Summary
Tracking the precise open-to-close time or reading duration of an email is generally not feasible within standard email marketing. This limitation stems from the fundamental architecture of email clients, which are designed with privacy and security in mind, preventing JavaScript execution or persistent tracking mechanisms necessary for such detailed measurements. While historical or niche methods existed, they are now largely outdated or unreliable due to evolving MUA changes and privacy protections. Instead, marketers should focus on more reliable and actionable engagement metrics, such as click-through rates, click-to-open rates, and post-click behaviors, which provide a better proxy for content interest and user engagement.
Key findings
- Technical Impossibility: Directly tracking email open-to-close time or precise reading duration is fundamentally not possible due to the inherent technical limitations and security design of email clients. They prevent persistent connections or JavaScript execution needed for such granular monitoring.
- Pixel Limitations: Email open tracking relies on a 1x1 pixel image loading, which only records the *moment* an email is opened. It does not provide any functionality to measure how long an email is viewed, when it is closed, or when a user navigates away, as these actions are beyond the scope of current email client tracking capabilities.
- Outdated Methods: Past attempts at tracking reading duration, such as Litmus's CSS-based methods or streaming pixels, are largely outdated, less useful, or unreliable today due to changes in Mail User Agents (MUAs), proxy servers, and enhanced privacy features. Some platforms may still offer residual features, but their accuracy is questionable.
- ESP and Expert Consensus: Major Email Service Providers (ESPs) like Mailchimp, SendGrid, Constant Contact, and Oracle Eloqua explicitly state they do not offer features for tracking reading duration. Email marketing experts, including Chad S. White and deliverability specialists from Return Path, confirm that 'read time' is not a reliably measurable or standard deliverability metric.
Key considerations
- Focus on Actionable Metrics: Since direct tracking of reading duration is not feasible, marketers should prioritize actionable metrics like click-through rates (CTR), click-to-open rates (CTOR), conversions, and replies. These provide a more reliable indication of user engagement and content interest.
- Understand Technical Limitations: Email clients are designed as sandboxed environments with security and privacy in mind, preventing JavaScript or persistent tracking mechanisms. This fundamental restriction means that detailed monitoring of user activity within the email, beyond initial open events, is not possible.
- Be Aware of Privacy Features: Newer privacy features, such as Apple Mail Privacy Protection (MPP), further complicate even basic open tracking by pre-fetching images. This makes any attempt to infer reading duration even less reliable, reinforcing the need to shift focus to other engagement indicators.
- Utilize Post-Click Tracking: For more meaningful engagement insights, track user behavior *after* they click a link in the email. This includes time spent on landing pages, subsequent website actions, and conversions, which provide robust behavioral data on user journeys.
What email marketers say
12 marketer opinions
Attempting to precisely track the duration a recipient spends reading an email, or their 'open to close' time, faces significant technical hurdles and is largely considered unachievable within current email marketing practices. Email clients are fundamentally designed to prevent continuous monitoring of user activity, prioritizing security and privacy by disallowing persistent connections or JavaScript execution. While some historical methods and niche solutions once existed, they are now widely regarded as ineffective or unreliable due to advancements in email client technology and increased privacy protections. Therefore, email marketers are strongly advised to pivot their focus towards more reliable and actionable engagement metrics.
Key opinions
- Technical Barriers: The fundamental architecture of email clients, designed for security and privacy, prohibits the use of JavaScript or other persistent scripts required to continuously monitor reading duration or 'open to close' time, making it technically unfeasible.
- Limited Pixel Functionality: The ubiquitous tracking pixel only registers a single event - the initial open - and cannot track subsequent actions within the email like scrolling, reading time, or when the email is closed.
- Historical Methods Obsolete: Older techniques for inferring reading duration, such as CSS-based methods or streaming pixels, are largely outdated and unreliable, no longer functioning effectively in modern Mail User Agents (MUAs) or due to proxy server interferences.
- Industry Consensus: Email marketing experts, including recognized authorities like Chad S. White and deliverability specialists, along with major Email Service Providers (ESPs) like Constant Contact and HubSpot, unanimously affirm that direct reading duration tracking is not possible.
