Summary
The common understanding of URL parameters dictates the use of a question mark (?) to separate the base URL from its query string. However, some advanced tracking systems, like Doubleclick's ad links, sometimes omit this traditional delimiter, instead using semicolons (;) or other methods to denote parameters. This raises questions about how browsers and web servers interpret and capture these parameters without the conventional question mark.
Key findings
- Server configuration: Web servers can be configured to parse parameters using delimiters other than the standard question mark. This flexibility allows for non-standard URL structures.
- Alternative delimiters: Systems may use alternative separators, such as semicolons, for parameters within the path or as part of a custom query format. While less common, this is technically feasible if the server side is prepared to handle it.
- Client-side vs. server-side: The ability to capture parameters without a question mark primarily depends on the server's configuration rather than typical client-side browser behavior. Standard browser-side JavaScript's window.location.search property relies on the question mark.
- Fragment identifiers: Anything after a hash (#) symbol in a URL, known as a fragment identifier, is typically processed client-side and not sent to the server. This means parameters after a hash cannot be captured directly by the server.
Key considerations
- Standardization: Adhering to URL parameter standards (using ? and &) ensures broader compatibility and easier parsing by most web servers, analytics tools, and browsers. Deviations can lead to unexpected behavior or missed data capture.
- Tracking challenges: Third-party analytics platforms, like Google Analytics, are typically designed to interpret standard URL query strings. Non-standard parameter formats may require custom configurations or lead to inaccurate tracking.
- Email deliverability impact: While directly unrelated to the question mark, complex or malformed URLs (even if custom-parsed) can sometimes trigger spam filters or affect how email clients handle links. Learn more about unencoded URLs and spam filtering. Also consider why email filters modify or break links.
- Debugging: Non-standard URL parameter structures can make debugging and troubleshooting significantly more complex for developers and marketers alike.
- URL parsing: The way a URL is parsed can vary depending on the context. The handling of URL parameters is critical for data capture and routing.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often deal with various tracking link formats, including those with non-standard parameter delimiters. Their primary concern is usually ensuring that all necessary data points are captured for analytics and campaign performance measurement. While the '?' is the most recognizable separator, some ad networks or custom systems might use other characters like ';' or embed parameters directly into the path.
Key opinions
- Server-side flexibility: Many marketers acknowledge that web servers can be configured to accept various delimiter types, meaning a missing question mark isn't inherently problematic if the server is set up for it.
- Third-party analytics: A common concern is whether non-standard URLs will be correctly processed by third-party analytics platforms, as these often expect the conventional '?'. Quora discussions often highlight this reliance.
- Ad network specifics: Some marketers are familiar with ad networks (like Doubleclick) using different parameter structures, indicating these systems have proprietary ways of handling such links.
- Client-side impacts: Whether parameters are still accessible for client-side JavaScript once the landing page loads is a consideration for front-end tracking implementations.
Key considerations
- Data integrity: Ensure that all parameters intended for tracking are successfully captured and attributed, regardless of the URL structure.
- Compatibility testing: Thorough testing of non-standard URLs across different browsers, devices, and analytics setups is crucial to confirm data capture.
- Email deliverability: While not directly related to parameters, unusual link formatting can sometimes be perceived negatively. Consider how long URLs affect spam filtering or email addresses as URL parameters.
- Vendor communication: If using a third-party ad or tracking platform, understand their specific URL formatting requirements and how they handle parameter capture.
- URL structure: Be aware that a question mark in a URL signifies the start of the query string. Without it, some systems may not correctly parse parameters, as noted by Altitude Marketing.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks notes that they are typically concerned about capturing parameters on the client side in the browser, and whether the parameters still appear as expected on the landing page after a click.
Marketer view
A marketer from SUSO Digital finds that one trend they have observed is the use of the hash symbol (#) instead of the question mark (?) as the fragment identifier, especially for passive tracking.
What the experts say
Technical experts confirm that while the question mark is the standard delimiter for query parameters, it is not the only way to pass data. Server-side configurations can allow for custom parsing of URLs, enabling alternative delimiters or even path-based parameters. The key lies in how the web server and the application are programmed to interpret the incoming URL.
Key opinions
- Server-side control: Experts agree that the owner of the web server has the power to define custom delimiters, or even no explicit delimiter, for parameter parsing.
