Summary
The use of BCC in email marketing, particularly during IP warming, has a complex relationship with sender reputation and deliverability. While not directly causing issues like spam complaints, BCC usage often signals underlying problems such as poor list management, lack of explicit opt-in consent, and difficulty tracking engagement. Sending to large BCC lists increases the risk of being flagged as spam, as it often implies sending to recipients who haven't requested the emails. Technical documentation highlights that exceeding sending limits (potentially through BCC overuse), incorrect header usage, and sending unsolicited emails can harm sender reputation. Experts recommend avoiding BCC for bulk emails and using dedicated email platforms that facilitate proper list management, opt-in consent, and engagement tracking to maintain a positive sender reputation. Exceptions exist for BCCs to owned mailboxes where whitelisting is implemented.
Key findings
- BCC as a Symptom: BCC usage often signals underlying problems rather than being inherently harmful.
- Poor List Management: BCC frequently indicates poor list management practices and a lack of explicit opt-in consent.
- Engagement Tracking Challenges: BCC makes it difficult to track engagement metrics like opens and clicks, hindering optimization efforts.
- Spam Signal: Sending to large BCC lists can make emails appear as spam, especially without proper opt-in procedures.
- Violation of Sending Limits: Overuse of BCC can lead to exceeding sending limits imposed by email service providers, negatively impacting domain reputation.
- IP Reputation Damage: Sending emails to non-opted-in recipients, often associated with BCC, can damage IP reputation and cause deliverability issues.
- Exceptions Exist: BCC to owned mailboxes, where whitelisting is possible, may not negatively impact sender reputation.
Key considerations
- Prioritize Opt-In: Obtain explicit consent from all recipients before sending emails to build trust and avoid spam flags.
- Implement List Management: Maintain clean, segmented email lists and regularly remove inactive or unsubscribed recipients.
- Utilize Dedicated Platforms: Use dedicated email marketing platforms that offer features for managing lists, tracking engagement, and complying with anti-spam regulations.
- Monitor Engagement: Track email engagement metrics and adjust strategies to improve deliverability and sender reputation.
- Adhere to Sending Limits: Stay within the sending limits set by email service providers to avoid being flagged as a spammer.
- Whitelist Internal BCCs: If using BCC for internal purposes, ensure those mailboxes are whitelisted to prevent deliverability issues.
- Proper Header Usage: Use email headers correctly and avoid practices that might trigger spam filters.
What email marketers say
10 marketer opinions
Using BCC in email campaigns, particularly during IP warming, can negatively impact sender reputation and deliverability. While BCC doesn't directly cause issues like spam complaints, it often indicates poor list management, lack of explicit consent, and difficulty tracking engagement. Sending to large BCC lists can signal spamming practices, especially if recipients haven't opted-in. Although, exceptions exist for BCCs to owned mailboxes where whitelisting is possible. Overall, experts recommend avoiding BCC for bulk emails and using dedicated email platforms to maintain sender reputation.
Key opinions
- Indirect Impact: BCC doesn't directly affect sender reputation like spam complaints but signals underlying issues.
- Poor List Management: Excessive BCC use suggests inadequate list management practices and lack of consent.
- Engagement Tracking: BCC makes it difficult to track engagement metrics like opens and clicks.
- Spam Signal: Sending to large BCC lists can make emails look like spam, especially without proper opt-in.
- IP Warming Risk: BCC is particularly detrimental during IP warming due to potential deliverability issues.
- Exceptions: BCC to owned and whitelisted mailboxes is an exception.
Key considerations
- Opt-In Consent: Ensure all recipients have explicitly opted-in to receive emails.
- List Management: Maintain clean and segmented email lists.
- Dedicated Platforms: Use dedicated email marketing platforms for proper list management and deliverability.
- Track Engagement: Monitor engagement metrics to identify and address deliverability issues.
- Avoid Bulk BCC: Refrain from using BCC for sending bulk emails.
- Whitelisting: If using BCC to owned mailboxes, ensure they are whitelisted.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks shares an example of a client sending BCC notifications experiencing dips in reputation and spam folder placement. They also point out that reduced send volume and negative recipient response can contribute to the issue.
27 Feb 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Reddit shares that using BCC excessively can make your email look like spam, as legitimate senders usually use proper email marketing platforms that handle subscriptions and unsubscriptions automatically.
