Suped

Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark vs.
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on in 2026

Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark dashboard screenshot
postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
G2
4.6/5
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on dashboard screenshot
splunk.com logo
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on
G2
0.0/5
vs.
We tested both products for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender connected. Postmark's free weekly digests are easier to start with, but they stay shallow. Splunk TA-DMARC gives technical teams more raw control, but it asks them to build the DMARC workflow themselves.
Priya Raman profile picture
Priya Raman
Senior Software Engineer, Suped
Published 4 Nov 2025
Updated 30 May 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
Free weekly DMARC email reports
Starts at
$0
Best fit
Small teams checking one low-risk domain
In one line
Postmark gave us a simple weekly view of top sources, but it did not give us a live dashboard, account separation, or enough source history to drive enforcement confidently.
splunk.com logo
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on
Self-managed DMARC data ingestion
Starts at
Not publicly listed
Best fit
Splunk operators who want DMARC data inside Splunk
In one line
Splunk TA-DMARC parsed aggregate reports into Splunk, but useful sender classification, alerts, dashboards, and ownership handoff required internal engineering work.
suped.com logo
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn more

Pick Postmark for a free check, pick Splunk for raw control, pick guided operations for ownership

Pick Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark if
Best for a small team that wants a free weekly DMARC pulse
The primary corporate domain verified quickly and started receiving weekly email summaries without a dashboard build.
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace appeared as expected sources, but the free summary compressed detail once more senders appeared.
The unauthorized spoof sample surfaced as a problem signal, but we still had to do our own investigation and owner handoff.
Free plan available
Pick Splunk TA-DMARC add-on if
Best for a security team already operating Splunk
The add-on ingested XML reports from mailbox collection and gave us searchable DMARC events inside Splunk.
SendGrid and Mailchimp required SPL cleanup before business owners could understand which sending stream belonged to whom.
Forwarded mail with SPF failure was visible in events, but explaining it required a custom saved search and analyst notes.
Not publicly listed
Consider Suped if
A third option when guided fixes, hosted records, and clearer ownership matter
Use guided fixes as a buying criterion when teams need SPF, DKIM, and DMARC next steps assigned to owners instead of buried in reports.
Prioritise automated issue detection and alert quality when unknown senders, spoof samples, and forwarding edge cases need fast triage.
Check MSP workflows and published starter pricing when multiple domains, client handoff notes, and recurring reporting are part of the operating model.
Free plan available

The differences that actually change your week

postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
splunk.com logo
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on
suped.com logo
Suped
DMARC report analysis
How far the product turns aggregate XML into usable authentication insight.
Weekly email only
Add on parsing
Dashboard and reports
Source detection
Whether sending services are identified clearly enough for owner handoff.
Top sources only
Manual workflow
Source identification
Forward detection
Whether forwarding patterns are separated from true authentication failures.
Unclear
Searchable events
Included
Spoof detection
Whether unauthorized traffic is highlighted for investigation.
Report signal
Searchable events
Included
Notifications and alerts
Whether the product routes important changes before a weekly review.
Weekly digest
Requires Splunk setup
Alerting included
Reporting
Whether recurring reports are usable for stakeholders.
Email report
Custom dashboards
Recurring reports
API
Whether report data can feed other workflows programmatically.
Limited metadata
Splunk API
Available
Multi-tenancy
Whether accounts, clients, or business units can be separated cleanly.
Not included
Manual index design
Included
SPF flattening
Whether SPF lookup limits can be managed inside the product.
Not supported
Not supported
Included
Hosted DMARC
Whether DMARC records can be managed through hosted records.
Not supported
Not supported
Included
Hosted SPF
Whether SPF records can be managed through a hosted service.
Not supported
Not supported
Included
Hosted MTA-STS
Whether MTA-STS policy hosting and TLS reporting workflows are covered.
Not supported
Not supported
Included
Blocklists and reputation
Whether blocklist (blacklist) and reputation checks are part of the workflow.
Not supported
Not supported
Included
Automatic issue detection
Whether the product detects authentication issues without manual review.
Manual review
Manual workflow
Included
AI copilot
Whether users get AI-assisted triage or explanation inside the workflow.
Not supported
Not supported
Included
DNS monitoring
Whether authentication record changes are monitored after setup.
Not supported
Requires Splunk setup
Included
Self hostable
Whether the workflow can run inside the buyer's own infrastructure.
No
Yes
No
Free trial/free tier
Whether there is a free way to start testing.
Free tier
Free add on
Free tier

Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10

We scored both products against a fixed editorial rubric covering enforcement readiness, source resolution, setup, alerting, account workflows, hosted authentication records, blocklist and blacklist coverage, pricing clarity, and time to enforcement. Higher is better in every row.

