Summary
Using two subdomains on a single dedicated IP address for different email types, such as transactional and marketing emails, is a common practice and generally feasible. The core principle is that while the IP address carries an overarching reputation, individual subdomains also cultivate their own distinct reputations. This setup is particularly beneficial for senders who might not have sufficient email volume to warrant separate dedicated IPs for each stream, allowing them to consolidate volume and build a stronger, combined sending history.
Key findings
- Reputation segmentation: Each subdomain can develop its own reputation, largely independent of other subdomains on the same IP. This allows for better management and isolation of issues.
- IP capability: A single dedicated IP address is capable of handling multiple subdomains and diverse email streams. Mailbox providers are sophisticated enough to differentiate between these streams.
- Volume consolidation: This configuration is ideal for senders who need a dedicated IP but whose individual email streams (e.g., transactional or marketing) might not generate enough volume on their own to maintain an optimal sending reputation. Combining them helps sustain the IP's performance.
- DNS flexibility: Subdomains are primarily managed through DNS settings, not requiring separate IP addresses or hosting. This makes the setup straightforward.
Key considerations
- Reputation bleed: While subdomains have distinct reputations, a severe issue on one (like high spam complaints) can still indirectly impact the overall IP reputation and, consequently, other subdomains. Consistent monitoring is essential, which can be done using blocklist monitoring.
- DKIM configuration: Using different DKIM signatures (specifically the d= tag) for each stream can help mailbox providers further differentiate and track their reputations independently.
- Content quality: Maintaining high content quality and relevancy for both transactional and marketing streams is crucial. Even with separate subdomains, poor sending practices will ultimately affect deliverability.
- Engagement alignment: Consider whether the goal of transactional emails (e.g., establishing engagement) aligns with your content strategy. In some cases, tightly linking highly engaging transactional emails to content can be beneficial.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often navigate the complexities of sender reputation and inbox placement. When it comes to using multiple subdomains on a single dedicated IP, the consensus among marketers points towards a strategic advantage, particularly in managing diverse email streams. The primary motivation is usually to segment reputation, protecting critical transactional emails from the potentially volatile nature of marketing campaigns, while still leveraging the benefits of a dedicated IP.
Key opinions
- Reputation protection: Marketers frequently use separate subdomains for different email types (e.g., transactional, marketing) to protect their primary domain and isolate reputation impacts.
- Isolation benefits: This setup allows distinct reputations to be built for each stream, so if one type of email receives high spam complaints, it's less likely to drag down the deliverability of others.
- Engagement synergy: Some marketers prefer not to separate confirmation or transactional emails from content sending, believing that the strong engagement of transactional messages can positively influence the overall sender reputation and improve inbox placement for other emails.
- DNS simplicity: The creation of subdomains is primarily a DNS configuration task, meaning it does not necessitate the purchase of additional IP addresses or hosting, simplifying the technical overhead. As noted by Mailmodo, subdomains are created within the DNS settings.
Key considerations
- Risk of bleed-through: Despite subdomain separation, some marketers acknowledge that poor performance (e.g., high spam complaints, bounces) from a marketing subdomain can still negatively affect the reputation of transactional emails if they share the same IP. This concern often leads to questions about whether separate IPs or subdomains are best.
- Volume requirements: A dedicated IP requires consistent, sufficient sending volume to build and maintain a good reputation. Marketers need to ensure the combined volume from both subdomains meets this threshold.
- Primary domain impact: Consider if using different subdomains will affect your primary domain's reputation, even if only minimally.
- Content alignment: Careful consideration should be given to how different content streams (e.g., confirmation vs. newsletter) are perceived by recipients, and whether their sending strategies should be entirely independent or somewhat integrated.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks discusses a common client scenario involving a single dedicated IP and two subdomains for distinct email types. The client aims to use one subdomain for confirmation emails and another for regular content. The core question is whether this setup poses a major issue, especially since obtaining a second IP from the ESP is not an option. They express a common challenge faced by senders: optimizing infrastructure under specific constraints. The inquiry highlights a desire to segregate email streams for reputation purposes while being limited by available resources, such as the number of dedicated IP addresses.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks emphasizes the importance of engagement. They highlight that the primary purpose of confirmation emails is often to establish user engagement. For this reason, separating the sender for regular content might not be desirable, as it could dilute the positive engagement built by transactional messages. This perspective underscores the value of maintaining a cohesive sender identity across all communications, particularly when transactional emails serve as a foundational element for recipient interaction. The argument is that the positive sender reputation gained from highly engaging transactional emails should ideally benefit all subsequent communications from that sender.
What the experts say
Deliverability experts generally agree that using multiple subdomains on a single dedicated IP address for different email types is a viable and often recommended strategy. Their insights focus on the technical mechanisms that allow for such separation, the sophistication of mailbox providers in handling diverse mail streams, and the critical importance of proper authentication and consistent sending practices. While there are nuances, the overall sentiment is positive, especially when resource constraints limit the acquisition of multiple dedicated IPs.
Key opinions
- Mailbox provider sophistication: Mailbox providers are highly adept at distinguishing between various mail streams originating from a single IP address, even if senders attempt to obscure these distinctions.
