Summary
The answers to the question regarding standard formats for late bounce error messages and asynchronous bounce handling reveal a multi-faceted approach. RFC 3464 is cited as a standard for Delivery Status Notifications (DSNs). Experts generally advise against sending delayed bounces, favoring alternative solutions. VERP (Variable Envelope Return Path) is commonly used by ESPs, though its effectiveness is debated due to spam concerns and the infrequency of asynchronous bounces. Handling asynchronous bounces requires robust bounce processing systems with strong parsing logic due to the lack of a universal standard. Proper bounce management, understanding bounce types, list hygiene, and email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) are also highlighted as crucial for maintaining sender reputation and improving email deliverability. Tools like Microsoft Exchange NDRs, Mailgun webhooks, Amazon SES with SNS, and Google Postmaster Tools are suggested for monitoring and addressing deliverability issues.
Key findings
- RFC 3464 for DSNs: RFC 3464 serves as a standard format for Delivery Status Notifications (DSNs).
- Delayed Bounces Discouraged: Experts advise against sending delayed bounces, suggesting the use of alternatives.
- VERP Usage and Concerns: VERP is a common method for linking bounces to campaigns, but its effectiveness is debated due to spam risks and infrequent asynchronous bounces.
- Robust Bounce Processing: Handling asynchronous bounces requires robust systems with strong parsing logic.
- Importance of List Hygiene: Maintaining proper list hygiene is critical for minimizing bounce rates and improving sender reputation.
- Email Authentication: Email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is crucial for improving deliverability.
- Platform-Specific Tools: Tools like Microsoft Exchange NDRs, Mailgun webhooks, Amazon SES with SNS, and Google Postmaster Tools can aid in monitoring and addressing deliverability issues.
Key considerations
- Consider Alternatives: Explore alternatives to sending delayed bounces to improve deliverability.
- Weigh VERP Risks: Carefully assess the potential risks and benefits before implementing VERP.
- Invest in Parsing: Invest in strong parsing logic for bounce processing systems to handle varied bounce formats effectively.
- Maintain List Hygiene: Regularly clean email lists to minimize bounce rates.
- Implement Authentication: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to authenticate emails.
- Monitor with Platform Tools: Utilize platform-specific tools like NDRs, webhooks, SNS, and Postmaster Tools to monitor and address deliverability issues.
- Understand Bounce Types: Differentiate between hard and soft bounces and handle them appropriately.
What email marketers say
8 marketer opinions
The responses highlight the importance of bounce management for maintaining sender reputation and improving email deliverability. VERP (Variable Envelope Return Path) is a commonly recommended technique to associate bounces with specific email campaigns. Understanding the difference between hard and soft bounces is crucial, as is implementing double opt-in and regularly cleaning email lists. Asynchronous bounces, which are delayed and difficult to track, require careful monitoring of bounce rates and potentially using a dedicated IP address. Effective bounce processing often necessitates using dedicated libraries or services due to the complexity and variability of bounce message formats. Employing email authentication methods (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), segmenting lists, and personalizing content also contribute significantly to deliverability.
Key opinions
- VERP Usage: VERP is a widely recommended technique for associating bounces with specific email campaigns, aiding in more precise bounce tracking and management.
- Bounce Types: Distinguishing between hard and soft bounces is essential for understanding the nature of delivery failures and taking appropriate action.
- Asynchronous Bounces: Asynchronous bounces are difficult to track due to their delayed nature, necessitating proactive monitoring and dedicated strategies.
- Complex Parsing: Parsing bounce messages can be complex due to format variations, often requiring specialized libraries or services for effective handling.
- Proactive Measures: Implementing double opt-in and regularly cleaning email lists are crucial for reducing bounce rates and maintaining list hygiene.
- Authentication Importance: Email authentication methods (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) are vital for establishing sender legitimacy and improving deliverability rates.
Key considerations
- VERP Implementation: Carefully implement VERP to accurately track bounces and avoid potential issues related to its complexity.
- Bounce Monitoring: Establish robust systems for monitoring bounce rates to quickly identify and address deliverability issues.
- List Hygiene: Regularly clean email lists to remove invalid or inactive addresses, minimizing bounce rates and improving sender reputation.
- Authentication Setup: Properly configure email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) to enhance sender legitimacy and improve email deliverability.
- Dedicated IP: Consider using a dedicated IP address for sending emails, particularly if dealing with high volumes or asynchronous bounces, to better manage reputation.
- Third-party Tools: Evaluate using third-party bounce processing libraries or services to handle complex parsing and management of bounce messages.
Marketer view
Email marketer from StackOverflow shares that parsing bounce messages can be complex due to variations in formatting. They recommend using a dedicated bounce processing library or service to handle this task effectively.
16 Jun 2023 - StackOverflow
Marketer view
Email marketer from SendGrid shares that understanding different bounce types (hard vs. soft) is important for email deliverability. Hard bounces indicate permanent delivery failures, while soft bounces are temporary. SendGrid automatically handles bounce processing and provides analytics on bounce rates.
18 Jun 2021 - SendGrid
What the experts say
6 expert opinions
Experts generally discourage sending delayed bounces and suggest alternatives should be prioritized. RFC3464 is referenced as a standard for delivery status notifications (DSNs), though VERP (Variable Envelope Return Path) is often used by ESPs to link bounces to original campaigns. While mail handlers should avoid asynchronous bounces, bulk senders need to handle them. Implementing VERP might be useful, but its present-day value is questioned due to the infrequency of async bounces and increasing spam risks. Robust bounce processing systems are crucial for categorizing bounces and maintaining sender reputation, requiring strong parsing and logic due to the absence of a single unified standard.
Key opinions
- Discouraged Practice: Sending delayed bounces is generally frowned upon, with experts recommending exploring alternative solutions.
- RFC3464 & VERP: RFC3464 serves as a standard for delivery status notifications, while VERP is a common method among ESPs for linking bounces to specific email campaigns.
- Async Bounce Handling: Mail handlers should aim to avoid sending asynchronous bounces, but bulk senders must still be prepared to manage them.
- VERP Concerns: The contemporary utility of VERP is debated, with considerations around the rarity of asynchronous bounces and the growing threat of spam.
- Robust Processing Needed: A robust bounce processing system is critical for categorizing bounces and preserving sender reputation, demanding sophisticated parsing capabilities due to the lack of a universal standard.
Key considerations
- Prioritize Alternatives: Explore and implement alternatives to sending delayed bounces to improve email deliverability.
- VERP Implementation Risks: Carefully weigh the potential benefits and risks, including increased spam vulnerability, before implementing VERP for bounce handling.
- Invest in Parsing Logic: Invest in robust parsing logic within your bounce processing system to effectively handle varied bounce message formats.
- Balance Handling Efforts: Strike a balance between avoiding asynchronous bounces and effectively managing them to minimize impact on sender reputation.
- Follow RFC3464: Refer to RFC3464 as a guide to the standard format for delivery status notifications when developing bounce handling strategies.
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource suggests implementing a robust bounce processing system that can automatically categorize bounces (hard vs. soft) and update email lists accordingly to maintain deliverability and sender reputation. They highlight that there is not a single standard, so robust parsing and logic is required.
4 Dec 2022 - Spam Resource
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks suggests VERP is useful, but implementing it today is uncertain due to the rarity of async bounces and the increase of spam targeting VERP return-path addresses.
28 Nov 2022 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
5 technical articles
The provided documentation excerpts focus on various systems and standards for handling bounce messages, particularly late and asynchronous bounces. RFC 3464 is identified as a standard for Delivery Status Notifications (DSNs), which provide a structured format for reporting delivery failures. Major email platforms like Exchange (Microsoft Learn), Mailgun, Amazon SES, and Google Postmaster Tools offer distinct mechanisms for reporting and handling bounces. These range from Non-Delivery Reports (NDRs) in Exchange to webhook notifications in Mailgun and bounce notifications via Amazon SNS. Google Postmaster Tools assists in monitoring email sending reputation and bounce rates to pinpoint and resolve deliverability issues.
Key findings
- RFC 3464 Standard: RFC 3464 is a defined standard for delivery status notifications (DSNs), facilitating interoperability in reporting email delivery failures.
- Platform-Specific Mechanisms: Various email platforms such as Exchange, Mailgun, and Amazon SES provide their own mechanisms for reporting and handling bounce messages.
- Webhook Notifications: Mailgun utilizes webhooks to notify users of bounce events, including detailed information about the bounced email.
- SNS Integration: Amazon SES integrates with Amazon SNS to enable bounce notifications and facilitates tracking bounce rates via the SES console.
- Reputation Monitoring: Google Postmaster Tools offers insights into email sending reputation, spam rates, and bounce rates, aiding in identifying and resolving deliverability issues.
Key considerations
- Interoperability: Consider the importance of adherence to standards like RFC 3464 to ensure interoperability between different mail systems when handling bounce messages.
- Platform Adoption: Understand the specific mechanisms each email platform (e.g., Exchange, Mailgun, Amazon SES) offers for reporting and handling bounces to tailor your approach accordingly.
- Webhook Implementation: If using Mailgun, leverage the webhook notifications to capture detailed information about bounce events for effective bounce management.
- SNS Setup: If using Amazon SES, set up bounce notifications using Amazon SNS to proactively monitor and respond to bounce events.
- Reputation Tracking: Utilize Google Postmaster Tools to continuously monitor email sending reputation and bounce rates, taking proactive steps to address any identified issues.
Technical article
Documentation from ietf.org explains that RFC 3464 defines a standard format for delivery status notifications (DSNs), which include information about delivery failures, including late bounces. It specifies the structure and content of these notifications to ensure interoperability between different mail systems.
31 Dec 2024 - ietf.org
Technical article
Documentation from AWS explains how Amazon SES handles bounces and complaints. It details how to set up bounce notifications using Amazon SNS and how to track bounce rates using the SES console.
12 Dec 2023 - AWS Documentation
Are asynchronous bounces back in email marketing and where will the DKIM2 discussion take place?
Can 'invalid recipient' bounce messages be false positives and what should I do about it?
How are email bounce rates calculated and what is considered a good bounce rate?
How can I test bounce alerts and what are some example bounce email addresses?
How do I troubleshoot email bounce messages?
What are common email bounce messages and what do they mean?
