What is the main difference in their DMARC approach?

spfXio focuses on providing managed DMARC, SPF, and DKIM services, handling the complexities for you. Agari Brand Protection offers a more comprehensive, enterprise-grade email security suite that includes DMARC enforcement alongside advanced threat intelligence and brand protection features.

Which product is better for small businesses or MSPs?

spfXio, with its managed service tiers and focus on core DMARC management, is generally more suitable for SMBs and MSPs. Agari Brand Protection's extensive feature set and enterprise-level focus might be overkill and cost-prohibitive for smaller organizations.

Does either product offer a free trial or free tier?

spfXio offers a 30-day free trial for its managed service plans. Agari Brand Protection does not publicly advertise a free trial or free tier, which is common for enterprise solutions where custom demos and consultations are typically required.

How do these tools help with email spoofing?

Both tools help prevent email spoofing by allowing you to enforce DMARC policies. This ensures that only authorized senders can use your domain, preventing unauthorized parties from sending emails that appear to originate from your brand. Agari Brand Protection extends this with advanced threat detection capabilities to identify and block more sophisticated spoofing and phishing attempts.

What are the typical pricing models for each?

spfXio offers tiered managed service pricing based on the number of DMARC reported emails, SPF/DKIM requests, domains, and users. Agari Brand Protection, being an enterprise solution, typically uses custom pricing models that require direct contact with their sales team for a quote tailored to specific organizational needs.

spfXio vs Agari Brand Protection

Choose spfXio for managed services, choose Agari Brand Protection for enterprise-grade security.

0 / 5(0)

Compare to Suped

4 / 5(1)

Compare to Suped

Compare product functionality

Feature set

spfXio offers a focused suite of DMARC management tools, emphasizing SPF, DKIM, and DMARC record management. Its features are geared towards simplifying the complexities of email authentication for domains. We've found its approach to be straightforward, covering the core necessities without excessive frills, making it efficient for direct implementation.

The platform also integrates reporting history and user management, suitable for a team managing several domains. While it excels at the foundational aspects, we observed that some advanced features, such as deep threat intelligence or extensive brand protection beyond DMARC enforcement, are not its primary focus.

Agari Brand Protection (now Fortra DMARC Protection) offers a comprehensive suite designed for advanced email security and brand protection. It extends beyond standard DMARC reporting to include sophisticated threat intelligence, phishing protection, and deep analysis of email ecosystems. We've experienced its robust capabilities in identifying and mitigating complex email-borne threats.

Its feature set aims at larger organizations requiring extensive security measures, offering granular control and detailed insights into attack vectors. We noted that this breadth of features makes it a powerful tool for enterprises combating persistent and sophisticated cyber threats targeting their brand.

How easy is each product to use

User experience

spfXio provides a clean and intuitive user interface that prioritizes ease of use, especially for those primarily focused on DMARC, SPF, and DKIM management. We found the dashboard to be well-organized, presenting critical data points clearly, which minimizes the learning curve for new users.

Setting up and managing records feels streamlined, and the reporting is accessible. For users who prefer a straightforward approach to email authentication without being overwhelmed by excessive features, spfXio's UX is quite effective, allowing for quick actions and monitoring.

Agari Brand Protection's user experience caters to the complexities of enterprise-level email security. While it offers deep insights and extensive control, the interface can initially feel dense due to the sheer volume of information and configuration options. We've found that it requires a more technical understanding to fully leverage its capabilities.

Navigation is logical, but the learning curve is steeper for less experienced users. For security professionals who manage intricate email environments and appreciate comprehensive data, the UX provides the necessary tools and detailed views, albeit with a steeper initial investment in learning the platform.

Which product has the best support

Support

spfXio emphasizes a dedicated account manager and regular report reviews, even for their entry-level managed service plans. Our interactions suggest a personalized support experience, which is particularly beneficial for organizations looking for guidance on DMARC implementation and ongoing management.

The support structure appears designed to proactively assist clients in maintaining optimal email authentication. This hands-on approach can be a significant advantage for those who prefer direct communication and expert assistance rather than relying solely on self-service documentation.

Agari Brand Protection, as an enterprise-grade solution, typically offers robust support channels, including dedicated account teams and technical support. However, we've seen feedback suggesting that response times can sometimes be a bit slow, especially when dealing with complex policy curation, which is a common theme with larger, more comprehensive platforms.

Despite this, the quality of support, when engaged, is generally high, with knowledgeable staff capable of handling intricate security issues. For critical enterprise deployments, the depth of expertise available is valuable, even if initial responsiveness might vary.

Who should use each product

Suitability

spfXio is particularly well-suited for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and managed service providers (MSPs) looking for a streamlined, managed approach to DMARC. Its clear pricing tiers and focus on core DMARC, SPF, and DKIM management make it an excellent choice for organizations that need expert assistance without a massive overhead.

For MSPs, the multi-domain management and dedicated support structure can simplify client management. Enterprise clients might find it suitable for foundational DMARC needs, but larger organizations seeking advanced threat intelligence might look for more comprehensive solutions.

Agari Brand Protection is designed for enterprise clients and larger organizations that face sophisticated email threats and require extensive brand protection beyond basic DMARC enforcement. Its advanced features, including phishing defense and threat intelligence, are invaluable for high-value targets.

While it offers comprehensive security, it might be overkill for SMBs. For MSPs, it could be integrated into offerings for large enterprise clients, but its complexity and cost might not align with managing a broad portfolio of smaller clients. It's built for those who prioritize maximum security and deep forensic capabilities.

How does spfXio compare with Agari Brand Protection?

DMARC report analysis

Helps interpret DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.

Source detection

Identifies all legitimate and unauthorized sending sources.

Forward detection

Detects email forwarding chains that might impact DMARC authentication.

Spoof detection

Identifies attempts to spoof your domain.

Notifications and alerts

Provides real-time alerts on DMARC failures or policy changes.

Reporting

Offers comprehensive reports on email authentication status.

API

Offers an API for integration with other systems.

Multi-tenancy

Allows management of multiple domains or clients under one account.

SPF flattening

Combines multiple SPF lookups into a single record.

Hosted DMARC

Manages your DMARC record configuration.

BIMI

Supports Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI).

MTA-STS/TLS-RPT

Provides support for MTA-STS and TLS-RPT for email encryption.

Blocklists and reputation

Monitors domain and IP reputation on email blocklists (or blacklists).

AI copilot

Uses AI to assist with DMARC management and policy recommendations.

DNS monitoring

Monitors relevant DNS records for changes.

Self hostable

Can be hosted on your own infrastructure.

Free trial/free tier

Offers a free trial or a permanently free service tier.

30-day free trial

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

spfXio primarily focuses on managed DMARC services, which means it might not offer the same depth of advanced threat intelligence or broader email security features found in more comprehensive platforms. Its pricing structure is also based on managed services, which might not suit organizations looking for a purely self-service DMARC reporting tool. Agari Brand Protection, while powerful, can present a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set, making it potentially overwhelming for users without a strong technical background. The support response times, as indicated by some feedback, might also be a point to consider, especially for urgent issues, and the cost is likely higher due to its enterprise focus.

We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.

0 / 5(0)

4 / 5(1)

No G2 reviews

G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Descent Email Security

4.0 / 5

What do you like best about Fortra DMARC Protection? I am a new user of cloud email protection and I am extremely fond of the added security layer it offers to the users of office 365. Most amazing feature is the added notification whenever a suspicious mail is there. I have observed that the other folder segregation doesn't always work in the office 365 but here it works like magic. What do you dislike about Fortra DMARC Protection? The policies are a bit off to curate for an individual from a non tech background. And the support provided by the team are a little slow. Rest everything is up to the mark and I'll still continue to use it further. What problems is Fortra DMARC Protection solving and how is that benefiting you? It is enabling an added security layer to the emails with confidential content to make it a little better and secure for all the individuals within an organization.

Ritika D.

Senior Analyst Computer Software Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)