Suped

spfXio vs OnDMARC

Choose spfXio for a fully managed DMARC service, choose OnDMARC for comprehensive self-service features.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
spfXio primarily operates as a managed DMARC service, meaning many advanced features are handled directly by their team rather than through a self-service portal. We found that their offering focuses on core DMARC, SPF, and DKIM record management, with explicit limits on DMARC reported emails and domains per plan.
While it includes essential DMARC report analysis, its strength lies in offloading the complexity of DMARC implementation and ongoing adjustments. It is less about providing a vast array of self-service tools and more about ensuring compliance through direct management.
OnDMARC, in contrast, offers a robust SaaS platform with a broad suite of features designed for self-service DMARC management. It excels in providing granular insights through detailed DMARC report analysis, including forensic reporting for deeper investigations. Their dynamic services for SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI streamline complex configurations.
We noted features like 'Investigate' for instant deliverability diagnostics, 'Smart Alerts' for anomalies, and 'Radar' for brand protection, blocklist (blacklist) monitoring, and reputation management. Higher tiers include API access, Event Hub for SIEM integration, and advanced DNS Guardian capabilities, showcasing a comprehensive approach to email security.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Given spfXio's managed service model, the user experience is largely hands-off for the client. The primary interaction involves regular report reviews and communication with a dedicated account manager. This means less time spent navigating complex dashboards or configuring settings ourselves.
For organizations preferring to outsource DMARC management, this approach simplifies the entire process. There isn't an extensive self-service portal to master, reducing the learning curve for internal teams.
OnDMARC provides a self-service platform with a comprehensive user interface. While many users praise its intuitive nature and easy setup, particularly for DMARC implementation and managing dynamic SPF, we've also seen feedback indicating that the GUI can sometimes feel a bit clunky or overwhelming initially.
The platform offers guided workflows to help users move from monitoring to enforcement, and the visual reporting is generally clear. However, the sheer volume of data and features might require some acclimatization for new users, and some reporting customization options are desired.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
spfXio's managed service model inherently includes a strong support component. All plans come with a dedicated account manager and regular report reviews (quarterly or monthly for higher tiers). This hands-on approach means clients receive proactive guidance and assistance.
The support structure is integrated into the service, ensuring that expertise is readily available without needing to navigate typical support channels for every query. We consider this a significant advantage for those who value personalized, consistent guidance.
OnDMARC receives consistently high praise for its customer support. Reviews highlight responsive and knowledgeable teams, excellent onboarding experiences, and proactive customer success managers. We've seen mentions of email, chat, and phone support, with higher tiers offering dedicated account managers and custom SLAs.
While the Express plan offers email support, the Essentials and Premier plans escalate to include annual or quarterly account reviews, dedicated team-based support, and broader communication channels. This layered approach ensures that support scales with organizational needs and complexity.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
spfXio is particularly well-suited for organizations that prefer a fully managed service for their DMARC, SPF, and DKIM needs. This includes enterprise clients who might lack the in-house expertise or time to actively manage email authentication, or for MSPs looking to outsource this function for their clients.
Its structure simplifies DMARC compliance, making it an ideal choice for businesses prioritizing a hands-off approach and direct account management over extensive self-service tooling. SMBs might find the pricing model less appealing if they prefer a low-cost, self-managed solution.
OnDMARC caters to a wide range of organizations, from SMBs to large enterprises, with its tiered SaaS model. Its comprehensive self-service features make it suitable for companies with internal IT teams capable of managing DMARC, SPF, and DKIM directly. MSPs can also leverage its multi-tenancy and robust API for client management.
The platform's scalability, with unlimited domains and email volume in higher tiers, makes it a strong contender for enterprise deployments. Its detailed reporting and advanced security features appeal to organizations with sophisticated email security requirements and a desire for deep visibility.

