The necessity of double opt-in (DOI) in email marketing is a nuanced issue. Experts, marketers, and documentation from various sources agree that DOI offers significant advantages, especially for small senders, those prioritizing list quality, and businesses needing to comply with GDPR. It improves deliverability, protects sender reputation, reduces spam complaints, and fosters trust. However, some argue that single opt-in can be viable for established brands with clean data and robust anti-spam measures. DOI is viewed as a useful tool, but not always the *only* or *best* option, with alternatives and hybrid approaches considered depending on the specific context and business goals.
13 marketer opinions
The necessity of double opt-in (DOI) in email marketing depends on various factors. While some marketers argue it's not always crucial, especially for senders with clean data and strong reputations, others emphasize its importance for list quality, deliverability, legal compliance (GDPR), and sender reputation. Alternatives to DOI, such as single opt-in with robust anti-spam measures, or hybrid approaches like applying COI to non-paid signups, are also considered. Ultimately, the decision hinges on balancing the desire for rapid list growth with the need for a highly engaged and compliant subscriber base.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Entrepreneur.com answers that double opt-in is necessary when you need to demonstrate to your audience that your company takes their personal data privacy seriously, helping to build trust in your business.
29 Aug 2022 - Entrepreneur.com
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks sees no drawbacks to DOI, suggesting even a 'faux' version provides valuable engagement data for analysis and segmentation.
8 Feb 2025 - Email Geeks
5 expert opinions
Experts generally agree that double opt-in (DOI) offers significant advantages, particularly for smaller senders or when list hygiene, deliverability, and legal compliance are paramount. DOI can protect against blocklists, limit complaints, safeguard sender reputation, and ensure explicit consent, aligning with GDPR requirements. While considered a useful tool, some experts acknowledge that DOI might not always be the most suitable approach, and other methods may prove more effective depending on the specific context.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks recommends DOI for small senders to protect against blocklists, especially hyperlocal news and newsletter senders.
30 Nov 2021 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks advises against dissuading clients who want DOI, suggesting confirmations are common enough that most users understand the process and those who don't may not be valuable customers.
11 Jan 2025 - Email Geeks
3 technical articles
Email marketing platform documentation consistently emphasizes that double opt-in (DOI) is necessary to ensure high-quality subscribers, improve deliverability rates, protect sender reputation, and comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations. DOI helps to filter out invalid or uninterested email addresses, minimize spam complaints, and maximize engagement metrics.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailchimp answers that double opt-in is necessary to protect your sender reputation by only sending to subscribers who have confirmed their interest, helping you avoid spam complaints and improve engagement metrics.
1 Sep 2022 - Mailchimp
Technical article
Documentation from Sendinblue explains that double opt-in is necessary when you want to ensure high-quality subscribers who are genuinely interested in your content, improve deliverability, and comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
27 Aug 2022 - Sendinblue
Are B2B lead vendors' claims of opt-in leads reliable?
Do email marketing opt-outs ever expire?
How can I ensure deliverability when many signups are from qq.com addresses and what steps can I take to prevent spam signups?
How can I prevent nefarious email signups using rate limiting, reCAPTCHA, and double opt-in?
Is COI/DOI email opt-in still a relevant best practice?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of double signing DKIM by ESPs?