Postmark is easier to start, Splunk is stronger for teams that can build around raw data

Postmark scored higher on setup, pricing clarity, and basic support expectations because our three domains were easy to add and the free price is obvious. Splunk scored higher on integrations and self-managed workflows because DMARC events landed inside Splunk, but source resolution, dashboards, and ownership handoff depended on custom SPL. Both scored zero where the tested product had no hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, or blocklist and blacklist monitoring.
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark score
33.5/100
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on score
30/100
postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
33.5/100
DMARC enforcement
3.5
Customer support
4.0
Source resolution
4.0
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
1.0
Alerting and integrations
2.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
9.0
Time to enforcement
3.0
splunk.com logo
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on
30/100
DMARC enforcement
4.0
Customer support
1.0
Source resolution
5.0
Setup and onboarding
3.0
MSP workflows
5.0
Alerting and integrations
6.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
2.0
Time to enforcement
4.0

Feature set

Reports vs raw data

Postmark wins on free simplicity. Splunk wins on searchable DMARC events.

Postmark covered the basic weekly reporting job with little effort, while Splunk exposed more event-level detail after we built searches. For buyers, the missing layer in both products is guided fixes or automated issue detection that turns Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and unknown sender findings into assigned next steps.
postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
G2
4.6/5
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark screenshot
Microsoft 365 surfaced quickly
Mailchimp summary stayed readable
Unknown sender lacked depth
splunk.com logo
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on
G2
0/5
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on screenshot
SendGrid searchable by domain
Forwarded SPF case visible
Classification required SPL
Postmark Free DMARC Weekly Digests gave us a concise email summary for the primary domain and surfaced Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp as recognizable sources. The limitation appeared when the marketing subdomain and support desk sender created extra rows: the weekly report did not give us enough drilldown history to classify the unknown sender confidently, and the DKIM pass on a subdomain still needed manual interpretation before policy movement.
Splunk TA-DMARC handled the raw DMARC feed better once mailbox collection and parsing were stable. We could search Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp records, isolate the spoof sample, and inspect the forwarded mail SPF failure, but the add-on did not package that into a DMARC operator workflow. Classification, dashboards, alert thresholds, and business-owner explanations were work we had to create.

User experience

Guided email vs operator console

Postmark is easier for a first look. Splunk is easier only if your team lives in Splunk.

Postmark made the first setup feel light because the weekly email format needed almost no training. Splunk felt powerful after setup, but the path to a usable DMARC view was longer and depended on internal Splunk knowledge.
postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
G2
4.6/5
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark screenshot
Three domains added quickly
Weekly cadence slowed triage
Forwarding explanation was manual
splunk.com logo
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on
G2
0/5
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on screenshot
Setup required Splunk skills
Unknown sender searched faster
Stakeholder notes stayed manual
Postmark was the faster start across our three test domains. The primary domain verified cleanly, but the marketing subdomain and parked domain made the limits obvious: we waited for the weekly cadence, then copied details into our own tracker to explain the unknown sender and the forwarded mail SPF failure.
Splunk TA-DMARC had more friction at the start because mailbox collection, parsing, indexes, and field expectations had to be checked before the data was useful. Once it worked, finding the unknown sender was faster than scanning a weekly email, but explaining the forwarded mail SPF failure to a non-Splunk stakeholder still required a written handoff note.

Support

Vendor help vs internal ownership

Postmark has clearer expectations. Splunk TA-DMARC is mostly self-managed.

Postmark's free workflow set expectations around self-service, with a cleaner DNS handoff than Splunk TA-DMARC. Splunk's add-on status meant our escalation path was internal, so enterprise onboarding depended on whoever owned Splunk and email authentication.
postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
G2
4.6/5
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark screenshot
Clear DNS handoff
Self-service free setup
Limited escalation depth
splunk.com logo
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on
G2
0/5
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on screenshot
Internal escalation required
OAuth setup needed ownership
Enterprise runbook needed
Postmark gave us a straightforward DNS setup path for the corporate domain and made the reporting address clear enough for a DNS administrator to add. During the parked domain test, support expectations were limited for the free workflow, so classification and policy questions still sat with our team rather than a DMARC specialist.
Splunk TA-DMARC required a different support model. DNS changes were not the hard part, but mailbox access, OAuth2 configuration, index routing, CIM mapping, and dashboard decisions needed a Splunk owner. For an enterprise rollout, we would plan an internal runbook before onboarding more domains.

Suitability

Simple monitoring vs security operations

Postmark fits one-domain monitoring. Splunk fits teams that want DMARC inside security operations.

Postmark is the cleaner fit for an SMB that wants a free weekly check on a low-risk domain. Splunk TA-DMARC is better suited to enterprises that already manage Splunk indexes, alerts, and dashboards. Buyers with MSP workflows or strict alert quality needs should test account separation, client handoff, and noise control before committing.
postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
G2
4.6/5
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark screenshot
Best for one domain
Weak client handoff
No account separation
splunk.com logo
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on
G2
0/5
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on screenshot
Enterprise control fits
MSP workflow is custom
Recurring reports need build
Postmark's fit narrowed as soon as we treated the three domains like separate operating surfaces. The corporate domain was fine for a weekly readout, but the marketing subdomain and parked domain needed grouping, recurring reporting, and owner notes that the free product did not provide.
Splunk TA-DMARC fit our enterprise-style test better because account separation could be designed through indexes, roles, and dashboards. That flexibility helped with domain grouping, but it was not an MSP workflow out of the box: client handoff notes, recurring summaries, and business-readable status needed custom work.

