Suped

Summary

Emails receive phishing warnings in Gmail when Google's sophisticated, internal systems detect characteristics associated with potential impersonation or fraudulent activity. This is distinct from a typical spam flag and is largely driven by a combination of factors, including the absence or misconfiguration of crucial email authentication protocols, suspicious content within the email, poor sender reputation, and the use of untrustworthy or obscured links. Gmail's dynamic detection relies on analyzing patterns of known phishing attacks, even flagging legitimate emails if they mimic these traits. To prevent these warnings, senders must prioritize robust email authentication, build and maintain a strong sender reputation through consistent and legitimate sending practices, and ensure all email content, especially links, is transparent and trustworthy.

Key findings

  • Phishing vs. Spam: Gmail's 'phishing warning' is distinct from a typical 'spam' classification. It signifies a potential threat related to impersonation, suspicious content, or unverified sender identity, rather than just unsolicited commercial email.
  • Dynamic Detection: Gmail's phishing detection is highly dynamic and relies heavily on internal, proprietary algorithms, user reports, and sophisticated content analysis. It is not primarily based on public blacklists, making manual checks for phishing IPs generally unhelpful.
  • Authentication Priority: The primary defense against phishing warnings is robust email authentication, specifically SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. These protocols enable Gmail to verify the sender's identity and determine if an email claiming to be from your domain is legitimate or a spoofing attempt.
  • Content & Links Trigger: Suspicious content, such as mismatched domains in links (HREFs vs. visible text), the use of public URL shorteners, redirects, or compromised domains within the message, are major triggers for phishing warnings. Even well-authenticated emails can be flagged if their content appears suspicious.
  • Reputation Matters: Sender reputation plays a significant role in Gmail's assessment. Emails from domains with low trust, inconsistent sending patterns, or those appearing too generic are more prone to warnings, as are those sent from newly registered domains without established history.

Key considerations

  • Robust Authentication: Implement and correctly configure SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records for your sending domain. DMARC, in particular, is critical for telling email providers like Gmail how to handle unauthenticated messages, significantly reducing phishing warning likelihood.
  • Sender Reputation: Build and maintain a strong, positive sender reputation by sending consistent, legitimate emails to engaged recipients. This involves avoiding unsolicited mail, maintaining a clean email list, and ensuring your email service provider (ESP) or sending infrastructure is reputable.
  • Transparent Links: Always use full, transparent URLs in your email content and avoid public URL shorteners (like goo.gl, bit.ly) which are commonly abused. Ensure all linked domains are trustworthy, match the visible text, and are primarily your own content to prevent link-related flags.
  • Content & Attachments: Avoid overly generic content, 'spammy' trigger words, or characteristics that mimic known phishing kits. Be cautious with suspicious attachments or unusual file types (.zip, .js) which can trigger sophisticated filters, even from legitimate senders.
  • Domain Trust: For newly registered domains, start with low email volumes and gradually increase sending over time to build trust. Ensure all email authentication is perfectly configured from day one to establish credibility with ISPs.
  • Infrastructure Choices: Be mindful of shared public infrastructure, as reputation is shared among users. While not always necessary, dedicated IPs can offer more control over your sender reputation compared to shared environments.

What email marketers say

13 marketer opinions

Building on the understanding that Gmail's sophisticated algorithms flag emails for phishing warnings based on a confluence of factors, a primary driver behind these alerts is the failure to properly establish sender legitimacy. This often stems from a lack of robust email authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and especially DMARC, which are critical for domain verification. Furthermore, emails containing suspicious or deceptive links, particularly those using public URL shorteners or redirects that obscure the final destination, and those originating from domains with a poor or unestablished sending reputation, are highly susceptible to being flagged. Gmail's systems are designed to detect patterns indicative of impersonation and social engineering, even if the email appears legitimate, thereby requiring comprehensive security measures and consistent positive sending practices.

