Summary
To intentionally generate a hard bounce for email testing, a variety of reliable methods are available to help verify bounce handling logic without negatively impacting sender reputation. These approaches generally fall into categories such as utilizing specific bounce simulator addresses provided by Email Service Providers, sending to non-existent email addresses within legitimate or controlled domains, or targeting domains that are genuinely invalid or lack proper Mail Exchange records. Carefully selecting the method ensures accurate testing of how your system processes permanent delivery failures.
Key findings
- ESP Designated Addresses: Many major Email Service Providers including Mailgun, SendGrid, Postmark, and AWS SES provide specific, dedicated email addresses, such as bounce@mailgun.com or bounce@simulator.amazonses.com, designed to reliably trigger a hard bounce for testing purposes, often without affecting your sender reputation.
- Non-Existent Usernames: A common and effective method is to send an email to a username that does not exist within a valid domain. This can be a random string, an overly short or long username, or a deleted account on a domain you control, leading to a permanent delivery failure.
- Invalid or Unreachable Domains: Intentionally targeting a domain that genuinely does not exist, lacks Mail Exchange (MX) records, or is otherwise unresolvable will consistently generate a hard bounce, as the receiving server cannot deliver the email due to a permanent domain issue.
- Malformed Email Syntax: Sending an email to an address with intentionally malformed syntax, such as user@.com, can also reliably produce a hard bounce because the address is immediately deemed invalid by the mail server during the initial validation process.
Key considerations
- Sender Reputation Impact: Generating numerous random non-existent addresses for testing can negatively affect your sender reputation, making it crucial to use designated test addresses or your own controlled domains when possible to avoid adverse outcomes on proper mail delivery.
- Bounce Message Timing: Some hard bounces, like those from SocketLabs' test address, are out-of-band or asynchronous. This means the initial email acceptance appears immediate, but the permanent failure message, the hard bounce, follows shortly afterward.
- Existing Suppression Lists: Be aware that certain publicly known test addresses, such as me@privacy.net, might already be on an Email Service Provider's suppression list, potentially preventing the intended bounce from being observed.
- Controlled Environment Testing: For the most accurate and risk-free testing, consider using a non-existent address within a domain you own and control, or intentionally disabling an existing account's receiving capabilities. This allows for precise observation of your bounce handling without impacting external services.
What email marketers say
14 marketer opinions
To reliably generate a hard bounce for email testing, senders can employ several effective strategies to simulate permanent delivery failures. These include sending messages to specific bounce testing addresses provided by email service providers, targeting email addresses within domains that are intentionally non-existent or lack proper DNS configurations like MX records, and dispatching mail to non-existent users within otherwise valid domains. Additionally, using syntactically malformed email addresses can immediately trigger a hard bounce, aiding in the validation of bounce handling logic.
Key opinions
- ESP Provided Test Addresses: Certain email service providers and testing services offer dedicated addresses designed to immediately hard bounce, such as SocketLabs' bounce-test@service.socketlabs.com or general 'sink' servers like those SparkPost provides.
- Invalid or Missing Domain Records: A very reliable method involves sending emails to domains that genuinely do not exist, like test@nonexistentdomainxyz123.com or no-reply@thisshouldnotexist.xyz, or domains that exist but lack Mail Exchange (MX) records, causing an immediate and permanent delivery failure.
- Non-Existent Users on Valid Domains: Sending to an email address where the username does not exist on an otherwise valid domain, or to an account intentionally deleted or disabled within a controlled domain, will reliably generate a hard bounce, often triggering a 550 SMTP error.
- Syntactically Incorrect Addresses: Email addresses with malformed syntax, for example, user@.com, are immediately identified as invalid by mail servers, leading to a direct hard bounce.
Key considerations
- Protecting Sender Reputation: Avoid generating a large volume of random, non-existent email addresses for testing, as this practice can negatively impact your overall sender reputation and proper mail delivery.
- Understanding Bounce Timing: Be aware that some test bounces may be asynchronous or 'out-of-band,' meaning the initial acceptance of the email is immediate, but the permanent failure notification follows shortly afterward.
- Awareness of Suppression Lists: Publicly known test addresses, like me@privacy.net, might already be on an email service provider's internal suppression lists, which could prevent the intended hard bounce from being observed.
- Leveraging Controlled Environments: For the most accurate and safe testing, consider using non-existent addresses or intentionally disabled accounts within a domain you control. This allows for precise testing of your bounce handling without affecting external services or risking your sender standing.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks explains that me@privacy.net is intended to hard bounce, but warns it might already be on an ESP's suppression list. He also suggests picking someone who doesn't exist at your company.
