Summary
While a direct competitor to Validity Certification might not exist, a robust multi-faceted approach can significantly reduce reliance on it. Building and maintaining a strong sender reputation through consistent sending habits, engaging content, and authenticating emails (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) are paramount. Clean email lists, avoidance of spam triggers, and easily accessible unsubscribe options are essential. Monitoring sender reputation via Google Postmaster Tools, utilizing feedback loops, and participating in programs like Microsoft's JMRP provide valuable insights for addressing deliverability issues. CSA membership is valuable for European ESPs, and consultants can provide onboarding assistance. The key takeaway is a proactive focus on best practices, authentication, and engagement, mitigating the need for expensive certification.
Key findings
- Comprehensive Approach: A holistic strategy combining sender reputation management, authentication, list hygiene, and engagement is the most effective alternative.
- Sender Reputation Dominance: Building and maintaining a good sender reputation is the cornerstone of successful deliverability.
- Authentication is Key: Implementing SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is crucial for verifying sender identity and preventing spoofing.
- List Hygiene Matters: Regularly cleaning email lists by removing inactive subscribers and spam traps is critical for avoiding deliverability problems.
- Engagement Signals Trust: Encouraging opens, clicks, and positive interactions with content signals trustworthiness to ISPs.
Key considerations
- Validity's Residual Benefits: Validity Certification might still offer specific advantages, particularly within the Microsoft ecosystem, though benefits may be diminishing.
- Geographic Focus: CSA certification is most beneficial for senders primarily targeting European ESPs and provides specific access to European FBLs.
- Continuous Monitoring: Regularly monitoring sender reputation metrics using tools like Google Postmaster Tools is vital to identify and address deliverability issues proactively.
- The Importance of Compliance: Compliance with CAN-SPAM, GDPR, and other data privacy regulations impacts email deliverability and sender reputation.
- No Silver Bullet: No single action guarantees perfect deliverability; a sustained and comprehensive effort is essential.
What email marketers say
11 marketer opinions
Several alternatives to Validity Certification for email whitelisting exist, primarily focused on improving sender reputation, authentication, list hygiene, and engagement. Experts recommend adhering to best practices, such as following CSA guidelines, and implementing robust authentication methods like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. Maintaining clean email lists, avoiding spam triggers, and providing easy unsubscribe options are also crucial. Additionally, focusing on engaging content, consistent sending volume, and IP warming strategies can improve sender reputation and reduce the reliance on whitelisting services. Feedback loops (FBLs) are valuable for identifying and removing subscribers who mark messages as spam.
Key opinions
- Sender Reputation: Building and maintaining a strong sender reputation through consistent sending practices and engaging content is crucial.
- Email Authentication: Implementing robust email authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC significantly improves deliverability.
- List Hygiene: Maintaining a clean email list by removing inactive subscribers and avoiding spam traps enhances deliverability.
- Engagement: Creating engaging content that encourages opens and clicks signals positive interactions to ISPs, boosting deliverability.
- Compliance: Following best practices, such as those outlined by CSA, can eliminate the need for whitelisting services.
Key considerations
- CSA Benefits: Following CSA requirements can provide access to tools, data, and support regarding legal and technical topics.
- Expert Help: Consulting with an email deliverability expert can provide tailored guidance and support for improving sending practices.
- IP Warming: Implementing a proper IP warming strategy is essential when starting with new IP addresses to build a positive reputation.
- Feedback Loops: Utilizing feedback loops to identify and remove subscribers who mark messages as spam is crucial for maintaining a healthy sender reputation.
- Engagement Metrics: Continuously monitoring open rates and click-through rates to assess the effectiveness of email campaigns and adjust strategies accordingly is critical.
Marketer view
Email marketer from GMass explains that implementing a proper IP warming strategy, gradually increasing sending volume to build a positive reputation with ISPs, can be an effective alternative to whitelisting.
21 Nov 2021 - GMass
Marketer view
Email marketer from HubSpot states encourages sender to focus on creating engaging content to improve open rates and click-through rates, signaling positive interactions to ISPs, which improves deliverability and reduces the need for whitelisting.