- Custom parsing: It's feasible to use mechanisms like a 404 handler to interpret non-standard URL structures and extract parameters, as part of a custom server configuration.
- Proprietary systems: Large advertising platforms may use non-standard URL formats for specific reasons, which implies their servers are designed to handle these unique structures.
- Client-side limitations: The primary concern with non-standard URLs often shifts to how client-side scripts or third-party analytics tools might handle them, as these typically rely on standard URL parsing.
Key considerations
- URL specification: While servers offer flexibility, sticking to RFC 3986 (URI Generic Syntax) ensures maximum compatibility. A reliable resource for understanding standards can be helpful.
- Server configuration complexity: Implementing custom URL parsing (e.g., via Apache rewrite rules or a custom application router) requires deep technical knowledge and can introduce maintenance overhead.
- Debugging: Issues arising from non-standard URL structures can be difficult to diagnose without clear documentation of the custom parsing logic.
- Deliverability impact: While the presence or absence of a '?' typically does not impact spam filtering directly, unusual URL structures can sometimes be flagged. For broader context, refer to guides on why emails go to spam.
- URL shortening: The use of URL shorteners often encapsulates complex or non-standard URLs behind a standard, shorter link, which can sometimes be a workaround for deliverability issues, as discussed in URL shorteners and email deliverability.
Expert view
An expert from Email Geeks suggests that whoever controls the web server where the link lands has the authority to define any delimiters they wish, making custom parameter formats entirely feasible from the server's perspective. They also mention that a website's 404 handler can be used for heavy lifting in parsing the URL.
Expert view
An expert from Word to the Wise explains that the query string part of a URL is explicitly defined to start with a question mark, followed by a series of key-value pairs. Deviating from this standard requires custom parsing logic on the server.
What the documentation says
Official web standards and documentation (like RFCs and MDN Web Docs) clearly define the role of the question mark (?) as the separator for a URL's query string. While custom server configurations can deviate from this, the foundational parsing rules of web browsers and many libraries depend on these established conventions. Understanding these rules is crucial for predictable URL behavior.
Key findings
- Standard delimiter: The question mark ('?') is formally recognized as the delimiter that separates the path of a URL from its query component, where parameters are typically listed.
- Parameter list separator: Within the query string, parameters are traditionally separated by an ampersand ('&'), while key-value pairs are delimited by an equals sign ('=').
- Fragment identifier behavior: The hash symbol ('#') denotes a fragment identifier, which is part of the URL that points to a specific section within a document. This part is processed by the browser and is not sent to the server in an HTTP request.
- Server-side interpretation: Web servers and server-side applications can implement custom routing and parsing logic to interpret URL segments as parameters, even if they don't follow the standard query string format.
Key considerations
- Adherence to standards: For maximum interoperability and predictability, it's recommended to follow established URL syntax defined by RFCs. The MDN Web Docs on form elements illustrate standard parameter usage.
- Client-side scripting: JavaScript functions like URLSearchParams or window.location.search rely on the '?' to identify the query string.
- SEO implications: Search engines are optimized to parse standard URL structures. Non-standard approaches might impact how pages are crawled and indexed.
- Application routing: Many modern web frameworks use routing mechanisms that map URL paths to specific functions, allowing path segments to act as parameters without a query string. However, these are processed as part of the path, not query parameters.
- Backward compatibility: Older systems or tools might not correctly interpret URLs that deviate from the standard query string format. The Requests library for Python, for instance, strips superfluous trailing question marks.
Technical article
Documentation from MDN Web Docs explains that the <form> HTML element is used to contain interactive controls for submitting information, and typically uses standard URL query parameters for data transmission.
Technical article
Documentation from GitHub, specifically an issue regarding the `requests` library, notes that a trailing question mark without parameters is often considered superfluous and may be stripped by request handlers.
Related resources
9 resources
Related pages
How do unencoded URLs impact email deliverability?
Why do email filters modify or break links?
How does URL length affect email deliverability?
What are the risks of including email addresses?
How does including email addresses affect deliverability at Gmail?
Does URL alignment impact email deliverability?
Does using redirected URLs impact deliverability?
Do long URLs affect email spam filtering?
How to track deep links when ESP wrapping breaks?
Why your emails are going to spam in 2024?
