Summary
When considering a change to your domain extension, for instance, from yourdomain.com to yourdomain.net, a crucial question arises regarding the need to re-warm your existing IP address. While the IP itself remains the same, the domain from which emails originate is perceived as entirely new by mailbox providers. This distinction is vital because sender reputation is predominantly tied to the domain, not just the IP address. Consequently, transitioning to a different Top-Level Domain (TLD) almost always necessitates a warm-up process to build a positive sending reputation for the new domain.
Key findings
- Domain reputation is primary: Mailbox providers primarily assess sender reputation based on the domain used for sending, not solely the IP address. A change in TLD, even if the second-level domain (e.g., yourdomain) remains the same, creates a new identity.
- New TLD, new reputation: Each TLD (e.g., .com, .net, .org) is treated as a separate entity by DNS and, by extension, by recipient mailbox providers. This means example.com and example.net have independent reputations.
- Authentication impact: Changing the TLD requires updating all email authentication records, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, to reflect the new domain. Failure to do so can severely impact deliverability.
- Recipient perception: Automated filtering systems will not automatically link the reputation of a ".com" domain to its ".net" counterpart, even if the root domain name is identical. Manual connections by human reviewers are rare and unreliable.
- Shared vs. dedicated IPs: The need for domain warm-up is consistent whether you are using a dedicated IP or shared IPs, as the domain's reputation is distinct.
Key considerations
- Gradual volume increase: Implement a structured warm-up schedule, gradually increasing your sending volume to mailbox providers to build a positive reputation for the new TLD. Iterable's guide to IP warming provides a good overview of this process.
- Monitor deliverability: Closely monitor deliverability metrics such as inbox placement, open rates, click-through rates, and bounce rates for the new domain during the warm-up period. Adjust your sending strategy as needed.
- Content quality: Maintain high-quality, engaging content to ensure positive recipient engagement, which is crucial for reputation building.
- Subscriber engagement: Focus on sending to your most engaged subscribers initially to demonstrate positive sending habits to ISPs.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often approach changes in domain extensions with caution, recognizing the distinct nature of TLDs in the eyes of mailbox providers. Their experiences highlight the importance of treating a new TLD as a completely fresh sending entity, even if the brand and IP remain the same. The consensus is that skipping the warm-up can lead to significant deliverability issues, including emails landing in spam folders or being blocklisted (blacklisted).
Key opinions
- New domain, new reputation: Marketers frequently state that a change in domain extension, like .com to .net, is akin to adopting an entirely new domain. This new domain starts with zero reputation, regardless of the previous domain's standing or the IP's history.
- Warm-up is essential: The overwhelming sentiment is that a warm-up is necessary. They emphasize that recipient mailbox providers will treat the new TLD as an unproven sender, requiring a gradual increase in volume to build trust.
- Authentication alignment: Marketers recognize that all associated authentication mechanisms (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) must be updated and aligned with the new domain. This is a critical step for validating sender identity.
- Deliverability risk: Many share concerns about potential deliverability setbacks, including increased spam placement or blocklisting, if the warm-up process is neglected.
Key considerations
- Migration strategy: Develop a comprehensive migration strategy that includes a detailed warm-up plan for the new TLD. Consider the best practices for switching to a new sending domain to ensure a smooth transition.
- Subscriber communication: Inform your subscribers about the domain change to manage expectations and minimize spam complaints.
- Phased rollout: Some marketers suggest a phased rollout, gradually shifting traffic from the old domain to the new one while maintaining the warm-up schedule. This can help mitigate potential deliverability issues during the transition, as discussed in detail by Ongage's IP warming guide.
- Monitoring domain reputation: Continuously track the reputation of your new domain using tools like Google Postmaster Tools. Understanding your email domain reputation is key.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks states that even a slight change in domain extension, such as from .com to .net, renders it a completely new domain in terms of reputation. Mailbox providers will treat it as having zero sending history.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Knak emphasizes that IP warming is necessary not only for new IP addresses but also when switching domains. This implies that even a TLD change warrants a warm-up.
What the experts say
Deliverability experts consistently underscore the fundamental principle that each unique domain, including variations in Top-Level Domains (TLDs), establishes its own independent sender reputation. They clarify that ".com" and ".net" are distinct TLDs, not merely extensions, and therefore, an IP warm-up is critical for a new TLD. Experts also highlight that automated filtering systems do not automatically associate reputations across different TLDs, making a dedicated warm-up indispensable for maintaining inbox placement.
