Summary
The decision of whether or not to unsubscribe inactive users is a critical one for email marketers and deliverability professionals. While it might seem counterintuitive to reduce your subscriber count, maintaining a clean and engaged email list is paramount for ensuring high email deliverability, protecting your sender reputation, and avoiding blocklists. Ignoring inactive subscribers can lead to lower open rates, higher spam complaints, and ultimately, your emails landing in the spam folder rather than the inbox. Understanding the nuances of inactivity, the risks involved, and the best practices for managing these segments is essential for long-term email marketing success.
Key findings
- Deliverability impact: Sending to inactive users significantly harms sender reputation and inbox placement, increasing the likelihood of emails being marked as spam or blocked.
- No automatic unsubscription: Automatically unsubscribing users without their explicit consent or notification is generally not advised, as it constitutes a change in their data state and can lead to legal or ethical issues.
- Sunset policies: Implementing a formal "sunset policy" is a widely accepted best practice. This involves gradually reducing email frequency to unengaged subscribers and eventually suppressing them from regular sends.
- Re-engagement first: Before completely removing inactive users, a well-designed re-engagement campaign can often win back a portion of these subscribers, turning potential losses into active customers.
- ISPs set the rules: Regardless of local laws, internet service providers (ISPs) and mailbox providers dictate who gets to send mail and where it lands. Their algorithms prioritize engagement, so managing inactive users is crucial for compliance with their filtering rules.
Key considerations
- Defining inactivity: The definition of "inactive" can vary based on your business model and product lifecycle. For some, six months without engagement is critical, while for others, especially those with infrequent purchase cycles, it might be longer, like 2-3 years.
- Segmentation: Instead of outright removal, consider segmenting inactive subscribers into a separate list. This allows for targeted re-engagement efforts or a reduced sending frequency without completely cutting ties.
- Client education: Educating clients or superiors on the tangible benefits of managing inactive subscribers, such as improved Gmail deliverability and reduced spam complaints, is often necessary to gain buy-in for list hygiene practices.
- Spam trap avoidance: Old, unengaged email addresses are prone to becoming spam traps. Sending to these can severely damage your sender reputation and lead to blocklistings.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often find themselves in a challenging position when it comes to inactive subscribers. On one hand, there's the desire to maintain a large list size and not lose potential future engagement. On the other, there's the pressing need to protect sender reputation and ensure emails reach active inboxes. The consensus among marketers leans towards strategic management of inactive segments rather than immediate, forced unsubscription, emphasizing re-engagement and careful list segmentation.
Key opinions
- Subscriber choice: The primary opinion is that the subscriber should initiate their own unsubscribe. Marketers should focus on providing clear unsubscribe options and managing send frequency for those who are not engaging.
- Segment, don't delete: Many advise against deleting inactive subscribers outright. Instead, segmenting them allows for tailored approaches, such as reduced sending or specific re-engagement campaigns, preserving their potential value.
- Re-engagement value: Inactive subscribers are seen as an untapped source of revenue, and re-engaging them can be more cost-effective than acquiring new customers. The right message at the right time can reactivate even long-dormant contacts.
- Educate clients: For agencies or service providers, educating clients about email deliverability best practices and the risks of sending to old, unmaintained lists is crucial to prevent damage to IP and domain reputation.
Key considerations
- Sunset strategy: A robust "sunset" strategy is vital for managing dormant users. This involves a phased approach to reduce engagement frequency before eventual suppression, balancing deliverability needs with potential future opportunities to re-engage inactive subscribers.
- Business context: Consider your specific business model and customer purchase patterns. For products with longer sales cycles, inactivity thresholds might be longer, requiring adjustments in email frequency rather than immediate unsubscription.
- Reputation risks: Leaving extremely old, unmaintained contact lists active poses a significant risk to sender reputation and can lead to blocklisting. Removing these contacts, or at least quarantining them, is crucial. This helps to improve the overall deliverability when re-engaging these segments.
- Unsubscribe best practices: While managing inactive users, always adhere to best practices for the unsubscribe process itself, ensuring it is clear and easy for users to opt out, which builds trust and maintains a positive sender reputation. SmartSites offers more insights on making the most of an email unsubscribe.
Marketer view
An email marketer from Email Geeks suggests letting contacts unsubscribe themselves, but emphasizes the importance of segmenting inactive users to reduce sending frequency. This approach allows marketers to manage their lists based on engagement levels without forcing an unsubscribe.
Marketer view
An email marketer from Email Geeks highlights the importance of aligning email frequency with customer purchase patterns. For products with longer repurchase cycles, it's more strategic to adjust sending frequency rather than immediately unsubscribing users, allowing for re-engagement during relevant periods.
What the experts say
From a deliverability perspective, experts strongly advocate for proactive management of inactive email subscribers. Their primary concern is the impact of unengaged contacts on sender reputation, which is meticulously monitored by mailbox providers. Sending to lists with a high percentage of inactive users can quickly lead to higher complaint rates, lower inbox placement, and even being placed on email blacklists or blocklists. Experts emphasize that neglecting list hygiene prioritizes quantity over quality, a strategy that inevitably backfires in the modern email ecosystem.