23 Jul 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks shares that bounce-test@service.socketlabs.com will hard bounce, specifying that it is an out-of-band or asynchronous bounce, meaning acceptance appears immediate but the bounce message follows shortly.
5 Oct 2022 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
3 expert opinions
To intentionally generate a hard bounce for email testing, experts recommend creating scenarios where an email address or its domain is definitively invalid or non-existent. This can involve sending to addresses with unusual patterns at large email providers, targeting domains that are genuinely unresolvable or lack proper DNS configurations like MX or A records, or utilizing non-existent email addresses within domains you own and control. These methods ensure a permanent delivery failure, allowing you to effectively test your system's response to hard bounces.
Key opinions
- Specific Non-Existent Usernames: Hard bounces can be generated by sending to addresses with highly unlikely usernames at major providers, such as those starting with a number at AOL, or excessively long or short usernames at Gmail, as these are unlikely to correspond to valid accounts.
- Invalid or Missing Domain Records: Sending emails to domain names that genuinely do not exist, or to domains that lack critical DNS records like a Mail Exchanger (MX) record or an A record, will reliably trigger a hard bounce because the mail server cannot route the message.
- Controlled Internal Non-Existent Addresses: A highly effective method involves sending to a non-existent email address within a domain you own and manage, particularly if you control the MX filters, allowing for a controlled test of your system's bounce handling.
Key considerations
- MTA Bounce Handling Verification: The core purpose of generating intentional hard bounces is to verify that your Mail Transfer Agent (MTA) or email sending system correctly processes and logs these permanent delivery failures, which is crucial for maintaining a clean email list.
- Sender Reputation Management: While testing, prioritize methods that minimize risk to your sender reputation, such as using non-existent addresses within domains you control, rather than sending a high volume of emails to arbitrary, potentially non-existent addresses on public domains.
- Control Over Test Environment: For the most accurate and risk-free testing, leverage domains you own and control, allowing you to manipulate MX records or create deliberately non-existent user accounts, ensuring precise observation of hard bounce behavior.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that to get an email to hard bounce, you can send to an address unlikely to exist, such as one starting with a number at AOL, or with an overly long or short username at Gmail. She also advises using a non-existent address at your own company, ideally within a domain you own and control the MX filters for.
25 Apr 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains that to intentionally generate a hard bounce, one should send to an email address that is invalid or does not exist, or to a domain name that is invalid or does not exist. This creates the conditions for a permanent rejection by the recipient's mail server, which is the definition of a hard bounce.
11 May 2024 - Word to the Wise
What the documentation says
4 technical articles
To intentionally generate a hard bounce for email testing, senders can leverage dedicated test addresses provided by major Email Service Providers. These specific addresses, like those from Mailgun, SendGrid, Postmark, and AWS SES, are designed to reliably trigger a 550 permanent failure, allowing developers to verify their bounce handling logic without affecting their sender reputation.
Key findings
- Dedicated ESP Test Addresses: Leading Email Service Providers, including Mailgun, SendGrid, Postmark, and AWS SES, offer specific, designated email addresses for intentionally generating hard bounces.
- Reliable Permanent Failures: Sending emails to these provider-specific addresses, such as bounce@mailgun.com or bounce@simulator.amazonses.com, consistently results in a 550 permanent failure.
- Reputation-Safe Testing: These dedicated test addresses enable developers to verify their bounce handling logic and processing workflows without negatively impacting their sender reputation or list hygiene.
Key considerations
- Accurate Logic Verification: Using designated ESP test addresses is crucial for precisely testing and verifying that an application correctly processes permanent email delivery failures.
- Protecting Sender Reputation: These specialized bounce addresses allow for robust testing of bounce handling logic without negatively impacting your sender reputation or incurring actual bounce rates.
- Consistent Error Codes: The 550 permanent failure response generated by these test addresses provides a consistent and expected error code, simplifying the development of robust bounce processing workflows.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailgun explains that you can use their designated test address, such as bounce@mailgun.com, to intentionally generate a hard bounce for testing purposes. Sending to this address will result in a 550 permanent failure, allowing developers to verify their bounce handling logic.
11 Jul 2023 - Mailgun
Technical article
Documentation from SendGrid explains that sending an email to a specifically crafted address, like bounce@sendgrid.com, will trigger a hard bounce. This allows users to test their bounce processing workflows and ensure their application correctly handles permanent delivery failures.
27 Feb 2023 - SendGrid
How can I intentionally deliver emails to the spam folder?
How can I intentionally send a newsletter to the spam folder?
How can I test bounce alerts and what are some example bounce email addresses?
What causes hard bounces when sending emails to Yopmail addresses and how to resolve them?
What services can I use to test email deliverability and simulate bounce responses?
Why did a valid email address hard bounce, and how can I resolve it?
