Suped

What are the risks of using newer TLDs like .clinic or .vet for email sending domains?

Summary

Using newer top-level domains (TLDs) like .clinic or .vet for email sending domains carries significant risks for deliverability. While these TLDs offer niche branding opportunities, they often face inherent challenges with email service providers (ISPs) and anti-spam filters due to their historical association with spam and the lack of established reputation. It is generally advisable to opt for well-established generic TLDs (gTLDs) like .com, .org, or .net to ensure optimal inbox placement and avoid unnecessary deliverability hurdles. New gTLDs (generic top-level domains) can be particularly problematic for email, especially if they have a history of abuse or are perceived as 'vanity' domains.

What email marketers say

Email marketers often express caution regarding the use of newer TLDs for email sending. Their concerns stem from practical experiences with deliverability challenges and the perception of these domains by both spam filters and end-users. While acknowledging the potential for niche branding, many prefer to err on the side of caution to protect their sender reputation and ensure their campaigns reach the inbox.

Marketer view

An Email Geeks marketer explains that the decision to use a new TLD depends heavily on the target audience. Different audiences and their preferred ISPs might react differently to newer, less common domain extensions.

09 Nov 2020 - Email Geeks

Marketer view

An Email Geeks marketer states a general preference for avoiding 'vanity style' domains for email. They suggest that while these domains might seem appealing for branding, they often present unforeseen deliverability complications.

09 Nov 2020 - Email Geeks

What the experts say

Deliverability experts often provide a more technical and data-driven perspective on newer TLDs, emphasizing the underlying mechanisms that lead to deliverability issues. They point to the historical usage patterns of these domains and how major anti-spam systems integrate this data into their filtering decisions. Their advice typically focuses on the long-term implications for sender reputation and the challenges of establishing trust with mailbox providers.

Expert view

A deliverability expert from Email Geeks, steve589, advises that newer TLDs often carry an inherent risk of being treated with more skepticism by mail filters. This means legitimate senders might face an uphill battle to establish trust with ISPs.

10 Nov 2020 - Email Geeks

Expert view

An expert from SpamResource states that new gTLDs are frequently acquired by spammers due to their low cost and relative anonymity, leading to many of these domains quickly appearing on blocklists and blacklists.

15 Feb 2023 - SpamResource

What the documentation says

Official documentation and research from internet governance bodies, domain registries, and anti-abuse organizations often highlight the statistical realities and policy considerations surrounding new TLDs. This includes data on spam rates, security concerns, and the challenges of brand protection in an expanding domain landscape. Understanding these documented findings is crucial for anticipating deliverability challenges.

Technical article

Documentation from the IONOS Digital Guide advises careful consideration of new gTLDs. It states that these domain endings carry the potential to defame businesses, brands, or individuals due to their usage patterns and public perception.

22 Jun 2023 - IONOS Digital Guide

Technical article

Spamhaus statistics on TLDs highlight the significant occurrence of new gTLDs in spam campaigns. Their data provides an objective measure of how frequently these domains are misused, contributing to their poor reputation among anti-spam systems.

09 Nov 2020 - Spamhaus Statistics

4 resources

Start improving your email deliverability today

Get started