Are fake profiles and Indian IPs common in cold outreach emails?
Michael Ko
Co-founder & CEO, Suped
Published 1 May 2025
Updated 19 Aug 2025
6 min read
When you're deeply involved in email deliverability, you inevitably see a lot of cold outreach. Some of it is excellent, but a significant portion raises immediate red flags. I frequently encounter emails where the sender's profile seems fabricated, or the email headers reveal an IP address originating from an unexpected country, such as India, despite the sender purporting to be from a Western company.
This observation often leads to questions about the legitimacy and effectiveness of such tactics. Are fake profiles and Indian IP addresses common in cold outreach emails? And if so, what are the implications for email deliverability and sender reputation? Let's dive into why these elements are observed and their broader impact.
The prevalence of fake profiles
The realm of cold email outreach has become incredibly competitive. In an effort to scale operations, some individuals and organizations resort to tactics that prioritize quantity over quality. This often includes the creation of fake profiles. These profiles are designed to appear legitimate, sometimes using generic names or stock photos, to mask the true identity of the sender or the origin of the campaign. The goal is often to bypass initial scrutiny from recipients and email service providers (ESPs).
The use of fake profiles can be an attempt to distance the sender's primary identity or domain from potentially negative consequences, such as getting marked as spam or placed on a blacklist. However, this approach ultimately undermines trust and can lead to severe deliverability issues. ESPs are becoming increasingly sophisticated at detecting these deceptive practices.
From a deliverability perspective, sending emails from fake profiles can significantly hurt your sender reputation. ESPs analyze various signals, including the authenticity of sender details, to determine if an email is legitimate. When these signals are absent or appear misleading, it's a strong indicator of suspicious activity. To protect your deliverability, it's essential to identify and prevent fake email addresses from your lists.
Identifying the sender's IP address in email headersplain
Received: from mail.example.com ([192.0.2.1]) by mx.receivingserver.com with ESMTP;
Understanding the 'Indian IP' phenomenon
Another common observation is cold outreach emails originating from Indian IP addresses, even when the supposed sender or company is based in a Western country. This isn't inherently problematic, as many legitimate businesses and outsourcing partners operate from India. However, the prevalence of certain IP ranges associated with less reputable or bulk sending operations can raise red flags for discerning recipients and ESPs alike.
The Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre has even warned about fake emails. The issue often arises when these IP addresses have a history of sending spam or unsolicited mail. ISPs maintain internal blocklists (also known as blacklists) and reputation scores for IP addresses. If an IP is frequently associated with spam complaints or malicious activity, emails from it, regardless of sender reputation, are more likely to be filtered or rejected.
This highlights the importance of IP reputation. While many legitimate businesses in India send emails, the sheer volume of outbound cold outreach from certain segments can lead to negative associations. It's a complex challenge that affects legitimate businesses as much as it impacts malicious actors. Ultimately, segmenting email sending IPs by country can be crucial for deliverability if you are sending internationally.
Factor
Impact on deliverability
Example red flags
IP reputation
A history of spam complaints or blacklisting associated with the IP address. High bounce rates also weigh heavily.
Frequent emails from data centers that host many spammers or from IPs previously on a blocklist.
Domain reputation
The domain's past sending behavior, engagement, and authentication. Low engagement reduces trust.
Spammy keywords, irrelevant messaging, or misleading subject lines.
Generic pitches that don't address the recipient's needs.
The impact on your deliverability and brand
The unfortunate reality is that fake profiles and suspicious IP origins, whether from India or elsewhere, severely damage email deliverability. When ESPs detect these patterns, they often route emails directly to the spam folder, or even reject them outright. This impacts not only the specific campaign but also the long-term domain reputation and deliverability of the sending infrastructure.
A negative reputation means future legitimate emails, even those sent from genuine profiles, will struggle to reach the inbox. It can lead to your domain or IP address being placed on a blocklist, effectively halting your email marketing efforts. Recovering from a damaged reputation is a lengthy and challenging process, requiring consistent adherence to best practices and careful monitoring.