Key opinions

  • DMARC Centrality: The absence or misconfiguration of DMARC policies is a primary reason for phishing warnings, as it allows for email spoofing and prevents Gmail from verifying sender authenticity.
  • Public URL Shortener Risk: Public URL shorteners, such as goo.gl and bit.ly, are commonly abused and flagged as suspicious, making their use in marketing emails a significant risk factor for phishing warnings.
  • New Domain Challenges: Newly registered domains often trigger phishing warnings due to a lack of established trust and sending history, requiring a careful warm-up period.
  • Blacklist Impact is Minimal: Most public blacklists have little to no actual impact on email deliverability or phishing warnings; the focus should instead be on robust authentication and content.
  • Shared Infrastructure Vulnerability: Sending from shared public infrastructure can negatively impact reputation, as the actions of other users may affect your sender identity.

Key considerations

  • Validate Authentication Records: Rigorously verify that SPF, DKIM, and DMARC DNS records are correctly published and aligned with your sending domain to ensure sender legitimacy.
  • Prioritize Transparent URLs: Always use full, clear, and trustworthy URLs in email content, completely avoiding public link shorteners and deceptive redirects to ensure link transparency.
  • Strategic Domain Warm-up: For new domains, begin with low email volumes and gradually increase sending over time, while ensuring all authentication is configured from day one to build trust.
  • Maintain Consistent Sending: Ensure consistent sending patterns and volume, and use a reputable email service provider (ESP) to build and maintain a positive sender reputation.
  • Personalize and Avoid Generic: Personalize emails where possible and avoid sending from generic 'noreply' addresses to enhance sender identity and reduce the appearance of automated, untrustworthy communication.
  • Choose Reputable Infrastructure: Opt for a reputable email service provider (ESP) and be mindful of shared public infrastructure; while not always necessary, dedicated IPs can offer more control over your sender reputation than shared environments.
  • Monitor Blocklists Cautiously: While most blacklists do not directly cause phishing warnings, it is wise to monitor your IP for listings on highly impactful ones, such as SURBL, though this is secondary to authentication.

Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Geeks suggests checking sender IP for listings on sites like multirbl.valli.org as a potential cause, sharing an experience where a SURBL listing affected a site. However, he clarifies that many blacklists have little to no impact on delivery and later agrees with Laura Atkins' assessment that the issue is likely phishing-related.

6 Jul 2023 - Email Geeks

Marketer view

Email marketer from Email Geeks clarifies that only a very few blacklists actually affect email delivery, and many 'check every blacklist' websites cause unwarranted panic. He identifies public URL shorteners, like goo.gl and bit.ly, as suspicious and commonly abused, advising against their use. He emphasizes avoiding shared public infrastructure, as reputation is shared among users, and recommends using clean URLs in the email body, linking primarily to one's own content. While public data APIs exist for checking phishing, he notes it's generally not useful to do manually as it's a rare issue.

27 Apr 2024 - Email Geeks

What the experts say

3 expert opinions

Gmail's phishing warnings, distinct from typical spam classifications, are generated by advanced internal systems that dynamically assess email legitimacy. These alerts often stem from a blend of factors, including issues with sender reputation, failures in critical email authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, and particularly suspicious content or links. The system scrutinizes aspects such as mismatched domains within links, the presence of compromised domains, or unusual domain usage patterns, going beyond just authentication to identify characteristics common in known phishing attempts. Consequently, even perfectly authenticated emails can trigger warnings if their content or linked elements suggest fraudulent intent. Effective prevention therefore necessitates robust authentication, meticulous content review, and a consistently strong sender reputation.

Key opinions

  • Internal, Dynamic Detection: Gmail's phishing detection relies on proprietary, internal algorithms and dynamic heuristics, not public blacklists, making specific external checks for phishing IPs largely ineffective.
  • Authentication as a Baseline: While essential (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), email authentication alone is insufficient; sophisticated content and link analysis also heavily influence phishing warnings.
  • Link and Content Integrity: Mismatched domains in visible link text versus the actual HREF, compromised domains within the message, or an unusual mix of domain usage are significant triggers for phishing flags.
  • Sender Reputation Impact: A poor sender reputation, often linked to unsolicited mail or inconsistent sending, is a direct contributor to emails being flagged for potential phishing.
  • Shared IP Risk: Sending from shared IP addresses that have previously hosted or been associated with phishing activities can inadvertently lead to warnings for legitimate senders.