- Independent reputation building: Each subdomain will cultivate its own distinct reputation, even if sharing an IP. This allows for segmentation of sending practices and reputation management.
- DKIM for stream differentiation: Utilizing different d= values in DKIM signatures for each stream can further signal to mailbox providers that the emails are distinct categories, aiding in separate reputation tracking.
- Volume efficiency: This setup is particularly advantageous for senders whose individual email types lack sufficient volume to independently sustain a dedicated IP, as it allows for combined volume to build a strong IP reputation.
Key considerations
- Potential for impact: While segmentation is possible, a highly negative sending pattern from one subdomain (e.g., severe blacklisting from a prominent blocklist) can still exert some negative influence on the shared IP and other subdomains.
- Optimal IP usage: A dedicated IP is best utilized with consistent, high-volume sending. Senders must ensure their combined email volume across all subdomains on that IP meets this requirement to maintain an optimal reputation.
- Authentication configuration: Proper configuration of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC for each subdomain is paramount to ensure email authentication and deliverability. This includes understanding if a subdomain needs its own SPF record.
- Monitoring and adaptation: Continuous monitoring of email performance, including open rates, click-through rates, and spam complaints, for each subdomain is vital. This data helps in adapting sending strategies to optimize deliverability.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks (Alison) explains that while the reputation of different mail types can influence each other, each subdomain also possesses its own distinct reputation, similar to a shared IP where multiple domains send from the same IP, but in this case, both domains belong to the same entity. This insight suggests a nuanced view of reputation, acknowledging both shared and isolated elements. It provides comfort for senders utilizing this setup, indicating that inherent segregation capabilities exist within the email ecosystem.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks (Alison) further clarifies that this approach can be highly beneficial for senders who might not generate enough volume to justify or sustain separate dedicated IPs for each email type (e.g., transactional and marketing). By combining their total marketing and transactional traffic on a single dedicated IP, they can achieve the necessary volume to build and maintain a healthy reputation for that IP. This highlights the practical advantages of the setup, especially for businesses with moderate but diversified email sending needs. It's a strategic way to leverage a dedicated IP efficiently.
What the documentation says
Technical documentation and industry guides largely support the use of multiple subdomains on a single dedicated IP address. They often outline how DNS records facilitate this separation and how mailbox providers are designed to handle such configurations. The underlying message is that while an IP address is a crucial factor in deliverability, the domain and subdomain hierarchy also play a significant role in how sender reputation is established and managed. These sources typically provide the technical backbone for implementing such strategies, focusing on proper setup and expected outcomes.
Key findings
- Subdomain independence: Documentation often implies that subdomains, while linked to a primary domain, can function as separate sending entities, each capable of building its own distinct reputation.
- DNS records: The foundation for using multiple subdomains on one IP lies in proper DNS configuration, including A records, MX records, SPF, and DKIM, for each subdomain.
- Dedicated IP definition: A dedicated IP is defined as being used by a single sender. This means all traffic from that IP, regardless of the subdomain, is attributed to one entity, allowing for concentrated reputation efforts. Mailmodo notes that a dedicated IP is used by only one sender.
- Reputation decoupling: Many guides recommend separating marketing and transactional emails to decouple their reputations, implying that this is achievable even when sharing an IP, provided the subdomains are correctly set up.
Key considerations
- Comprehensive authentication: While subdomains can share an IP, each still requires its own SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records to ensure proper authentication and alignment, crucial for inbox placement.
- ISP tracking: Documentation often alludes to how Internet Service Providers (ISPs) track sender reputation, emphasizing that they monitor not only the IP but also the domain, subdomains, and sending behavior associated with each. This means that careful integration and setup is critical.
- No explicit prohibition: No standard documentation explicitly prohibits or advises strongly against using two subdomains on a single dedicated IP for different email types, suggesting it's an acceptable configuration when properly managed.
- Granular analysis: Using separate subdomains aids in more granular analysis of deliverability issues, as metrics can be tied directly to specific email streams, simplifying troubleshooting.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailmodo clarifies that a dedicated IP address is exclusively used by a single sender. This means that all email traffic originating from that IP, whether from different subdomains or email types, is attributed solely to that one entity, allowing for concentrated reputation building (or damaging) on that specific IP. This principle underlies the responsibility inherent in using a dedicated IP, as its performance directly reflects the sending practices across all associated subdomains.
Technical article
Documentation from EngageBay explains that subdomains, while often used to direct web traffic to different servers or IPs, inherently maintain a connection and access to the main domain. This hierarchical relationship means that the brand identity and underlying domain authority persist, even as different email functions are delegated to subdomains. This signifies that while you gain flexibility with subdomains, they are not entirely disconnected from your core domain's reputation.
Related resources
5 resources
Related pages
Will using a subdomain for different email types affect my primary domain's reputation?
Should I use separate IPs or domains for transactional vs marketing emails?
Should I use separate subdomains for marketing and transactional emails?
Can one dedicated IP be mapped to multiple sub-domains for email?
Why use subdomains for email marketing deliverability?
How to set up email subdomains and what DNS records are required?
How many subdomains should I create for my email sending, and what naming conventions should I use?
A simple guide to DMARC, SPF, and DKIM
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
How email blacklists actually work: a simple guide