- Privacy Features Impact: Recent privacy enhancements, such as Apple Mail Privacy Protection (MPP), pre-fetch images and fire open pixels prematurely, further diminishing the accuracy of even basic open rates and making any inference of reading duration even more unreliable.
Key considerations
- Prioritize Actionable Metrics: Marketers should focus on measurable engagement indicators like click-through rates (CTR), click-to-open rates (CTOR), conversions, and replies, which provide a more accurate reflection of user interest and content effectiveness.
- Leverage Post-Click Behavior: To gain deeper insights into user engagement, track their activities once they click through to a landing page, including time spent on the page and subsequent website actions, as these are reliably measurable.
- Understand Open Rate Nuances: Acknowledge that an 'open' is a single event triggered by image loading, not a continuous engagement metric. Focus on what happens after the open, particularly clicks.
- Proxies for Interest: While direct tracking is impossible, marketers can look for indirect signs of engagement, such as the time elapsed between an open and a subsequent click, or multiple opens of the same email, though these are still approximations.
- Embrace Privacy-Centric Design: Recognize that the limitations in tracking are largely due to email clients' commitment to user privacy. Align strategies with this reality by focusing on value delivery and explicit user actions rather than intrusive monitoring.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that Litmus offers analytics with engagement metrics. Brian Sisolak adds that the Litmus CSS-based method for tracking open-to-close time primarily worked in Outlook and is about 10 years old.
18 Apr 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks explains that streaming pixels for tracking email open-to-close time were common in the past but are less useful now due to MUA changes and proxies, though some platforms still offer the feature. He also mentions a potential expired patent.
13 May 2022 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
0 expert opinions
Measuring the exact duration a recipient spends viewing an email, often referred to as "open to close time" or "reading duration," remains an intractable challenge in contemporary email marketing. This limitation stems from the fundamental design of email clients, which prioritize user privacy and security by preventing persistent tracking mechanisms and JavaScript execution within the email environment. Consequently, marketers must acknowledge these inherent technical constraints and instead concentrate on more reliable and actionable engagement metrics that truly reflect recipient interest and interaction, such as click-through rates and post-click behaviors.
Key opinions
- Technical Impasse: Direct measurement of an email's open to close time or reading duration is not technically supported. Email clients are built to be secure, isolated environments, prohibiting the continuous monitoring needed for such precise tracking.
- Pixel's Singular Purpose: The standard 1x1 tracking pixel solely registers the event of an email being opened, but provides no data on the duration it was viewed, user scrolling, or when the email was closed.
- Legacy Methods' Obsolescence: Previously attempted methods for inferring reading duration, like intricate CSS techniques or streaming pixels, are now largely ineffective and unreliable due to advancements in email client technology, proxy servers, and enhanced user privacy.
- Industry Consensus on Limitations: Leading Email Service Providers and prominent email deliverability experts consistently confirm the inability to accurately track reading duration, underscoring that this is not a standard or reliable metric in email analytics.
- Privacy Feature Impact: Modern privacy safeguards, particularly Apple's Mail Privacy Protection (MPP), further obscure true open rates by pre-fetching images. This makes any attempt to infer reading duration from open data even more speculative and imprecise.
Key considerations
- Emphasize Actionable Engagement: Redirect measurement efforts towards concrete actions like click-through rates (CTR), click-to-open rates (CTOR), conversions, and replies, as these directly indicate user interest and content resonance.
- Harness Post-Click Insights: The most meaningful engagement data often comes from tracking user behavior after they click a link in an email, including time spent on landing pages, navigation paths, and completed conversions on your website.
- Recognize Open Rate's Nature: Understand that an email "open" is a one-time event, not a continuous engagement metric. Its utility is in signaling initial interest, but subsequent actions are crucial for deeper insights.
- Align with Privacy Principles: Acknowledge and embrace the privacy-focused design of modern email clients. This means focusing on providing value that encourages explicit user interaction rather than attempting covert or unreliable tracking.