Key considerations

  • Strengthen Authentication: Ensure full and correct implementation of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, as these are foundational for verifying sender identity and preventing spoofing.
  • Verify All Links: Rigorously check all hyperlinks for legitimacy, ensuring the visible text matches the destination domain, and avoid using any compromised or suspicious domains in your messages.
  • Maintain High Reputation: Consistently engage in legitimate sending practices, avoid sending unsolicited emails, and manage your email list to foster and preserve a strong sender reputation.
  • Content Scrutiny: Avoid any content, formatting, or imagery that could mimic known phishing templates or appear deceptive, even if unintentional.
  • Assess Shared Infrastructures: Be aware that the reputation of shared sending IPs can impact your deliverability; if possible, choose providers with excellent IP hygiene or consider dedicated IP options.

Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks explains that Gmail's warning is a phishing warning, not a spam warning, and clarifies that phishing is dynamic and not related to typical blacklists. She details potential causes including shared IPs hosting phishing sites, mismatched domains in links (HREFs and visible text), compromised domains within the message, or a mix of domain usage triggering heuristics. She also notes that ISPs largely manage phishing detectors internally and do not publish this information publicly, making general sites to check for phishing IPs rare.

18 Nov 2021 - Email Geeks

Expert view

Expert from Spam Resource explains that Gmail's blocking of messages for potential phishing typically stems from poor sender reputation, authentication failures (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), or suspicious content. To prevent this, senders should prioritize strong authentication, maintain a clean sending reputation by avoiding unsolicited mail, and ensure their email content is not spammy.

24 Jun 2022 - Spam Resource

What the documentation says

5 technical articles

Gmail's advanced anti-phishing measures frequently trigger warnings when an email lacks proper authentication, such as correctly configured SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records, or when its content appears suspicious. These alerts are particularly common for messages that fail DMARC authentication, signaling potential spoofing attempts that Gmail's systems are designed to detect. Beyond authentication, Gmail also scrutinizes email content for characteristics common in known phishing attacks, including suspicious attachments or unusual file types, even if the sender seems legitimate. Preventing these warnings requires a multi-faceted approach, starting with robust email authentication and extending to careful content creation that avoids any elements resembling phishing tactics.

Key findings

  • Authentication Failure is Key: Emails frequently receive phishing warnings in Gmail due to the absence or misconfiguration of critical authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, which are essential for verifying sender identity.
  • DMARC Policy Enforcement: Gmail heavily relies on DMARC policies; emails failing DMARC authentication are highly susceptible to warnings, as this indicates a potential spoofing attempt that doesn't align with the sender's declared identity.
  • Content-Based Phishing Detection: Beyond authentication, Gmail's sophisticated filters can flag emails based on suspicious content, such as the detection of characteristics associated with known phishing kits, including unusual attachments (.zip, .js) or file types.
  • Google's Internal Suspicion: Gmail automatically identifies suspicious messages, with warnings appearing for emails from unverified senders or those containing content that resembles common phishing attempts, relying heavily on Google's internal detection systems.

Key considerations

  • Implement Comprehensive Authentication: Ensure SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are correctly set up and aligned for your sending domain, specifically publishing a robust DMARC policy (e.g., p=quarantine or p=reject) to instruct Gmail on handling unauthenticated messages.
  • Vet Attachments and File Types: Exercise extreme caution with email attachments, especially common phishing file types like .zip or .js, and scrutinize all content for characteristics that might mimic known phishing kits.
  • Educate on Social Engineering: While primarily for recipients, understanding common social engineering tactics can help senders avoid inadvertently incorporating elements that could trigger Gmail's phishing warnings.
  • Monitor Gmail Warnings: Administrators should regularly monitor for 'be careful with this message' warnings in Gmail and promptly address any underlying authentication or content-related issues.

Technical article

Documentation from Google Workspace Admin Help explains that Gmail displays a 'be careful with this message' warning when an email is unauthenticated or appears suspicious. To prevent this, administrators should set up SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records for their domain to verify the sender's identity.

31 May 2024 - Google Workspace Admin Help

Technical article

Documentation from Gmail Help explains that Gmail automatically identifies suspicious messages, including those with unverified senders or content that resembles phishing attempts. Users are warned to check the sender's email address and look for suspicious links. Prevention relies heavily on Google's internal detection systems.

7 Apr 2023 - Gmail Help

Start improving your email deliverability today

Sign up