up period to build its own reputation. This can delay the full effectiveness of campaigns sent from a new subdomain.
- Monitoring different streams: Marketers must be equipped to monitor the deliverability and engagement of each subdomain independently. This includes tracking inbox placement, bounce rates, and complaint rates for all sending streams, which can be done using dedicated email deliverability testing tools.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains their situation with a high-volume email stream that naturally has lower engagement. They generate emails from people getting insurance quotes, leading to a high volume with lower follow-through due to shopping around and invalid emails. They are concerned this stream could negatively affect other marketing emails.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks shares their apprehension that a lower-performing quote stream might compromise other crucial marketing campaigns, such as seasonal promotions and newsletters, prompting consideration of subdomain separation.
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts generally advocate for strategic subdomain use, especially for distinguishing critical email streams. They highlight that while subdomains can help manage reputation, they are not a magic bullet for underlying issues like poor data quality or low engagement. The nuances of how different mailbox providers treat subdomain reputation are also a key point of discussion.
Key opinions
- Transactional separation: Experts strongly recommend using a different subdomain with unique DKIM signing for transactional emails. This helps larger mailbox providers differentiate critical mail streams, which are often treated more favorably.
- Overhead of new subdomains: Every new subdomain requires individual reputation management, which can be overkill and may not always provide significant benefits beyond basic transactional/promotional separation.
- Root domain impact: Even with separate subdomains, many networks might still block the organization's root domain if one subdomain runs into major problems (e.g., severe blocklisting or high complaint rates). Understanding what happens when your domain is blocklisted is essential here.
- Engagement-based reputation: Mailbox providers like Google attribute individual reputations to subdomain/DKIM domain pairs based heavily on engagement. Therefore, segmenting a low-engagement stream might not always be beneficial if your list is heavily skewed towards such providers.
Key considerations
- Prioritize data quality: Addressing fundamental issues like invalid email addresses, high bounce rates, and spam complaints should be the first course of action before extensive subdomain segmentation.
- Balancing engagement metrics: Higher engagement campaigns can often counterbalance metrics for lower engagement ones when sending from the same domain or subdomain. This integrated approach might be simpler and equally effective than further segmentation.
- Problem identification: Before segmenting, clearly define the problem you are trying to solve. If it's a reputation issue, consider whether the current problem is truly solvable by subdomain separation or requires deeper engagement and list hygiene improvements. This is part of understanding your email domain reputation.
- Industry-specific challenges: Certain industries, like insurance with B2C quotes and policy renewals, commonly face challenges with high-volume, lower-engagement streams. Experts advise that these issues are often better addressed through data quality improvements rather than complex subdomain strategies.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that a separate subdomain with unique DKIM signing is recommended for transactional emails, as this helps larger mailbox providers differentiate email streams. This distinction is important because transactional emails are often handled differently by these providers, receiving priority.
Expert view
Deliverability expert from Email Geeks cautions that spinning up a new subdomain means managing its individual reputation, which might be overkill and not always yield significant benefits. They suggest that keeping transactional emails separate is often the maximum segmentation most senders need.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and research often emphasize the technical benefits of subdomain segmentation for managing sender reputation and improving deliverability. They typically advise separating different email streams, particularly transactional from marketing, to mitigate risks and optimize inbox placement. The focus is on robust authentication and consistent sending practices for each subdomain.
Key findings
- Reputation separation: Documentation often highlights that separate subdomains allow for distinct reputation profiles. This ensures that a negative reputation on one stream (e.g., marketing) does not compromise the deliverability of another (e.g., transactional).
- Improved deliverability: By segregating email types, senders can tailor their sending practices to the nature of each stream, potentially improving inbox placement for critical emails. Kickbox Blog notes that segregating transactional emails from marketing ones using a dedicated subdomain can safeguard the sender's transactional email reputation.
- Stream control: Using separate subdomains offers better control over different types of email communication (promotional, outreach, transactional), allowing for tailored strategies and monitoring for each.
- Enhanced user experience: Separating transactional emails can improve delivery speed, contributing to a better user experience and higher customer satisfaction. This is especially important for timely messages like password resets or order confirmations.
Key considerations
- Authentication setup: Each subdomain requires proper SPF, DKIM, and DMARC configuration to ensure authenticity and prevent spoofing. This technical setup is crucial for maximizing deliverability. To learn more about setting these up, consider reviewing a simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM.
- Monitoring individual reputations: While subdomains offer separation, consistent monitoring of each subdomain's sending reputation (e.g., via Google Postmaster Tools) is necessary to proactively identify and address deliverability issues. This helps manage the risks associated with multiple subdomains.
- Subdomain naming conventions: Consider clear and consistent naming conventions for subdomains (e.g., mail.example.com for transactional, marketing.example.com for promotional) to help mailbox providers categorize your email traffic effectively.
- Volume and frequency: Different email types have different sending volumes and frequencies. Subdomains allow senders to manage these variations without one impacting the other negatively. For example, high-volume marketing blasts will not negatively affect urgent transactional messages.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailgun explains that separating marketing and transactional email streams using subdomains enables distinct sender reputations. This separation helps to protect the deliverability of critical transactional emails from the potentially fluctuating reputation of marketing campaigns.
Technical article
SAP Community documentation suggests that separating transactional subdomains can improve delivery speed, which in turn enhances user experience and satisfaction. This is crucial for emails that require immediate delivery, such as password resets or order confirmations.
Related resources
15 resources
Related pages
Should I separate transactional and marketing emails?
When should I use subdomains for email sending and how do they affect my reputation?
Should I use subdomains for transactional and promotional emails to protect my main domain reputation?
Should operational emails be sent from a marketing subdomain or transactional subdomain?
Should I use separate IPs or domains for transactional vs marketing emails?
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
Email Deliverability Issues: Getting Your Messages to the Inbox in 2025
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
Should I use multiple subdomains for different email streams or a single stream?
