Summary
Identifying and handling email forging and replay attacks involves a layered approach encompassing email authentication protocols, anomaly detection, user awareness, and robust security measures. Implementing SPF, DKIM, and, crucially, DMARC (with a 'reject' or 'quarantine' policy) is fundamental in preventing spoofing and mitigating replay attacks. Monitoring email traffic for anomalies like sudden changes in sender IPs and volume aids in early detection. Recognizing snowshoe spamming patterns and inconsistencies in DKIM signatures are also crucial. Domain reputation monitoring helps identify forged emails originating from low-reputation domains. Technical implementations like session keys and sequence numbers can further mitigate replay attacks. Responding effectively necessitates a multi-system, defense-in-depth strategy beyond basic authentication. User education remains vital in identifying suspicious emails, verifying links, and reporting potential threats.
Key findings
- SPF/DKIM/DMARC Crucial: SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are foundational for preventing spoofing and mitigating replay attacks.
- DMARC Enforcement is Key: Enforcing a DMARC policy ('reject' or 'quarantine') significantly reduces the effectiveness of attacks.
- Anomaly Detection is Important: Monitoring email traffic for anomalies (sender IPs, volume) aids in early detection.
- Domain Reputation Matters: Forged emails often originate from domains with poor reputations; monitor yours.
- Multi-layered Defense: Defense in depth is necessary – no single solution is sufficient.
- User Awareness is Essential: Educated users are crucial for identifying and reporting suspicious emails.
- Technical Mitigation Tactics: Session keys and sequence numbers mitigate replay attacks.
Key considerations
- Implementation Complexity: Proper implementation and maintenance of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are essential for their effectiveness; can be complex.
- Policy Impact: Carefully consider the impact of 'reject' vs. 'quarantine' policies on legitimate email.
- Ongoing Monitoring: Regular monitoring of email traffic and domain reputation is crucial.
- User Education: Continuously educate users on identifying and reporting suspicious emails.
- Dynamic Threat Landscape: Attack techniques evolve; stay informed and adapt security measures accordingly.
- SPF, DKIM Limitations: SPF, DKIM records can be complex and time consuming to maintain. By themselves they may not be enough.
What email marketers say
7 marketer opinions
Identifying and handling email forging and replay attacks involves a multi-faceted approach primarily centered around email authentication protocols, anomaly detection, and user awareness. DMARC implementation and enforcement is highlighted as a crucial step, with a 'reject' policy preventing unauthenticated emails. Monitoring email traffic for sender IP and volume anomalies helps detect spoofing. To identify forged emails, examining headers for inconsistencies, checking sender addresses for irregularities, and verifying links are important. Furthermore, reporting spoofed emails to providers aids in improving spam filters. Technical implementations such as SPF and DKIM, along with session keys and sequence numbers, can mitigate replay attacks. User awareness and caution regarding suspicious requests are also vital.
Key opinions
- DMARC Enforcement: Implementing and enforcing DMARC with a 'reject' policy is crucial for preventing domain spoofing.
- Anomaly Detection: Monitoring email traffic for anomalies like sudden changes in sender IPs or email volume can identify potential attacks.
- Header Analysis: Inconsistencies in email headers can indicate a forged email.
- Sender Verification: Examining sender addresses for misspellings or unusual domains helps identify forged emails.
- Link Verification: Verifying the authenticity of links before clicking is essential to avoid phishing attacks.
- Replay Attack Mitigation: Session keys and sequence numbers are methods for mitigating replay attacks.
Key considerations
- DMARC Implementation Complexity: Properly implementing and maintaining DMARC can be complex and requires ongoing monitoring.
- User Awareness: End-users need to be educated to recognize and report suspicious emails.
- SPF & DKIM Limitations: SPF and DKIM records alone may not be sufficient and are complex and time consuming to maintain
- Email Security Products: Various email security products are available to help protect against spoofing and forging, these should be investigated.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Red Sift shares that to identify forged emails, check the email headers for inconsistencies, examine the sender's address for misspellings or unusual domains, and verify the authenticity of links before clicking on them. They also advise being wary of emails that request sensitive information or contain urgent requests.
17 May 2023 - Red Sift
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks notes that DMARC is not passing, which is a good sign. Having an enforcement policy in place should provide reassurance that not all malicious emails will get through.