How does spfXio compare with OnDMARC?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When assessing the drawbacks, we notice spfXio's primary limitation stems from its managed service model, which offers less direct control and transparency through a self-service portal. For OnDMARC, some users find the interface occasionally clunky or overwhelming, and a desire for more customization and export options in reporting is a common theme.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Great for Managing Multiple DMAC Traces, Needs Auto-Triage for Forensic Reports
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? Managing multiple DMARC traces has become much simpler. By enabling BIMI, we were able to significantly reduce our key risks with both customers and partners. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? There is a need for automatic triaging of forensic reports, along with notifications if any anomalies are detected. What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? BIMI helps our customers and partners recognize phishing scams more easily.
Verified User in Retail
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Dynamic SPF and Powerful Features, GUI Could Use Improvement
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? I have been using Red Sift OnDMARC for over three years for monitoring DMARC, SPF, and DKIM across multiple domains, which would be difficult to manage without such a tool. It offers the ease of dynamic SPF and dynamic DMARC, which simplify complex monitoring tasks. The software provides a powerful set of features, making any initial setup challenges worthwhile. I especially value the single pane of glass interface as an IT administrator managing domains that engineers use, allowing me to track domain usage, detect spam issues, and dynamically update DMARC, DKIM, and SPF with ease. The dynamic SPF and DMARC/DKIM reports are integral for my operations, as they save considerable time by turning potentially lengthy tasks into several-minute jobs. Furthermore, the friendliness and support from our account manager, alongside our quarterly meetings, enhance the overall experience and decision to continue using the platform. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? I find the GUI a little bit difficult to navigate sometimes and a bit clunky, which sometimes makes it hard to find what I want. What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? I use the product to monitor DMARC, SPF, and DKIM across domains, simplifying updates and detecting spam issues with ease. It turns lengthy tasks into minutes, providing a comprehensive view of domain usage and security.
Brice P.
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Easy DMARC implementation with great visibility
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? OnDMARC makes it very easy to set up and maintain DMARC records. The guided workflows and clear reporting helped us move from monitoring to full enforcement confidently. The user interface is intuitive, and support is very responsive whenever we have questions. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? It would be helpful if some of the reporting dashboards allowed more customization or export options. Sometimes, the volume of daily reports can feel overwhelming without filtering. What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? It is helping us prevent domain spoofing and phishing attacks by enforcing DMARC policies. It has also improved visibility into who is sending emails on behalf of our domain, so we can take quick action if needed. Overall, it has strengthened our email security posture and improved trust in our communications.
Shashi K.
SR Manager IT Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
It is quite a useful tool to manage SPF/DKIM/DMARC records and understand it's impact on the domain.
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? The ease of using the application and the UI that is provides that helps in managing the records of the domain. Plus the customer service for the tool is quite responsive. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? The limitation of the feature of MTA-STS, in which it reports only a few of the domains. What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? It helps us in getting a clearer picture of the use case of our domain, plus the acceptance and the rejection rate.
Ashman B.
CyberSecurity Analyst Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Easy DMARC setup
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC? We have had OnDMARC for several years, we onboarded all of our managed domains over the past 12months. It was very easy adding SPF, DKIM records and moving DMARC to 100% Reject. We had support from Red Sift all the way. What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC? Sometimes the dashboard is misleading, i had moved a domain to reject 50% and the dashboard didn't reflect that. but customer support fixed that very quickly What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? Securing our domains to bring them up to 100% Reject
Verified User in Law Practice
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

Pricing

spfXio primarily offers managed service plans with higher entry costs, while OnDMARC provides a more accessible self-service Express plan for smaller needs before escalating to contact-for-pricing tiers.
Logo
Logo
Small
Starts at 25k DMARC reported emails.
$9-12 USD/month
Medium
$299-499/month for 25k-50k DMARC reported emails.
$9-12 USD/month
Large
Managed service email limits are lower.
$9-12 USD/month (Express Plan)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing (Platinum MS)
Contact for pricing (Essentials/Premier)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with spfXio or OnDMARC?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions