spfXio focuses on a managed service approach. We see it handling the complexities of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records on behalf of the user. Their platform is built around simplifying these core email authentication protocols, offering services like SPF record management and DMARC reporting.
This makes spfXio a good fit for organizations that prefer to delegate their email authentication setup and ongoing maintenance to an external provider. It offers a solution for those who want robust DMARC without diving deep into the technical configurations themselves.
DMARC360, on the other hand, presents itself as a more encompassing digital risk protection (DRP) platform. While it includes DMARC reporting, its feature set extends to external attack surface management, brand protection, anti-phishing, and takedowns.
This broad scope means users get a wider view of their external cyber posture beyond just email, identifying threats across various digital channels. It's designed to provide a comprehensive security solution that consolidates several functions into a unified platform.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
spfXio, as a managed service, implies a streamlined, hands-off approach for the client. Our experience suggests that the user interface, while functional, is primarily a portal to view the managed services rather than a deeply interactive DMARC analysis tool. It is designed for clarity and reporting on the status of your managed email authentication.
This straightforward design makes it easy for users who do not want to get bogged down in technical details. The focus is on presenting actionable summaries and ensuring that email authentication is handled efficiently in the background.
DMARC360's interface is generally intuitive, though some users have noted a learning curve when diving into all its modules, especially the email security metrics. We found it effective for presenting a holistic view of digital risks, even if navigating certain filtering features sometimes requires a few extra clicks.
The platform prioritizes actionable insights across its various DRP features, aiming to consolidate external attack surface management and brand protection. While generally user-friendly, getting the most out of its extensive capabilities may take some time.
Which product has the best support
Support
spfXio offers a dedicated account manager and regular report reviews, even at their entry-level Quartz MS tier. This indicates a strong, personalized support model, which is a key benefit of their managed service. Their team is designed to be proactive in guiding clients through their DMARC journey and ensuring optimal configuration.
The inclusion of quarterly report reviews demonstrates a commitment to ongoing engagement and optimization, helping clients understand their DMARC posture and address any emerging issues with expert guidance.
DMARC360 also receives consistent praise for its customer support. Reviewers frequently highlight the team's responsiveness, helpfulness, and professional manner in resolving issues. While it may not always include a dedicated account manager at every tier, the support team is readily available.
They guide users through platform features and address any questions related to their broad digital risk protection services. This ensures that users can effectively leverage the platform's capabilities to enhance their cybersecurity posture.
Who should use each product
Suitability
spfXio is particularly well-suited for organizations that prioritize a fully managed solution for their email authentication, aiming for a hands-off approach to DMARC implementation and enforcement. Its tiered managed services cater to various scales of operation.
For MSPs, spfXio is very suitable, allowing them to outsource DMARC management for their clients, leveraging the dedicated account manager and specialized services. Enterprise clients will find it suitable if they prefer third-party handling of DMARC complexities, ensuring compliance and protection without requiring extensive internal expertise. SMBs will find it highly suitable, looking for a comprehensive DMARC solution without needing an in-house expert, allowing them to focus on their core business.
DMARC360, with its broader digital risk protection (DRP) offering, appeals to organizations seeking a unified platform for external threat monitoring that goes beyond just email security. Its comprehensive suite of features makes it a versatile choice.
MSPs will find it suitable, especially if they are looking to offer a wider range of digital risk protection services beyond just email security to their clients. Enterprise organizations are very suitable users, given its comprehensive features for large entities with complex digital footprints and multiple attack vectors. SMBs are moderately suitable, as while the Community Edition offers free access, the full platform's extensive features might be more than what some smaller businesses initially require, although its holistic approach can be beneficial for proactive security.
How does spfXio compare with DMARC360?