18 Dec 2023 - HubSpot
What the experts say
7 expert opinions
Experts have varying opinions on alternatives to Validity Certification. While no direct competing product exists, focusing on sender reputation, email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), consistent sending practices, and engaging with subscribers can mitigate the need for certification. CSA is valuable, especially for European ESPs, offering access to feedback loops. Consultants can provide onboarding support similar to Validity. ISIPP sets basic practice requirements. Validity retains benefits at Microsoft. Strong sender reputation and authentication often outweigh the need for whitelisting.
Key opinions
- No Direct Alternative: There is no direct competing product to Validity Certification.
- Sender Reputation Importance: Building and maintaining a good sender reputation is critical.
- Email Authentication: Implementing SPF, DKIM, and DMARC helps ISPs verify email legitimacy.
- CSA Benefits: CSA is useful for European ESPs and provides access to feedback loops.
- Consultant as Alternative: A consultant can offer similar onboarding support as Validity.
Key considerations
- Validity Still Holds Benefits: Validity Certification may still provide unique benefits, particularly at Microsoft.
- Yahoo Deliverability: Even with certification, emails may still land in the bulk folder at Yahoo.
- Focus on Fundamentals: Ensure core email practices are solid, as programs like ISIPP primarily enforce basic hygiene.
- Strategic Choice of Tools: The correct tool for deliverability and whitelisting should be carefully considered to suit business needs, as each has its benefits.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks shares that there's no competing product to Return Path/Validity Certification and isn't sure if Yahoo still uses it. Mentions that even with certification, some mail still went to bulk at Yahoo.
26 Oct 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks mentions CSA (Certified Senders Alliance) is useful for European ESPs and provides access to some European Feedback Loops (FBLs).
13 Nov 2024 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
5 technical articles
Technical documentation highlights email authentication and sender reputation monitoring as key alternatives to Validity Certification. SPF records verify senders, reducing spam. DMARC policies instruct recipient mail servers on handling authentication failures, preventing spoofing. Monitoring spam rates and IP reputation via Google Postmaster Tools helps address deliverability issues. Microsoft's JMRP allows senders to address spam complaints. DKIM authenticates domains, improving deliverability.
Key findings
- SPF: SPF records verify the sender of an email, reducing spam.
- DMARC: DMARC policies instruct recipient mail servers on handling authentication failures.
- Google Postmaster Tools: Monitoring spam rate and IP reputation improves deliverability.
- Microsoft JMRP: Participating in Microsoft's JMRP helps address spam complaints.
- DKIM: DKIM authenticates domains, enhancing sender reputation.
Key considerations
- Implementation Complexity: Implementing SPF, DKIM, and DMARC requires technical expertise and careful configuration.
- Monitoring: Regularly monitor sender reputation metrics in Google Postmaster Tools and other similar services to identify and address any issues proactively.
- Participation: Actively participate in feedback loops and programs like Microsoft's JMRP to address spam complaints and improve deliverability.
- Integration: Ensure proper integration of DKIM signing with email sending infrastructure for effective authentication.
- Policy Enforcement: Configure DMARC policies to instruct recipient servers on how to handle emails that fail authentication, balancing deliverability and security.
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft recommends that participating in Microsoft's Junk Email Reporting (JMRP) program allows senders to identify and address spam complaints, improving deliverability and sender reputation. This acts as an alternative to certification.
8 Oct 2022 - Microsoft
Technical article
Documentation from Cisco explains that using DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) and authenticating domains helps improve deliverability and sender reputation and that this acts as a good alternative to certification.
23 Jun 2022 - Cisco
Are there any tools available to report on Verizon's new data feeds?
Do SuretyMail and Validity Sender Certification increase inbox reach, and how do they work?
How accurate are email spam testing tools and what are the alternatives?
How can I gain access to Yahoo's Campaign and Performance Feeds as an ESP?
Is Folderly worth the price for email deliverability improvement?
Is Validity IP Certification worth the cost for email deliverability?