What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use

postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark

A lightweight weekly check for low-risk domains

After 90 days, Postmark felt like a useful weekly smoke test rather than a full DMARC operations tool. It handled the primary domain cleanly and gave us enough signal to see Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender, but we kept a separate tracker for owner assignments and policy decisions.
The biggest friction was time and depth. When the unauthorized spoof sample appeared, the weekly email gave us a useful warning, but we still needed manual review to separate that case from the forwarded SPF failure and the subdomain DKIM pass.
Where it wins
Fastest initial setup
No cost for basic monitoring
Readable weekly summaries
Good fit for parked domains
Where it lags
No live dashboard
Limited source drilldown
No MSP account workflow
No hosted authentication records
Pricing
$0
Free tier
Yes
Onboarding
Fast
G2 rating
4.6 / 5
splunk.com logo
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on

A raw DMARC feed for Splunk-led teams

After 90 days, Splunk TA-DMARC felt useful when we treated DMARC as another security data source. The raw events made it possible to search by sending IP, organization, domain, and result, which helped when we investigated the unknown sender and the unauthorized spoof sample.
It did not feel like a packaged DMARC product. We built the operational layer ourselves: sender naming, owner notes, saved searches, alert thresholds, stakeholder reports, and the explanation for the forwarded SPF failure.
Where it wins
Searchable event history
Fits existing Splunk operations
Good raw parsing control
Self-hosted deployment path
Where it lags
Archived and not supported
No guided policy movement
Custom dashboards required
Pricing depends on Splunk
Pricing
Not publicly listed
Free tier
Free add on
Onboarding
Technical
G2 rating
0 / 5

Pricing

postmarkapp.com logo
Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark
splunk.com logo
Splunk TA-DMARC add-on
suped.com logo
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
The free weekly email workflow fits one basic domain with limited history and source detail.
$0
The add-on itself has no listed charge, but it needs a working Splunk environment.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$0
The free product is not a multi-domain paid ladder, so each domain needs the free workflow's limits checked carefully.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
DMARC-specific pricing is not listed because cost depends on the Splunk environment and workload.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$0
There is no public volume tier for the free weekly product, and the workflow becomes manual at this size.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
The add-on has no public DMARC tier, and practical cost depends on ingest, retention, storage, and searches.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
$0
The free product can still be free, but it does not provide enterprise account separation or a full operational workflow.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
No separate public TA-DMARC enterprise tier was found; platform capacity planning drives the real cost.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
Postmark Free DMARC Weekly Digests pricing is a public $0 product price checked as of May 15, 2026. Splunk TA-DMARC add-on pricing is listed as $0 for the add-on where applicable, while Splunk platform costs are not publicly fixed for these DMARC segments, so medium, large, and enterprise values are price-status estimates checked as of May 15, 2026.

If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped

Suped dashboard
Move past weekly review
Postmark's free digest helped us spot the spoof sample, but the weekly cadence and limited drilldown slowed investigation. Suped's product is built for daily DMARC monitoring, sender classification, and issue workflows across the domains under review.
Reduce Splunk build work
Splunk TA-DMARC gave us raw events, but we had to create searches, dashboards, alert logic, and handoff notes. Suped's product packages those DMARC workflows so operators can spend less time turning XML data into owner-ready actions.
Handle hosted records
Neither reviewed product handled hosted SPF, hosted DMARC, or hosted MTA-STS in our test. Suped's product connects reporting with hosted record management, which matters when SPF lookup pressure and policy changes block enforcement.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark or Splunk TA-DMARC add-on?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.

Frequently asked questions

Here's why customers love Suped for DMARC monitoring

MONEYME cover

How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped

See how MONEYME uses Suped
Jam Cyber cover

How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped

See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
DigiBean cover

How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients

See how DigiBean uses Suped
Alliance Group cover

How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped

See how Alliance Group uses Suped
Maaser cover

How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement

See how Maaser uses Suped
G2 LeaderG2 Users Most Likely To RecommendG2 Easiest To Do Business WithG2 High PerformerG2 Best Estimated ROI
DMARC monitoring

Start monitoring your DMARC reports today

Suped DMARC platform dashboard
What you'll get with Suped
Real-time DMARC report monitoring and analysis
Automated alerts for authentication failures
Clear recommendations to improve email deliverability
Protection against phishing and domain spoofing
    Free DMARC Weekly Digests by Postmark vs Splunk TA-DMARC add-on DMARC product review in 2026 - Suped