Summary
Parsing SMTP responses is critical for identifying hard and soft bounces, which is essential for maintaining good email deliverability and sender reputation. SMTP enhanced status codes offer a structured approach, where the first digit indicates success (2xx), transient failure (4xx), or permanent failure (5xx). However, relying solely on these codes is insufficient. A nuanced approach is needed, involving analyzing the specific wording of the SMTP response and implementing custom logic to handle variations across different mail servers. Advanced parsing techniques, including regular expressions and natural language processing, are recommended for accurate interpretation and to differentiate between various soft bounce scenarios. Manual review of responses sorted by receiver can also be helpful. Furthermore, Non-Delivery Reports (NDRs) also utilize these codes. Effective bounce management includes categorizing bounces and automatically removing hard bounces from email lists, while being aware that even repeated soft bounces can negatively impact deliverability. Setting up automated bounce processing is recommended to filter hard bounces, improve deliverability, and reduce costs.
Key findings
- SMTP Codes: SMTP codes indicate success, temporary failure or permanent failure.
- Regex is Common: Regular expressions are commonly used to parse SMTP replies.
- Automated Processing: Automated bounce processing filters hard bounces, improving deliverability.
- List Hygiene: Removing hard bounces maintains list hygiene.
- Nuance Required: Accurate bounce categorization requires nuanced analysis beyond basic SMTP codes.
Key considerations
- Manual Review: Manual review helps identify nuances.
- Server Variation: Different mail servers may produce varying responses.
- Code Isn't Enough: Don't rely only on SMTP code as soft bounces can become hard bounces.
- Advanced Techniques: Advanced parsing helps identify underlying reason for bounces.
- Reputation: High bounce rates negatively impact sender reputation.
What email marketers say
11 marketer opinions
Parsing SMTP responses is crucial for identifying hard and soft bounces, which is essential for maintaining good email deliverability and sender reputation. Hard bounces, typically indicated by 5xx SMTP error codes, signify permanent delivery failures due to invalid or non-existent email addresses. Soft bounces, usually associated with 4xx codes, represent temporary issues like full inboxes or server problems. Repeated soft bounces should be treated with caution as they may become hard bounces. Effective bounce management involves using regular expressions to extract the SMTP status code and message, categorizing bounces, and automatically removing hard bounces from email lists. Contextual analysis of error messages is vital for accurate classification, as the wording and specific digits within the SMTP response provide granular information. Automated bounce processing is recommended to filter hard bounces, improve deliverability, and reduce costs.
Key opinions
- Hard Bounce Codes: 5xx SMTP error codes generally indicate hard bounces, signifying permanent delivery failures.
- Soft Bounce Codes: 4xx SMTP error codes typically indicate soft bounces, signifying temporary delivery issues.
- Regex Parsing: Regular expressions are commonly used to extract SMTP status codes and messages from bounce responses.
- Automated Processing: Automated bounce processing is essential for filtering hard bounces and maintaining a clean email list.
- Contextual Analysis: Contextual analysis of the SMTP error message is crucial for accurately classifying bounces.
Key considerations
- Nuance of Codes: While 5xx codes often indicate hard bounces and 4xx codes indicate soft bounces, this isn't always the case, requiring careful analysis.
- Reputation Impact: High bounce rates negatively impact sender reputation, leading to deliverability issues.
- Variety of Responses: Different mail servers may produce varying SMTP response messages, requiring adaptability in parsing logic.
- Soft Bounce Monitoring: Repeated soft bounces should be monitored as they may eventually turn into hard bounces.
- List Hygiene: Removing hard bounces from your email list is critical for maintaining good list hygiene and deliverability.
Marketer view
Email marketer from authsmtp.com explains that interpreting bounce emails requires parsing the SMTP response code within the email body. Different mail servers produce different output, however almost all will include the important SMTP response.
1 Apr 2022 - authsmtp.com
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks suggests separating 5xx from 4xx response codes and manually reviewing what is happening, sorting by receiver (e.g., Yahoo 5xx, Yahoo 4xx). He cautions that not all 5xx errors are permanent errors.
20 Aug 2022 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
2 expert opinions
Accurately categorizing bounces from SMTP responses requires more than just looking at 4xx/5xx codes. A nuanced approach involving specific wording analysis and custom logic is needed due to variations across mail servers. Advanced parsing techniques, including regular expressions and natural language processing, are recommended to interpret responses accurately and identify the underlying reasons for bounces. Contextual analysis of error messages is crucial for differentiating soft bounce scenarios.
Key opinions
- Nuanced Approach: Categorizing bounces accurately goes beyond simple 4xx/5xx codes.
- Custom Logic: Custom logic is needed to handle variations across different mail servers.
- Advanced Parsing: Advanced parsing techniques (regex, NLP) are recommended for accurate interpretation.
- Contextual Analysis: Contextual analysis of error messages is crucial for differentiating soft bounces.
Key considerations
- Server Variations: Be aware of variations in SMTP responses from different mail servers.
- Message Wording: Pay attention to the specific wording of SMTP responses.
- Resource Intensity: Advanced parsing techniques can be resource-intensive.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains that accurately categorizing bounces requires a nuanced approach beyond simple 4xx/5xx codes. It involves considering the specific wording of the SMTP response and implementing custom logic to handle variations across different mail servers.
6 Jan 2024 - Word to the Wise
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource recommends using advanced parsing techniques, including regular expressions and natural language processing, to accurately interpret SMTP responses and identify the underlying reasons for bounces. Contextual analysis of the error message is crucial for differentiating between various soft bounce scenarios.
31 Oct 2023 - Spam Resource
What the documentation says
4 technical articles
SMTP response codes, as detailed in various documentation sources, provide a structured method for determining email delivery outcomes. The first digit of the code indicates success (2xx), a transient failure (4xx), or a permanent failure (5xx), enabling programmatic identification of hard and soft bounces. Examining both the SMTP response codes and the accompanying messages is essential for categorizing bounces effectively, and regular expressions are often used to match specific error messages for refined classification. Non-Delivery Reports (NDRs) in systems like Exchange Server also utilize these codes to categorize delivery failures.
Key findings
- Structured Codes: SMTP enhanced status codes provide a structured way to determine email delivery outcomes.
- Code Classes: The first digit indicates success (2xx), transient failure (4xx), or permanent failure (5xx).
- Bounce Categorization: Examining codes and messages categorizes bounces.
- Regex Usage: Regex patterns are used to match specific error messages.
- NDR Integration: NDRs include codes to categorize delivery failures.
Key considerations
- Detailed Messages: Detailed error messages should be analyzed for more specific classifications, not just the code itself.
- Varied Implementations: Be aware that different systems (e.g., Exchange Server) may have their own nuances in how they report bounces.
- Programmatic Parsing: Parsing requires programmatic solutions to extract the code and messages.
Technical article
Documentation from exim.org details that bounce processing involves examining the SMTP response codes and messages to categorize bounces. Hard bounces (permanent failures) typically have 5xx codes, while soft bounces (temporary failures) have 4xx codes. Regex patterns are used to match specific error messages for finer-grained classification.
13 Mar 2022 - exim.org
Technical article
Documentation from mozilla.org outlines that SMTP response codes are three-digit numbers where the first digit signifies the class of response: 2xx (success), 4xx (transient failure), and 5xx (permanent failure). Parsing these codes is the first step in identifying bounce types. Detailed error messages should be analyzed for more specific classifications.
25 Nov 2021 - mozilla.org
Can a hard bounced email address become deliverable again, and under what circumstances?
Can Gmail give false positive SMTP bounce responses?
Can 'invalid recipient' bounce messages be false positives and what should I do about it?
Do soft bounces affect email deliverability and sender reputation?
How are email bounce rates calculated and what is considered a good bounce rate?
How should different bounce types be classified and handled by ESPs?
