The provided answers converge on the idea that the optimal time to delete inactive users from an ESP is not fixed but rather depends on several factors, including sending frequency, business model (B2B vs. B2C), the nature of the relationship with subscribers, and engagement strategy. A consistent recommendation is to prioritize list hygiene by regularly removing unengaged subscribers to maintain deliverability, improve engagement rates, and reduce costs. Implementing a re-engagement campaign before removing subscribers is also a widely supported practice. Several sources suggest segmenting lists based on engagement levels to personalize communication and identify subscribers for removal. While specific timeframes vary (3-6 months, 6-12 months, or 90 days), the overarching theme is that a proactive approach to managing inactive subscribers is crucial for a healthy email marketing program. Additionally, a robust suppression list must be maintained.
10 marketer opinions
The responses indicate that there's no single ideal timeframe for deleting inactive users from an ESP. Instead, the optimal duration depends on several factors, including sending frequency, relationship with contacts, business type (B2B or B2C), and engagement strategy. A common theme is the importance of regular list cleaning to maintain good deliverability, engagement rates, and cost-effectiveness. Many sources recommend implementing re-engagement campaigns before removing subscribers and segmenting lists based on engagement levels. Some sources suggest timeframes ranging from 3-6 months for more frequent senders to 6-12 months for less frequent senders, while others suggest 90 days of inactivity.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Sendinblue suggests defining inactive subscribers as those who haven't opened or clicked an email in the last 3-6 months. They explain that once a subscriber meets this criteria, they should be targeted with a re-engagement campaign, and if they still don't engage, they should be removed from the list.
11 May 2022 - Sendinblue
Marketer view
Email marketer from OptinMonster mentions the importance of removing subscribers to benefit from higher engagement rates, improved deliverability, better sender reputation, and reduced costs.
21 May 2022 - OptinMonster
1 expert opinions
Laura Atkins from Word to the Wise highlights the importance of a clean email list for deliverability, focusing on engagement-based segmentation and valuable content for active subscribers. While a specific timeframe for deleting inactive users isn't given, the guidance implies their removal after failed re-engagement efforts and emphasizes honoring unsubscribe requests, as unengaged users become spam complainers.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise (Laura Atkins) emphasizes that maintaining a clean email list is crucial for deliverability. While she doesn't provide a specific timeframe for deleting inactive users, she suggests creating segments based on engagement and focusing on sending valuable content to active subscribers. She also highlights the importance of having a clear unsubscribe process and honoring unsubscribe requests promptly, because unengaged users become spam complainers. This implies removing unengaged subscribers after re-engagement attempts fail.
14 Sep 2023 - Word to the Wise
4 technical articles
Email platform documentation emphasizes identifying inactive subscribers based on engagement metrics and the importance of list hygiene for maintaining a good sender reputation and deliverability. Mailchimp suggests a removal timeframe of 6-12 months, depending on sending frequency and business type, preceded by a re-engagement email. Klaviyo advocates for using a 'sunset policy' to automate the process of identifying, re-engaging, and potentially removing unengaged subscribers using sunset flows. SparkPost highlights the general importance of removing inactive users to reduce the likelihood of hitting spam traps. AWS focuses on suppression lists, advising that hard bounces and manual unsubscribes should automatically be added to ensure they are never emailed again, which increases sender reputation.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailchimp advises identifying inactive subscribers based on engagement metrics like opens and clicks. They explain that after a certain period of inactivity (often 6-12 months, depending on the sending frequency and business type), these subscribers should be considered for removal. They also recommend sending a final re-engagement email before unsubscribing them.
8 Mar 2024 - Mailchimp
Technical article
Documentation from SparkPost highlights the importance of list hygiene for deliverability. They explain that regularly removing inactive subscribers helps maintain a good sender reputation, as it reduces the likelihood of sending to spam traps or users who report emails as spam. They do not provide a specific timeline for removing inactive users, but emphasis cleaning inactive addresses.
10 Feb 2025 - SparkPost
Do email marketing opt-outs ever expire?
How do I target inactive email users without hurting my domain reputation?
How long should I exclude unengaged email subscribers to improve deliverability?
How long should I keep inactive email addresses on my marketing list?
Should e-commerce stores implement an email sunset policy for inactive customers?
Should I unsubscribe inactive users and what are the best practices?