Key opinions
- TLDs are separate entities: Experts emphasize that .com and .net are distinct Top-Level Domains, not mere extensions. From a DNS and reputation perspective, domain.com and domain.net are entirely separate identities.
- No automatic reputation transfer: Automated email systems will not automatically link the sending reputation of one TLD to another, even if the second-level domain name is identical.
- Human versus automation: While a human might manually connect similar domains across TLDs (e.g., google.com and google.ca), automated filtering systems do not make such inferences for general senders.
- Focus on domain authentication: Changing a TLD necessitates a complete overhaul of email authentication records (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) for the new domain, as these records are domain-specific.
Key considerations
- Comprehensive planning: Plan your domain transition carefully, acknowledging that the new TLD requires a full warm-up process to establish its own, separate sender reputation.
- DNS configuration: Ensure proper configuration of DNS records for the new domain, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. These records are fundamental to email authentication and deliverability.
- Reputation tracking: Actively monitor the new domain's reputation and deliverability performance from day one. Issues may arise if the warm-up is insufficient or improper. This is especially true for Microsoft email accounts.
- Leverage established methods: Utilize proven methods for IP and domain warming. Resources from industry experts like Word to the Wise on IP warming can provide valuable insights.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that .net and .com are not merely domain extensions but are properly referred to as TLDs (Top-Level Domains), emphasizing their independent nature.
Expert view
Deliverability expert from SpamResource states that sender reputation is intrinsically tied to the domain and its performance, implying that a new TLD will always start with a clean slate, regardless of IP history.
What the documentation says
Official documentation from leading email service providers and deliverability platforms consistently emphasizes that a change in domain, including its Top-Level Domain (TLD), creates a new sender identity requiring a warm-up. These resources clarify that IP warm-up primarily builds reputation for the IP, but domain reputation is a separate, critical component. They highlight the necessity of establishing trust for the new domain with Internet Service Providers (ISPs) through a measured and gradual sending approach.
Key findings
- New domain, new reputation: Documentation confirms that each domain, including variations in TLDs, has its own unique sender reputation that must be built from scratch.
- Domain vs. IP reputation: While IP warming builds reputation for the sending IP, documentation clarifies that domain warming is distinct and necessary when changing domains, even if the IP remains constant.
- Authentication updates: Official guides stress the importance of correctly configuring SPF, DKIM, and DMARC for the new domain as part of the warm-up process.
- Gradual volume escalation: A phased approach to increasing email volume is consistently recommended to build trust with ISPs and avoid reputation penalties for the new domain.
Key considerations
- Warm-up duration: Expect a warm-up period of 4-6 weeks for a new domain. The exact timeline depends on volume and engagement metrics, as highlighted by Kickbox's guide.
- Engagement first: Prioritize sending to your most active and engaged subscribers first to establish a positive sending pattern for the new domain.
- Monitoring and adaptation: Continuously monitor deliverability and sender reputation metrics. Be prepared to adjust your sending volume and strategy based on performance. This proactive approach is crucial, especially when rebranding a domain.
- Risks of non-warming: Documentation warns that skipping the warm-up can lead to emails being marked as spam or blocked, severely impacting reach.
Technical article
Documentation from Iterable explains that IP warming helps improve email deliverability by building a positive sending reputation. This concept extends to new domains, as a new TLD represents a fresh sending identity that requires its own reputation building.
Technical article
WP Mail SMTP's documentation on IP warming states that it gradually increases the number of emails sent from a new IP address to build a positive sender reputation. The same principle applies when establishing a new domain's reputation with a different TLD.
Related resources
13 resources
Related pages
What is the best IP and domain warm-up strategy for Gmail and Microsoft?
What is the email deliverability impact of domain rebranding when keeping existing warm IPs?
What are the best practices for dedicated IP warm-up?
How important is email warming on shared IPs, and how do domain and IP reputations interact?
After what period of inactivity should an email sending domain be warmed up again?
What are the best practices for switching to a new sending domain?
What are the consequences of not warming up an IP address correctly?
When switching to a new subdomain for email, what warm-up process is required?
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
Why Your Emails Are Going to Spam in 2024 and How to Fix It