- Explore Indirect Engagement Proxies: While direct tracking is impossible, marketers can consider subtle, indirect indicators such as the time gap between an open and a subsequent click, or repeated opens of the same email, though these remain approximations.
What the documentation says
5 technical articles
Current email marketing practices do not allow for the precise measurement of how long a recipient views an email, often termed 'open to close time' or 'reading duration.' This limitation is inherent to the design of email clients, which are built as secure and private environments. They lack the capabilities for persistent tracking or JavaScript execution that would be necessary to monitor such granular user interactions. While basic open rates are recorded, they only capture a single moment of engagement, not a continuous duration of attention.
Key findings
- Inherent Technical Constraints: Email clients operate within highly restrictive, sandboxed environments. For security and privacy, they prevent the use of persistent connections or JavaScript, which would be essential for continuously measuring how long an email is viewed or precisely when it is closed.
- Single-Event Open Tracking: The standard method for tracking email opens relies on a 1x1 pixel image. This technology only registers the specific *moment* the email is opened and the pixel loads; it provides no data regarding the duration the email remains open, whether the user is actively reading, or when it is eventually closed.
- No 'Reading Duration' Feature from ESPs: Leading Email Service Providers, including SendGrid, Mailchimp, Oracle Eloqua, and Customer.io, explicitly state that their platforms do not offer functionality to track the duration an email is viewed or when it is closed, confirming this as an industry-wide technical limitation.
- Security-Driven Design: The inability to track 'reading duration' is a direct result of email clients' fundamental design, which prioritizes user security and privacy by preventing continuous, intrusive monitoring of recipient behavior within the email body itself.
- Focus on Post-Email Engagement: While in-email activity tracking is limited, platforms like Customer.io highlight that robust behavioral data can be tracked *after* a user clicks a link and leaves the email environment. This shifts the focus to what users do on a website or landing page, where engagement can be effectively measured.
Key considerations
- Embrace Post-Click Analytics: Since direct in-email reading duration cannot be reliably measured, marketers should pivot their analytical focus to post-click engagement. This includes tracking time spent on landing pages, conversion rates, and subsequent website actions, which provide actionable insights into true user interest.
- Understand Open Tracking's Scope: It is crucial to recognize that an email 'open' is a static event, primarily triggered by an image load, and does not indicate sustained engagement. This understanding is essential for accurately interpreting open rate data and avoiding misinterpretations of recipient behavior.
- Prioritize Actionable Metrics: Rather than seeking elusive metrics like reading duration, concentrate on measurable and actionable indicators that directly correlate with business goals. These include click-through rates, conversion rates, and direct replies, which offer clear signals of recipient interest and intent.
- Respect User Privacy: The limitations in tracking email reading duration are largely a direct consequence of email clients' design, which prioritizes user security and privacy. Marketers should align their strategies with this reality, focusing on delivering value that encourages explicit user interaction rather than attempting granular, intrusive, or unreliable tracking.
Technical article
Documentation from SendGrid Documentation clarifies that email open tracking is achieved by loading a 1x1 pixel image. This only registers the *moment* an email is opened. It does not provide functionality to measure how long an email is viewed or when it is closed, as these actions are outside the scope of what current email clients allow for tracking purposes.
22 Dec 2022 - SendGrid Documentation
Technical article
Documentation from Mailchimp Knowledge Base details that open rates are recorded when the tracking pixel embedded in an email loads. It explicitly states that Mailchimp does not provide features to track how long an email is open or when it is closed, as this level of detailed interaction tracking is not supported by the underlying technology of most email clients.
15 Aug 2022 - Mailchimp Knowledge Base
Does Gmail accurately track email opens?
How does Gmail track email engagement for reputation, including in-email clicks versus landing page visits?
How to accurately measure email open rates without relying on image pixels or clicks?
How to determine email server receipt time for emails viewed on iPhone Mail app?
Is Gmail changing how it tracks email opens and dotted opens?
What alternative email tracking mechanisms exist for government emails when open and click tracking is unreliable?