29 May 2022 - Reddit
What the experts say
1 expert opinions
According to an expert from Word to the Wise, BCC itself isn't inherently harmful, but its use frequently points to underlying problems. It often indicates that emails are being sent to a list of recipients who haven't explicitly opted in, which raises the likelihood of spam complaints and subsequently harms sender reputation. Moreover, BCC complicates unsubscribe management and engagement tracking, which further degrades deliverability.
Key opinions
- Sign of Underlying Issues: BCC usage often indicates problems, even if not directly harmful.
- Lack of Opt-In: Indicates potential lack of explicit recipient consent.
- Increased Spam Risk: Raises the risk of spam complaints.
- Impaired Management: Complicates unsubscribe management.
- Difficult Tracking: Makes it more difficult to track engagement.
Key considerations
- Gain Explicit Consent: Ensure all recipients have opted-in to receive emails.
- Proper List Management: Implement robust list management practices.
- Monitor Spam Complaints: Actively monitor and address spam complaints.
- Enable Easy Unsubscribes: Make it easy for recipients to unsubscribe.
- Track Engagement: Implement mechanisms to track email engagement.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains that while BCC isn't inherently bad, its usage can signal problems. Often, it is a sign of sending to a list where recipients haven't explicitly opted-in, increasing the risk of spam complaints, and thus negatively impacting sender reputation. Additionally, using BCC can make it difficult to manage unsubscribes and track engagement, further damaging deliverability.
23 Aug 2021 - Word to the Wise
What the documentation says
4 technical articles
Technical documentation from Google Workspace, RFC Editor, Microsoft Support, and Spamhaus collectively suggests that while BCC's direct impact is not always explicitly stated, its usage can lead to negative consequences for sender reputation and deliverability. Sending limits, designed to prevent abuse (like bulk BCC sends), can be breached, harming domain reputation. Improper email header usage, including BCC, risks emails being marked as spam. Microsoft's policies for bulk emailing stress that unsolicited emails harm reputation. Spamhaus emphasizes that sending large volumes of emails to non-opted-in recipients, often associated with BCC use, negatively impacts IP reputation and deliverability.
Key findings
- Sending Limits: Exceeding sending limits, potentially through BCC overuse, can harm domain reputation (Google Workspace).
- Header Usage: Incorrect usage of email header fields, including BCC, increases the risk of being marked as spam (RFC Editor).
- Unsolicited Emails: Sending unsolicited or unwanted emails harms sender reputation, even with BCC (Microsoft Support).
- Opt-In Importance: Sending large volumes of emails to non-opted-in recipients, often linked to BCC, damages IP reputation (Spamhaus).
Key considerations
- Respect Sending Limits: Adhere to sending limits set by email service providers.
- Correct Header Usage: Ensure proper usage of email headers, including BCC.
- Avoid Unsolicited Emails: Only send emails to recipients who have explicitly opted-in.
- Prioritize Opt-In: Obtain explicit consent from recipients before sending emails.
- Monitor IP Reputation: Regularly monitor your IP address reputation.
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft Support outlines their policies for sending bulk emails. Although BCC isn't mentioned directly, Microsoft states that sending unsolicited or unwanted emails can harm sender reputation and lead to account restrictions. Using BCC to hide recipients doesn't exempt senders from these policies.
11 May 2022 - Microsoft Support
Technical article
Documentation from RFC Editor outlines the standards for email header fields. While it doesn't explicitly discuss the impact on sender reputation, it clarifies that the 'Bcc' field is used to send copies to recipients without revealing their addresses to other recipients. Incorrect usage of email header fields can lead to emails being marked as spam.
22 Nov 2023 - RFC 5322
Are IP warming services effective for improving email deliverability?
Can I perform IP warming with single image emails?
Do I need an IP warm-up when moving to a new ESP with shared IPs?
Do I need to re-warm up my IP when changing domain extension?
How do I warm up a new IP address for transactional emails?
How do soft bounces and unsubscribe rates impact Gmail sender reputation during IP warming?
How do subdomain deliverability issues affect parent domains, and what are the primary causes of email deliverability problems?
How do you warm up a new dedicated sending domain for automated email flows with a welcome series?
How do you warm up a new sending domain on an existing warmed IP address?
How does using only BCC recipients affect email deliverability?