DMARC report analysis
Ability to parse and analyze DMARC aggregate reports (RUA)
Source detection
Identifies all sending sources, legitimate and illegitimate
Forward detection
Detects email forwarding chains and their impact on DMARC
Spoof detection
Identifies instances of unauthorized email spoofing
Notifications and alerts
Configurable alerts for DMARC policy changes or threats
Reporting
Customizable reports on DMARC performance and security
API
Application Programming Interface for integration
Not specified
Not explicitly mentioned, but common for DRP platforms
Multi-tenancy
Ability to manage multiple separate domains or clients
Implied by managed service tiers
Implied by suitability for MSPs
SPF flattening
Consolidates multiple SPF records into one to bypass the 10-lookup limit
Not explicitly mentioned as a feature
Hosted DMARC
Manages DMARC records externally
Not explicitly mentioned as a standalone feature
BIMI
Brand Indicators for Message Identification support
Not mentioned
Not mentioned
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Support for secure email transport protocols
Not mentioned
Not mentioned
Blocklists and reputation
Monitoring email sending IPs against common blocklists (or blacklists)
Not explicitly mentioned
Part of broader digital risk protection
AI copilot
AI-powered assistance for DMARC configuration or analysis
Not mentioned
Not mentioned
DNS monitoring
Monitoring of DNS records for changes or misconfigurations
Included for SPF/DKIM/DMARC management
Covered by external attack surface management
Self hostable
Option to host the platform on private infrastructure
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free trial or permanently free service tier
30-day free trial
Community Edition available
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
spfXio currently has no publicly available G2 reviews, which makes it challenging to gauge community sentiment beyond their stated services. Its pricing structure is also based on "record requests" and "reported emails," which can be less intuitive than simpler per-domain or per-mailbox models. For DMARC360, while comprehensive, some users have noted a potentially steep learning curve and occasional issues with the platform's filtering features or integration capabilities. It is also important to note that the G2 reviews provided for DMARC360 were initially tagged as for "CTM360" in the original data source.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
0 / 5(0)
4.7 / 5(360)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
delivers a seamless, proactive brand protection experience
3.5 / 5
What do you like best about CTM360?CTM360 consolidates external attack surface management, brand protection, anti‑phishing, and takedowns into a single, unified platform. It cuts through the noise with pre‑populated threat data specific to our brand—no extra setup required—and consistently delivers highly actionable alertsWhat do you dislike about CTM360?While takedowns are fast and effective, expanding reach across more platforms and registrars would enhance the impactWhat problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you?Data leakage, Breaches, Brand imposters or VIP
Verified User in Airlines/Aviation
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
It's Good
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about CTM360?The detection works. Really good information given on breached credentials and fake apps that a takedown was so easy.What do you dislike about CTM360?The interface is not user friendly. Sometimes it takes more than a couple of clicks to get the information needed.What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you?It allows us to view breached credentials and also fake website & apps.
Zulfa J.
CTO Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
CTM360 give whole experience as a user. The detection for cases is okay overall
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about CTM360?The support of the CTM360 team is totally responsive and helpful. The platform also user friendly and easy to useWhat do you dislike about CTM360?Sometimes we got confuse with the filtering features. However, the support team has guide us accordinglyWhat problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you?Detection for EASM cases - features of deep scanningbrand monitoring. By connecting with the CIRT team globally. CTM360 Sometimes able to take down cases faster than other platform
Verified User in Financial Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Recommmended
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about CTM360?quick Threat intelligence and insights about the related issues and leaksWhat do you dislike about CTM360?Sometime shows repeated or resolved issues and vulnerabilitiesWhat problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you?TI feeds, Data leaks etc
Hafiz T.
Unit Head Cyber Security Operations Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Review CTM360 after using for 1 Year period.
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about CTM360?Most helpful from CTM360 is take down phishing domain very fast for my customer and could finding and detect Brand Impersonation focus on Social media app with fake content.What do you dislike about CTM360?Least helpful is data exposure on repository with another platform such as Gitlab , Bitbucket in case some customer using above tool will could not detect.What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you?In the past take down period is big issue for my customer because take around 5-7days and customer have complain on this issue , However when changing to use "Brand Protection" of CTM360 service , CTM360 team could help my team action quickly on take down phishing URL or fake content URL related with my customer domain name. average complete action take down around 2-3 days.
Watthanachai K.
Consulting IT Specialist Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Pricing
spfXio offers tiered managed services with clear pricing based on email and request volumes, whereas DMARC360 provides a free Community Edition and requires direct contact for full plan costs.
0 / 5(0)