7 Jul 2024 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
3 expert opinions
Identifying and handling email forging and replay attacks requires a layered approach. Recognizing snowshoe spamming patterns in rDNS and noting inconsistencies such as failing DKIM on a replay attack are critical. Monitoring domain reputation is essential as forged emails often originate from domains with poor reputations. Responding to attacks necessitates multiple systems and defense layers beyond just SPF, DKIM, and DMARC.
Key opinions
- Snowshoe Spamming Identification: rDNS patterns resembling snowshoe spamming are indicators of potential email forging.
- Domain Reputation Monitoring: Forged emails often come from domains with poor reputations, making domain reputation monitoring a key detection method.
- DKIM Inconsistencies: Atypical DKIM behavior, such as failing DKIM on a suspected replay attack, is a red flag.
- Defense Depth: Relying solely on SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is insufficient; a multi-layered defense strategy is necessary for responding to replay attacks.
Key considerations
- IP Ownership: Compromised IPs might be owned by spammers, emphasizing the need for robust authentication mechanisms.
- Comprehensive Monitoring Tools: Employing tools to monitor domain reputation and identify unauthorized sending sources is essential for mitigation.
- Multi-System Response: A comprehensive response strategy necessitates multiple systems working in concert, as single-point solutions are inadequate.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks identifies the issue as someone forging the user's email. The rDNS on the sending IPs looks like snowshoe spamming, possibly a replay attack. SPF is passing because niziloformation.monster is allowed to send from the IPs. The IPs are owned by the spammer and located in Russia. DKIM is weird, as a replay attack would typically show a passing DKIM.
27 Jan 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains that one method to identify forged emails is to pay attention to domain reputation. Forged emails often come from domains with poor reputations. Using tools to monitor your own domain's reputation and identify any unauthorized sending sources can help mitigate damage.
21 Sep 2022 - Word to the Wise
What the documentation says
4 technical articles
Email forging, or spoofing, occurs when a message appears to be from a different sender. Replay attacks involve intercepting and re-sending legitimate messages. Documentation consistently recommends implementing SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. SPF validates sending servers, DKIM adds digital signatures, and DMARC dictates how to handle failed authentication. DMARC policies of 'reject' or 'quarantine' are effective in reducing the success of both spoofing and replay attacks. Replay prevention measures are essential to protect sensitive communications, prevent eavesdropping, and ensure privacy.
Key findings
- SPF, DKIM, and DMARC: SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are recommended to prevent email spoofing.
- DMARC Policy: DMARC policies of 'reject' or 'quarantine' effectively reduce the impact of spoofing and replay attacks.
- Replay Attack Definition: Replay attacks involve intercepting and resending legitimate email messages.
- Spoofing Definition: Spoofing occurs when an email appears to be from someone other than the actual sender.
Key considerations
- Implementation Complexity: Proper setup and maintenance of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are essential for their effectiveness.
- Policy Enforcement: Selecting the appropriate DMARC policy ('reject' vs. 'quarantine') requires careful consideration of potential impact on legitimate emails.
- Comprehensive Protection: While effective, SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are not foolproof and should be part of a broader security strategy.
- Privacy Implications: Replay prevention measures are critical to ensure privacy and authentication of communications.
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft Learn explains that spoofing is when an email message appears to be from someone other than the actual sender. They recommend using SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to prevent spoofing. SPF validates the sending mail server, DKIM adds a digital signature, and DMARC specifies how to handle emails that fail SPF or DKIM checks.
27 Apr 2025 - Microsoft Learn
Technical article
Documentation from NIST explains that replay attacks are the act of an attacker intercepting and fraudulently retransmitting a valid data transmission. Replay prevention measures should protect sensitive communications, prevent eavesdropping, and ensure privacy and authentication.
2 Dec 2022 - NIST
How can a phishing email pass SPF and DKIM authentication checks?
How can email senders and users prevent and identify phishing emails?
How can I prevent brand and sender profile impersonation in emails and what actions can I take?
How can I use DMARC to prevent spammers from using my domain?
How do I handle spoofing when DMARC reject is set but not enforced on inbound mail server?
Is BIMI easily spoofed and are there drawbacks to BIMI implementation?