Key opinions
- ISPs' authority: Regardless of regional laws, ISPs are the ultimate gatekeepers of the inbox. They use engagement metrics as a key signal for sender trustworthiness, meaning sending to unengaged lists directly undermines your deliverability.
- Spam trap risk: Old, unengaged email addresses are highly susceptible to being converted into spam traps. Hitting these traps can lead to severe damage to your sender reputation and can result in your domain or IP being added to a blacklist.
- Engagement signals: Mailbox providers prioritize senders who demonstrate good list hygiene and consistent positive user interaction, such as opens and clicks. Low engagement from a segment signals poor sender quality.
- Cost-effectiveness: The financial benefits of not sending emails to genuinely inactive users, including reduced ESP fees and improved inbox placement for active subscribers, often outweigh the perceived value of maintaining a larger list.
Key considerations
- Strategic segmentation: Instead of hard unsubscribing, a more nuanced approach involves segmenting inactive users to control send frequency and protect overall sender reputation.
- Gradual sunsetting: Implementing a sunset policy with gradual contact reduction over 9-12 months is recommended, especially for major mailbox providers like Outlook. This prevents sudden negative impacts on deliverability.
- Educate stakeholders: It's vital to provide comprehensive educational materials to clients or internal teams to help them understand the importance of email list hygiene and its direct link to inbox placement, preventing future blocklisting issues. A better understanding of how email blacklists work can assist with this.
- Re-engagement strategy: When attempting to re-engage, use targeted messaging and provide clear opt-out paths to avoid triggering spam complaints. A poorly executed re-engagement can be more detrimental than simply suppressing the inactive contacts.
Expert view
An email expert from Email Geeks emphasizes the strategic use of sunset policies, particularly for major mailbox providers like Outlook, suggesting a 9-12 month inactivity threshold. This expert advises against automatic unsubscribing without notification due to data state changes, recommending instead a gradual segmentation of inactive contacts to prevent spam complaints.
Expert view
An email expert from Email Geeks states that even in the absence of local spam laws, internet service providers (ISPs) hold ultimate authority over email delivery. This highlights that adherence to ISP guidelines and best practices is paramount for ensuring inbox placement, regardless of legal mandates.
What the documentation says
Official email marketing documentation and research-backed guidelines consistently emphasize the importance of list hygiene and active subscriber management. These resources provide a framework for best practices, from initial opt-in to handling inactive users, all aimed at optimizing deliverability and maintaining a positive sender reputation. Key recommendations often revolve around transparent processes, explicit consent, and a focus on subscriber engagement to ensure compliance and effective email program performance.
Key findings
- Opt-in validation: Documentation frequently highlights the necessity of email validations and double opt-in processes to ensure list quality from the outset, minimizing future inactive users and spam traps.
- Easy unsubscribes: Providing clear and easy ways to unsubscribe is a consistent recommendation across all documentation. This prevents recipients from resorting to spam complaints, which are far more damaging to sender reputation.
- Re-engagement campaigns: Many guidelines suggest sending targeted re-engagement campaigns as a proactive measure to reactivate dormant subscribers before considering their removal from the active mailing list.
- Sunset policies: Formal sunset policies are outlined as essential strategies for managing inactive segments. These policies define a systematic approach to reduce sending frequency to unengaged users over time.
- Reputation building: All best practices ultimately contribute to building and maintaining a strong sending reputation, which is fundamental for ensuring consistent inbox placement across various mailbox providers.
Key considerations
- Compliance: Ensure your unsubscribe and data management practices comply with relevant regulations like GDPR and CAN-SPAM, particularly concerning 1-click versus 2-click email unsubscribes.
- Subscriber experience: Documentation often advises making the unsubscribe process as seamless as possible to enhance user experience and prevent negative feedback or direct spam reports. Learn more about email unsubscribe link best practices.
- Data accuracy: Regularly cleaning lists and suppressing unengaged contacts is essential for maintaining data accuracy and avoiding bounces, which can also negatively impact sender reputation.
- Automated processes: Leveraging automation for identifying and managing inactive subscribers, including re-engagement series and eventual suppression, is a key takeaway from many best practice guides. Mailgun discusses this in detail when it comes to re-engaging inactive subscribers.
Technical article
Mailgun documentation outlines fundamental practices for engaging inactive subscribers and maintaining list health. Key recommendations include regular email validation, implementing double opt-in, offering clear unsubscribe options, deploying re-engagement campaigns, and establishing a robust sunset policy.
Technical article
Campaign Monitor documentation emphasizes the importance of a seamless unsubscribe process for customers. They note that user-friendly unsubscribe mechanisms not only improve customer experience but also significantly contribute to building a positive sender reputation.
Related resources
15 resources
Related pages
How can managing inactive email subscribers improve Gmail deliverability?
How to re-engage inactive email subscribers and when should you stop sending?
How to manage deliverability when re-engaging inactive email subscribers?
How to persuade management to remove unengaged email list subscribers for better deliverability?
When to remove unengaged subscribers from email lists?
Email marketing best practices for unengaged subscribers: opt-out, suppression, or re-engagement?
What are the best practices and legal considerations for 1-click versus 2-click email unsubscribes?
Email unsubscribe link best practices: avoiding bot clicks and ensuring compliance
How should I define unengaged subscribers for removal from my email list?
What is the risk of sending email to inactive users?
