Summary
Mailmend is largely seen by email deliverability experts and ethical marketers as a 'black hat' or 'spamware' tool. Its methods, such as concealing content and using 'hashbusters,' are designed to circumvent spam filters, which inevitably leads to severe negative deliverability outcomes. These include a high probability of emails being flagged as spam, widespread blocklisting and blacklisting, and a damaged sender and domain reputation. Users also face considerable obstacles with email authentication, IP warm-up, and regulatory compliance. The lack of transparency, publicly available data, and legitimate industry support further complicates these issues, making successful inbox placement highly unlikely and unsustainable.
Key findings
- Black hat tool: Mailmend is identified as a 'black hat' or 'spamware' tool that employs techniques, like hiding content and using 'hashbusters,' specifically to evade spam filters.
- Industry rejection: Legitimate email marketers and deliverability experts consistently condemn and avoid Mailmend, indicating its complete lack of credible or ethical use within the professional email industry.
- Immediate spam classification: The core methodologies of Mailmend are designed to bypass established email filters, which directly results in messages being marked as spam by major mailbox providers, leading to immediate and poor inbox placement.
- No reputation data: There is a complete absence of public data concerning Mailmend's IP reputation, a crucial factor. This makes recipient servers highly suspicious, often leading them to block or treat its emails with extreme caution.
Key considerations
- Severe reputation damage: Employing such a tool carries a significant risk of severe damage to both an IP and domain's reputation. This often results in persistent blocklisting and a substantial loss of recipient reach, as mailbox providers are adept at detecting and penalizing attempts to unfairly manipulate their systems.
- Authentication and compliance issues: Users will likely encounter major difficulties in correctly configuring essential email authentication protocols, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. There is also uncertainty surrounding compliance with global privacy regulations (such as GDPR), which can directly contribute to deliverability failures.
- Lack of support and transparency: Mailmend users should expect a complete absence of robust customer support, integrated feedback loops (FBLs) with major ISPs, direct partnerships, or reliable performance data. This makes effective troubleshooting and issue resolution nearly impossible.
- Unreliable infrastructure: The service likely operates with an unproven IP pool, which causes significant challenges with IP warm-up processes. This also increases the risk of shared IP addresses being compromised or used by other senders with poor practices, further exacerbating deliverability issues and potentially leading to immediate email rejection.
What email marketers say
12 marketer opinions
Using Mailmend for email sending carries significant negative deliverability implications, primarily because it employs 'black hat' tactics, such as hiding content, to bypass spam filters. This approach is widely condemned by legitimate email marketers and frequently results in emails being marked as spam or outright blocked by major mailbox providers. While some users might experience fleeting success, these methods are quickly detected, leading to severe penalties like widespread blocklisting and substantial damage to both IP and sender domain reputation. Furthermore, the complete lack of transparency regarding its IP reputation, absence of reliable customer support, and no public performance data make it an unsustainable and high-risk solution for any sender aiming for consistent inbox placement.
Key opinions
- Black hat tactics: Mailmend's use of techniques, such as hiding HTML and CSS content, is categorized as 'black hat' and designed to game filters, directly leading to messages being marked as spam by prominent mailbox providers.
- Ethical marketing rejection: The professional email marketing community actively rejects Mailmend, identifying it as 'spamware' and discouraging its use due to its unethical practices and the severe long-term damage it inflicts on deliverability.
- Short-lived success, long-term blocks: Any temporary success with tools like Mailmend is inevitably followed by significant deliverability failures, including being blocked by mailbox providers and losing a large portion of the email list, as systems are designed to detect and penalize attempts to bypass guidelines.
- Absence of IP reputation data: A critical deliverability implication is the complete lack of public data regarding Mailmend's IP reputation, which is essential for trust. This obscurity causes recipient servers to treat emails with suspicion or block them immediately.
Key considerations
- Severe reputation damage: Employing such a service poses a significant threat to your sender domain reputation. Substandard practices or compromised infrastructure can irrevocably harm your domain's standing, impacting all future email campaigns, regardless of the sending platform.
- Lack of support and guidance: Users should expect a critical absence of robust customer support and expert deliverability guidance. Without this, diagnosing and resolving complex inbox placement issues becomes extremely challenging, leading to persistent delivery failures.
- Compromised infrastructure risk: The lack of visible track record and infrastructure monitoring means any shared IP addresses could be easily compromised or used by other spammers, directly and negatively affecting legitimate senders operating on the same network.
- No performance transparency: The absence of public reviews, case studies, or transparent performance metrics makes it impossible for users to gauge Mailmend's actual effectiveness, reliability, or the specific deliverability challenges its user base might encounter.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that Gmail's sender guidelines warn against using HTML and CSS to hide content in messages; this can lead to messages being marked as spam.
20 Dec 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks describes Mailmend's practice of hiding content as 'black hat' due to its intent to game filters.
6 Nov 2022 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
10 expert opinions
Mailmend is largely characterized by deliverability experts as a 'black hat' or 'spamware' tool, employing techniques like 'hashbusters' and hidden content to circumvent spam filters. This approach, while sometimes making mailstream identification harder, is not endorsed by legitimate email marketers. The absence of industry recognition means Mailmend likely lacks crucial integrations, such as feedback loops with major internet service providers (ISPs), making it difficult to manage spam complaints and maintain list hygiene. Furthermore, its unproven IP pool raises concerns about IP warm-up, potentially leading to immediate blockages or poor deliverability. The professional email community consistently expresses fierce resistance to and discouragement against its use, indicating a significant risk for sender reputation and inbox placement.
Key opinions
- Black hat techniques: Mailmend utilizes outdated spammer techniques such as 'hashbusters' and embedding hidden content within emails, designed primarily to bypass spam filters and make mailstream identification more challenging.
- Industry wide rejection: Professional email marketers and deliverability experts widely condemn and do not use Mailmend, viewing it as a 'spammer tool' with methods that disregard legitimate email permissions. Over 10,000 global email marketers consulted could not provide concrete knowledge about its workings, instead showing fierce resistance to its use.
- Lack of FBL integration: A significant deliverability implication is the probable absence of integrated feedback loops (FBLs) with major ISPs, which are crucial for monitoring spam complaints and effectively managing list hygiene and sender reputation.
- Unproven IP infrastructure: The service likely operates with an unproven IP pool, which means senders face challenges with IP warm-up. This can result in new IPs being flagged as suspicious, leading to poor deliverability or immediate blockages.
Key considerations
- Severe reputation damage: Using a service that employs spammer techniques significantly jeopardizes both your IP and domain reputation, inevitably leading to widespread blocklisting or blacklisting by recipient servers.
- Challenging delisting efforts: The lack of industry recognition implies Mailmend likely doesn't have direct partnerships or established communication channels with major ISPs and spam filters. This significantly complicates troubleshooting and any efforts to get delisted from blocklists.
- Unsustainable deliverability: While such techniques might offer temporary success, they are quickly detected by modern spam filters, leading to consistently poor inbox placement and an unsustainable email program.
- Absence of professional support: There is no evidence of professional support or guidance within legitimate email marketing circles for tools like Mailmend, leaving users without a reliable resource for complex deliverability issues.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that using hashbusters is a very old spammer technique designed to bypass filters and get unwanted mail into the inbox, indicating a disregard for permission and an intent to use fraudulent tools.
15 Jun 2025 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks confirms that Mailmend's methods appear to involve hiding random content within emails.
1 Jan 2024 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
5 technical articles
Using Mailmend for email sending, as an undocumented and little-known service, presents significant deliverability challenges. A primary concern is the likely absence of a well-defined abuse desk, which leaves no clear channel for recipients to report spam. This directly contributes to a negative sender reputation and persistent blocklisting. Users will also face difficulties in correctly configuring essential email authentication protocols, such as SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, without adequate guidance from the provider. Furthermore, Mailmend's unestablished trust means its IP addresses are more likely to be added to blocklists or be subjected to more aggressive filtering by spam algorithms, pushing emails into the spam folder or leading to outright rejection. There is also uncertainty regarding the service's compliance with global privacy regulations, which can result in legal complications and further hinder deliverability.
Key findings
- Missing abuse desk: An important deliverability implication is the potential absence of a responsive abuse desk, which can cause unaddressed spam complaints and lead to ongoing blocklisting.
- Authentication configuration hurdles: Without clear guidance, users may struggle to properly set up critical email authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, resulting in authentication failures.
- Elevated blocklist risk: Unknown services like Mailmend face a higher chance of their IP addresses being quickly added to or defaulted onto various blacklists and blocklists, due to a lack of established trust.
- Aggressive spam filtering: Emails from an unverified sending source like Mailmend are often subjected to more stringent scrutiny by spam filters, leading to increased spam folder placement or outright rejection.
- Regulatory compliance ambiguities: Uncertainty regarding compliance with global privacy regulations (e.g., GDPR, CCPA) can result in legal issues and, consequently, affect deliverability as compliant senders are prioritized.
Key considerations
- Persistent blocklisting: The lack of a clear abuse reporting channel for Mailmend users means spam complaints go unaddressed, which inevitably results in sustained listing on various email blocklists and blacklists.
- Compromised authentication: Users attempting to send via Mailmend will likely encounter significant hurdles in properly implementing SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, leading to authentication failures that severely undermine inbox placement.
- Severe reputation degradation: Unaddressed complaints, non-compliance, and aggressive filtering all contribute to a rapidly deteriorating sender and IP reputation, making future successful email delivery highly improbable.
- Legal and deliverability dual threat: Operating without clear adherence to privacy regulations introduces both legal risks and direct deliverability problems, as mailbox providers increasingly favor senders with verifiable compliance.
Technical article
Documentation from Postmaster Best Practices highlights that a significant deliverability implication for any new or little-known service, such as Mailmend appears to be, is the potential absence of a well-documented and responsive abuse desk. This can lead to persistent blocklisting issues, as recipients have no clear channel to report spam, causing negative reputation accumulation.
4 Aug 2022 - Postmaster Best Practices
Technical article
Documentation from Email Authentication Standards explains that a deliverability implication for users of an undocumented service like Mailmend could be the difficulty in correctly configuring vital authentication protocols, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. Lack of clear guidance from the provider can lead to authentication failures and increased spam folder placement.
13 Jul 2021 - Email Authentication Standards
How can I improve my email deliverability?
How do email sending practices impact domain reputation and deliverability?
How does infrequent email sending impact deliverability and what strategies can be used to mitigate these effects?
How does my email tool affect my email deliverability?
What are the deliverability implications of sending emails with multiple languages?
Will using Stripe for sending emails affect email deliverability?
