Companies ignore email opt-out requests for a combination of deliberate, often short-sighted, reasons and systemic failures. Intentional disregard can manifest as deceptive 'dark patterns' or a calculated decision to retain subscribers despite their explicit wishes, sometimes rationalized by the perceived importance of their mission. Concurrently, many instances stem from technical complexities, such as outdated or fragmented systems, unsynchronized multiple mailing lists, human error in database management, or simply a slow processing of unsubscribe requests. Regardless of the reason, this practice violates major anti-spam regulations like CAN-SPAM, GDPR, and CASL, and severely damages sender reputation, leading to deliverability issues and potential legal repercussions.
12 marketer opinions
Companies often fail to honor email opt-out requests due to a mix of intentional, often short-sighted, strategies and operational shortcomings. Deliberate actions include using deceptive 'dark patterns' to hinder unsubscribes or making a conscious choice to retain subscribers, sometimes under the pretense of a 'good cause' for non-profits. Simultaneously, systemic issues such as poor list management, fragmented or outdated systems, and unsynchronized multiple mailing lists frequently prevent requests from being processed universally. Human errors in database management or technical glitches can also lead to ignored preferences. This persistent failure to respect user choices significantly harms sender reputation, increases spam complaints, and carries potential legal liabilities.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks shares that disregard for opt-outs, even if accidental, is a major pet peeve from an ESP perspective.
11 Feb 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains a common problematic unsubscribe scenario where senders inquire if they can set up a system so unsubscribing from just one email doesn't unsubscribe from any others.
15 Dec 2022 - Email Geeks
5 expert opinions
Companies ignore email opt-out requests for a combination of reasons, ranging from deliberate misdirection to complex systemic issues. Some intentionally circumvent preferences by re-adding unsubscribed contacts to different lists, misclassifying promotional emails as 'transactional' to avoid opt-out rules, or exploiting past consent for new, unrelated communications. Concurrently, many instances stem from operational challenges like fragmented legacy systems, unsynchronized databases across multiple brands, or a general lack of updated internal processes. A misunderstanding or outright disregard for legal obligations like CAN-SPAM and GDPR, which includes the right to erasure, also contributes significantly to this problem. Ultimately, failing to honor these requests damages sender reputation, increases spam complaints, and carries severe legal and financial risks.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that companies should not ignore previous opt-outs, even when moving ESPs, as opt-outs are to the sender, not per ESP. She highlights deliberate instances of this disregard and notes that problematic practices like moving recipients to other lists after an unsubscribe are blatantly against CAN-SPAM. She also details how 'related organizations' sometimes use old consent for new emails from entities the recipient has never heard of, which she considers not a valid opt-in.
4 Aug 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that companies may appear to ignore unsubscribe requests not out of malice, but due to the complex technical challenges of processing opt-outs across multiple systems, brands, and data sources, especially for large organizations. This complexity can lead to failures in fully propagating an unsubscribe across all relevant mailing lists.
16 Feb 2022 - Spam Resource
5 technical articles
Ignoring email opt-out requests stems from a mix of intentional non-compliance and technical processing failures. Regulations globally, including the CAN-SPAM Act in the U.S., GDPR in Europe, and CASL in Canada, all legally mandate that companies honor unsubscribe requests promptly, often within 10 business days, making deliberate inaction unlawful data processing. Beyond the direct legal penalties, failing to respect subscriber preferences severely undermines sender reputation, leading to critical deliverability issues like blacklisting by internet service providers, higher spam complaint rates, and potential account suspension by email service providers. This pervasive issue reflects either a conscious, risky disregard for legal and best practices, or significant underlying operational deficiencies.
Technical article
Documentation from FTC.gov explains that companies ignore opt-out requests either due to direct violation of the CAN-SPAM Act, which mandates honoring unsubscribe requests within 10 business days, or due to technical issues in processing these requests. Deliberate non-compliance is illegal.
8 Aug 2021 - FTC.gov
Technical article
Documentation from ICO.org.uk explains that companies might ignore email opt-out requests, which is a breach of GDPR, specifically Article 21, granting individuals the right to object to direct marketing. Companies must provide clear and easy ways to opt-out, and ignoring these requests is unlawful data processing.
17 Feb 2023 - ICO.org.uk
Do email marketing opt-outs ever expire?
How are Gmail and Yahoo enforcing unsubscribe requests, and what factors do they consider for compliance?
Why are non-subscribers receiving marketing emails and submitting unsubscribe requests?
Why do I keep receiving emails after unsubscribing?
Why do I still receive emails after unsubscribing through Gmail's unsubscribe button?
Why is it so difficult to unsubscribe from SAP emails?