The long-term effects on your brand can be even more detrimental than immediate deliverability issues. Recipients who consistently receive unsolicited or suspicious emails from your domain will begin to associate your brand with spam, eroding trust and making future engagement incredibly difficult. This can directly impact sales and customer acquisition efforts. As noted on Reddit, cold email isn't dead, but poor execution makes it seem that way.
The path to better deliverability
To achieve successful cold outreach, focus on building trust and maintaining a strong sender reputation. This means avoiding deceptive practices like fake profiles and ensuring your sending infrastructure (including IP addresses) is clean and reputable. Legitimate businesses prioritize permission-based marketing and transparency, leading to better long-term results.
Authenticate your emails: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to prove your emails are legitimate.
Monitor your reputation: Regularly check blocklists and use tools like Google Postmaster Tools to keep an eye on your sending health.
Maintain a clean list: Remove inactive or invalid addresses to reduce bounces and spam trap hits.
Best practices for ethical and effective cold outreach
For ethical and effective cold outreach, authenticity is key. Always use genuine profiles and ensure your email sending infrastructure aligns with your sender identity. This means ensuring your domain is properly configured with email authentication records and that your sending IPs have a clean history. Transparency builds trust with both recipients and ESPs.
Building a clean, verified email list is paramount. Avoid purchasing lists or scraping contacts, as these sources often contain spam traps and invalid addresses, which can quickly land your domain on a real-time blackhole list (RBL) (blocklist). Focus on legitimate lead generation and verification processes to ensure you're reaching real, interested individuals.
Finally, adhere to cold email outreach best practices from the outset. This includes proper domain warming, sending personalized and relevant content, and respecting recipient preferences. These steps are crucial for improving your primary domain reputation after sending cold outreach emails and maintaining strong deliverability over time.
Problematic cold outreach
Sender identity: Uses fake names or generic email addresses like info@gmail.com.
IP origin: Email headers show an IP from a country inconsistent with the stated business location.
Content: Highly generic, impersonal, or overtly sales-focused messaging.
Ethical cold outreach
Sender identity: Uses a real person's name and a professional company email address.
IP origin: Consistent with the company's geographical location or known legitimate ESPs.
Targeted, personalized messages that offer genuine value to the recipient.
Navigating the landscape of cold outreach
In the complex world of cold email outreach, it's clear that fake profiles and suspicious IP origins are indeed common, particularly in less scrupulous campaigns. While not every email from an Indian IP is spam, the association often stems from a history of poor sending practices or large-scale, untargeted outreach.
Ultimately, the best approach to cold outreach involves authenticity, transparency, and a deep understanding of email deliverability best practices. By focusing on building genuine relationships and respecting the inbox, you can ensure your emails not only land but also resonate with your intended audience, leading to sustainable and successful campaigns.
Views from the trenches
Best practices
Always use a real sender name and a professional email address from your business domain.
Verify your email lists to remove invalid addresses and reduce bounces, improving deliverability.
Segment your email campaigns and tailor content to specific audiences for better engagement.
Common pitfalls
Relying on purchased email lists, which often contain spam traps and fake addresses.
Using generic email addresses or fake profiles that erode recipient trust.
Ignoring email authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC.
Expert tips
Regularly monitor your domain and IP reputation using tools like Google Postmaster Tools.
Analyze engagement metrics (opens, clicks, replies) to gauge campaign effectiveness and adjust strategies.
Ensure your email content is highly personalized and offers genuine value to avoid spam complaints.
Marketer view
A marketer from Email Geeks expressed frustration over cold outreach from "email deliverability tools" claiming expertise after finding contacts on LinkedIn.
2024-07-05 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
A marketer from Email Geeks questioned the authenticity of sender names and profiles encountered in unsolicited emails.